|
Let's have a nice clean LR thread folks! Beware that moderation will probably be stricter than usual, balance whine, player bashing and trolling will not be tolerated! |
On January 11 2012 19:53 Scarecrow wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:51 Drazerk wrote:On January 11 2012 19:49 Seeker wrote:
Lol. Let's say I am biased.
I don't effing do it in my polls kay?
I may post with bias at times but my polls are strictly based on "WAS THAT GAME EXCITING?!?!"
If it was, a plain old "yes" doesn't do it justice People will complain about anything just carry on and ignore them "DAT DEFENCE" is just a plain spoiler and ruins the result of game 2. Yes/No is just better, I'm psyched whenever I see a 98% Yes, it does the game more than enough justice.
I actually agree with this, "dat defence" is a really bad poll option and you're going to know the result of the game right from the opening builds.
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
On January 11 2012 19:54 Roostalol wrote:Lucky is actually a bit chubby, or at least that's how his face looks. I think that means you're making fun of MC.
He looks like a younger MC to me, the fat/anorexic shit is just idiotic
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On January 11 2012 19:54 Hassybaby wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:53 DoNotDisturb wrote:On January 11 2012 19:52 Seeker wrote:
DRAZERK IS HERE!!
GET READY FOR SOME EPIC LRS GUYS!! But it's a ZvZ, hence no Ravens Still working on the full rules
Infested ravens!
|
idra has one of the best ZvZs? hmmmm?
|
On January 11 2012 19:53 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:52 sAsImre wrote:On January 11 2012 19:47 mrtomjones wrote:On January 11 2012 19:45 hysterial wrote:On January 11 2012 19:44 Seeker wrote:Poll: Recommend MVP vs NesTea Game 3?HOLLLYYYYY SHIIIITTTTT!!!! (130) 65% No (54) 27% If you have time (15) 8% 199 total votes Your vote: Recommend MVP vs NesTea Game 3? (Vote): HOLLLYYYYY SHIIIITTTTT!!!!
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
Can you stop making retarded polls lol? Just keep it simple and if the game is really really good, then change the option. I'm pretty sure his polls are working just fine to do their job. No. You're spoiled half of the time with seeker's polls if you just want to watch the good games of a series. This has only been the cases in the up/downs at which point it was boxer advancing so it was worth being spoiled. If you don't want to be spoiled you shouldn't be visiting TL really.
Exactly. Why are you browsing TL when you haven't watched the games? Stupid really.
|
On January 11 2012 19:53 Napoleon53 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:49 Seeker wrote:
Lol. Let's say I am biased.
I don't effing do it in my polls kay?
I may post with bias at times but my polls are strictly based on "WAS THAT GAME EXCITING?!?!"
If it was, a plain old "yes" doesn't do it justice I don't feel like voting, when I need to vote for something like "HOLY SHIT!!11" If "yes" is an option, and 98% votes "yes".. then you can tell that the game was extremely good. Not that it is bothering me.. just my 2 cent.
WHen I didnt watch the game and its just exiting... and 90% Yes... I think its just a good game...
When I see crazy shit like "HELL YES" I know something epic was shown or the game was epic and a lot of up and down... I love it that way... Keep doing it
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37115 Posts
IDRA VS LUCKY!!!
Time to see which one wants it more :D
|
United Kingdom14464 Posts
Come on Idra, for foreigners everywhere, at least take 3rd in your group.
|
Wow....I just realized that Hot 6 is a play on words of "Hot SEX"
that's very clever
haha
|
On January 11 2012 19:53 mTw|NarutO wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:50 Zerg-Master wrote:On January 11 2012 19:47 mTw|NarutO wrote:On January 11 2012 19:45 TheDwf wrote:On January 11 2012 19:44 evolute wrote:
What a NUTS all in timing. Your use of the expression “all-in” is terrible. It was allin. Yes, this timing would deal damage even if Terran is prepared, but I can guarantee that you are dead as hell if you do not kill the Terran there. MVP had 3 orbitals ready and his production would have really kicked in if he had hold it off so yeah. It was a good timing for an allin - and there's no shame in mixing it up, but if you do such an attack against a Terran who did macro (scvs) all the time, you will be far behind or even dead if it doesn't kill him or deal enormous damage. Not really, Nestea could have stopped ling/bane production at a few different points and still been perfectly fine. For example, if he hadn't made any past the ones that initially hit, he still would have killed most of the SCVs at MVP's natural. Not sure why everyone calls everything an all-in nowadays.. Sure, since "hypothetically he could have" lost his whole army without killing anything, I guess it's an all-in... It is all in because he's investing into attacking units and especially a lot of gas. If he doesn't kill MVP or all his scvs he's not 'fine' and he won't be able to just back down, take a 3rd because he will be behind in tech and economy very soon. If he doesn't kill A TON of scvs it would at best put him equal with the Terran economy (+ mules) and he doesn't have a 3rd then...
