EPTOn December 01 2012 13:04 padfoota wrote:
This is why you dont go (insert terran build here)
Fixed.This is why you dont go (insert terran build here)
That was dumb. Yeah ZvZ final incoming.
User was warned for this post
[Code S] Semi-Finals 2012 GSL Season 5 - Page 89
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Ben...
Canada3485 Posts
That was dumb. Yeah ZvZ final incoming. User was warned for this post | ||
|
Chill Penguin
Australia756 Posts
| ||
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On December 01 2012 13:04 opterown wrote: | ||
|
Kreb
4834 Posts
I dont know why it went from 200-170 to 170-60. Gonna need 10 bunkers to maybe hold that. | ||
|
ThePlayer33
Australia2378 Posts
| ||
Shellshock
United States97277 Posts
On December 01 2012 13:05 elfonse wrote: Anyone know who Axioms coach is? Crank | ||
|
Discerpo
263 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
| ||
|
felisconcolori
United States6169 Posts
| ||
|
jakethesnake
Canada4948 Posts
| ||
|
-TesteR-
Canada1165 Posts
On December 01 2012 13:04 DazZle. wrote: Without Infestors how is zerg supposed to win Every other unit is bad, zerg would auto lose without infestors. It's impossible for them. | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
every zerg who uses that comment to defend the strength of the infestor " you can't nerf it because then I can't win! " | ||
|
RoyAlex
Norway420 Posts
So tired of this shit... A move, and SDDDDDDDDDDDDDD. User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
Wrathsc2
United States2025 Posts
every zerg and their mother has been saying that if u nerf infenstors u have to buff other units cuz they suck and they cant win without infenstors | ||
|
LimitSEA
Australia9580 Posts
On December 01 2012 13:05 Kreb wrote: Isnt a sieged up T supposed to be hard to break? :p I dont know why it went from 200-170 to 170-60. Gonna need 10 bunkers to maybe hold that. One with more than 3 tanks is. And one that actually target fires. | ||
|
veKtory
233 Posts
| ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32755 Posts
Is that a new record for "No" in a GSL semi-finals? | ||
|
Badfatpanda
United States9719 Posts
| ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On December 01 2012 13:05 Kreb wrote: Isnt a sieged up T supposed to be hard to break? :p I dont know why it went from 200-170 to 170-60. Gonna need 10 bunkers to maybe hold that. Well yeah but he only had 3 sieged tanks which isn't enough for that much shit xD | ||
|
Weirdkid
Singapore2431 Posts
 Go Axiom!! | ||
| ||
