|
On June 22 2012 20:29 Loxley wrote:Show nested quote +On June 22 2012 20:24 Waxangel wrote:
Seems like the game plan for SlayerS was never send out Terrans against Zerg, which is sensible.
Because ZvT is so imba in Korea right now, I they probably don't consider Terran a real multi-kill card anymore. I think they probably would have played a Terran against a Protoss or another Terran if they were ahead on map score, because even if the the Terran got sniped by a Zerg immediately after, that would still be a 1:1 trade. But since they got behind trying to snipe Sniper with Protoss players, there was no situation for Terran to come out. Dunno, code s in the Ro16 now has 13(41%) terrans 10(31%) protoss and 9(28%) zerg. More than enough of those 13 terrans have beaten Zerg to get there. I know GSTL is different from Code S, but still.. This week has shown terran can still beat zerg.
no it didnt im sorry, practice results matter more than code s one, believe it or not. even in the words of drg himself "code s is different terrans can come up with specific strategy due to time to prepare, but the race isnt good". code s is about abusing ur opponents mistakes and weaknesses, not the ones of his race
|
It's a zerg world out there zerg to win it!
Yeah I know it's a pvp now.
|
On June 22 2012 20:31 Walitgon wrote:
This is quite pleasant. Glad I got $100 on MVP at 2.1 odds (how were they not the favourite!?!??!?!)
Someone is giving odds on GSTL?
|
On June 22 2012 20:26 GoingGoingGone wrote:
Is YuGiOh even there? (I missed the beginning of the show.) Not saying they should pull him out, but why doesn't he play GSTL for Slayers?
Don't know. Everytime I see Slayers as a team, YuGiOh seems to be very isolated. I don't know what going on between Slayers and him, but if that's true, he should very much consider a teamchange!
|
On June 22 2012 20:33 Blaec wrote:Show nested quote +On June 22 2012 20:31 Walitgon wrote:
This is quite pleasant. Glad I got $100 on MVP at 2.1 odds (how were they not the favourite!?!??!?!) Someone is giving odds on GSTL?
I am interested.
|
On June 22 2012 20:33 CtrlShiftAltGrrrrrrr wrote:Show nested quote +On June 22 2012 20:29 Loxley wrote:On June 22 2012 20:24 Waxangel wrote:
Seems like the game plan for SlayerS was never send out Terrans against Zerg, which is sensible.
Because ZvT is so imba in Korea right now, I they probably don't consider Terran a real multi-kill card anymore. I think they probably would have played a Terran against a Protoss or another Terran if they were ahead on map score, because even if the the Terran got sniped by a Zerg immediately after, that would still be a 1:1 trade. But since they got behind trying to snipe Sniper with Protoss players, there was no situation for Terran to come out. Dunno, code s in the Ro16 now has 13(41%) terrans 10(31%) protoss and 9(28%) zerg. More than enough of those 13 terrans have beaten Zerg to get there. I know GSTL is different from Code S, but still.. This week has shown terran can still beat zerg. no it didnt im sorry, practice results matter more than code s one, believe it or not. even in the words of drg himself "code s is different terrans can come up with specific strategy due to time to prepare, but the race isnt good". code s is about abusing ur opponents mistakes and weaknesses, not the ones of his race
I know but Ryung showed a great game vs Leenock, (2-0) and tbh its not like Zerg shows a different strategy every game..
But I understand your point and see the meaning in it. I just would have loved to see Ryung playing 
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37034 Posts
Poll: Recommend SlayerS-EG vs MVP Game 6?If you have time (5) 45% No (4) 36% Yes (2) 18% 11 total votes Your vote: Recommend SlayerS-EG vs MVP Game 6? (Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
|
|
|
On June 22 2012 20:34 SomeONEx wrote:Show nested quote +On June 22 2012 20:33 Blaec wrote:On June 22 2012 20:31 Walitgon wrote:
This is quite pleasant. Glad I got $100 on MVP at 2.1 odds (how were they not the favourite!?!??!?!) Someone is giving odds on GSTL? I am interested.
So interested, but I feel the OP is not going to deliver.
|
I really enjoy tasteless casting, I haven't watched him cast in a long time.
I have not had much time lately to watch the GSL, its so great to see tasteless casting though.
|
Pretty funny that the slayers team have not used one single Terran player out of five ppl. Always thought of slayers as a terran team.
|
SC! Man, it's been a while since he's been put out.
|
Yay, we get to see SC. Awesome.
|
On June 22 2012 20:33 CtrlShiftAltGrrrrrrr wrote:Show nested quote +On June 22 2012 20:29 Loxley wrote:On June 22 2012 20:24 Waxangel wrote:
Seems like the game plan for SlayerS was never send out Terrans against Zerg, which is sensible.
Because ZvT is so imba in Korea right now, I they probably don't consider Terran a real multi-kill card anymore. I think they probably would have played a Terran against a Protoss or another Terran if they were ahead on map score, because even if the the Terran got sniped by a Zerg immediately after, that would still be a 1:1 trade. But since they got behind trying to snipe Sniper with Protoss players, there was no situation for Terran to come out. Dunno, code s in the Ro16 now has 13(41%) terrans 10(31%) protoss and 9(28%) zerg. More than enough of those 13 terrans have beaten Zerg to get there. I know GSTL is different from Code S, but still.. This week has shown terran can still beat zerg. no it didnt im sorry, practice results matter more than code s one, believe it or not. even in the words of drg himself "code s is different terrans can come up with specific strategy due to time to prepare, but the race isnt good". code s is about abusing ur opponents mistakes and weaknesses, not the ones of his race
lol the race still plays a huge part of it dude. I bet if Terran had lost every code s game and had no one in code S anymore you would call that imbalance.
|
|
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
... polt style... wolf fanboy haha
|
On June 22 2012 20:35 Loxley wrote:Show nested quote +On June 22 2012 20:33 CtrlShiftAltGrrrrrrr wrote:On June 22 2012 20:29 Loxley wrote:On June 22 2012 20:24 Waxangel wrote:
Seems like the game plan for SlayerS was never send out Terrans against Zerg, which is sensible.
Because ZvT is so imba in Korea right now, I they probably don't consider Terran a real multi-kill card anymore. I think they probably would have played a Terran against a Protoss or another Terran if they were ahead on map score, because even if the the Terran got sniped by a Zerg immediately after, that would still be a 1:1 trade. But since they got behind trying to snipe Sniper with Protoss players, there was no situation for Terran to come out. Dunno, code s in the Ro16 now has 13(41%) terrans 10(31%) protoss and 9(28%) zerg. More than enough of those 13 terrans have beaten Zerg to get there. I know GSTL is different from Code S, but still.. This week has shown terran can still beat zerg. no it didnt im sorry, practice results matter more than code s one, believe it or not. even in the words of drg himself "code s is different terrans can come up with specific strategy due to time to prepare, but the race isnt good". code s is about abusing ur opponents mistakes and weaknesses, not the ones of his race I know but Ryung showed a great game vs Leenock, (2-0) and tbh its not like Zerg shows a different strategy every game.. But I understand your point and see the meaning in it. I just would have loved to see Ryung playing
ok then. but yea im obv sad they dint field a terran and at the end of the day id like to know what is the exact reason they did it, cuz we can speculate on balance players condition w/e but from slayers its definitely notable
|
On June 22 2012 20:37 Slangen wrote:
Pretty funny that the slayers team have not used one single Terran player out of five ppl. Always thought of slayers as a terran team.
How times have changed...
|
Oh yeah, MVPSC!
Also, Terran!
|
sc!!! show dem how to tvp plz
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
