EPT[GSL] Super Tourney ro64 D4 - Page 59
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Further balance whining will result in severe bans. Time stamp 21:09 KST. | ||
|
asperger
Sweden1310 Posts
| ||
|
Carson
Canada820 Posts
On May 26 2011 20:07 BuzZoo wrote: HAHA Marty and Borg are so right. FD looks so high. Wolf: "look at him, he looks.... stressed" He needs to get some of his "medication" before he plays! | ||
|
Yaotzin
South Africa4280 Posts
On May 26 2011 20:06 Tachion wrote: It always baffles me how a Terran can possibly lose a game where they kill the Zerg's FE. Reminds me of Jinro's games almost. I mean he had his expansion mining before the Zerg even started to remake his nat hatch. It puts the Zerg so retardedly behind that the Terran basically has to try to lose from that position. That kind of heavy and early pressure cuts a lot of scvs. Zergs always seem to overreact to it, they aren't nearly as behind as they think, unless they lose tons of drones + their nat. Losing only the nat is ok. | ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/ojjwy.jpg) VS ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/9Lfsa.jpg) | ||
|
doffe
Sweden636 Posts
On May 26 2011 20:08 FarbrorAbavna wrote: I'm hoping for another epic "I just got up from bed after being drunk all day yesterday"-look from fruitdealer hahahahahahaha that sooo sums up how he looks... Im actually worried for him when I see him sometimes... he soo looks lika some sort of addict. | ||
|
Eppa!
Sweden4641 Posts
On May 26 2011 20:05 doffe wrote: Marines vs banelings most certinly gives the micro requirement to the marines. Although I dont know if thats something that is positive for the zerg since with players getting better their marines will get more and more cost effecient against banelings and there is not much a zerg can do about it but avoid attacking. Reacting to a marinesplit by splitting your banelings is more or less impossible unless you have 1000apm and 0.000001s reaction time with perfect precision Quite a few pros do it, hell Morrow does"scoot and shoot" micro with slowlings. Blings are easier to split than marines. | ||
|
Taf the Ghost
United States11751 Posts
| ||
|
Ayush_SCtoss
India3051 Posts
| ||
|
habeck
1120 Posts
| ||
Fionn
United States23455 Posts
He looks high and/or drunk. | ||
|
dirtydrunk
Northern Ireland109 Posts
| ||
|
Zuor
Finland377 Posts
| ||
|
Monolithic-
United States83 Posts
 | ||
|
Goibon
New Zealand8185 Posts
| ||
|
Grettin
42411 Posts
| ||
|
ifonlyiwereawsum
United States484 Posts
On May 26 2011 20:09 MrCon wrote: Ok, fruitdealer will lose, he had a party all night that is still going on as far as he is concerned >< VS Fixed. | ||
|
Poopi
France13011 Posts
On May 26 2011 20:06 FuzzyJAM wrote: So NesTea plays Bomber to get to the Ro16 while HongUn plays Revival. Bahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Poor NesTea, Bomber has a bad seed cuz it's his first time appearance. | ||
|
skullhoof
Korea (North)835 Posts
| ||
|
pyro19
6575 Posts
| ||
|
fant0m
964 Posts
On May 26 2011 20:01 Highways wrote: Am I the only one that reckons zerg requires no micro? Terran has to work their ass off to marine spilt, target banes and not get surrounded by lings. While zerg is just a-moving their blings? I mean a-move will make the lings auto surround as well. Dunno, not impressed with revival, it was ensnare doing all the micro moves while zerg was attack moving the whole game. Did you see how badly he fared in most fights when he did that? Listen to the casters, they were complaining about his micro all game. He could have closed out that game about 10 times if he'd just used even a grain of micro. In the first game he A-moved lings, but the mutas were targeting the right stuff (BCs), brood lords were hanging back in the right places, banelings actually landed on marines as much as they could, and fungals hit everything they could reach. None of those happen without micro... and you only have about 2 seconds of your army actually being alive when you play vs. siege tanks as Z anyway. | ||
| ||
