EPTGSL S2 - Offline Qualifiers Day 4 - Page 35
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
koOma
Norway462 Posts
| ||
|
Faraday
United States553 Posts
| ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
http://www.gomtv.net/sc2_teaminvi.php | ||
|
foxmeep
Australia2320 Posts
On October 12 2010 21:35 Kiante wrote: Really? ready to have your mind BLOWN? http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/details.php?section=korean&type=players&id=15&part=games&league=standard#tblt-24-1-default-0-nada Boom 50% vs nada ready for more? http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/details.php?section=korean&type=players&id=15&part=games&league=standard#tblt-24-1-default-0-boxer 100% vs boxer Nada played Zerg in Proleague? Lol. | ||
Kiante
Australia7069 Posts
| ||
|
epik640x
United States1134 Posts
| ||
GTR
51402 Posts
| ||
|
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
| ||
|
Boonbag
France3318 Posts
On October 12 2010 21:35 Kiante wrote: Really? ready to have your mind BLOWN? http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/details.php?section=korean&type=players&id=15&part=games&league=standard#tblt-24-1-default-0-nada Boom 50% vs nada ready for more? http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/details.php?section=korean&type=players&id=15&part=games&league=standard#tblt-24-1-default-0-boxer 100% vs boxer I didn't express myself properly. ITR was a very good player what I meant is I can't imagine a gaming scene where ITR would be more popular than Nada or Boxer, because it is actually very possible as ITR was praised to no end by his fans for his looks and is said to model. I remember him saying he wanted to quit gaming for modeling only... so it's like weird... ah | ||
|
netherDrake
Singapore1831 Posts
On October 12 2010 22:18 Boonbag wrote: I didn't express myself properly. ITR was a very good player what I meant is I can't imagine a gaming scene where ITR would be more popular than Nada or Boxer, because it is actually very possible as ITR was praised to no end by his fans for his looks and is said to model. I remember him saying he wanted to quit gaming for modeling only... so it's like weird... ah Quite alot of sc pros have pretty good looks, from what i've seen so far. | ||
|
AJ-
United States316 Posts
nooo Garimto  | ||
|
Welmu
Finland3295 Posts
| ||
|
Lonyo
United Kingdom3884 Posts
On October 12 2010 22:15 TheBB wrote: 15 Zergs, 20 Protosses and 29 Terrans. Depends on what Apple plays. SOme have said Zerg, which would give +1Z and -1T. Certainly a bit different to the first GSL, with Terran and Protoss basically swapping distribution (since there were more P than T in GSL1). | ||
|
Piski
Finland3461 Posts
 Also didn't somebody on the site already confirmed that Apple played as terran? But maybe it's just more hearsay | ||
|
sleepingdog
Austria6145 Posts
| ||
|
PangO
Chile1870 Posts
Guess NaDa will have to win now. | ||
|
dcberkeley
Canada844 Posts
| ||
|
EIRELEGEND
Ireland26 Posts
| ||
|
InFiNitY[pG]
Germany3468 Posts
Feels to me like they should start seeding the top16, or at least put them in a position where they only have to beat one person to advance. | ||
|
dcemuser
United States3248 Posts
On October 12 2010 23:13 InFiNitY[pG] wrote: so 40 players from last GLS did not qualify this time, out of which 28 lost in the ro64, and another 7 in the ro32. so only 5 players that made ro16 last time didn't qualify for GSL2 (4 if you discount liveforever who didn't attend): Tester, TOP, Lotze and Anypro. Feels to me like they should start seeding the top16, or at least put them in a position where they only have to beat one person to advance. These are the GSL pre-season events. They are designed to set up seeding for the real GSLs starting next year. | ||
| ||
