• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:24
CEST 18:24
KST 01:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week8[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17
StarCraft 2
General
Heaven's Balance Suggestions (roast me) Magnus Carlsen and Fabi review Clem's chess game. Who will win EWC 2025? Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Corsair Pursuit Micro? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Pro gamer house photos Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread BWCL Season 63 Announcement
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 811 users

[G] PvZ Fast Archon Zealot Pressure

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Normal
Monsoon
Profile Joined September 2010
United States14 Posts
October 11 2010 04:08 GMT
#1
[G] PvZ – Fast Archon Zealot Pressure

Purpose

I am about a 1200 Diamond player. I was having difficulties playing against mutaling as Protoss. When a Zerg player would go heavy roach or hydra, I would have no problems, but mutaling harass really put me under pressure. This build was developed primarily to combat mutaling. However, it also allows for a easy expansion and transitions out of it.

Background General Strategy

The key to defeating mutaling is to keep pressure on their front. Muta’s are great at harass, but very vulnerable to direct confrontations. You must make them fight your army, and you do this by attacking. The problem I encountered was the need for a very good balance with your gateway units. If you have too many zealots, your army gets crushed by the muta’s; too many stalkers and the lings overwhelm you. It is also easier for the Zerg player to switch the balance of his army to take advantage of your composition then it is for you to do the same.
+ Show Spoiler +
Enter the Archon: The much derided Archon has one major advantage. It is neither weak to lings or muta’s. A single Archon (100/300) can kill three mutas (300/300), and with either upgraded weapons or shields can beat four. It also has one shots zerglings, has splash damage, and can absorb a lot of damage. With a couple zealots blocking for it, Archons will roll over any amount (within reason of course) of zerglings.

The idea of this build is to put pressure on the zerg at their expo before they can harass you with mutas and also before they can really start getting returns on that expo. You also will have enough minerals to expand with your first push.

The initial push will be a three gate push with about 5 zealots and an archon, supported by a stalker or two. It should happen about the same time zerg’s spire is completed.


Basic Build Order

The following is the basic build. Obviously timings will change somewhat due to real game conditions:
+ Show Spoiler +
9 Pylon -> Scout
13 Gateway
14 Gas
15 Pylon
18 Zealot -> From this point forward make an additional zealot followed by 2 stalkers, then only zealots until the Archon is made.
20 Cyber
21 Gas
24 Warpgate Tech
24 Gateway
25 Twilight Council
26 Gateway
30 Templar Archives


Weaknesses

Roaches!
+ Show Spoiler +
Roaches are by far the biggest threat to this build in the early game. An early roach rush can be especially dangerous. If you see roaches, I recommend delaying or abandoning this build completely and get stalkers. However, if you see roaches, you know that mutaling is not on the table immediately.

Very Fast Expand
+ Show Spoiler +
If a zerg goes hatch before pool, they may have too much stuff when your push come. If you see them hatch before pool, throw down a second gate sooner and do some harass with zealots and other gateway units. Even though your archons will be delayed, their economy and build will also be delayed. You just can’t let them expo unchallenged. However, as this build timing is mainly gas driven, if you use mainly zealots in your early pressure your Archon timing will not be radically altered.

Ling Rush
+ Show Spoiler +
Every Protoss needs to be aware of 10 pool or earlier pressure. If you scout early lings, defend in your favorite way. Either a second gate, chrono’ed zealots out of the first gate, or a forge and cannons will work. As with the very fast expand, since none of these options require gas, your overall timing will not be hurt much. Zealots will compose the bulk of your army, so building more, sooner doesn’t hurt. Also, +1 weapons or +1 shields are very nice for the Archons, so getting an early forge will allow you to get those upgrades sooner.

Mid Game Infestor/Hyrda
+ Show Spoiler +
If you have chosen to stay in this build even though they aren’t going mutaling, you must be aware of the devastating potention of fugal growth + hydras. Hydra’s can stay out of range of your Archons and focus them down freely. This isn’t a worry on your initial push though. If they go early infestors, they won’t have enough Hyrdas at that time to take advantage of your snared units.

Brain Dead Archons
+ Show Spoiler +
I don’t know if it is because two Templars are fighting for control or what, but let’s face it, Archons aren’t the brightest crayon in the Protoss box. They will stop and shoot a floating Overlord, extractor, larva, etc. You must stay on top of them on your push, or your army will leave them behind. This is especially true of your zealots. Archons are also difficult to mirco. With their short range, mutas can dance in and out of range. A stalker or two in support makes this more difficult for zerg to do.

