|
Here we go again. This weekend is about good games and good fun. Don't rain on that parade. Play nice guys. Here's the very standard and friendly:
- NO Balance Whine.
- NO Player Bashing.
- NO Caster Bashing.
- NO BM whatsoever.
Breaking these rules (from pg 166 forward) will be met with severe punishment. |
I'm on team leenock... gooo leeenockk show the power of youth!
|
Leenok is blowing my mind today. I don't remember him being this good when I've seen him on the GSL.
|
DRGGGGGGG vs Leenockkkkkk
Poll: Recommend Game 4?Yes (20) 83% No (2) 8% If you have time (2) 8% 24 total votes Your vote: Recommend Game 4? (Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
|
On November 21 2011 09:08 Sandermatt wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2011 09:06 SinTio wrote:On November 21 2011 09:04 diophan wrote:On November 21 2011 09:02 SinTio wrote:On November 21 2011 09:01 SolidMoose wrote:On November 21 2011 09:00 Silidons wrote:On November 21 2011 08:59 MLG-Kyle wrote:
Let me clear up the situations here (Quote so this gets viewed):
If DRG wins, Naniwa is up 2-0 in a best of 7
If Leenock wins, they play a best of 3 series. If Naniwa wins, he wins the championship. If Leenock wins the best of 3, it is extended to a best of 7 (taking the first best of 3 into account), winner take all. mlg is a joke. so every single mlg the finals are going to be unbalanced because whoever came from the winner bracket has a way easier chance. rofl He doesn't know what he's talking about. It's two separate BO3's if Leenock wins No it is not. http://pro.majorleaguegaming.com/competitions/25#event_54_competition_format What? You linked something that says exactly if Leenock is in the finals there are 2 BO3s. "If the Player who came from the Championship Bracket Losers Bracket wins the initial Match, the Match will expand to a Best of 7, include the initial Match, and pick up where that Match left off. For example, if the Championship Bracket Losers Bracket Player beat the Championship Bracket Winners Bracket Player 2 Games to 0 in the initial Match, the Best of 7 will resume with Game 3 and the Championship Bracket Losers Bracket Player leading 2 Games to 0. " This is NOT two Bo3's. This is a Bo3 that can expand into a Bo7. So if DRG wins, Naniwa has a better chance to win the tournament, If Lennock wins he has a code S spot.
Yes, but the extra chance is just based on 1 more game.
|
just noticed Haypro placed 7th and went through Nestea and took a game off MVP
holy shit
|
Red stream lagging for anyone else?
|
dat "more cheeks = more skills"
agreed.
|
and now please an epic ZvZ until broodlords are out! XD
|
On November 21 2011 09:04 diophan wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2011 09:02 SinTio wrote:On November 21 2011 09:01 SolidMoose wrote:On November 21 2011 09:00 Silidons wrote:On November 21 2011 08:59 MLG-Kyle wrote:
Let me clear up the situations here (Quote so this gets viewed):
If DRG wins, Naniwa is up 2-0 in a best of 7
If Leenock wins, they play a best of 3 series. If Naniwa wins, he wins the championship. If Leenock wins the best of 3, it is extended to a best of 7 (taking the first best of 3 into account), winner take all. mlg is a joke. so every single mlg the finals are going to be unbalanced because whoever came from the winner bracket has a way easier chance. rofl He doesn't know what he's talking about. It's two separate BO3's if Leenock wins No it is not. http://pro.majorleaguegaming.com/competitions/25#event_54_competition_format What? You linked something that says exactly if Leenock is in the finals there are 2 BO3s.
