EPT[GSL] 2012 Jan Code S RO32 D6 - Page 39
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36920 Posts
| ||
|
shabby
Norway6402 Posts
| ||
|
qazadex
Australia473 Posts
| ||
|
MrSandman
Australia188 Posts
| ||
|
Sabu113
United States11035 Posts
On January 17 2012 18:59 rothsbury wrote: I really think even top Protoss players have less than spectacular army control. Forget splitting your army in different locations; even within the army they just have everything on one hotkey, so naturally you get everything mixed up with zealots at the back etc. The immortal range buff was necessary because Protoss would have them at the back of the army where they would neither tank nor deal damage. I've seen pretty much all top protoss make basic mistakes like this. Ok I think that's just ridiculous. If there's one race that punishes these sorts of mechanics it's toss. It's the race least forgiving for looking away from a battle yet you have to look away to reinforce. You have more units of differing speeds... That's just a completely absurd and ridiculous statement. =.= Top end control is usually the hallmark of toss players. Such a wierd matchup. Always interesting these days. How long til the muta ball. Just dont let it get going. Zealots popping... -->> Why do they forcefield infront of the roacheswhen he wasnt retreating. oooh Gonna be tough goign home for genius. | ||
|
bRiz
United States113 Posts
Was there some amazing game I missed of his before? | ||
|
artrea
Latvia3560 Posts
| ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
On January 17 2012 18:59 rothsbury wrote: I really think even top Protoss players have less than spectacular army control. Forget splitting your army in different locations; even within the army they just have everything on one hotkey, so naturally you get everything mixed up with zealots at the back etc. The immortal range buff was necessary because Protoss would have them at the back of the army where they would neither tank nor deal damage. I've seen pretty much all top protoss make basic mistakes like this. Yeah, because Zerg players never A-move their shit mindlessly. There is actually a reason most pro Protoss keep their army in 1 control group. The army is most of the time a ball, and controling it with several control groups yields troubles with stutter stepping while macroing. What you need to do though is split your army to defend multipronged attacks, and split your spellcasters in different control groups to activate their spells quickly (sentries/templars). The rest can be done with the mouse, within 1 control group. | ||
|
ChaosTerran
Austria844 Posts
On January 17 2012 19:01 cyclone25 wrote: He can attack the protoss with his main army if the protoss splits his colossus/stalkers to defend drops (as many suggested). Terran can just scan ahead and see if he can attack. Even if he makes a bad decision he can stim and run back. You don't even need collossi. The trick in defending drops as protoss is to fortify the bases beforehand, leave an HT for feedback and a few cannons there, so you can buy time or kill a single drop completely. Realistically, if you fortify the bases before you start mining handling drops shouldnt really be a problem. It's just when you have no static defense and you are forced to split your army, then it gets though, but that's the protoss player's fault. On January 17 2012 19:04 Sabu113 wrote: Ok I think that's just ridiculous. If there's one race that punishes these sorts of mechanics it's toss. It's the race least forgiving for looking away from a battle yet you have to look away to reinforce. You have more units of differing speeds... That's just a completely absurd and ridiculous statement. =.= Top end control is usually the hallmark of toss players. I completely disagree with this. If anything, the race that gets punished the most for looking away from the army is terran. If you get surprised your bio ball melts within seconds when you don't kite and your marine/tank army (in TvZ) gets absolutely annihilated if you get caught unsieged. Protoss has a lot of room for error, because they have tanking units (zealots) and units that can simply be a moved while still being effective (chargelots, archons, collossi). | ||
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36920 Posts
| ||
|
artrea
Latvia3560 Posts
| ||
|
Xcobidoo
Sweden1871 Posts
On January 17 2012 19:04 bRiz wrote: Why does it seem like Artosis is totally in love with DRG? He's a great player, but he seems to get the benefit of the doubt 99.9999998% of the time. Was there some amazing game I missed of his before? DRG has been on fire (again) as of late. Also, Tastosis Hype as usual  | ||
|
Cabinet Sanchez
Australia1097 Posts
| ||
|
Mobius_1
United Kingdom2763 Posts
On January 17 2012 19:02 Mobius_1 wrote: GSL Ro32 Group F Match 2 Game 1 MVPDongRaeGu vs MVPGenius Antiga Shipyard 1.2 0:00 DRG spawns Z2 Genius spawns P8 Genius FFE, forge --> nexus --> cannon --> gateway DRG opens pool hatch, hatchery held up slightly by probe harassment, takes 3rd after overlord scouts forge 5:00 Genius opts for stargate tech, and up to 6 gates DRG has roaches, speedlings and spores to try to defend | ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51449 Posts
| ||
|
artrea
Latvia3560 Posts
| ||
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36920 Posts
| ||
|
Silentness
United States2821 Posts
| ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
| ||
|
Leetley
1796 Posts
| ||
| ||