One great thing about Archons though, is that they fully take advantage of the Protoss gimmick of shield. If their shields are getting low, disengage (preferably with your whole army if you can), and let the shields charge. This occurs very quickly, much more quickly than zerg’s health. Once you are full, go back and finish the job. With a well-placed pylon, you can also reinforce during this time.

Transitions

Continued Mutaling
+ Show Spoiler +
If the zerg continues to try to play mutaling there is no reason to transition. As the scale increases, the odds shift more and more in favor of zealot/Archon. Make sure you continue to get upgrades, especially the shield upgrades. Shield upgrades will drastically reduce the mutas’ splash damage.

Roach/Hydra
+ Show Spoiler +
This build is by far weakest to Roach/Hydra. While Archons will easily kill Hydras, the Roaches sitting in front get in the way of both the zealots and the Archons, and tank far too much damage. Fortunately (and obviously), if they are going Roach/Hydra they are NOT going mutaling. I think most protoss players are comfortable against Roach/Hyrda, and you can use your favorite build at this point.
The transition to High Templar play is simple here (research storm), but it optional. You also have easy access to Blink. Upon seeing roaches you could also plan to lay down a Robotics Facility. This gives you Immortals to deal with the immediate threat and lets you transition to colossi later if you choose. Remember, at the heart of this build it is 3-Gate pressure and expand. 3-Gate expand is very flexible for Protoss. Gas isn’t that much of an issue; as you were planning on pumping out Archons at the cost of 300 a pop. Making stalkers, Immortals, or Colossi is cheap by comparison, even with the extra buildings.

Mass Hydras
+ Show Spoiler +
This build will also work well against mass Hydras. However, Infesters will ruin your day instantly at this point. If you continue with Zealot/Archon make sure you get upgrades, especially shields and + 1 weapons. A +1 weapons will allow Archons to two shot Hydras. Obviously the transitions listed above for Roach/Hydra are viable here.


Replays

The replays do not always do justice to the strategy. There is a reason I am only a 1200 diamond player; my macro slips often during the push, and my micro can be quite awful. When watching, even if I don't expand with my push, notice that the money is available to do so. There are also more replays I will be adding in the future.

With that ugly disclaimer out of the way, here are the replays:

The Victories
+ Show Spoiler +
Mutaling after a 7 pool.
[image loading]

One base Mutaling
[image loading]

Added more Stalkers to my army after encountering Roaches.
[image loading]

Another victory by adding Stalkers against Roaches
[image loading]

Against Pure Hydra
[image loading]

First push fails, but still beats ling/hyrda/muta
[image loading]

The Defeats
+ Show Spoiler +
Loss to Roaches
[image loading]

Loss to FE Mutaling. I let the FE go unharassed for too long.
[image loading]


I'll never drop the anchor, if you never stop the rain.
MrBitter
Profile Joined January 2008
United States2940 Posts
October 11 2010 04:12 GMT
#2
As a 1600+ Zerg player, I firmly believe that Archons are the most underused unit in the Protoss arsenal these days.

They tank like ultras, and dish out damage like nukes... without the AoE, of course.

From my end, I've yet to figure out how to really handle them, so I guess that's some sort of an endorsement, OP. =p
DragonDefonce
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States790 Posts
October 11 2010 04:22 GMT
#3
Hellofa first post. Nicely done. However, this is very snipy build.

Consider this:
At first scout, you can see 1. FE 2.ling rush 3. baneling or roaches 4. fast lair
FE translates into 2,3, or 4 so lets consider those three. This build is only good for option 4. It will however keep you alive against ling rush.

Then, if he went lair, the zerg still has 2 choices: hydras or mutals.

So, this build cannot be used preemtively because theres you literally cannot predict if zerg going mutals(of course, depends on the map/player preference). I would much rather use a build where I fast expand so that I can support a templar army if the need be.
BoondockVeritas
Profile Joined August 2010
United States191 Posts
October 11 2010 05:11 GMT
#4
why not go for one or two base zealot/templar mix to begin with, then just turn into archons when ready? depending on what you scout you could go zealots with high templar or even dark templar maybe since they both make archons. i feel like a swarm of zerglins or whatever will be weaker against zealot tanks with storms going down and then archons hitting them. also i think dts are underused as well, although if zerg has a lair its easy to get overseer. 45 damage cloaked units that can go into archons sounds worth testing imo.
NA server Veritas.414, KR server Bullet.382. 지지요!
piroko139
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States261 Posts
October 11 2010 05:40 GMT
#5
Zealot/Templar takes longer to kick into effect because you need to research Storm (and the Amulet to make them more effective by a long shot).