Uhm, no? "If the Player who came from the Championship Bracket Losers Bracket wins the initial Match, the Match will expand to a Best of 7, include the initial Match, and pick up where that Match left off."
|
On November 21 2011 09:07 Bengui wrote:I might be in the minority, but I love to watch/play ling/banelings micro 
I like watching it a lot more than playing haha, the intense micro can be so stressful... One misclick and the game ends :[
|
On November 21 2011 09:08 Zalithian wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2011 09:06 Diamond wrote:On November 21 2011 09:02 Zalithian wrote:On November 21 2011 08:57 diophan wrote:On November 21 2011 08:56 hifriend wrote:On November 21 2011 08:55 Diamond wrote:On November 21 2011 08:52 Noktix wrote:On November 21 2011 08:50 Serpico wrote:On November 21 2011 08:49 Eufouria wrote:On November 21 2011 08:45 StarStruck wrote:
[quote]
Only 750 more and like I said earlier he doesn't need the money and he only cares about winning.
The difference between 1 spot means very little to him. $750 is more money than he's won at most MLG events this season. And it's irrelevant because players like him and huk make most of their money off their contracts. It is getting paid $750 to win 2 games. There really is no excuse to not play that - I don't care who you are. No pro player is at the point where they should turn that down. Seems that should be a decision left to him and his management. yeah this is kind of ridiculous, he should be able to freely pick which matches he decide to play -_- would have loved to see haypro vs idra though, if they would have even casted it They never cast the consolation matches... so I have no idea why everyone is up in arms. If he doesn't want to potentially win the money leave him alone cause it doesn't affect what you get to see at all. I think everyone is missing the point. Idra is essentially saying 30-40 minutes isn't worth $750 dollars to him. It's his job to play video games. He signed up for MLG Providence, is scheduled to play and is choosing not to. That's pretty spoiled if you ask me. But I guess it's not a surprise, considering he asks for $300+ per hour of coaching. He's free to play or not play in whatever games his team will let him, but that doesn't mean refusing to play isn't ungrateful/spoiled. Again, isn't this a decision that should be left to he player and his management? How is that an appropriate response? Of course it's his and his teams decision, but I see nothing wrong with feeling it's ungrateful, bad mannered, and acting spoiled. People are of course free to disagree. I have my opinion, others have theirs. I would think most people would be slightly bothered by someone implying $750 for an hour isn't worth their time, but hey, everyone's different.
How is it spoiled anyway? He can afford not to play it, and it's none of our business. The only person he has to thank for affording not to play that game is himself.
|
On November 21 2011 09:09 red4ce wrote:
$10,000 ZvZ coming up holy shit.
Fastest 10k ever 
So tense
|
On November 21 2011 09:02 SinTio wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2011 09:01 SolidMoose wrote:On November 21 2011 09:00 Silidons wrote:On November 21 2011 08:59 MLG-Kyle wrote:
Let me clear up the situations here (Quote so this gets viewed):
If DRG wins, Naniwa is up 2-0 in a best of 7
If Leenock wins, they play a best of 3 series. If Naniwa wins, he wins the championship. If Leenock wins the best of 3, it is extended to a best of 7 (taking the first best of 3 into account), winner take all. mlg is a joke. so every single mlg the finals are going to be unbalanced because whoever came from the winner bracket has a way easier chance. rofl He doesn't know what he's talking about. It's two separate BO3's if Leenock wins No it is not. http://pro.majorleaguegaming.com/competitions/25#event_54_competition_format
1. If the Players scheduled to play each other in the Finals have not yet played against each other in the Event, an initial Match must be played. (BO3)
2. If the Player who came from the Championship Bracket Winners Bracket wins the initial Match, they will win the Event.
3. If the Player who came from the Championship Bracket Losers Bracket wins the initial Match, the Match will expand to a Best of 7, include the initial Match, and pick up where that Match left off.
So what does this mean? If Naniwa wins 2 out of 3 first games he has won.
If Leenock wins 2 out of 3 first games it is from then a normal BO7 (First to 4 wins) with Leenock in the lead by two games.
So Naniwa has an advantage at first, but if he does not take it early on, he is actually behind but still has a shot at it.
