what a joke, for all the OMG EG/LIQUID WILL WIN! thats a sad showing that a number of long time top sc2 players in thorzain etc were just embarassed by a group of kespa players who much recently made the change from BW
On December 08 2012 13:54 GreyKnight wrote: Rofl the people thinking this team can dominate better repent their dumb naive views
Name a Kespa team with a better 1-2 punch than HerO and Taeja if they bring their A-game? Hardly dumb or naive.
All KeSPA teams have same or better 1-2 punch than HerO and Taeja. This is proleague, not MLG.
Unless you know somethigng that no-one else does, this is a fairly ignorant statement.
considering taeja does most of the load for tl (afaik), most teams have a damn good 1-2 combo except team 8. Just that taeja has been better in team leagues than proleague player potentials, but hero isn't going to be anything special in proleague. (edit in relation to being considered a #2 player)
Taeja will best team league player they will have imo. he has really strong all around play and can beat pretty much anyone.
hero is super good and so is stephano but don't expect them to carry as much as taeja. in fact i dont expect hero to beat many people despite being my captain
On December 08 2012 14:00 RagequitBM wrote: I'm disappointed Jaedong decided to forgo spinecrawlers, though I guess immortal too stronk. And that they would play Puma last in a match that might not happen. When he's your best player there on that day.
I don't know, I gotta say a loss is a loss, I don't see a difference in 4-1 and 4-0. Or are there points attributed to a team that had a least one win compared to a team that lost with no win? In that case your point might make sense, otherwise having Puma play 1st or last doesn't change the final outcome of the encounter.
On December 08 2012 14:01 Zozma wrote: Let's relax a bit. It's only one match.
One match, but it was 4-0
With the likes of Zenio and Thorzain playing and JaecantdefendimmortalpushDong in the 4 spot. For them to have a chance, JYP had to win his PvP and bank on Puma/Huk taking them to Ace Match. JYP botched his PvP and they lost miserably.
On December 08 2012 14:04 GarethGore wrote: what a joke, for all the OMG EG/LIQUID WILL WIN! thats a sad showing that a number of long time top sc2 players in thorzain etc were just embarassed by a group of kespa players who much recently made the change from BW
I wouldn't say it so brutally (although the series looks like it went so), I'm just happy that KeSPA players are winning as they should be. Some things are better left unchanged.
On December 08 2012 13:54 GreyKnight wrote: Rofl the people thinking this team can dominate better repent their dumb naive views
Name a Kespa team with a better 1-2 punch than HerO and Taeja if they bring their A-game? Hardly dumb or naive.
All KeSPA teams have same or better 1-2 punch than HerO and Taeja. This is proleague, not MLG.
Are you trolling?
Nope.
then you are simply stupid. There is no way you can claim that all Kespa teams have the same or better top 2 players as HerO and Taeja in SC2. Pure talent, maybe but they in no way have the same experience. Its just naive to claim it and completly baseless. You go from feeling cause they have in no way proven what you say by achievements. Objectivly, they dont come close.
On December 08 2012 14:03 iKill wrote: I don't know about you guys, but I'll give ThorZaiN another chance. He just reached Korea - once he settles in the Lab and reaches his level + works together with Coach Park, he'll be a monster. Just wait.
i hear this shit about foreigners over and over. I've waited too long.
One lost series and here comes the relentless negativity of Kespa fanboys making fun of EGTL and EGTL fanboys immediately abandoning hope. Relax everyone, it was the first match.
On December 08 2012 14:00 RagequitBM wrote: I'm disappointed Jaedong decided to forgo spinecrawlers, though I guess immortal too stronk. And that they would play Puma last in a match that might not happen. When he's your best player there on that day.
I don't know, I gotta say a loss is a loss, I don't see a difference in 4-1 and 4-0. Or are there points attributed to a team that had a least one win compared to a team that lost with no win? In that case your point might make sense, otherwise having Puma play 1st or last doesn't change the final outcome of the encounter.
Set wins matter, tie breakers are a fairly likely possibility, unless I'm completely wrong about the system lol