EPTParting > Alive
Brown < Taeja
Soo < Jaedong
Fantasy > Oz
Rain > HerO
Paralyze < JYP
Ace:
Rain > Taeja
SK T1 4-3 EG-TL.
Though I'm definetly hoping for an upset
[SPL] SK Telecom T1 vs EG-TL R4 - Page 2
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
EvilDet
Germany130 Posts
Parting > Alive Brown < Taeja Soo < Jaedong Fantasy > Oz Rain > HerO Paralyze < JYP Ace: Rain > Taeja SK T1 4-3 EG-TL. Though I'm definetly hoping for an upset | ||
Olli
Austria24420 Posts
Parting < Alive Brown < Taeja soO < Jaedong Fantasy > Oz Rain < HerO EGTL wins 4-1. This is more of a "if everything goes well" kind of prediction. Parting's PvT is WAY less solid than it used to be. Taeja is Taeja. Jaedong vs soO could go either way but I have faith in Jaedong. Oz' weakest matchup has been PvT FOR A LONG PERIOD OF TIME IN SC2 but he's damn good so this could go either way too. And then of course, HerO to finally beat Rain and take all the glory. | ||
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On April 19 2013 20:32 DarkLordOlli wrote: Parting's PvT is WAY less solid than it used to be. Taeja is Taeja. Jaedong vs soO could go either way but I have faith in Jaedong. Oz' weakest matchup has always been PvT but he's damn good so this could go either way too. And then of course, HerO to finally beat Rain and take all the glory. wat | ||
|
Olli
Austria24420 Posts
Don't you remember that one time Choya decided to play himself instead of Oz because it would've been PvT? I mean after that he enter his dark age of PvP but generally it was PvT iirc. | ||
|
smogg
Bulgaria167 Posts
Brown < Taeja Soo < Jaedong Fantasy < Oz Rain <> HerO Paralyze < JYP EGTL 4 - x SKT where x is likely 2, but hopefully 1. | ||
|
Longtimer
490 Posts
On April 19 2013 20:38 DarkLordOlli wrote: Don't you remember that one time Choya decided to play himself instead of Oz because it would've been PvT? Choya always played himself if he could. | ||
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On April 19 2013 20:38 DarkLordOlli wrote: Don't you remember that one time Choya decided to play himself instead of Oz because it would've been PvT? I mean after that he enter his dark age of PvP but generally it was PvT iirc. but that statement is incorrect since Oz has had a period of time when PvT was not his worst~ | ||
|
Olli
Austria24420 Posts
On April 19 2013 20:45 opterown wrote: but that statement is incorrect since Oz has had a period of time when PvT was not his worst~ HOKAI, edit inc >_> | ||
|
Emzeeshady
Canada4203 Posts
| ||
|
styLesdavis
Germany833 Posts
PartinG <Neo Planet S> aLive Brown <Whirlwind> TaeJa soO <Bel'Shir Vestige> Jaedong FanTaSy <Newkirk Redevelopment Precint> Oz Rain <Fighting Spirit> HerO ParalyzE <Naro Station> JYP - not needed | ||
|
Inzan1ty
1163 Posts
PartinG > aLive Brown < Taeja SoO = Jaedong Fantasy = Oz Rain > HerO Paralyze > JYP Can swing from 3-3 to 4-1, but SKT should definetly seal it in the Ace, Rain PvT is just too much On April 19 2013 20:38 DarkLordOlli wrote: Don't you remember that one time Choya decided to play himself instead of Oz because it would've been PvT? I mean after that he enter his dark age of PvP but generally it was PvT iirc. Oz PvT is alright, not particularly great but better than his PvP | ||
|
Delphiki
Philippines1955 Posts
On April 19 2013 19:44 Arceus wrote: they ditched this rule long ago iirc. Some team celebrated that by fielding 100% terran immediately I think ur thinking of boosters | ||
|
shid0x
Korea (South)5014 Posts
 ((((((( I miss him 4-0'ing life. | ||
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
| ||
|
endy
Switzerland8970 Posts
It will certainly be interesting to see coach Park vs his former team. | ||
|
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
On April 19 2013 22:51 endy wrote: Oh Bisu's not on the lineup It will certainly be interesting to see coach Park vs his former team. There's so many toss on SKT now we will probably see a lot of rotating between Best, Bisu, Brown, and Paralyze until one pulls away from the others | ||
|
Charlie.Sheen
662 Posts
| ||
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
| ||
|
Larkin
United Kingdom7161 Posts
On April 20 2013 00:53 lichter wrote: Are you sure there is a rule that forces teams to play more than one race? Pretty sure Woongjin did it with an all Zerg line up a few years ago. There's definitely a one of each race rule. http://www.inven.co.kr/webzine/news/?news=50869&iskin=esports "Every race will have to play at least one set" comes from that article. | ||
|
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
On April 20 2013 00:55 Larkin wrote: There's definitely a one of each race rule. http://www.inven.co.kr/webzine/news/?news=50869&iskin=esports "Every race will have to play at least one set" comes from that article. I see. I wonder when they started this rule, because it definitely has happened before. | ||
| ||
