EPT[HDH2] Invited Players + Open Slots// Pre-Thread - Page 11
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
TT1
Canada10104 Posts
| ||
|
PokePill
United States1048 Posts
| ||
|
stalife
Canada1222 Posts
ThisisJimmy (solid terran player who proved himself through ladders + tournaments) Kiwikaki (I never played this guy, but I hear he's really good. Not sure why he's not up there yet) Moman (very mannered good player) Hashe (from fastest community, but the best from fastest. I'm sure he'll make an impact in sc2. plus he's got the whole fastest community rooting for him :D) EDIT: thank you all suggest me in the HDH2, I hope I get a chance to play in this definitely :D | ||
|
Welmu
Finland3295 Posts
Suggesting to add him to roster... | ||
|
mrgoochio
United States557 Posts
| ||
|
Leviance
Germany4079 Posts
| ||
|
Ouga
Finland645 Posts
Also I don't think regions matter much at all. HDH is big enough tournament for any pro to buy another product. If they had to that is, most have sponsor to do that. | ||
|
pencilcase
United States330 Posts
On July 26 2010 03:20 PokePill wrote: It's a crime if you invite a bunch more North American players over MadFrog, DayFly, and the rest of ogs. So because they don't all know english and don't waste their time on silly tournaments with no prize pools or streaming themselves for attention they should be punished because they don't serve us? It's the same situation as the last HDH, do Husky and HDStarcraft want good players or popular community players? That's up for them to decide. I'd prefer the option that results in better games. Not only that, but given some of the players invited I'm expecting some of the early games to be complete blowouts and walkovers. Naturally these type of games make for a very bad viewing experience. Thus, inviting the best players all around makes for simply better games in the whole tournament for everyone, regardless of how well known the players are. | ||
|
ROOTCatZ
Peru1238 Posts
On July 26 2010 03:20 ReachTheSky wrote: Its fair to you guys since you can choose to play ladder just like EVERYONE else. Your reasons for not choosing to play ladder as frequently...well thats your perogative. But what your saying doesn't actually apply to anything i said. if ladder isn't that hard for you then i guess you should have no problem making top 64 then right? So i'm still not exactly sure what your saying isn't fair..... Anyway The Sky is blue ;P haha XD im saying your idea of choosing people by just merely looking at who's the top 64 ranked players wouldn't be fair to many people. Yes of course it'd be fair in the sense that everyone decides wether they want to play ladder or not. I am not saying ladder is easy by any means, but on average I feel/know i improove more by playing with my team. so yeah, if they announced before the ladder season started that X or Y tournament would invite people based on ladder standings, it'd be fair to everyone. But at this point in time, if they just took your idea and made the top 60 play it'd be unfair to many who have chosen to prepare for tournaments and leagues by other means. XD hope that makes sense. On July 26 2010 03:12 TadH wrote: No one said it would be fair to you. Not everyone deserves to get in based on reputation, or how much they practice with their team. I think the way they are doing this is fine. Let the community decide some spots. I agree with you  i think you misread my post, I too think the way they're doing this works fine. | ||
|
canucks12
Canada812 Posts
The first three are all awesome players, and I just want to see the last two play ^^ | ||
|
trancey_
Germany729 Posts
On July 25 2010 19:32 CrudeClown wrote: PsyStarcraft ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/Zicon_small.png) please. # this | ||
|
ReachTheSky
United States3294 Posts
On July 26 2010 03:38 Ouga wrote: Goody and Madfrog definately should have place in it, solely on ladder performance. 60 spots wouldn't allow best global rankings in - would make no sense. I'm no expert on asian scene, but it'd definately be nice to have at least 10 asians in it. Also I don't think regions matter much at all. HDH is big enough tournament for any pro to buy another product. If they had to that is, most have sponsor to do that. I definitely agree that goody should be allowed in and i've seen/heard good things from Madfrog as well. Globally top 60 would allow the statistically top 60 best players to get in.....how does that not make sense? Everyone has a shot at becoming one as long as you have the drive to put the effort/work into doing so. I agree that more asians should be in it. Looking back from the bw days asians have always been considered the strongest at starcraft so i will like to see more foreigners compete with them. QXC vs IntoTheRainbow was BAAAAALLLLLLLLLEEERRR! if a top XX from global rankings wasn't used i would love to see an X amount of each race and a few random users so we could in a broad general sense how each of the 3 races performed. Yeah i definitely don't think regions would matter much as most people have friend's on other servers and could just borrow someone else's account. If worst came to worst, purchase additional software. | ||
|
Wolf
Korea (South)3290 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/Ricon_small.png | ||
|
GxZ
United States375 Posts
