EPTI guess ryung saw mutas and thought he just had to defend the pokes and prepare for normal wave of units. Instead ryung just massed and massed the entire time. Really caught ryung with his pants down. Was nice build even if slightly zz.
[Code S] Semi-Finals 2012 GSL Season 5 - Page 90
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
crms
United States11933 Posts
I guess ryung saw mutas and thought he just had to defend the pokes and prepare for normal wave of units. Instead ryung just massed and massed the entire time. Really caught ryung with his pants down. Was nice build even if slightly zz. | ||
|
haka
United States1414 Posts
On December 01 2012 13:05 Chill Penguin wrote: I've seen that build by zerg about 5-6 times in the last couple of weeks. I have yet to see it be held by Terran. It's never even been close. I've seen Terrans hold the initial wave but then succumb to the waves after. | ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
| ||
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On December 01 2012 13:06 PhoenixVoid wrote: Is that a new record for "No" in a GSL semi-finals? lol no haha | ||
|
Necro)Phagist(
Canada6660 Posts
| ||
|
ninjamyst
United States1903 Posts
| ||
|
geokilla
Canada8244 Posts
| ||
|
figq
12519 Posts
On December 01 2012 13:05 Adreme wrote: Exactly. Why do so many top zergs do this? Move command is fine, just detonate a couple of banelings as soon as they connect with many SCVs.Nah he move commanded the banelings which is why SCVs survived. | ||
|
LimitSEA
Australia9580 Posts
On December 01 2012 13:05 travis wrote: so is this just something that happens on this map because it seems like bullshit and its the same way both terrans died on this map If only terran could make more than 3 siege tanks. Oh wait. | ||
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
On December 01 2012 13:06 PhoenixVoid wrote: Is that a new record for "No" in a GSL semi-finals? I'm sure theres a game of Idra's back in the open seasons where he got cheesed that probably got 100% no | ||
|
DazZle.
United States56 Posts
On December 01 2012 13:06 -TesteR- wrote: Every other unit is bad, zerg would auto lose without infestors. It's impossible for them. Show me a game where Zerg can win without infestors | ||
|
kyllinghest
Norway1607 Posts
| ||
|
MangoMountain
Norway2044 Posts
| ||
|
Badfatpanda
United States9719 Posts
On December 01 2012 13:06 travis wrote: I really think that just has to do with the map more than race balance.. by leaps and bounds. | ||
Adreme
United States5574 Posts
On December 01 2012 13:06 LimitSEA wrote: One with more than 3 tanks is. And one that actually target fires. I feel like for a map like WW you need bunkers for the spot in between 3rd and natural sort of like with Antiga. | ||
|
ultratorr
Canada332 Posts
| ||
|
Goldfish
2230 Posts
On December 01 2012 13:05 Kreb wrote: Isnt a sieged up T supposed to be hard to break? :p I dont know why it went from 200-170 to 170-60. Gonna need 10 bunkers to maybe hold that. He had only 3-4 siege tanks vs a million lings and banelings. | ||
|
rd
United States2586 Posts
On December 01 2012 13:05 Kreb wrote: Isnt a sieged up T supposed to be hard to break? :p I dont know why it went from 200-170 to 170-60. Gonna need 10 bunkers to maybe hold that. Tends to be hard to break when you focus fire your tanks. Could have been 10-15 less banelings but 2-3 shots hit the initial lings. Unfortunate.  | ||
|
proofy
Canada283 Posts
| ||
|
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
| ||
| ||
