• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:07
CEST 08:07
KST 15:07
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202531RSL Season 1 - Final Week8[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams2Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 492 users

[Q] Hydra vs Roach DPS

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Normal
hun13
Profile Joined December 2010
55 Posts
March 04 2011 18:57 GMT
#1
I use the search and wasnt able to find anything dps related to answer this question.
hopefully i didnt miss something.

anyway, my question(s).
has anyone noticed that hydras actualy nearly the same dps per "money spent" than roaches?

and if so has this been talked about?

14.4 / 150 = .096 dps per money for hydra
8 / 100 = .08 per money spent for roach

add in movement speed and HP and the hydra seems pointless except when ytou wanna shoot up ?

i almost think going for corruptos or mutas for AA might be better and set up faster brood tech. But mainly im curious about the views of the community.
c0ldfusion
Profile Joined October 2010
United States8293 Posts
March 04 2011 19:01 GMT
#2
Agreed, in general roaches are way more cost effective than hydras. But hydras are more food effective. Also they have longer range. For a pure roach army unless you can get a nice concave in an open area, there will be quite a few roaches that won't be able to attack.
1Lamb1Rice
Profile Joined August 2010
United States435 Posts
March 04 2011 19:02 GMT
#3
You must also consider hydras have better range. Also hydra are more 'economical' in terms of larva.
twitch.tv/lambnrice @LambNRice
pbecot01
Profile Joined October 2010
41 Posts
March 04 2011 19:02 GMT
#4
There's a limit to how many roaches can be shooting at once at any individual target. No other drawback.
DeckOneBell
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States526 Posts
March 04 2011 19:04 GMT
#5
Keep in mind that the main bottleneck for roach damage is their range, not their damage per second. They are entirely slaughtered by marauders with concussive shells or blink stalkers, which is why hydras are needed.

The two units of course complement each other very well, with the squishier hydras being protected by the hardier roaches.

Yes, roaches are more cost effective, which is why it's rare to see anyone go hydras and hydras alone. But it's sort of like how marines supplement siege tanks very well, certain combinations are stronger than individual parts.
MoreFaSho
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1427 Posts
March 04 2011 19:14 GMT
#6
That's the difference between theory and practice. In theory they're the same, but in practice they're not.
I always try to shield slam face, just to make sure it doesnt work
Mercury-
Profile Joined December 2010
Great Britain804 Posts
March 04 2011 19:16 GMT
#7
On March 05 2011 04:04 DeckOneBell wrote:
Keep in mind that the main bottleneck for roach damage is their range, not their damage per second. They are entirely slaughtered by marauders with concussive shells or blink stalkers, which is why hydras are needed.

The two units of course complement each other very well, with the squishier hydras being protected by the hardier roaches.

Yes, roaches are more cost effective, which is why it's rare to see anyone go hydras and hydras alone. But it's sort of like how marines supplement siege tanks very well, certain combinations are stronger than individual parts.

I'll give you Marauders but I can't see upgraded Roaches doing bad vs Blink stalkers.
Sorkoas
Profile Joined May 2010
549 Posts
March 04 2011 19:20 GMT
#8
Hydras will also start attacking earlier so if you start counting roach dps when hydra starts attacking it will be lower. ^^
jiabung
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States720 Posts
March 04 2011 19:22 GMT
#9
Unit type also factors into why hydras are more effective vs stalkers. Hydras are light and roaches take extra stalker damage from being armored type.
McGuire72
Profile Joined February 2011
Canada140 Posts
March 04 2011 19:28 GMT
#10
I know it's already been said, but it's when the two units are used in combination that they're truly productive. A line of hydras behind a ball of roaches is where the real Zerg ground DPS is at. Add in the ability to attack air and no late-game roach army is really safe without hydras to support. That said, you DO want more total roaches than hydras in order to tank damage. I usually go for something like 3:1 roaches to hydras...not sure if that is perfect or not though.
CELTICS | PATRIOTS | RED SOX
Kornholi0
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada634 Posts
March 04 2011 19:29 GMT
#11
On March 05 2011 04:16 Mercury- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 05 2011 04:04 DeckOneBell wrote:
Keep in mind that the main bottleneck for roach damage is their range, not their damage per second. They are entirely slaughtered by marauders with concussive shells or blink stalkers, which is why hydras are needed.

The two units of course complement each other very well, with the squishier hydras being protected by the hardier roaches.

Yes, roaches are more cost effective, which is why it's rare to see anyone go hydras and hydras alone. But it's sort of like how marines supplement siege tanks very well, certain combinations are stronger than individual parts.

I'll give you Marauders but I can't see upgraded Roaches doing bad vs Blink stalkers.