This feels like a 4 gate that was changed around to fit in Archons. Shouldn't it be a transition rather than a rush for Archons instead?
Floophead_III
Profile Joined September 2009
United States1832 Posts
October 11 2010 06:03 GMT
#6
Well... at least you got the fundamental army comp correct.

You cannot go templar on 1 base. You simply don't have enough gas to justify spending 150/100 then 150/200 just to get the archives. Then it's 300 gas for a single archon. Too much too early.

There any many routes to zealot/archon, but fundamentally the builds all should look something like this:

-FE (forge, 1 gate, whatever)
-1 gate into fast twilight
-add 3 gates + archives OR shrine
-push on 2 archons + mass zealot

Something around that usually works. DT shrine gives you a chance to do harass and even cripple zerg before you go in for the killing blow. They're also cheaper gas-wise by a bit than HT archons. Templar Archives gets you access to storm though, which of course cuts through everything really nicely and is basically required vs zerg past a point.

Basically, my standard PvZ army consists of archon/zealot/immortal/templar now. I get some stalkers as support but I really like that archon/zealot/immortal mix and templar are key to beating banelings and hydra, so you really want them too.

As for DT vs HT. I don't like DT unless zerg goes for a very fast 3rd, since DT is a good way to punish them being spread out. A zerg who gets some heavy army before taking a 3rd is a lot harder to harass, and also has more units earlier so you need storm faster.
Half man, half bear, half pig.
Eesha
Profile Joined September 2010
3 Posts
October 11 2010 06:03 GMT
#7
Honest question, but wouldn't a phoenix + zealot composition be favorable vs Muta/ling? And is easier to tech to? Gonna watch vid later though, cus it's interesting ^_^
Shissar
Profile Joined September 2010
Netherlands15 Posts
October 11 2010 09:40 GMT
#8
Good strat. I am going to try it. But i think it might work a bit better with DT's (less gas) and some harrass / defence options (snipe overseer while defending).

Also nice follow up for end game --> get a mothership and vortex his army + your archons. (except if he has banelings ofcourse).
Vini, vide, suc mense bibi
sleepingdog
Profile Joined August 2008
Austria6145 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-11 10:04:58
October 11 2010 09:49 GMT
#9
On October 11 2010 15:03 Floophead_III wrote:
As for DT vs HT. I don't like DT unless zerg goes for a very fast 3rd, since DT is a good way to punish them being spread out. A zerg who gets some heavy army before taking a 3rd is a lot harder to harass, and also has more units earlier so you need storm faster.


actually I'm playing around with early DT for archons when zerg bunkers his 2nd with many spines (which is 99% muta-play), take my third quickly, defend with stalkers, harass with DTs and go stalker/archon...HTs very delayed - reason: if you make archons out of DTs you save 50 gas, which is HUGE; dark shrine is only 50 gas more expensive than archives and for archives to be worth it you need storm research...and pretty much amulet research too;
so after your first two DTs merged to an archon this has already payed off gas-wise; not only that, but DTs force your opponent to spend quite some gas on overseers too;
in fact, I wanna do some testing today how much mutas you need to take on two archons

last but not least: stalkers/archons do "ok" also vs zerg tier 3 units - often your attack will occur at a point when your oponent tries to switch to ultralisks; archons are no hard counter, but an archon/stalker-force does still pretty good vs ultras if you don't run in with stalkers first stupidly; I've never understood why archons are listed as "weak" vs ultras on liquipedia; they do bonus damage vs ultras and don't receive bonus-damage from their attack since they are non armored (if I'm not mistaken)

