|
Let's have a nice clean LR thread folks! Beware that moderation will probably be stricter than usual, balance whine, player bashing and trolling will not be tolerated! |
On January 11 2012 19:53 sAsImre wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:49 Seeker wrote: Lol. Let's say I am biased.
I don't effing do it in my polls kay?
I may post with bias at times but my polls are strictly based on "WAS THAT GAME EXCITING?!?!"
If it was, a plain old "yes" doesn't do it justice You're really stupid or you faint it? When a fan favourite play again a random player your polls indicate the winner each time, it's too complicated to understand it ?
Just stfu already, this is totally ridiculous
|
On January 11 2012 19:53 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:52 sAsImre wrote:On January 11 2012 19:47 mrtomjones wrote:On January 11 2012 19:45 hysterial wrote:On January 11 2012 19:44 Seeker wrote:Poll: Recommend MVP vs NesTea Game 3?HOLLLYYYYY SHIIIITTTTT!!!! (130) 65% No (54) 27% If you have time (15) 8% 199 total votes Your vote: Recommend MVP vs NesTea Game 3? (Vote): HOLLLYYYYY SHIIIITTTTT!!!! (Vote): No (Vote): If you have time
Can you stop making retarded polls lol? Just keep it simple and if the game is really really good, then change the option. I'm pretty sure his polls are working just fine to do their job. No. You're spoiled half of the time with seeker's polls if you just want to watch the good games of a series. This has only been the cases in the up/downs at which point it was boxer advancing so it was worth being spoiled. If you don't want to be spoiled you shouldn't be visiting TL really. Except for the fact that Idra v NesTea game one is spoiled in this very topic and the same can be said for other games.
Why are the results in the OP spoiled if people are only supposed to come here when they know the results? C'mon, it's not as though people are losing out a huge amount by being able to vote Yes/No/If you have time rather than whatever else you want to say, and it helps out the people who can't watch live. What exactly is the problem with going for that?
This is not simply "Waaaaah, whining!", it's people enjoying something on TL for 18 months (for me personally) having to now either watch every game or miss out on some good ones if we don't want to be spoiled. I recognise that this is a voluntary type thing so I don't have any control on what others are doing, but it's a real shame.
|
On January 11 2012 19:56 ragnorr wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:55 andaylin wrote:On January 11 2012 19:53 Drazerk wrote:On January 11 2012 19:52 sAsImre wrote:On January 11 2012 19:47 mrtomjones wrote:On January 11 2012 19:45 hysterial wrote:On January 11 2012 19:44 Seeker wrote:Poll: Recommend MVP vs NesTea Game 3?HOLLLYYYYY SHIIIITTTTT!!!! (130) 65% No (54) 27% If you have time (15) 8% 199 total votes Your vote: Recommend MVP vs NesTea Game 3? (Vote): HOLLLYYYYY SHIIIITTTTT!!!! (Vote): No (Vote): If you have time
Can you stop making retarded polls lol? Just keep it simple and if the game is really really good, then change the option. I'm pretty sure his polls are working just fine to do their job. No. You're spoiled half of the time with seeker's polls if you just want to watch the good games of a series. This has only been the cases in the up/downs at which point it was boxer advancing so it was worth being spoiled. If you don't want to be spoiled you shouldn't be visiting TL really. Exactly. Why are you browsing TL when you haven't watched the games? Stupid really. Its also very easy to find GSL vods, if people dont want to be spoiled, watch thoes instead =/ Maybe some people, like, don't want to watch every game so they, like, see the polls to see which games were like, good?
Like, that's the entire purpose of the polls.
|
On January 11 2012 19:55 Yokoblue wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:53 Napoleon53 wrote:On January 11 2012 19:49 Seeker wrote: Lol. Let's say I am biased.
I don't effing do it in my polls kay?
I may post with bias at times but my polls are strictly based on "WAS THAT GAME EXCITING?!?!"
If it was, a plain old "yes" doesn't do it justice I don't feel like voting, when I need to vote for something like "HOLY SHIT!!11" If "yes" is an option, and 98% votes "yes".. then you can tell that the game was extremely good. Not that it is bothering me.. just my 2 cent. WHen I didnt watch the game and its just exiting... and 90% Yes... I think its just a good game... When I see crazy shit like "HELL YES" I know something epic was shown or the game was epic and a lot of up and down... I love it that way... Keep doing it
Yes.. but when 80% of the pools have "hell yes"-options.. then the point is lost.. just like rappers using curse words in all of their sentences.
|
lucky looks like MC's illegitimate child
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36920 Posts
On January 11 2012 19:55 Shikyo wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:53 Scarecrow wrote:On January 11 2012 19:51 Drazerk wrote:On January 11 2012 19:49 Seeker wrote: Lol. Let's say I am biased.
I don't effing do it in my polls kay?
I may post with bias at times but my polls are strictly based on "WAS THAT GAME EXCITING?!?!"
If it was, a plain old "yes" doesn't do it justice People will complain about anything just carry on and ignore them "DAT DEFENCE" is just a plain spoiler and ruins the result of game 2. Yes/No is just better, I'm psyched whenever I see a 98% Yes, it does the game more than enough justice. I actually agree with this, "dat defence" is a really bad poll option and you're going to know the result of the game right from the opening builds. I will agree with this.
"Dat Defense" was a bit of a spoiler. I do apologize for that. I'll make sure this doesn't happen again
|
On January 11 2012 19:54 Napoleon53 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:53 masterchip27 wrote:On January 11 2012 19:50 Kerm wrote:On January 11 2012 19:49 zhurai wrote:On January 11 2012 19:49 Seeker wrote: Lol. Let's say I am biased.
I don't effing do it in my polls kay?
I may post with bias at times but my polls are strictly based on "WAS THAT GAME EXCITING?!?!"