Ever seen good blink micro? A very good blink micro can take out half a roach army before they lose any stalkers.
Team Channel: VTeX Team Co-leader: AGGhost 223 Stream: http://www.twitch.tv/agghost
farseerdk
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada504 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-04 20:17:13
March 04 2011 20:15 GMT
#12
Proves that Hydras need a buff! lol (I am Protoss for the record).

In anycase, shooting up is a huge deal, and range means that hydras scale much better in larger numbers (critical mass + ball effect). Hydras are also "light" and not "armored" so they don't die fast to stuff like marauders, immortals, stalkers or even tanks, all of which are very common unit compositions. The only +light damage you really have to worry about are hellions.

@above poster - that's an exaggeration. Good blink micro is effective, but isn't that great past a certain food count because even if you have godspeed hands you can't micro that well and roaches start 1-shotting stalkers. Additionally, 0/0 stalkers are reasonably cost effective against roaches, but once u hit 2/2, roaches start winning hardcore because they scale much better.
Perspective is merely an angle.
Slayer91
Profile Joined February 2006
Ireland23335 Posts
March 04 2011 20:18 GMT
#13
On March 05 2011 04:14 MoreFaSho wrote:
That's the difference between theory and practice. In theory they're the same, but in practice they're not.


No, just not enough factors have been taken into account. Theory is perfectly relevant as long as its rigorous.
Penke
Profile Joined October 2010
Sweden346 Posts
March 04 2011 20:27 GMT
#14
There is flaw when comparing only with resources instead of with larva. I'm personally not a Z players but to my brief knowledge the larva is usually the main cap of production, and not money.

Once again, I'm not a zerg, so take my opinions with a grain of salt. I do belive however that this issue is something worth discussing :D
hun13
Profile Joined December 2010
55 Posts
March 04 2011 21:10 GMT
#15
Ok, so ive seen some talk about the benefit of the range of hydras, but im ghonna disagree with most of those. Roaches range + speed is enough that they all get into range pretty quick.
second hydras do NOT start shooting sooner unless you put your hydras infront of your roaches, and thats instant fail.

About the food cap, thats a really good point actualy when you start having to worry about pop cap. so maybe in the late game the hydra is a better when your resourses can handle the heavier load of the Hydra. but then agian remaxing with the faster moving roach during battles is still very good.
and the corruptor can be your AA while setting you up for broods.

About larva effeciencies, ehhhhh. i could say this is the strongest arguement for have a couple of hydras in an army. making a macro hatch is a huge investment early game. But then agian the moneey your going to spend to fast tech to early hydras could have just been spend on UPS instead, which helps save larva a bit as well
LoLAdriankat
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States4307 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-04 21:18:28
March 04 2011 21:17 GMT
#16
On March 05 2011 06:10 hun13 wrote:
Ok, so ive seen some talk about the benefit of the range of hydras, but im ghonna disagree with most of those. Roaches range + speed is enough that they all get into range pretty quick.

When you send a big ball of roaches into a big ball of units with longer range than roaches, then the roaches are at a high disadvantage. This is because the opponent's ball will still be partially safe from the roaches while the roaches are fully exposed.. This is amplified when that ball of long range units are smaller, thus having a higher DPS density (marines).
farseerdk
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada504 Posts
March 04 2011 21:18 GMT
#17
On March 05 2011 06:10 hun13 wrote:
Ok, so ive seen some talk about the benefit of the range of hydras, but im ghonna disagree with most of those. Roaches range + speed is enough that they all get into range pretty quick.
second hydras do NOT start shooting sooner unless you put your hydras infront of your roaches, and thats instant fail.


It's not just about engaging, it's about things like fighitng melee units. Consider fighting zealots. up to 4 lines of roaches can shoot a zealot that is in melee combat with the first roach. Up to 7 hydras can shoot that same zealot. Similar stuff for zerglings, ultras etc.

Also, consider vs. blink stalkers. Stalkers with proper micro can make it so that 3 lines of stalkers can shoot 1 row of roaches, and thus blink away when the front row is going to die effectively. This isn't nearly as effective against hydras who out-range stalkers.

Also, on creep, hydra speed is pretty good.
Perspective is merely an angle.
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
March 04 2011 21:22 GMT
#18
On March 05 2011 04:29 Kornholi0 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 05 2011 04:16 Mercury- wrote:
On March 05 2011 04:04 DeckOneBell wrote:
Keep in mind that the main bottleneck for roach damage is their range, not their damage per second. They are entirely slaughtered by marauders with concussive shells or blink stalkers, which is why hydras are needed.

The two units of course complement each other very well, with the squishier hydras being protected by the hardier roaches.

