|
Let's have a nice clean LR thread folks! Beware that moderation will probably be stricter than usual, balance whine, player bashing and trolling will not be tolerated! |
On January 11 2012 19:51 mordk wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:48 JJH777 wrote:On January 11 2012 19:47 soulist wrote:On January 11 2012 19:43 Noktix wrote:
Nestea slumping? Yeah, ok. He was slumping. Maaybe hes out of it. Ever think of that? He wasn't slumping so bad that people were justified in not taking him out of this group. That was an extremely dumb pick. Yep, it's been said a loooot of times... People are exaggeratng nestea's slump, when the truth is he's as good as ever... He had some minor troubles but hardly as severe as people were saying they were
He should have lost against Idra at MLG and that game against Huk suggested more than just "minor troubles".
|
On January 11 2012 19:49 Seeker wrote:
Lol. Let's say I am biased.
I don't effing do it in my polls kay?
I may post with bias at times but my polls are strictly based on "WAS THAT GAME EXCITING?!?!"
If it was, a plain old "yes" doesn't do it justice
I don't feel like voting, when I need to vote for something like "HOLY SHIT!!11"
If "yes" is an option, and 98% votes "yes".. then you can tell that the game was extremely good.
Not that it is bothering me.. just my 2 cent.
|
On January 11 2012 19:48 Sub40APM wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:48 Shikyo wrote:
Here's my prophet predictions:
Lucky > Idra
Lucky > MVP
Lucky and Nestea advance. lucky already lost MVP. lucky would play nestea and mvp plays idra.
what? no
|
United States23455 Posts
Lucky looks like an anorexic MC.
|
On January 11 2012 19:52 Huckleuro wrote:
Is it me... or has the game become a game of timings/ semi allins again?
A month or so back, GREED was the situation. Everyone was playing the economical game more. Recently new timings/ funky cheeses/ timings have comeback with vengeance.
thats just how rts's works. Metagame is such a big part of every game that it swings a lot. =)
|
|
|
On January 11 2012 19:48 andaylin wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:47 bittman wrote:On January 11 2012 19:46 darkscream wrote:
LOL @ the poll whiners
dude seeker puts more time into this shit than anyone, he can write the polls in korean for all i care This is a great idea. Seeker, make it so. Do it Seeker.
do it!!! ALL HAIL SEEKER!
srsly though fuck stupid haters whining about spoilers in livereport threads
|
Hahah. I love the Nestea fence. "We need a fence or Nestea will just kill every nerd he sees."
<3 Tastosis
|
On January 11 2012 19:50 Zerg-Master wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:47 mTw|NarutO wrote:On January 11 2012 19:45 TheDwf wrote:On January 11 2012 19:44 evolute wrote:
What a NUTS all in timing. Your use of the expression “all-in” is terrible. It was allin. Yes, this timing would deal damage even if Terran is prepared, but I can guarantee that you are dead as hell if you do not kill the Terran there. MVP had 3 orbitals ready and his production would have really kicked in if he had hold it off so yeah. It was a good timing for an allin - and there's no shame in mixing it up, but if you do such an attack against a Terran who did macro (scvs) all the time, you will be far behind or even dead if it doesn't kill him or deal enormous damage. Not really, Nestea could have stopped ling/bane production at a few different points and still been perfectly fine. For example, if he hadn't made any past the ones that initially hit, he still would have killed most of the SCVs at MVP's natural. Not sure why everyone calls everything an all-in nowadays.. Sure, since "hypothetically he could have" lost his whole army without killing anything, I guess it's an all-in...
It is all in because he's investing into attacking units and especially a lot of gas. If he doesn't kill MVP or all his scvs he's not 'fine' and he won't be able to just back down, take a 3rd because he will be behind in tech and economy very soon. If he doesn't kill A TON of scvs it would at best put him equal with the Terran economy (+ mules) and he doesn't have a 3rd then...
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On January 11 2012 19:52 sAsImre wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:47 mrtomjones wrote:On January 11 2012 19:45 hysterial wrote:On January 11 2012 19:44 Seeker wrote:Poll: Recommend MVP vs NesTea Game 3?HOLLLYYYYY SHIIIITTTTT!!!! (130) 65% No (54) 27% If you have time (15) 8% 199 total votes Your vote: Recommend MVP vs NesTea Game 3? (Vote): HOLLLYYYYY SHIIIITTTTT!!!!
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
Can you stop making retarded polls lol? Just keep it simple and if the game is really really good, then change the option. I'm pretty sure his polls are working just fine to do their job. No. You're spoiled half of the time with seeker's polls if you just want to watch the good games of a series.
This has only been the cases in the up/downs at which point it was boxer advancing so it was worth being spoiled. If you don't want to be spoiled you shouldn't be visiting TL really.
|
On January 11 2012 19:51 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:49 Seeker wrote:
Lol. Let's say I am biased.
I don't effing do it in my polls kay?
I may post with bias at times but my polls are strictly based on "WAS THAT GAME EXCITING?!?!"
If it was, a plain old "yes" doesn't do it justice People will complain about anything just carry on and ignore them
"DAT DEFENCE" is just a plain spoiler and ruins the result of game 2. Yes/No is just better, I'm psyched whenever I see a 98% Yes, it does the game more than enough justice.
|
On January 11 2012 19:50 Kerm wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:49 zhurai wrote:On January 11 2012 19:49 Seeker wrote:
Lol. Let's say I am biased.
I don't effing do it in my polls kay?
I may post with bias at times but my polls are strictly based on "WAS THAT GAME EXCITING?!?!"
If it was, a plain old "yes" doesn't do it justice No need to listen to haters~  This. You shouldn't bother answering Seeker, do as you please.
Agreed -- polls are fine, haters are going to find a way to be pissy either way.
|
I would have picked Beast to be NesTea.
|
On January 11 2012 19:49 Seeker wrote:
Lol. Let's say I am biased.
I don't effing do it in my polls kay?
I may post with bias at times but my polls are strictly based on "WAS THAT GAME EXCITING?!?!"
If it was, a plain old "yes" doesn't do it justice
You're really stupid or you faint it? When a fan favourite play again a random player your polls indicate the winner each time, it's too complicated to understand it ?
|
Tastosis is up for a suprise I think.
|
On January 11 2012 19:51 Roe wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:51 Jigsetcza wrote:
Guys what is the song name? Please! something about being a real bad driver
die warzau - linoleum.
I dont see how this particular poll spoiled anything. Granted I dont visit LR threads often, but its kind of hard to reflect a bias in a poll. Well unless ofcourse the poll is titled "Watch this game because "Insertplayername" won.".
|
Some long explanation on the nestea vs mvp matches? OMG I I coudnt watch them.
|
On January 11 2012 19:52 hysterial wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:51 leo23 wrote:On January 11 2012 19:49 Seeker wrote:
Lol. Let's say I am biased.
I don't effing do it in my polls kay?
I may post with bias at times but my polls are strictly based on "WAS THAT GAME EXCITING?!?!"
If it was, a plain old "yes" doesn't do it justice While I don't mind your polls, these games do not deserve a "HOLY SHIT". So maybe tone it down a little bit? Yeah I don't understand why he is taking such offense.... Is no one open to criticism anymore?
The "Haters gonna hate" meme has been used as an excuse to deflect any and all criticism, unfortunately.
|
On January 11 2012 19:53 Fionn wrote:
Lucky looks like an anorexic MC.
CANNOT UNSEE
|
I love this Tastetosis banter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