So if you ever build attacking units it's an all-in? Nice. And I'm pretty sure killing even a third of MVP's scvs would pretty much have clinched the game for Nestea. He didn't need to kill "all of his scvs" at all
|
On January 11 2012 19:53 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:52 sAsImre wrote:On January 11 2012 19:47 mrtomjones wrote:On January 11 2012 19:45 hysterial wrote:On January 11 2012 19:44 Seeker wrote:Poll: Recommend MVP vs NesTea Game 3?HOLLLYYYYY SHIIIITTTTT!!!! (130) 65% No (54) 27% If you have time (15) 8% 199 total votes Your vote: Recommend MVP vs NesTea Game 3? (Vote): HOLLLYYYYY SHIIIITTTTT!!!!
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
Can you stop making retarded polls lol? Just keep it simple and if the game is really really good, then change the option. I'm pretty sure his polls are working just fine to do their job. No. You're spoiled half of the time with seeker's polls if you just want to watch the good games of a series. This has only been the cases in the up/downs at which point it was boxer advancing so it was worth being spoiled. If you don't want to be spoiled you shouldn't be visiting TL really.
#Cough... Owned.... #Cough
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
|
Eyedra!
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/YhlGs.jpg)
|
On January 11 2012 19:51 mordk wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:48 JJH777 wrote:On January 11 2012 19:47 soulist wrote:On January 11 2012 19:43 Noktix wrote:
Nestea slumping? Yeah, ok. He was slumping. Maaybe hes out of it. Ever think of that? He wasn't slumping so bad that people were justified in not taking him out of this group. That was an extremely dumb pick. Yep, it's been said a loooot of times... People are exaggeratng nestea's slump, when the truth is he's as good as ever... He had some minor troubles but hardly as severe as people were saying they were
I wouldn't call him as good as ever. Some games he's been playing the last couple of months have been outright terrible, especially late game. I do agree it gets blown out of proportion, he's still one of the absolute best.
|
On January 11 2012 19:52 Megabuster123 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:50 Zerg-Master wrote:On January 11 2012 19:47 mTw|NarutO wrote:On January 11 2012 19:45 TheDwf wrote:On January 11 2012 19:44 evolute wrote:
What a NUTS all in timing. Your use of the expression “all-in” is terrible. It was allin. Yes, this timing would deal damage even if Terran is prepared, but I can guarantee that you are dead as hell if you do not kill the Terran there. MVP had 3 orbitals ready and his production would have really kicked in if he had hold it off so yeah. It was a good timing for an allin - and there's no shame in mixing it up, but if you do such an attack against a Terran who did macro (scvs) all the time, you will be far behind or even dead if it doesn't kill him or deal enormous damage. Not really, Nestea could have stopped ling/bane production at a few different points and still been perfectly fine. For example, if he hadn't made any past the ones that initially hit, he still would have killed most of the SCVs at MVP's natural. Not sure why everyone calls everything an all-in nowadays.. Sure, since "hypothetically he could have" lost his whole army without killing anything, I guess it's an all-in... He had already spent so much gas at that point on banelings that made it all-in. The terran was on triple orbitals. It was a kill or be killed moment with that kind of attack.
No critical thinking. Would have been even game if the attack any sort of appreciable damage. Triple orbital doesn't matter when T production is so slow, it doesn't "kick in". The way it works is that if Z plays passively, triple orbital lets you keep up because there's no heavy pressure, and you can take a fairly early 3rd.
The benefit for having the 3rd orbital inbase is practically negligible. If T took any amount of damage, he would not be able to take the 3rd because there would be too many lings.
For triple orbital to be reliable, there needs to be simcity.
|
On January 11 2012 19:55 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:54 Hassybaby wrote:On January 11 2012 19:53 DoNotDisturb wrote:On January 11 2012 19:52 Seeker wrote:
DRAZERK IS HERE!!
GET READY FOR SOME EPIC LRS GUYS!! But it's a ZvZ, hence no Ravens Still working on the full rules Infested ravens!
Infestors are low-tech ravens.
|
God SPL coming up anytime soon! So many awesomeness, so little time!
|
lol Lucky is underdog? come Tasteless
|
ok lets go
idra wins: "so high lvl zvz"
lucky wins: "lol zvz coinflip"
gogogogoog
|
United Kingdom10823 Posts
On January 11 2012 19:53 sAsImre wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:49 Seeker wrote:
Lol. Let's say I am biased.
I don't effing do it in my polls kay?
I may post with bias at times but my polls are strictly based on "WAS THAT GAME EXCITING?!?!"
If it was, a plain old "yes" doesn't do it justice You're really stupid or you faint it? When a fan favourite play again a random player your polls indicate the winner each time, it's too complicated to understand it ?
If a fan favorite played a random and won, the polls would spoil it no matter what. That's a terrible argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