I also agree that archons are underused vs zerg - especially vs muta-lisk-heavy zergs; interestingly, many matches evolve around stalker/HT and once the protoss has run out of mana and merges his HTs to archons he does even slightly "better" because archons cannot be sniped out and are awsome tanks too
"You see....YOU SEE..." © 2010 Sen
OriginalBeast
Profile Joined September 2010
United States709 Posts
October 11 2010 10:00 GMT
#10
This is a strat that I have been doing for a while in 2s you'd have to be pretty bold to do it in 1v1
More gg, more skill.
kheldorin
Profile Joined April 2010
Singapore539 Posts
October 11 2010 10:43 GMT
#11
Nice strat. I saw that you get zealot legs in most of your replays. Why is that?
sikyon
Profile Joined June 2010
Canada1045 Posts
October 11 2010 13:09 GMT
#12
I would really assume that DT's would be the way to go with htis build if you're not going to use storm. DT's seem like they will get you some decent milage, especially if you can use them to snipe zerg tech like his spire
callecal
Profile Joined March 2010
Sweden65 Posts
October 11 2010 14:01 GMT
#13
Im with Eesha, why not go pheonix? they do extra damage to light, if you make a early stargate you can easily scout the spire and harass. If a spire is scouted warpin a second stargate and keep map controll, refusing the zergs overlords to scout. He needs spore crawlers wich cripple his economy. upgraded zealots should be more than enough for the ling, and because of your pheonixes you know when he switches tech. hell with air controll like that you could go collossi/zealot without to much worries.

However if zerg FE before pool phenixes will be to late pressure perhaps and zergs economy will be to good.

If protoss FE into pheonixes maybe scouting will be to late? in that case maybe research hallucination for scouting phenixes.
Maybe hallucinated pheonix to scout is good for the archon build...albeit way to gas heavy for 1 base....
Sixes
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada1123 Posts
October 11 2010 14:24 GMT
#14
I'm around 1300 Diamond Zerg player and have faced this a few times.

It has major issues with fast expands (14 hatch is what I do) as you pointed out. One of the bigger issues though is that zealot pressure on the fast expand leads to roaches (which you also have issues with). Two more problems you have not mentioned are spine crawlers (which pick off archons nicely) and roach burrow (and burrow move) because you have no detection.

Remember that fast roaches outrun your zealots and spire timing is about the same as roach speed + burrow (and burrowed move is right around the corner).

The DT idea is a good one as DTs force a bunch of costly reactions and put zerg on the back foot and you really want to avoid Zerg being aggressive with roaches.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
October 11 2010 14:59 GMT
#15
I found archons to be insanely good vs zerg as well. The one problem you will have is with a Z that switches to a roach heavy army instead of muta/ling/ultra.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
Mykill
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Canada3402 Posts
October 11 2010 15:27 GMT
#16
time to start using it...
zergs just mass lings with a couple mutas now. so annoying =\
[~~The Impossible Leads To Invention~~] CJ Entusman #52 The problem with internet quotations is that they are hard to verify -Abraham Lincoln c.1863
bobcat
Profile Joined May 2010
United States488 Posts
October 11 2010 15:28 GMT
#17
On October 11 2010 13:08 Monsoon wrote:
[G] PvZ – Fast Archon Zealot Pressure


Mid Game Infestor/Hyrda
[spoiler]If you have chosen to stay in this build even though they aren’t going mutaling, you must be aware of the devastating potention of fugal growth + hydras. Hydra’s can stay out of range of your Archons and focus them down freely. This isn’t a worry on your initial push though. If they go early infestors, they won’t have enough Hyrdas at that time to take advantage of your snared units


If they end up going for inf/hydra, HT's are actually a great place to be. Feedback destroys infestors and storm + chargelots rapes hydras.
"I just want to see bobcat wrist deep in someone's mother's anus" 165 votes
bobcat
Profile Joined May 2010
United States488 Posts
October 11 2010 15:31 GMT
#18
On October 11 2010 15:03 Eesha wrote:
Honest question, but wouldn't a phoenix + zealot composition be favorable vs Muta/ling? And is easier to tech to? Gonna watch vid later though, cus it's interesting ^_^


As the OP said the problem toss has against muta ling is that it is a composition nightmare. Zealots aren't really good vs lings in the early game so not having enough of them will lead to a lose and not having enough AA will lead to mutas eating your zealots. The problem with going phoenix is that you have to

A. build the right number of both units.
B. hope they're going mutas or you convert to phoenix harass.

"I just want to see bobcat wrist deep in someone's mother's anus" 165 votes
Monsoon
Profile Joined September 2010
United States14 Posts
October 11 2010 16:03 GMT
#19
Thank you guys for the replies. I will try to answer some of the questions that have been asked in this post.

Why not Dark Templars?


This is something I've considered. The early harass is very tempting. However, the reason why I didn't go this route is that they make for more expensive Archons (250/250) vs (100/300). I like having the extra minerals for zealots or an expansion. It also frees minerals for a forge or other upgrades. Also, Storm is just an upgrade away by going HT's. I will need to play around with DT's though, because it is a nice variation that gets you to the same place.

