[NASL] S4 Week 6 Division 3 - Page 2
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Govou
Canada1072 Posts
| ||
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
| ||
gengka
Malaysia461 Posts
| ||
BathTubNZ
New Zealand2556 Posts
| ||
hitpoint
United States1511 Posts
| ||
BathTubNZ
New Zealand2556 Posts
| ||
GumBa
United Kingdom31934 Posts
| ||
RiceAgainst
United States1849 Posts
NASL always being fun yet professional. PvTs are fun. | ||
SoulTakerz
Canada353 Posts
| ||
Swords
6038 Posts
Top 5 I'd say are 1. MC 2. Hero 3. Rain (will be 2nd and closing on 1st if he wins the OSL) 4. Seed (close to 2nd or 3rd cause of that GSL) 5. Squirtle ( a few more wins makes him a GSL and IPL winner, with fairly consistent results in general) | ||
xXFireandIceXx
Canada4296 Posts
| ||
Swords
6038 Posts
| ||
YoungTyTy
United States801 Posts
On October 20 2012 13:54 Swords wrote: It's really silly that Lowley is even in this at all. We've spent the last 10 minutes watching Hero destroy him with nonstop multitasking and drops and it doesn't even matter. Vortex or missed vortex and that's all that actually matters. It's not like he was crushing him for free. He invested so much into that harassment and really it came out pretty even because Lowely defended well. But yes, this is lategame PvZ, just how it is. | ||
xXFireandIceXx
Canada4296 Posts
| ||
GreyKnight
United States4720 Posts
| ||
xXFireandIceXx
Canada4296 Posts
On October 20 2012 14:00 GreyKnight wrote: lategame pvz is amazing, it truly rewards skill :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD ..................okay................really? It's quite the challenge for toss man | ||
Probasaur
United States461 Posts
On October 20 2012 14:02 xXFireandIceXx wrote: ..................okay................really? It's quite the challenge for toss man Obvious troll is obvious. HerO NOOOOO!!!!!!!!! Thats so painful to watch... 3 lousy infested terrans lost him the game. More like PvZ lost him the game. Two of the big reasons listed in Gretorp's post came into play here..... the Mothership being way too depended upon and completely controlling the tide of the end-game battles in PvZ. And also the fact that infested terrans are 0 supply and with upgrades just demolish everything including +3+3 stalkers. | ||
Gojira621
United States374 Posts
| ||
hayata2.0
Canada655 Posts
Stacked Broodlords -> Money Vortex -> No Broodlords Die Blink under 20+ Broodlords w/ Infestor Support -> All Broodlords Die Zerg wins anyway. what | ||
Swords
6038 Posts
On October 20 2012 13:57 YoungTyTy wrote: It's not like he was crushing him for free. He invested so much into that harassment and really it came out pretty even because Lowely defended well. But yes, this is lategame PvZ, just how it is. I disagree. HerO killed tons of drones. He sniped a ton of queens. He killed the Greater Spire, Hive, Infestation Pit. He killed macro hatches. To do this he used mostly minerals, which at that point in the game are a wash compared to gas. Killing a tremendous amount of economy and tech like that should cripple your opponent far more than losing the minerals HerO did - and yes, he did lose a lot of minerals. Then he managed to kill Lowley's army without even using a vortex and still lost the game despite outplaying him at every point. | ||
| ||