Kind of an interesting system in my opinion
|
On November 21 2011 09:09 TemplarCo. wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2011 09:08 Sandermatt wrote:On November 21 2011 09:06 SinTio wrote:On November 21 2011 09:04 diophan wrote:On November 21 2011 09:02 SinTio wrote:On November 21 2011 09:01 SolidMoose wrote:On November 21 2011 09:00 Silidons wrote:On November 21 2011 08:59 MLG-Kyle wrote:
Let me clear up the situations here (Quote so this gets viewed):
If DRG wins, Naniwa is up 2-0 in a best of 7
If Leenock wins, they play a best of 3 series. If Naniwa wins, he wins the championship. If Leenock wins the best of 3, it is extended to a best of 7 (taking the first best of 3 into account), winner take all. mlg is a joke. so every single mlg the finals are going to be unbalanced because whoever came from the winner bracket has a way easier chance. rofl He doesn't know what he's talking about. It's two separate BO3's if Leenock wins No it is not. http://pro.majorleaguegaming.com/competitions/25#event_54_competition_format What? You linked something that says exactly if Leenock is in the finals there are 2 BO3s. "If the Player who came from the Championship Bracket Losers Bracket wins the initial Match, the Match will expand to a Best of 7, include the initial Match, and pick up where that Match left off. For example, if the Championship Bracket Losers Bracket Player beat the Championship Bracket Winners Bracket Player 2 Games to 0 in the initial Match, the Best of 7 will resume with Game 3 and the Championship Bracket Losers Bracket Player leading 2 Games to 0. " This is NOT two Bo3's. This is a Bo3 that can expand into a Bo7. So if DRG wins, Naniwa has a better chance to win the tournament, If Lennock wins he has a code S spot. Leenock is in the Ro8 in Code S...
he was talking about naniwa i think
|
GOGO Leenock! You can do it! :D
|
United States97277 Posts
On November 21 2011 09:09 Lunares wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2011 09:08 Sandermatt wrote:On November 21 2011 09:06 SinTio wrote:On November 21 2011 09:04 diophan wrote:On November 21 2011 09:02 SinTio wrote:On November 21 2011 09:01 SolidMoose wrote:On November 21 2011 09:00 Silidons wrote:On November 21 2011 08:59 MLG-Kyle wrote:
Let me clear up the situations here (Quote so this gets viewed):
If DRG wins, Naniwa is up 2-0 in a best of 7
If Leenock wins, they play a best of 3 series. If Naniwa wins, he wins the championship. If Leenock wins the best of 3, it is extended to a best of 7 (taking the first best of 3 into account), winner take all. mlg is a joke. so every single mlg the finals are going to be unbalanced because whoever came from the winner bracket has a way easier chance. rofl He doesn't know what he's talking about. It's two separate BO3's if Leenock wins No it is not. http://pro.majorleaguegaming.com/competitions/25#event_54_competition_format What? You linked something that says exactly if Leenock is in the finals there are 2 BO3s. "If the Player who came from the Championship Bracket Losers Bracket wins the initial Match, the Match will expand to a Best of 7, include the initial Match, and pick up where that Match left off. For example, if the Championship Bracket Losers Bracket Player beat the Championship Bracket Winners Bracket Player 2 Games to 0 in the initial Match, the Best of 7 will resume with Game 3 and the Championship Bracket Losers Bracket Player leading 2 Games to 0. " This is NOT two Bo3's. This is a Bo3 that can expand into a Bo7. So if DRG wins, Naniwa has a better chance to win the tournament, If Lennock wins he has a code S spot. Leenock already has a Code S spot guaranteed for next season as he is in the Ro8 of Code S this season as the only zerg.
He was naming consequences for Naniwa. If Leenock wins Naniwa gets his code S spot. Pronoun confusion
|
|
|
ZvZ looks pathetic at most tournaments, but at this one its as refined as tvt.
Dear kerrigan, let leenock win.
Please.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37120 Posts
DRG COME ON!!! U GOT THIS!!!!
On the other hand: Leenock, you also deserve this win so
HWAITING!!!
|
On November 21 2011 09:08 fezvez wrote:
PvP or ZvZ as worse mirror matchup?
Come on, here, the early aggression always paid off =/
Baneling wars feels more boring than 4 gate wars imo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
