|
fake bunker at nat and ninja 2nd gas. guess you just have to robo 100% of the time. thanks for telling us how to play blizz  oh well. i'm fine with that; i think robo openers are just necessary and will be in pvt as a mainstay forever.. i mean what builds do you just lose to if you DO get a robo? outside of 4 rax all in that you don't see, i can't think of one. be safe, protosses :p
|
On January 10 2012 19:36 Azzur wrote: Lol, why don't MC just go 1-gate FE into 3-gate robo
Such a safe and solid build against everything...
Instead MC goes for something gimmicky (as usual) and is foiled by supernova
Because he wanted to bust him or atleast pressure heavy.
|
|
On January 10 2012 19:36 Azzur wrote: Lol, why don't MC just go 1-gate FE into 3-gate robo
Such a safe and solid build against everything...
Instead MC goes for something gimmicky (as usual) and is foiled by supernova
Well it wouldn't be MC if he didn't take a load of risks.
|
I think supernova is also surprised that MC did not build a robo.
|
mmm not a fan of 4gate PvT these days ... although he did get fooled into it from supernova's nice strat
|
On January 10 2012 19:37 PredY wrote: YES! loved this game. protoss thinking he can blind counter Fortunately 111 blind counters everything
|
|
SuperNoVa has to be the best all-iner in the world. - GIve him a reward......................
|
well MC if you want to gamble, this is what happens, getting a robo is necessarry, yes there was a bunker in good position, but cman this was the last game of the set, you should probably play it safe.
|
This isn't some incredible mindgame this has been done a number of times before in GSL. You cannot make this assumption, he should have sacced a stalker to confirm.
|
On January 10 2012 19:36 Pandemona wrote:We call that a BO loss  poor MC
That was a brilliant deceiving play rather.
|
I play terran and that series sucked.
|
Hoping for Leenock to take this match and advance
|
I knew supernova couldn't win without using 1/1/1
|
On January 10 2012 19:37 MuseMike wrote:Show nested quote +On January 10 2012 19:36 Azzur wrote: Lol, why don't MC just go 1-gate FE into 3-gate robo
Such a safe and solid build against everything... You can't 3 gate robo every game. Oz goes 3-gate robo almost every game.
|
Terran early game was always perplexing me about cloaking and detection, and this is a good example of my reasons. It makes for very boring BO losses against every race which needs tech to detect... every one but Terran.
|
On January 10 2012 19:37 CortoMontez wrote: How exactly can you know what a terran is doing... they are unscoutable!
I heard observers do quite a good job scouting.
|
On January 10 2012 19:37 MuseMike wrote:Show nested quote +On January 10 2012 19:36 Azzur wrote: Lol, why don't MC just go 1-gate FE into 3-gate robo
Such a safe and solid build against everything... You can't 3 gate robo every game.
Why not?
|
I love watching these replays, sick production from Gom. <3
|
|
|
|