If it was, a plain old "yes" doesn't do it justice No need to listen to haters~ data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" This. You shouldn't bother answering Seeker, do as you please. Agreed -- polls are fine, haters are going to find a way to be pissy either way. Isnt there a difference between "haters" and "feedback"?
hating does not include feedback and feedback does not include hating
ive not seen any negative feedback yet, only hating. the only ones that keep it civil are the ones on seekers side.
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On January 11 2012 19:57 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:56 Drazerk wrote:Game One on Daybreak In the bottom left is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9253/a92538e393fc6dfdaba8cfa9cd7524f1ff7f07e9" alt="" Lucky In the top right is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9253/a92538e393fc6dfdaba8cfa9cd7524f1ff7f07e9" alt="" Idra 3:30
Expansions from both players Idra got his pool first however 4:30Ling speed for both players Lucky getting both his queens Idra making a lot of lings but lucky is getting a spine at his natural
5:40
Baneling nest for both players
Idra has a drone lead
|
On January 11 2012 19:53 masterchip27 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:50 Kerm wrote:On January 11 2012 19:49 zhurai wrote:On January 11 2012 19:49 Seeker wrote: Lol. Let's say I am biased.
I don't effing do it in my polls kay?
I may post with bias at times but my polls are strictly based on "WAS THAT GAME EXCITING?!?!"
If it was, a plain old "yes" doesn't do it justice No need to listen to haters~ data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" This. You shouldn't bother answering Seeker, do as you please. Agreed -- polls are fine, haters are going to find a way to be pissy either way.
This just shits me. Are people not allowed to offer criticism anymore?
Any criticism someone gives is immediately shot down and that person accused of being a 'hater'.
Well, I don't hate Seeker at all. I respect and admire his dedication in making so many LR threads and LR'ing so often. But I would rather simple Yes/No polls. Especially when the game wasn't that great, like NesTea vs. Mvp game 3.
Am I a hater too?
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51449 Posts
Idra up 4/5 drones already 0.O macro of a god!
|
On January 11 2012 19:53 MCDayC wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:51 TheDwf wrote:On January 11 2012 19:47 mTw|NarutO wrote:On January 11 2012 19:45 TheDwf wrote:On January 11 2012 19:44 evolute wrote: What a NUTS all in timing. Your use of the expression “all-in” is terrible. It was allin. Yes, this timing would deal damage even if Terran is prepared, but I can guarantee that you are dead as hell if you do not kill the Terran there. MVP had 3 orbitals ready and his production would have really kicked in if he had hold it off so yeah. It was a good timing for an allin - and there's no shame in mixing it up, but if you do such an attack against a Terran who did macro (scvs) all the time, you will be far behind or even dead if it doesn't kill him or deal enormous damage. Sorry, but with 30 banes like that you're pretty much guaranteed to wipe out his entire mineral line at his natural. There are many pushes that need to deal “enough damage” to be worth it (for instance, if we consider the other side, the 3 Tanks with Marine push). Would you call this “all-in” too? But by that standard, nothing is all in. Everything just does enough damage that both players can carry on. There's just a point where “enough damage” is only killing him, otherwise you won't be able to recover. See game 2 for instance. MVP had done a lot of damage, but since he invested everything in it he had to get the kill. Here, NesTea still had some economy and tech to back up his attack. 3 OCs is very powerful, of course, but 3 hatch can saturate a third very quickly too if needed.
|
On January 11 2012 19:56 sopas wrote: ok lets go idra wins: "so high lvl zvz" lucky wins: "lol zvz coinflip" gogogogoog
hahahaha
on a more serious note. hopefully a good series
|
Defensive banelings into mutas, gogo Idra!
|
looks like a "macro" game to me
|
>_> those arguments are utterly pointless ...
==
also, 7 minute lair by idra :o
|
Idra is going Muta it looks like.
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51449 Posts
Looks like muti build by idra?
Then throws down RW xD lol
|
On January 11 2012 19:55 neoghaleon55 wrote: Wow....I just realized that Hot 6 is a play on words of "Hot SEX" that's very clever haha
roflmao thanks for pointing this out hahahahahahaa
|
I find it strange...when people can't complain about the matches..they resort to raging about the polls?
|
United Kingdom38149 Posts
On January 11 2012 19:56 ragnorr wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2012 19:55 andaylin wrote:On January 11 2012 19:53 Drazerk wrote:On January 11 2012 19:52 sAsImre wrote:On January 11 2012 19:47 mrtomjones wrote:On January 11 2012 19:45 hysterial wrote:On January 11 2012 19:44 Seeker wrote:Poll: Recommend MVP vs NesTea Game 3?HOLLLYYYYY SHIIIITTTTT!!!! (130) 65% No (54) 27% If you have time (15) 8% 199 total votes Your vote: Recommend MVP vs NesTea Game 3? (Vote): HOLLLYYYYY SHIIIITTTTT!!!! (Vote): No (Vote): If you have time
Can you stop making retarded polls lol? Just keep it simple and if the game is really really good, then change the option. I'm pretty sure his polls are working just fine to do their job. No. You're spoiled half of the time with seeker's polls if you just want to watch the good games of a series. This has only been the cases in the up/downs at which point it was boxer advancing so it was worth being spoiled. If you don't want to be spoiled you shouldn't be visiting TL really. Exactly. Why are you browsing TL when you haven't watched the games? Stupid really. Its also very easy to find GSL vods, if people dont want to be spoiled, watch thoes instead =/
Why even have recommended games polls then? The whole point is for people who want to know what's really worth watching if they don't have enough time to watch everything (or simply wish to prioritise)...
===
Hoping we get a nice macro ZvZ, I suspect mutas from Idra.
|
|
|
|