|
On February 15 2012 19:01 TheNessman wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2012 18:50 Pure-SC2 wrote:On February 15 2012 18:47 TheNessman wrote:On February 15 2012 18:46 Inflicted_ wrote:On February 15 2012 18:44 JJH777 wrote:On February 15 2012 18:43 Matkap wrote:On February 15 2012 18:34 TheNessman wrote:omg artosis and tasteless rambling about random build orders instead of what's happening in the game, its really annoying and i think they don't gel as well as they used to if you listen close, they actually ask each other "how was your day" on air, aka they DONT TALK outside of work. I feel like they dont even hang out at all , or even practice data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" i feel its really effected their commentating as of late you have to be kidding right? you realise people have a LIFE? artosis for example had a freaking kid, one would think he has less free time ffs.. I disagree with that guy and think he is dumb but having a life isn't an excuse to do your job poorly. Since when was hanging out with his co-worker apart of his job? when was the last time you saw the word "tastetosis". they used to "GEL" and just work together SO WELL, and now they interrupt each other, get off topic, joke too much, their tempo is much slower and i feel it is not as good. I think part of their job should be something about being able to work together. also when did they become co workers and stop being Friends I'm impressed with how well you personally know Tastetosis. They must be very happy to have someone posting in this thread that knows them so well and is prepared to give us this wonderful insight into their personal relationship. i've watched tasteless and artosis commentating from 2005, and artosis' vids were some of the first SC videos i watched in 09 , I have seen them casting alone and together, and i've seen them change styles and hairdos (tasteless == blue??) and i know when I see good casting.
"I've watched them for a long time, so my questionable opinions/inferences are now justified"
|
On February 15 2012 19:00 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2012 18:59 BLinD-RawR wrote:On February 15 2012 18:58 frucisky wrote:On February 15 2012 18:56 Shellshock1122 wrote: Uh oh Drazerk.... Where is your Raven God now? This should be a meme meh, TL memes die quick. Dunno the Fionn curse has lasted a while.
edit: damn wrong quote
|
On February 15 2012 18:58 Fionn wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2012 18:57 Devolved wrote: Why didn't MMA want to fight out the rest of the game? Did I miss something? Alive had a cloaked banshee in MMA's base. It was game over. If he had kept the one viking in his base, it would have went on.
There was a viking in MMA's base. MMA didn't have enough energy for scan initially and when did, Banshee had done too much dmg.
|
damn me I just noticed I could have all the post on the same page TT
|
On February 15 2012 19:01 Blaec wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2012 18:58 Kettchup wrote: Poor map awareness there by MMA. Should've seen that banshee flying in. Might be a reflection of him not feeling well. It was stealthed, that was the whole point of Alive's build
It wasn't cloaked until after it flew over MMA's marine/barracks.
|
United States97274 Posts
I feel like this proxy marauder build is so much more common than it used to be that MMA has to know it's coming... it happens like once a day in GSL now
|
|
On February 15 2012 19:02 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2012 18:58 Seeker wrote:Poll: MMA's Raven decision?Good job with dem autoturrets (13) 81% Should've thrown down a pdd (3) 19% 16 total votes Your vote: MMA's Raven decision? (Vote): Should've thrown down a pdd (Vote): Good job with dem autoturrets
ok it is pretty sad people are voting for PDD T_T
3 people think aLive plays Protoss, t-up if you think this comment is true!
|
|
United States23455 Posts
That SCV catch was beautiful.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36919 Posts
On February 15 2012 19:02 Dodgin wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2012 19:01 Seeker wrote:On February 15 2012 19:00 hysterial wrote:On February 15 2012 18:58 Seeker wrote:Poll: MMA's Raven decision?Good job with dem autoturrets (13) 81% Should've thrown down a pdd (3) 19% 16 total votes Your vote: MMA's Raven decision? (Vote): Should've thrown down a pdd (Vote): Good job with dem autoturrets
This fact that you made this poll means you didn't watch the engagement. orrrrrrrrrrrr It means I thought pdd worked against tanks and marines. Meh.... still got a lot to learn I thought you were testing the readers to see how many people have no idea how PDD works to be honest >_> We'll go with that answer.
Honestly, I don't use ravens because they keep reminding me of Drazerk. And I LIVE to prove Draz wrong
|
On February 15 2012 19:01 Seeker wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2012 19:00 hysterial wrote:On February 15 2012 18:58 Seeker wrote:Poll: MMA's Raven decision?Good job with dem autoturrets (13) 81% Should've thrown down a pdd (3) 19% 16 total votes Your vote: MMA's Raven decision? (Vote): Should've thrown down a pdd (Vote): Good job with dem autoturrets
This fact that you made this poll means you didn't watch the engagement. orrrrrrrrrrrr It means I thought pdd worked against tanks and marines. Meh.... still got a lot to learn
Fair enough.
In TvT it affects: Marauder Reaper - Building attack only Viking - Fighter Mode only Banshee Thor - Anti-Air attack only Battlecruiser - Air to Ground Attack and Air to Air Attack but not Yamato Cannon Missile Turret
|
|
|
|
raelly really really bad control from alive : (
|
On February 15 2012 19:01 Seeker wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2012 19:00 hysterial wrote:On February 15 2012 18:58 Seeker wrote:Poll: MMA's Raven decision?Good job with dem autoturrets (13) 81% Should've thrown down a pdd (3) 19% 16 total votes Your vote: MMA's Raven decision? (Vote): Should've thrown down a pdd (Vote): Good job with dem autoturrets
This fact that you made this poll means you didn't watch the engagement. orrrrrrrrrrrr It means I thought pdd worked against tanks and marines. Meh.... still got a lot to learn
Haha, oh dear.
PDD's only work against things that produce visible projectiles but excludes special attacks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|