|
On March 09 2011 19:12 mr_tolkien wrote: I don't get how you can be «lucky» in a game with near 0 randomisation and on a move your opponent was aware of...
You contest that "build order wins" don't exist?
|
Such a bad day for the GSL, tbh... It was over in an hour. IMO, that's just really sad.
I'm not really liking the fact that majority of the series in the GSL have been one-sided, either, with a TON of 2-0 wins, though that might just be personal preference.
|
Alicia: So that's how it feels to lose to ninja expansion T.T
|
I liked the last serie actualy, refreshing to see a terran win, especialy against a protoss. Sick how the game changed in a month.
|
Hopefully the next matches will be more exciting. GG & GL to the winners though.
|
On March 09 2011 19:13 FarbrorAbavna wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2011 19:12 mr_tolkien wrote: I don't get how you can be «lucky» in a game with near 0 randomisation and on a move your opponent was aware of... it's not lucky but some people just dont wanna realise
Of course Blame luck, blame imbalance Everything but the player
|
On March 09 2011 19:11 hi im new wrote: hows that 'bm' shit bad? it just adds entertainment. think back to gstl losira/st dancing. i lol'd for minutes.
lol yea the in-game antics are great and add entertainment. that dance in the gstl was made even greater since losira would end up losing lol.
|
johnfacts.org: john is lazy on wednesday
|
BOOM some drama right there. It's on now!
|
Nova has more confidence.
|
Losira's interviews are so much better than Supernova's. Supernova doesn't seem to have any passion or emotion.
|
I really wish more casters would point out the little tiny details that happen like Artosis.
|
On March 09 2011 19:12 HankScorpio wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2011 19:09 danielsan wrote:On March 09 2011 19:05 HankScorpio wrote:On March 09 2011 19:04 Maskedsatyr wrote: Supernova clearly the better player Strongly disagree. Alicia out thought Supernova in both games. OGS won game 1 because he got lucky with the build order (Raven vs DT), and won game 2 because when they traded workers, the terran just built mules. yeah, he built mules from his extra, fully saturated 3rd. lol The banshee did not kill as many workers as the toss push did. Also, the toss push killed quite a few structures. It's true that terran had more workers left due to the 3rd base, but in a worker trade off, the mules will win every game for the terran, which is what happened. watch the game again. and stop crying about mules.
|
On March 09 2011 19:14 HankScorpio wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2011 19:12 mr_tolkien wrote: I don't get how you can be «lucky» in a game with near 0 randomisation and on a move your opponent was aware of... You contest that "build order wins" don't exist? Ofc they do, but when you choose a tech path even with alot of information it's hardly luck based. The player makes a choice based on what he sees and if he does the wrong one, it'll backfire.
Then noobs will come to forums and say "it was a buildorder loss, Terran got lucky!".
|
Kinda sad that so little people watched the semis.
|
Build order wins are usually luck. Last GSL, MVP demolished MC because he went for DT's. Does that suggest that MVP is far superior, or that luck was simply in play.
Mules winning the game in a worker tradeoff isn't a racial imbalance, it's simply a perk that terran has, which allows them to recover from base trade/near base trade far better than the other two races.
It's merely something that's ignored when unit comparisons are done.
|
No results update/recommended games in the OP? :/
|
I think Alicia's game plan in game 1 was to use DTs to keep terran contained while he cashed in on the gold minerals, bad decision i think since he saw the banshee which meant that a raven could be easily made to counter DTs =/.
Game 2 was just a bit of overconfidence, at that point he didn't even have resources to keep his warpgates pumping because his probes were dropping so fast. If he had waited a bit in the natural of Supernova and warped in stalkers to defend his own base, i think he coulda had the game in the bag. But losing all his probes resulted into turning the push into an all in with almost no reinforcements.
On the other hand, oGs must be happy, they are looking at possibly both their second Code A and Code S championships. Theres a good chance of them taking both golds this season.
|
On March 09 2011 19:17 danielsan wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2011 19:12 HankScorpio wrote:On March 09 2011 19:09 danielsan wrote:On March 09 2011 19:05 HankScorpio wrote:On March 09 2011 19:04 Maskedsatyr wrote: Supernova clearly the better player Strongly disagree. Alicia out thought Supernova in both games. OGS won game 1 because he got lucky with the build order (Raven vs DT), and won game 2 because when they traded workers, the terran just built mules. yeah, he built mules from his extra, fully saturated 3rd. lol The banshee did not kill as many workers as the toss push did. Also, the toss push killed quite a few structures. It's true that terran had more workers left due to the 3rd base, but in a worker trade off, the mules will win every game for the terran, which is what happened. watch the game again. and stop crying about mules. Seriously get over yourself. why must some whiny people have to bring up game balance? Mules didn't win that, SN had a fully mining base and Alicia only had a few probes left, he had twice the supply.
|
Beyonder
Netherlands15103 Posts
What are the results up to now? OP isnt updated
|
|
|
|
|
|