| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Samahoj
Sweden109 Posts
On November 11 2011 11:08 archonOOid wrote: if you loose first 2 games in the final why must you win the next four? Where is the winner bracket advantage? Extended series... naniwa needs to win two series, white-ra only has to win one its only extended if they've met before dont pay attention to this, i was wrong | ||
|
OminouS
Sweden1343 Posts
On November 11 2011 11:11 Samahoj wrote: naniwa needs to win two series, white-ra only has to win one its only extended if they've met before Thats not what JP said though, and score says 2-0 indicating that it's a extended series instead of a second Bo3. I've always thougth it was 2xBo3 in the finals, but apparently not. | ||
|
Samahoj
Sweden109 Posts
nvm | ||
|
Nimic
Norway1360 Posts
| ||
|
SafeAsCheese
United States4924 Posts
Is it forienger vs korean? | ||
|
Nimic
Norway1360 Posts
| ||
|
lxanderl
United States629 Posts
| ||
|
ypslala
Burma545 Posts
| ||
|
Gamegene
United States8308 Posts
| ||
|
LlamaNamedOsama
United States1900 Posts
| ||
|
OminouS
Sweden1343 Posts
On November 11 2011 11:30 LlamaNamedOsama wrote: In the base trade, why didn't Naniwa build a forge and then cannon instead of the cyber core? He only had 115 minerals left after the core, same value as a forge. | ||
Adebisi
Canada1637 Posts
On November 11 2011 11:30 LlamaNamedOsama wrote: In the base trade, why didn't Naniwa build a forge and then cannon instead of the cyber core? Don't think he had 300 minerals in total. | ||
|
Wherewolf
United States353 Posts
| ||
|
Yonnua
United Kingdom2331 Posts
| ||
|
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
| ||
|
Gamegene
United States8308 Posts
| ||
|
Dakure
United States513 Posts
On November 11 2011 10:45 Telcontar wrote: I want all strats to be viable, like TvT is right now. PvP is still way too 1-basey. I think that's just how Protoss is supposed to be. For example, Zerg has the capability to expand quickly, and loosely speaking, an n + 1 base Zerg is about as strong as a n base Protoss or Terran. This translates into having weak low base strategies. Terran doesn't expand as quickly as Zerg but generally expands faster than Protoss. In TvZ, I think it's fair to accept that a lower base Terran is as strong as a slightly more base Zerg (maybe one more base, not necessarily fully saturated). I don't know PvT as well but save the 1-1-1 all in, Terran seems to need the extra bases for the army to keep up with the Protoss army. Protoss is a race that's slow to expand. But it must compete somehow, right? They're just stronger off less bases. These differences might be bases on mobility and the way each race constructs their town hall (300 mins for Zerg, 400 for Terran but it can float, 400 for Protoss but must be built at site.) Thus, I'm okay with Protoss being strong off one base/fewer bases. Though it's annoying on small maps. | ||
|
OminouS
Sweden1343 Posts
| ||
|
Alpino
Brazil4390 Posts
| ||
|
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
OSC
GSL
Monday Night Weeklies
Replay Cast
WardiTV Weekly
The PondCast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
