oh well. i'm fine with that; i think robo openers are just necessary and will be in pvt as a mainstay forever.. i mean what builds do you just lose to if you DO get a robo? outside of 4 rax all in that you don't see, i can't think of one. be safe, protosses :p

Lysanias

Netherlands8351 Posts

January 10 2012 10:37 GMT

#1802

On January 10 2012 19:36 Azzur wrote:
Lol, why don't MC just go 1-gate FE into 3-gate robo

Such a safe and solid build against everything...

Instead MC goes for something gimmicky (as usual) and is foiled by supernova

Because he wanted to bust him or atleast pressure heavy.

eonDE

Canada371 Posts

January 10 2012 10:37 GMT

#1803

god dammit..

Seraphone

United Kingdom1219 Posts

January 10 2012 10:37 GMT

#1804

Well it wouldn't be MC if he didn't take a load of risks.

Alvis

876 Posts

January 10 2012 10:37 GMT

#1805

I think supernova is also surprised that MC did not build a robo.

Swink

Australia26 Posts

January 10 2012 10:38 GMT

#1806

mmm not a fan of 4gate PvT these days ... although he did get fooled into it from supernova's nice strat

Scarecrow

Korea (South)9172 Posts

January 10 2012 10:38 GMT

#1807

On January 10 2012 19:37 PredY wrote:
YES! loved this game. protoss thinking he can blind counter

Fortunately 111 blind counters everything

deathzz

669 Posts

January 10 2012 10:38 GMT

#1808

supernova n puma bff?

Utaheka

Denmark124 Posts

January 10 2012 10:38 GMT

#1809

SuperNoVa has to be the best all-iner in the world. - GIve him a reward......................

rebuffering

Canada2436 Posts

January 10 2012 10:38 GMT

#1810

well MC if you want to gamble, this is what happens, getting a robo is necessarry, yes there was a bunker in good position, but cman this was the last game of the set, you should probably play it safe.

architecture

United States643 Posts

January 10 2012 10:38 GMT

#1811

This isn't some incredible mindgame this has been done a number of times before in GSL. You cannot make this assumption, he should have sacced a stalker to confirm.

dubRa

2165 Posts

January 10 2012 10:38 GMT

#1812

On January 10 2012 19:36 Pandemona wrote:
We call that a BO loss

poor MC

That was a brilliant deceiving play rather.

Jigsetcza

United States118 Posts

January 10 2012 10:38 GMT

#1813

I play terran and that series sucked.

DrPandaPhD

5188 Posts

January 10 2012 10:38 GMT

#1814

Hoping for Leenock to take this match and advance

MetalLobster

Canada532 Posts

January 10 2012 10:38 GMT

#1815

I knew supernova couldn't win without using 1/1/1

Azzur

Australia6260 Posts

January 10 2012 10:38 GMT

#1816

On January 10 2012 19:37 MuseMike wrote:

Show nested quote +

You can't 3 gate robo every game.

Oz goes 3-gate robo almost every game.

WigglingSquid

5194 Posts

January 10 2012 10:38 GMT

#1817

Terran early game was always perplexing me about cloaking and detection, and this is a good example of my reasons. It makes for very boring BO losses against every race which needs tech to detect... every one but Terran.

Nocteo

Belgium799 Posts

January 10 2012 10:38 GMT

#1818

On January 10 2012 19:37 CortoMontez wrote:
How exactly can you know what a terran is doing... they are unscoutable!

I heard observers do quite a good job scouting.

Seraphone

United Kingdom1219 Posts

January 10 2012 10:38 GMT

#1819

On January 10 2012 19:37 MuseMike wrote:

Show nested quote +