|
On May 22 2013 02:52 lord_nibbler wrote:I just realized, that with this format most of these games are rather unimportant.  They have to win 3 sets to get a promotion into Premier League. But if they lose they end up in the same group stage. (Only 1 out of 5 players 'wins' so to speak and nobody 'loses'.) So even the players who won this round probably only gained a hundred bucks and some bragging rights.
Not true because if you win you bracket you get promoted to premier league and that's where the big money is
|
On May 22 2013 02:49 AlternativeEgo wrote:Phew. Got a little nervous there. 
Me to. Even though I like Bling I just think Kas deserve a premier league spot a lot more
Edit: And double post wtf keep up slackers
|
Socke vs Tod wuhu fuck yeah! I love them both :/
|
DTs in game one, any takers?
|
On May 22 2013 02:52 lord_nibbler wrote:I just realized, that with this format most of these games are rather unimportant. They have to win 3 sets to get a promotion into Premier League. But if they lose they end up in the same group stage. (Only 1 out of 5 players 'wins' so to speak and nobody 'loses'.) So even the players who won this round probably only gained a hundred bucks and some bragging rights.
I wouldn't totally agree with that sentiment, since there is money on the line for Challenger league progression. But ultimately you're right, even if people do drop out here they're still relatively 'safe'. Only the very worst will actually get eliminated from Challenger.
|
On May 22 2013 02:38 Lonyo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2013 02:37 TheSir wrote:
I just saw the biggest throw i've seen so far this year.... wth Bling? Bling didn't throw, he wasn't ahead. He had more economy, but Kas is terran. The casters just confused everyone by talking complete rubbish abut Blings position relative to Kas.
Just stop....
|
When you reach the final round, at least you have a better seeding for the group stage so you can avoid the other round of 16 players who barely missed code s.
|
On May 22 2013 02:55 Benjamin99 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2013 02:52 lord_nibbler wrote:I just realized, that with this format most of these games are rather unimportant. They have to win 3 sets to get a promotion into Premier League. But if they lose they end up in the same group stage. (Only 1 out of 5 players 'wins' so to speak and nobody 'loses'.) So even the players who won this round probably only gained a hundred bucks and some bragging rights. Not true because if you win you bracket you get promoted to premier league and that's where the big money is
The point is you could lose at anytime during the bracket and still be in an up and down group with the same chance as anyone else of advancing, whether you lose first round or final round.
Edit: besides seeding you don't get much for winning only two rounds, it's all or nothing
|
On May 22 2013 03:01 YoungTyTy wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2013 02:55 Benjamin99 wrote:On May 22 2013 02:52 lord_nibbler wrote:I just realized, that with this format most of these games are rather unimportant. They have to win 3 sets to get a promotion into Premier League. But if they lose they end up in the same group stage. (Only 1 out of 5 players 'wins' so to speak and nobody 'loses'.) So even the players who won this round probably only gained a hundred bucks and some bragging rights. Not true because if you win you bracket you get promoted to premier league and that's where the big money is The point is you could lose at anytime during the bracket and still be in an up and down group with the same chance as anyone else of advancing, whether you lose first round or final round.
Yes that's correct but if you win you bracket you get promoted instantly to premier league if you lose you have to play the up&downs
|
Next up : Socke vs. Tod and Noname vs. Mana
|
for the haters.. 20k isnt bad when premier gets 50k
|
On May 22 2013 03:04 Benjamin99 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2013 03:01 YoungTyTy wrote:On May 22 2013 02:55 Benjamin99 wrote:On May 22 2013 02:52 lord_nibbler wrote:I just realized, that with this format most of these games are rather unimportant. They have to win 3 sets to get a promotion into Premier League. But if they lose they end up in the same group stage. (Only 1 out of 5 players 'wins' so to speak and nobody 'loses'.) So even the players who won this round probably only gained a hundred bucks and some bragging rights. Not true because if you win you bracket you get promoted to premier league and that's where the big money is The point is you could lose at anytime during the bracket and still be in an up and down group with the same chance as anyone else of advancing, whether you lose first round or final round. Yes that's correct but if you win you bracket you get promoted instantly to premier league if you lose you have to play the up&downs
Not to mention an additional 75 WCS points and $300 in your pocket. Those extra 75 points could be the difference between making the big end of year event or not.
KK, here we go. Destroy him ToD! Use your suave! :D
|
On May 22 2013 03:04 Benjamin99 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2013 03:01 YoungTyTy wrote:On May 22 2013 02:55 Benjamin99 wrote:On May 22 2013 02:52 lord_nibbler wrote:I just realized, that with this format most of these games are rather unimportant. They have to win 3 sets to get a promotion into Premier League. But if they lose they end up in the same group stage. (Only 1 out of 5 players 'wins' so to speak and nobody 'loses'.) So even the players who won this round probably only gained a hundred bucks and some bragging rights. Not true because if you win you bracket you get promoted to premier league and that's where the big money is The point is you could lose at anytime during the bracket and still be in an up and down group with the same chance as anyone else of advancing, whether you lose first round or final round. Yes that's correct but if you win you bracket you get promoted instantly to premier league if you lose you have to play the up&downs
His point is that there is no advantage to win 1 or 2 matches against a player who has won 0 series. And I agree that there should be one.
|
On May 22 2013 03:01 YoungTyTy wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2013 02:55 Benjamin99 wrote:On May 22 2013 02:52 lord_nibbler wrote:I just realized, that with this format most of these games are rather unimportant. They have to win 3 sets to get a promotion into Premier League. But if they lose they end up in the same group stage. (Only 1 out of 5 players 'wins' so to speak and nobody 'loses'.) So even the players who won this round probably only gained a hundred bucks and some bragging rights. Not true because if you win you bracket you get promoted to premier league and that's where the big money is The point is you could lose at anytime during the bracket and still be in an up and down group with the same chance as anyone else of advancing, whether you lose first round or final round. Edit: besides seeding you don't get much for winning only two rounds, it's all or nothing
GSL format is better I think. First round losers are completely eliminated, so every round have a big importance (not being eliminated, or advanced to premier league)
|
PvP is definitely the most coin flippy of mirrors imo. Also called the DTs :p
|
Well Duckdeok didn't last for long. Guess it really hurts when you have to play from KR unlike MC for example.
|
Did not expect that, I thought the one thing that shuts down DT opening the hardest is an Oracle first stargate build, how is Socke so ahead?
|
 MaNa 1 - 0  Noname Map was Akilon, 2nd Map is Daybreak
|
On May 22 2013 03:13 Bagi wrote:
Well Duckdeok didn't last for long. Guess it really hurts when you have to play from KR unlike MC for example.
Actually been MC and not a code B team-league sniper probably helps a good deal too
|
Dammit those graphics settings, every time a stalkers dies, I think it just blinked away...
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