Yes, roaches are more cost effective, which is why it's rare to see anyone go hydras and hydras alone. But it's sort of like how marines supplement siege tanks very well, certain combinations are stronger than individual parts.

I'll give you Marauders but I can't see upgraded Roaches doing bad vs Blink stalkers.

Ever seen good blink micro? A very good blink micro can take out half a roach army before they lose any stalkers.


Not really against upgraded roaches, and not in large numbers. Blink stalker micro is fantastic in small to middle army numbers, but there hits a point when there are so many roaches they just one shot stalkers and there's no way blink helps kill the roaches there, it only helps to run away. Speed roaches are also faster than stalkers I believe.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
BlasiuS
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States2405 Posts
March 04 2011 21:51 GMT
#19
Yes per cost they are about the same, which is why roaches are so good in the mid-game.

But late-game supply is the limiting factor, not cost.

DPS per supply (no upgrades):
Hydra - 7.23
Roach - 4

DPS per supply (level 3 attack):
Hydra - 9.035
Roach - 5.5

As you can see, hydra beat roach in terms of DPS per supply. This is why roaches are better mid-game (unless you need AA), but as you approach maxed army, you want to add hydras (and corruptors).
next week on Everybody Loves HypnoToad:
Jeffbelittle
Profile Joined August 2010
United States468 Posts
March 04 2011 21:54 GMT
#20
You're also forgetting one of the most major things of them all: The roach's dps suffers significantly from Overkilling. Roaches slow attack speed but high damage means lots of dps is wasted on overkilling units. Where as the fast attacking Hydralisk doesn't overkill nearly as much. Just something else to add to the calculation.
RoKetha
Profile Joined July 2010
United States211 Posts
March 04 2011 22:01 GMT
#21
Roaches actually scale better damage-wise than Hydras do because Roaches gain +2 attack while Hydras gain +1, so when the enemy has +3 armor to your +3 attack, Roaches will be doing 19 damage while Hydras still do 12. But yeah, hydras are better when they aren't being hit and when roaches will not be able to get in range, although they have other drawbacks like not being able to retreat and heal or counterattack.

Overall hydras are horribly designed units, though. They just contribute to the whole "Zerg is easily hard-countered and massacred, while Zerg can only soft-counter the other races to have a fair fight" dynamic. Plus they're totally one-dimensional with no abilities besides attacking.
Jermstuddog
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2231 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-04 22:12:19
March 04 2011 22:05 GMT
#22
On March 05 2011 06:17 LoLAdriankat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 05 2011 06:10 hun13 wrote:
Ok, so ive seen some talk about the benefit of the range of hydras, but im ghonna disagree with most of those. Roaches range + speed is enough that they all get into range pretty quick.

When you send a big ball of roaches into a big ball of units with longer range than roaches, then the roaches are at a high disadvantage. This is because the opponent's ball will still be partially safe from the roaches while the roaches are fully exposed.. This is amplified when that ball of long range units are smaller, thus having a higher DPS density (marines).


I did a good bit of testing and realized the real problem with roach vs marine in large numbers.

It's not unit density or dps or anything like that, its missile travel time.

Roaches tend to overkill close marines when you get into numbers that big, with 5-8 roaches shooting each marine to kill it, even though it would die with 3 shots, effectively cutting their already low DPS in half.

Meanwhile, every marine is getting the full use of its damage due to instant damage. This is the big problem with Roach vs marine...

The stats are still screwed, but its the overkill that really does it.
As it turns out, marines don't actually cost any money -Jinro
1Eris1
Profile Joined September 2010
United States5797 Posts
March 04 2011 22:09 GMT
#23
Honestly it's more for the supply. Cost for cost, Hydras suck compared to Roaches.
But a 200/200 roach/hydra army will be a lot better then a 200/200 roach army
Known Aliases: Tyragon, Valeric ~MSL Forever, SKT is truly the Superior KT!
LoLAdriankat
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States4307 Posts
March 04 2011 22:13 GMT
#24
On March 05 2011 07:05 Jermstuddog wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 05 2011 06:17 LoLAdriankat wrote:
On March 05 2011 06:10 hun13 wrote:
Ok, so ive seen some talk about the benefit of the range of hydras, but im ghonna disagree with most of those. Roaches range + speed is enough that they all get into range pretty quick.

When you send a big ball of roaches into a big ball of units with longer range than roaches, then the roaches are at a high disadvantage. This is because the opponent's ball will still be partially safe from the roaches while the roaches are fully exposed.. This is amplified when that ball of long range units are smaller, thus having a higher DPS density (marines).


I did a good bit of testing and realized the real problem with roach vs marine in large numbers.

It's not unit density or dps or anything like that, its missile travel time.