Nice strat. I saw that you get zealot legs in most of your replays. Why is that?

I find that zealot legs helps keep your Archon alive. They get in front of the Archon fast against lings, spine crawlers, and even roaches. With how hard the Archon is to micro, this helps. However, it is pricey, and costs the same as +1 shields. I am not sure which helps more at this point, but the legs do help you transition into a normal chargelot/HT build.

Im with Eesha, why not go pheonix?

Phoenix play is very effective. It just wasn't what I as going for here. Having options is nice!

You cannot go templar on 1 base. You simply don't have enough gas to justify spending 150/100 then 150/200 just to get the archives. Then it's 300 gas for a single archon. Too much too early.

I am always very uncomfortable FE'ing against Zerg. This push gives me the freedom to expand without worry. It also keeps the gas and minerals well balanced. By using gateway only on a similar push, you have to include sentries simply because your mineral usage far outstrips the gas usage. While sentries are nice, they aren't required. You are money broke, but not gas broke. The gas is definitely available for the initial push. After you expand, gas isn't an issue.

At first scout, you can see 1. FE 2.ling rush 3. baneling or roaches 4. fast lair
FE translates into 2,3, or 4 so lets consider those three. This build is only good for option 4. It will however keep you alive against ling rush.


Yes, the Zerg has plenty of options. However, I like to use Day9's concept of "Forcing" when thinking about this build. If your oppenent goes Mutaling, you should win outright. Then you have to worry about dealing with the other options. It handles lings without any issue. Banelings are dangerous to your Zealots, but your Archons can absorb 15 Baneling hits. Even pure hydras fall pretty hard against Zealot Archon (see replay versus Hydra). The only one of these that is the threat is Roaches. Don't lose to Roaches and you are okay. But as a Protoss play, I am very happy if I am facing Roaches.

I'll never drop the anchor, if you never stop the rain.
PangO
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Chile1870 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-11 16:13:03
October 11 2010 16:12 GMT
#20
What can i say Monsoon i really like this build gonna try it out and see how it works.

Thank a lot
Hope i dont get too much Roach/Hydra rushed.
In Economics, the majority is always wrong. aka: MattRz
Craixs
Profile Joined January 2008
Denmark170 Posts
October 11 2010 16:15 GMT
#21
this only works if your opponent don't got a clue, if he just play some curruptors (against te phoenixes he got the game, because of the masse mutas he will be having, vs archons a zergs muta count will be so crusial that he will crush your archons, I have practiced this build the last 2 months myself, and if he scout it and know the stragegi your templar achrive or dark shine will get crushed by mutas which make s you stuck on stalkers and you will lose the game, but if you go blink stalkers first to try and defend the first couble of muta harras you can actually pull it off.

If your opponent is cought off guard it works well, but again in patch 1.2 this build wont be a variable since the roaches can just kill our fe due to the range incease so why bother perfecting this build anyway.
Entusman #9.
Monsoon
Profile Joined September 2010
United States14 Posts
October 11 2010 16:16 GMT
#22
On October 12 2010 01:12 PangO wrote:
What can i say Monsoon i really like this build gonna try it out and see how it works.

Thank a lot
Hope i dont get too much Roach/Hydra rushed.


Thank you. Post some replays later if you don't mind. I am curious to watch the community's take on it.
I'll never drop the anchor, if you never stop the rain.
AlexXx
Profile Joined September 2010
United States58 Posts
October 11 2010 17:36 GMT
#23
This seemed a bit sketchy, I watched a few of your replays and noticed you just had so much money banked up most of the time 2000k plus mostly... But then I just tried it. I ended up having ALOT of resources also because of the lack of stalkers and other expensive units. I think I could have had an extra forge as well.

The Archon opening is extremely strong because all the zerg units are Bio! and Archons do a whopping 35 dmg (i think) + splash! and +1 up is 39! thats almost 2 shot to an unupgraded hydra. I found myself having extra minerals laying around and was able to throw down more gates and expo faster than I usually would while still being able to be aggressive and fend off pushes.

My opponent went with the armored roach after seeing Archons and stalkers were just not cutting it so i decided to get sneaky on him and throw up a Dark Shrine and that really won me the game. But the Archon Open was Def solid. This is a 1500+ Diamond player and he is rank 6 in his divison.

