[GSL May] Code S Semifinals - Page 62
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
TYJ.Aoy
Brazil1265 Posts
| ||
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
I think he should watch the MSL ro16 tonight. | ||
Mailing
United States3087 Posts
On May 07 2011 15:10 SoLaR[i.C] wrote: Those units don't come out of barracks. Factories aren't exactly easy to mass when you've got 5+ barracks. Funny. Inca was able to get 6 gateways, as well as twilight and templar. I guess 2 factories is just to much for broke terrans. Their units cost so much. | ||
Haydin
United States1481 Posts
On May 07 2011 15:03 sang wrote: all-in cheesing is not out-playing. its simply a by product of preparing and executing inca did not out-macro nada in the last game. nada tried to snipe the third nexus and got too greedy. had he not been so aggressive, nada would have steamrolled inca as he was going up to 4 bases and had better upgrades. Responding to a million sentries and fast HT tech with ghosts when you already have a ton of tech lab'd barracks is also a good idea. Inca's cheese game 1 looked perfectly tailored to Nada's build, so I think we can assume it was prepared as a counter to Nada himself. Game 2, Nada lost a reaper without getting any information out of it. Game 3 also saw nada fly his first drop over the xel'naga tower in front of inca's base. That is kind of a bad idea. And inca was ahead of Nada in upgrades. Nada was about to be even with him had he survived a little longer. Inca played to his opponent perfectly, and Nada, despite his superior macro, made a ton of mistakes. If inca doesn't deserve to be in the finals, can you really say after those games that Nada did? If SC and Nada's places on the brackets were switched, and it was SC playing like that, would you really be singing the same tune? | ||
GriNn
United States243 Posts
| ||
HolyArrow
United States7116 Posts
On May 07 2011 15:10 ShallNoiseUpon wrote: hilarious how many people would rather watch games for entertainment than be frothing at the mouth about winning and money. http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=211978 Read it and gain wisdom. | ||
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 07 2011 15:10 Dantat wrote: Poor GOM.. Probably last half the viewership for the finals once Inca won. Will lose 90% if Sc gets to the finals as well. If you really think that, I feel sorry for you. | ||
mikyaJ
1834 Posts
On May 07 2011 15:11 On_Slaught wrote: Artosis saying nestea is the smartest zerg you will find ever. I think he should watch the MSL ro16 tonight. Savior was smarter. | ||
Azurues
Malaysia5612 Posts
| ||
LightWireEX
United States387 Posts
On May 07 2011 15:11 On_Slaught wrote: Artosis saying nestea is the smartest zerg you will find ever. I think he should watch the MSL ro16 tonight. this is starcraft 2 forum. this is starcraft 2 event. chill. | ||
Midgetman101
United States825 Posts
On May 07 2011 15:10 MatiNO wrote: lol whats with all the inca hate? tl trolls be ashame of yourselfs winning is winning remember that .. But you have to understand from a spectator stand point, Inca is trash. His cheese is boring, we want epic games as spectators not one base allins | ||
meep
United States1699 Posts
On May 07 2011 15:11 TYJ.Aoy wrote: Inca is a fluke that will fade into oblivion , NaDa has been one of the most consistent sc2 players, a single bo5 won through mass mozzarella won't change who the better player is. Just another Rain. pretty much | ||
doihy
668 Posts
On May 07 2011 15:10 ampson wrote: Well lets see, theres: MMM+ghosts Thor+hellion Tank+hellion Banshee opening instawins if he has no forge. There are plenty of ways to deal with that comp, NaDa just didn't do any of them. 1rst game, it seems nada was going mech. Then nada was discouraged because all-ins against teching are pretty good.l | ||
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
On May 07 2011 15:11 Monoamine wrote: How come everyone hates sC? Because he bunker rushes zerg players from time to time? Because no one realize how underrated he is. And because of his games against Losira. Over here on TL, if you beat a heavy fan favorite in a game which is less than 10 minutes, you are automatically hated on. | ||
Goibon
New Zealand8185 Posts
| ||
KonohaFlash
Canada1590 Posts
On May 07 2011 15:10 ampson wrote: Well lets see, theres: MMM+ghosts Thor+hellion Tank+hellion Banshee opening instawins if he has no forge. There are plenty of ways to deal with that comp, NaDa just didn't do any of them. This is what happens when someone who doesn't play terran makes a post on terran unit compositions. Thor+Hellion? LOL Tank+Hellion? LOL | ||
Pajegetc
United States3158 Posts
Then we feel sorry for you? | ||
SniXSniPe
United States1938 Posts
On May 07 2011 15:07 Resilient wrote: Please explain to me how Nada played better than Inca. All I saw was his Marauders running into 3 storms in a row, killing at least 10 of them @ the Nexus snipe attempt. Other than that Nada was barely ahead all game due to a failed Stargate attempt. Nada was about 30 supply ahead of Inca during the Nexus snipe. He didn't lost either medivac which was good, and still saved some units. Sniping that Nexus slows down Inca's economy for a decent amount of time definitely making it worth it. Please tell me how placing storms/using guardian shield is outplaying someone? The only reason why Inca won was because Nada did not even bother to get proper counters to Inca's unit composition. Huge error that cost him the game but still, his macro and micro was much more impressive. Nada had great macro, and micro as good as he could at that time (and he did a good job). I saw him pulling back units at multiple points at storm. It wasn't perfect, but I'll be damn if he didn't play well still. | ||
dragonblade369
Canada464 Posts
On May 07 2011 15:10 Dantat wrote: Poor GOM.. Probably last half the viewership for the finals once Inca won. Will lose 90% if Sc gets to the finals as well. God... This is going to be the last time I'm reading a LR thread. It feels that my IQ dropped by at least 50 since I started reading all the retarded posts here. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
| ||