EPT[1500$] SC2 Edmonton Open Nov 26-27th - Page 9
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
tQArchaic
Canada79 Posts
| ||
|
SaroVati
Canada280 Posts
 sigh that makes me sad.A question, if not all 64 people participate / register, is the prize pool still the same? Because only 30ish people need to register to create this current prize pool if I'm not mistaken, so I'm just wondering for that  | ||
|
KingDime
Canada750 Posts
| ||
|
Zoogtar
Canada21 Posts
| ||
|
Filsby
Canada12 Posts
Also I have to agree about the map pool. For the biggest tournament in Alberta I would have thought the map pool would have been more in conformity to other current tournaments, but hey always nice to see new maps. Maybe next tournament Ill come play. GL to all! | ||
|
prodiG
Canada2016 Posts
On November 26 2011 13:03 SaroVati wrote: So if we can't pay via paypal, we just have to pay $45 at the door...? sigh that makes me sad.A question, if not all 64 people participate / register, is the prize pool still the same? Because only 30ish people need to register to create this current prize pool if I'm not mistaken, so I'm just wondering for that You could have pre-registered at OverKlocked in person. (I say could have because the event is tomorrow). I mentioned to Tim that I don't think this was advertised enough and I'll bring it up with Mitch as well The prize pool remains the same regardless of entrants. On November 24 2011 17:28 chadissilent wrote: Where are these replays that Diamond promised us over 2 weeks ago? I'm harassing him about them, he's been busy with a lot of other stuff  edit" Replays here (More recent packs will feature Ithaca, Sandshorn Mist AE and Sungsu Crossing AE | ||
|
s[O]rry
Canada398 Posts
| ||
|
Kmickelow
Canada106 Posts
| ||
|
prodiG
Canada2016 Posts
On November 27 2011 01:43 Kmickelow wrote: Good luck people. Will there be online live brackets, usually its so hard to find live results/brackets for these tournaments-thanks They'll be up on challonge asap as far as i know | ||
|
Kmickelow
Canada106 Posts
| ||
|
CanucksJC
Canada1241 Posts
On November 26 2011 18:16 prodiG wrote: The prize pool remains the same regardless of entrants. I'm not from Edmonton or anything, but how does this make sense? So if only 16 people joined that's $640 from registration fees. $860 is coming from your own pocket in that case? What if all 64 joined with $45 late fees? That's $2880. Where would the entire $1330 go? That's a pretty big difference in prize pool depending on number of people showing up and I think you should be more transparent about it. | ||
|
Kmickelow
Canada106 Posts
| ||
|
VforValdes
Canada96 Posts
| ||
|
prodiG
Canada2016 Posts
| ||
|
Diamond
United States10796 Posts
On November 27 2011 08:40 CanucksJC wrote: I'm not from Edmonton or anything, but how does this make sense? So if only 16 people joined that's $640 from registration fees. $860 is coming from your own pocket in that case? What if all 64 joined with $45 late fees? That's $2880. Where would the entire $1330 go? That's a pretty big difference in prize pool depending on number of people showing up and I think you should be more transparent about it. Why on earth does it need to be explained? Do we sit there and add up the costs of MLG and demand to know where they are making money? | ||
|
Chairman Ray
United States11903 Posts
#1 - Dime #2 - tQdrOne (aka tQSelfMannerPool) #3 - tQarchaic | ||
|
ander
Canada403 Posts
On November 27 2011 17:03 Chairman Ray wrote: Predictions: #1 - Dime #2 - tQdrOne (aka tQSelfMannerPool) #3 - tQarchaic challenge accepted | ||
|
CanucksJC
Canada1241 Posts
On November 27 2011 17:01 Diamond wrote: Why on earth does it need to be explained? Do we sit there and add up the costs of MLG and demand to know where they are making money? Oh I'm sorry, I didn't realize your tournament was as grand as MLG, my apologies. As a local organizer myself, I just thought it was important to show the players exactly how their money was being spent. But really, instead of making adjustments to people complaining, all you have done here is just brute force your decisions. Look at all the 9 pages worth of complaints, and it clearly shows in the number of people that showed up. I raised up a question, because clearly, the entire 64 players did not show up, so did the organizer magically take out some $800 and give out to the players? | ||
|
Diamond
United States10796 Posts
On November 27 2011 18:57 CanucksJC wrote: Oh I'm sorry, I didn't realize your tournament was as grand as MLG, my apologies. As a local organizer myself, I just thought it was important to show the players exactly how their money was being spent. But really, instead of making adjustments to people complaining, all you have done here is just brute force your decisions. Look at all the 9 pages worth of complaints, and it clearly shows in the number of people that showed up. I raised up a question, because clearly, the entire 64 players did not show up, so did the organizer magically take out some $800 and give out to the players? Uh this is not my tournament...... Also, businesses sometimes lose money while trying to make money, sometimes they come out ahead, it's called risk. This isn't a new concept. | ||
|
prodiG
Canada2016 Posts
On November 27 2011 19:15 Diamond wrote: Uh this is not my tournament...... Also, businesses sometimes lose money while trying to make money, sometimes they come out ahead, it's called risk. This isn't a new concept. Short answer to your question is yes. | ||
| ||
