EPTOn June 22 2012 20:37 Blaec wrote:
So interested, but I feel the OP is not going to deliver.
So interested, but I feel the OP is not going to deliver.
the OP?
[GSTL] SlayerS-EG vs MVP Pennant Race Group A - Page 40
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37058 Posts
the OP? | ||
|
Walitgon
Australia550 Posts
On June 22 2012 20:31 Bagration wrote: Careful, it isn't over until it's over. See TSL vs LG-IM Too true. I had $300 on IM in that one. I was not happy afterwards  | ||
|
bittman
Australia8759 Posts
| ||
|
Pure-SC2
United Kingdom1440 Posts
At least put the odd comment about the game in guys. "Oh, good engagement for blah there", "better build order for blah there". Dissapointed in you lucky people who can watch this live... | ||
|
Walitgon
Australia550 Posts
Yes. You can bet at pinnaclesports.com Warning: do so at your own risk! SC2 is unpredictable business! | ||
|
Thrombozyt
Germany1269 Posts
On June 22 2012 20:37 Slangen wrote: Pretty funny that the slayers team have not used one single Terran player out of five ppl. Always thought of slayers as a terran team. There is a plan. Notice how the Slayers GSTL winrate with Terran is above 50%. Now if Slayers never field a Terran again, their winrate will stay there while the rate of other teams will drop. Soon they are the team with the best terrans by a lot, because no other team can match their 54%.  | ||
|
Blaec
Australia4289 Posts
Oh yeh, I guess that should be OC (original commentor?) On June 22 2012 20:40 Walitgon wrote: Yes. You can bet at pinnaclesports.com Warning: do so at your own risk! SC2 is unpredictable business! Awesome. I know the unpredictability, but I made a fair bit early in SC2 until the site I was using folded. And even if I lost it made watching way more fun. | ||
|
CtrlShiftAltGrrrrrrr
544 Posts
On June 22 2012 20:38 mrtomjones wrote: lol the race still plays a huge part of it dude. I bet if Terran had lost every code s game and had no one in code S anymore you would call that imbalance. ofc, and terran is really good at counter strategies/startegic play imo, even if it became unbelievably harder against zerg, but it still isnt a matter of like ok, race vs race, base skill vs base skill 1o1 u know ? looke at ganzi for example. he finds wrong patterns in his opponent play, and abuses them the same way no matter the race, which ends up with proxy rax in terrans, zergs, or protoss mains if the flaw is scouting, depending who he plays. a lot of korean terrans do that kind of thing, and its a big reason why theyre so good in code s | ||
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37058 Posts
On June 22 2012 20:40 Pure-SC2 wrote: Terrible LR thread. Am following on from my phone at work and not 1 comment in the thread about the game before the game recommendation poll. At least put the odd comment about the game in guys. "Oh, good engagement for blah there", "better build order for blah there". Dissapointed in you lucky people who can watch this live... Not necessarily an LR but if u look at my recommended games section, I always add in a little recap for each game | ||
|
CtrlShiftAltGrrrrrrr
544 Posts
On June 22 2012 20:42 SeeKeR wrote: Not necessarily an LR but if u look at my recommended games section, I always add in a little recap for each game games are bad minus crank wp cannon rush, and even that failed lol... | ||
|
Sea_Food
Finland1612 Posts
On June 22 2012 20:41 Blaec wrote: Oh yeh, I guess that should be OC (original commentor?) Awesome. I know the unpredictability, but I made a fair bit early in SC2 until the site I was using folded. And even if I lost it made watching way more fun. Took me 20sec in google http://www.pinnaclesports.com/League/E Sports/SC2 GSL/1/Lines.aspx | ||
|
Thrombozyt
Germany1269 Posts
| ||
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On June 22 2012 20:42 SeeKeR wrote: Not necessarily an LR but if u look at my recommended games section, I always add in a little recap for each game btw a bit of feedback, i think your game descriptions are kinda biased in favour of slayers... haha | ||
|
SarcasmMonster
3136 Posts
On June 22 2012 20:44 opterown wrote: btw a bit of feedback, i think your game descriptions are kinda biased in favour of slayers... haha Anyone who is not a scrub should be biased towards Slayers. Got your back Seeker. | ||
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37058 Posts
On June 22 2012 20:44 opterown wrote: btw a bit of feedback, i think your game descriptions are kinda biased in favour of slayers... haha Meh, maybe a tad bit. But believe me, I keep editing the game descriptions to make sure it's not biased | ||
|
Sea_Food
Finland1612 Posts
On June 22 2012 20:45 SarcasmMonster wrote: Anyone who is not a scrub should be biased towards Slayers. Got your back Seeker. Why? | ||
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On June 22 2012 20:45 SeeKeR wrote: Meh, maybe a tad bit. But believe me, I keep editing the game descriptions to make sure it's not biased all the games slayers have won have been 'entertaining' and the ones they have lost were 'very standard' or 'uninteresting' or 'anticlimactic' haha. just sometihng i noticed =] | ||
|
CtrlShiftAltGrrrrrrr
544 Posts
good defense still now he has templars even tho he lost all senntrys and sc has really late upgrades and medivacs os i guess he can do it still | ||
|
bittman
Australia8759 Posts
| ||
|
SarcasmMonster
3136 Posts
Slayers #1. Duh-doy. | ||
| ||