Roaches tend to overkill close marines when you get into numbers that big, with 5-8 roaches shooting each marine to kill it, even though it would die with 3 shots, effectively cutting their already low DPS in half.

Meanwhile, every marine is getting the full use of its damage due to instant damage. This is the big problem with Roach vs marine...

The stats are still screwed, but its the overkill that really does it.

Ah. Interesting. Thanks for the testing, I hope it comes to Blizzard's attention.
Spekulatius
Profile Joined January 2011
Germany2413 Posts
March 04 2011 22:14 GMT
#25
There's a lot of good answers in this thread and it all concludes to the fact that one single unit attribute doesn't even come close to being enough to validate the worth of a unit. I won't repeat all the posts of this page, but analysis needs to go deeper to be able to make a clear statement.

To help players improve their play, one should take a part of the game (a matchup, a unit composition, a stage of the game), and then take all facts in consideration. Without stating that it is exhaustive, this thread was actually helpful:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=196428
Always smile~
freetgy
Profile Joined November 2010
1720 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-04 22:52:21
March 04 2011 22:51 GMT
#26
On March 05 2011 07:01 RoKetha wrote:
Roaches actually scale better damage-wise than Hydras do because Roaches gain +2 attack while Hydras gain +1, so when the enemy has +3 armor to your +3 attack, Roaches will be doing 19 damage while Hydras still do 12. But yeah, hydras are better when they aren't being hit and when roaches will not be able to get in range, although they have other drawbacks like not being able to retreat and heal or counterattack.


i guess you should learn the difference between damage and dps...
hydra scale better with upgrades then Roaches.
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
March 04 2011 23:26 GMT
#27
On March 05 2011 07:01 RoKetha wrote:
Roaches actually scale better damage-wise than Hydras do because Roaches gain +2 attack while Hydras gain +1, so when the enemy has +3 armor to your +3 attack, Roaches will be doing 19 damage while Hydras still do 12. But yeah, hydras are better when they aren't being hit and when roaches will not be able to get in range, although they have other drawbacks like not being able to retreat and heal or counterattack.

Overall hydras are horribly designed units, though. They just contribute to the whole "Zerg is easily hard-countered and massacred, while Zerg can only soft-counter the other races to have a fair fight" dynamic. Plus they're totally one-dimensional with no abilities besides attacking.



Hydralisk does 14.5 DPS, +1.2 per upgrade. Roach does 8 DPS, +1 per upgrade.

Against a target with 3 armor, a hydralisk deals 10.8 dps, and 14.5 with +3. That's a 3.7 upgrade, some small rounding errors, but it's about +1.2 dps per upgrade. The roach only goes up by +1 per upgrade.

But that should be obvious: armor is more effective against weak, fast attackers than strong, slow attackers.

If the enemy does not have armor equal to your upgrades however, they hydralisk scales better. Let's look at a unit with no armor upgrades, but a base armor.

Let's take the stalker for example, base armor of 1. Roach DPS vs. stalker: 7.5, the armor is a .5 dps loss for the roach. Hydralisk: 13.25 dps, 1.25 dps drop from armor. Upgrade both with +1: roach dps is now 8.5, hydralisk is now at 14.5, back to normal. At +2, roach is at 9.5, hydralisk is at 15.7. At +3, Roach is at 10.5, hydralisk is at 16.8. Each +1 upgrade increases the roach's dps by 1, but the hydralisks' dps goes up by about 1.2 (I rounded slightly). Clearly, the hydralisk scales better against low armor targets.

Now let's look at the ultralisk with full armor upgrades: 6 armor.

+0 roach: 5 dps
+0 hydralisk: 7.2
+3 roach: 8 DPS, a +1 dps increase per +1 upgrade.
+3 hydralisk: 10.8 DPS, a 1.2 dps increase per +1 upgrade.

So in other words, hydralisks scale better than roaches with upgrades. It just so happens that roaches are less effected by high armor targets, but hydralisks still scale better.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
falstag
Profile Joined November 2010
United States55 Posts
March 04 2011 23:27 GMT
#28
This has been said, but the two work nicely the tanks in the front and the squishys in the back

If he looks weird, its his placement match
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 53m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech68
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 338
Snow 264
ToSsGirL 118
Leta 87
Backho 62
Sacsri 53
Dota 2
ODPixel295
XcaliburYe40
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1017
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox453
Other Games
summit1g5485
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1335
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH422
• practicex 46
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota211
League of Legends
• Stunt425
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
3h 53m
ByuN vs Zoun
SHIN vs TriGGeR
Cyan vs ShoWTimE
Rogue vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs Solar
Reynor vs Maru
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
Esports World Cup
1d 3h
Esports World Cup
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.