TLO - Random/Terran CatZ - Zerg Day9 - Random Demuslim - Terran Drewbie - Terran IntoTheRainbow - Terran Lucifronn - Terran Morrow - Terran Tester - Toss TT1 - Toss Hope this helps :D Recommend - KiWiKaKi(Toss), Moo(Terran), Attero(Random), MoMaN(zerg), Dimaga(zerg), Check(zerg) | ||
|
ChickenLips
2912 Posts
On July 26 2010 01:06 ChickenLips wrote: ![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/5BbYD.gif) aka UnknownArt, WC3 Undead pro, Top Zerg on the EU servers with a 72.34% winrate over more than 140 games. Totally unknown could make for an absolute surprise. On July 25 2010 20:32 MrKozi wrote: Tarson and UnknownArt On July 25 2010 20:47 Xainon wrote: I'd say MaDFroG,Ensnare,Gerrard,Newlife,Ace,Zenio,And Servyoa(ServaNt),quite unknown but top10 euro player!!! On July 25 2010 22:15 cuppatea wrote: A few players I'd like to see in there: MaDFroG - WC3 legend who ended the SC2 beta top of the Euro ladder. On July 25 2010 22:18 fiskerman wrote: I would love to see the mad frog On July 25 2010 22:32 Hyp-The-Feared wrote: MaDFroG-!!!! On July 25 2010 22:57 Potatisodlaren wrote: Definitely UnknownArt/MaDFroG On July 25 2010 23:15 apm66 wrote: I would absolutely love to see MaDFroG play! He was fav undead wc3 player of all time On July 26 2010 00:02 Rigby wrote: Well like some others allready mentioned i would like to see MaDFroG On July 26 2010 00:10 LokPest wrote: i would realy like to see UnknownArt (MaDFroG) in this tour! On July 25 2010 23:39 valaki wrote: This, he (MaDFroG) has been ripping through the ladder lately. On July 26 2010 01:24 figq wrote: It would make the tourney super epic if such mysterious figures get invited like [...], MaDFroG(aka UnknownArt, currently #1 Phase 2 EU zerg), who have been almost impossible to see play competitively during the Beta. On July 26 2010 01:31 Multis wrote: U just have to invite MaDFroG. This guy has a huge following from his wc3 days, would b really good for publicity. On July 26 2010 01:57 ReachTheSky wrote: MaDFroG On July 26 2010 02:17 arnold(soTa) wrote: my suggestion: MaDFroG On July 26 2010 02:26 Gloop wrote: Invite MaDFroG On July 26 2010 03:09 kilolo wrote: Invite MaDFroG aka Unknownart. He could win the whole thing if he tried. Check his ranking at the end of the beta: Global ranking On July 26 2010 03:20 PokePill wrote: It's a crime if you invite a bunch more North American players over MaDFroG, DayFly, and the rest of ogs. On July 26 2010 03:38 Ouga wrote: Goody and MaDFroG definately should have place in it, solely on ladder performance.. On July 25 2010 19:14 Psyclon wrote: I would really like to see Psy and UnknownArt (MaDFroG)! | ||
|
Wilko
Germany470 Posts
| ||
|
TadH
Canada1846 Posts
On July 26 2010 03:43 CatZ.root wrote: haha XD im saying your idea of choosing people by just merely looking at who's the top 64 ranked players wouldn't be fair to many people. Yes of course it'd be fair in the sense that everyone decides wether they want to play ladder or not. I am not saying ladder is easy by any means, but on average I feel/know i improove more by playing with my team. so yeah, if they announced before the ladder season started that X or Y tournament would invite people based on ladder standings, it'd be fair to everyone. But at this point in time, if they just took your idea and made the top 60 play it'd be unfair to many who have chosen to prepare for tournaments and leagues by other means. XD hope that makes sense. I agree with you i think you misread my post, I too think the way they're doing this works fine.Yeah I did my bad catz | ||
|
ReachTheSky
United States3294 Posts
On July 26 2010 03:43 CatZ.root wrote: haha XD im saying your idea of choosing people by just merely looking at who's the top 64 ranked players wouldn't be fair to many people. Yes of course it'd be fair in the sense that everyone decides wether they want to play ladder or not. I am not saying ladder is easy by any means, but on average I feel/know i improove more by playing with my team. so yeah, if they announced before the ladder season started that X or Y tournament would invite people based on ladder standings, it'd be fair to everyone. But at this point in time, if they just took your idea and made the top 60 play it'd be unfair to many who have chosen to prepare for tournaments and leagues by other means. XD hope that makes sense. I agree with you i think you misread my post, I too think the way they're doing this works fine.Now that you specify what you mean, I can understand what your saying. If we were to do it globally now, it would be definitely be unfair because no one was given notice as to whether or not they should have been grinding on ladder. I think in the future it would definitely be good to choose global top 64 or top whatever for big time tournies. | ||
|
sOvrn
United States678 Posts
| ||
|
ReachTheSky
United States3294 Posts
On July 26 2010 04:03 Sultan.P wrote: I'll jump on the MadFrog band wagon too. I really did enjoy his games in War3, and I'm surprised I didn't hear of him playing SC2 until now. Just to add more, I'd also like to see Tarson and Moman play Yeah i did forget to mention Moman earlier. He is definitely good. I think we need to add some more zergs in this anyhow. | ||
| ||
, for example I played A LOOOOOOOT more games with my teammates in training sessions at nights than I did in ladder because in my opinion I get better quality practice from qxc cauthonluck sheth kiwikaki slush drewbie suggy etc than I do playing someone who may or may not be good in ladder. so I've been practicing really hard ! how would your idea be fair to me, or for example qxc?
