EPT[GSTL] 2012 Season 1 Grand Finals - Page 477
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Everyone knows the drill by now. Keep it manner and have a good time. We'll be watching along with you. | ||
|
pic
United States162 Posts
| ||
Poopi
France12886 Posts
On April 08 2012 16:48 Murkinlol wrote: http://i.imgur.com/MTuji.jpg Should have given the win to Parting, no questions asked. Such stats are depressing as a terran. What happened, storms? Anyways I'm so happy for Prime and MarineKing :D. Too bad I Could not stay awake much longer at 2am. | ||
|
Lann555
Netherlands5173 Posts
Finals was basically over after that, so very disappointing in the ruling. And the lack of LAN/regame-options. | ||
|
Poopi
France12886 Posts
 . | ||
|
pic
United States162 Posts
On April 08 2012 15:48 sc14s wrote: both have to win two games.. both expend the same amount of effort in both games.. your logic doesn't follow. thats retarded if that is true. you could just go in a game make 20 observers. scout everything dc. then come back with a good game plan and win. thats basicly what i saw happen. player a outplayed one player so bad. that he just ran his units around looking at stuff. game 2 he doesnt do the same thing at all. he changes to the counter of what he lost to. the other player who won game one. doesnt get to see the changes he really needs to make. because player 1 lost so bad in the first place. such poor logic. | ||
|
Devolved
United States2753 Posts
On April 08 2012 17:16 Poopi wrote: Such stats are depressing as a terran. What happened, storms? Anyways I'm so happy for Prime and MarineKing :D. Too bad I Could not stay awake much longer at 2am. Storms, Chargelots, Archons and a couple of Colossi for good measure. | ||
|
MaNaVoId
492 Posts
| ||
|
baubo
China3370 Posts
On April 08 2012 17:06 Furniture wrote: they don't need to even do that. actually the most simple of fixes is actually blizzard lending (as part of the sponsorship) a battle.net server connected locally on lan, you probably don't even need a huge machine since it 'll be running a couple of matches at a single time. The most expensive thing of this is probably paying a blizzard guy to run the whole thing on site. Probably cost too much money for something that doesn't happen often. Also, IPL4 actually had observers from Korea and China for their local casts, so I don't think a local server works in that case. No, this doesn't affect GSTL, but just pointing out that sometimes games are observed in other areas of the world. A rejoin/reload function, if possible, would most certainly be the best way to take care of all problems. | ||
|
GhostFall
United States830 Posts
GSTL was completely ruined and tainted. Parting was robbed of one of the best PvT games ever in the history of SC2. Prime was robbed of being considered true champions. Thanks blizz. | ||
|
aksfjh
United States4853 Posts
On April 08 2012 17:19 pic wrote: thats retarded if that is true. you could just go in a game make 20 observers. scout everything dc. then come back with a good game plan and win. thats basicly what i saw happen. player a outplayed one player so bad. that he just ran his units around looking at stuff. game 2 he doesnt do the same thing at all. he changes to the counter of what he lost to. the other player who won game one. doesnt get to see the changes he really needs to make. because player 1 lost so bad in the first place. such poor logic. That's not what happened at all... Both players ultimately played the same game, except MKP made some slightly better micro decisions in the regame compared to PartinG. If PartinG was at the same skill as MKP (for tonight at least), he would have known how he edged out in the first game and corrected the tiny mistakes he had made. As for the first game, it wasn't decisively PartinG's yet. If you have never seen MKP play and his control with minimal units, sure, you could claim that PartinG had that game in the bag. However, there was a lot that could still go wrong for Part and right for MKP that would have put him back in the game. | ||
|
JJH777
United States4408 Posts
| ||
|
MaNaVoId
492 Posts
On April 08 2012 17:29 GhostFall wrote: Not going to lie, I completely lost interest after MKP won the regame, and just turned off the stream after he kept on winning. GSTL was completely ruined and tainted. Parting was robbed of one of the best PvT games ever in the history of SC2. Prime was robbed of being considered true champions. Thanks blizz. I dun think prime is being robbed of being considered true champions, they dun have much chance of winning if the match was given a fair ruling. | ||
|
babybell
776 Posts
But about Prime not feeling like the trua champions, please, you are missing a single point: Byun could 10-kill any team. | ||
|
tommym
42 Posts
| ||
|
BarbieHsu
574 Posts
| ||
|
rothsbury
Australia1654 Posts
On April 08 2012 17:34 babybell wrote: I saw Wolf and liquipedia saying that it was MarineKing's computer that disconnected. I am pretty sure it was Parting's actually. But about Prime not feeling like the trua champions, please, you are missing a single point: Byun could 10-kill any team. It was MKP's: http://i.imgur.com/yznqp.jpg | ||
|
babybell
776 Posts
also is the replay out for grabs? | ||
|
ravemir
Portugal595 Posts
Bummer that I couldn't record the event :S | ||
|
dormer
United States1314 Posts
Whether you agree with the regame decision or not, the fact that it has to come to that is not right. I understand that Blizz is first and foremost a business, so they have concerns about allowing LAN, but to not have any other workaround or safeguard against this sort of event really hurts the competitive scene. At least, it did today. Granted, this kind of thing is really rare in major tournaments, and having a drop or DC at such a bad time is pretty bad luck, but just, wow... This should have been one of the highlights of the year, and now everyone just feels awful and upset. I feel bad for Startale -- while I think a regame was probably the best decision, that's an awful way to lose. I just hope the final day of IPL is amazing and helps make up for some of the heartbreak today. | ||
|
baubo
China3370 Posts
On April 08 2012 17:30 aksfjh wrote: As for the first game, it wasn't decisively PartinG's yet. If you have never seen MKP play and his control with minimal units, sure, you could claim that PartinG had that game in the bag. However, there was a lot that could still go wrong for Part and right for MKP that would have put him back in the game. If you go by the final unit counter at disconnect. MKP had 110 supply, 71 scvs. That means 39 supply of attack units, of which probably half are still in production. Let's be generous and give him 30 supply actually on the field. Given that Parting had already hit some of MKP's production facilities, part of that army that pop up would immediately get destroyed. Parting had 148/149 supply(my vod wasn't clear enough to see exactly), 79 probes. That means ~70 supply of units and most of which are on the field except perhaps 1 or 2 colossi. At worst, Parting had twice the army supply of MKP and about to destroy part of potential reinforcements from those barracks. I can't imagine anyone who has ever played the game think MKP had any legit chance. Seriously, how can you believe that? | ||
| ||