Great post OP. Thanks for giving Toss another great path to go!
[image loading]
Nemesis-Xero
Profile Joined September 2010
United States5 Posts
October 11 2010 17:57 GMT
#24
I've attempted something similar to this myself. Certainly not as sophisticated as having a build order. But I've found that after you hold off the initial ling attack early on, you can generally do a small counter attack with just zealots to take the pressure off long enough to get your natural up. That can usually take care of the gas problem. Also, an Archon with +1 weapons can 1-shot a zergling. A handful of Archons can easily survive a zergling/baneling attack on their own as well, depending on the precise number of units of course.

Personally I prefer DTs because 90% of the time I have way more minerals than gas so I can easily afford the extra minerals and prefer the slightly reduced gas cost on Dark Templar while still making plenty of zealots. Also because I'm avoiding HTs because everyone uses them. Hehe... :D
They'll never see me coming...
Skyro
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1823 Posts
October 11 2010 18:00 GMT
#25
I'm not really sure what's the point of this build, TBH. The issues protoss has with mutaling is containment and harass, not direct army confrontations. The right mixture of gateway units is more than enough to handle mutaling in a straight, equal cost battle.

Archons are versatile vs zerg yes, but IMO still not cost effective. The cost of 1 archon (assuming 2 merged HTs) is about the cost of 3 sentries, and sentries are awesome vs mutaling.
PangO
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Chile1870 Posts
October 11 2010 18:02 GMT
#26
On October 12 2010 01:16 Monsoon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2010 01:12 PangO wrote:
What can i say Monsoon i really like this build gonna try it out and see how it works.

Thank a lot
Hope i dont get too much Roach/Hydra rushed.


Thank you. Post some replays later if you don't mind. I am curious to watch the community's take on it.

Just won 2 games with it lol.
I'll post replays as soon as posible.
In Economics, the majority is always wrong. aka: MattRz
CurLy[]
Profile Joined August 2010
United States759 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-11 18:05:57
October 11 2010 18:05 GMT
#27
I really like this. I might even consider getting blink since you got the Twilight, its so invaluable when dealing with mutas. Archons are incredible vs lings
Great pasta mom, very Korean. Even my crown leans to the side. Gangsta. --------->
AlexXx
Profile Joined September 2010
United States58 Posts
October 11 2010 18:13 GMT
#28
I agree it with this not being a direct muta counter or w/e because usually gateway units can handle that just fine, but I do think it has opened the doors to making Archons a more usable unit. Although I do think they need maybe a small range upgrade...

You have to do some scouting though with this build because if they have early roach, its good game for sure, Roaches dominate this.
PraetorHyper
Profile Joined May 2010
Venezuela12 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-11 20:21:33
October 11 2010 20:16 GMT
#29
I'm guessing this is inspired on Zanez's thread:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=151798 (this could answer Skyro's question about this build).

It's good to have a clear BO and good replays to check the concept much better.

Could be nice to squeeze a Hallucination research somewhere, to scout and know exactly what he's doing and what changes on your composition you should make. I feel like I'm going blind with archons and I don't like being blind =P.
Monsoon
Profile Joined September 2010
United States14 Posts
October 11 2010 21:40 GMT
#30
On October 12 2010 02:36 AlexXx wrote:
Great post OP. Thanks for giving Toss another great path to go!
[image loading]


Thanks for posting that replay Alex. I'm glad you stuck with it after the initial push didn't do much. It works surprisingly well even against that moderate number of roaches. It was once the roaches starting coming out in mass that there were issues. That said, I think every Protoss player is more than happy to play against mass roach.
I'll never drop the anchor, if you never stop the rain.
Drathmar
Profile Joined September 2010
United States160 Posts
October 12 2010 01:34 GMT
#31
I need to try this, mutaling is by far my biggest headache when playing.

I do agree Protoss love playing vs mass roach though... 2 immortals (easy to get since they only need robo) supported by pretty much anything and FFing roaches pretty much kill shitloads of them.
"you're just neural parasited by a retarded infestor" - day[9]
RoboBob
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States798 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-13 00:13:23
October 13 2010 00:11 GMT
#32
I don't think this build is weak vs hydra/infestor at all. You're going to be warping in High Templars all the time, and even without kydarian amulet they can pop off a feedback (doesn't require any tech) before merging. Although of course you'll need to micro well, as they have pretty much the same range.

Hmm actually, this might be better response vs mutaling, because if you go with phoenix they can be easily countered by corruptors. Since they already went muta they probably also have a leg-up on air upgrades, which would make corruptors even more tricky. Because mutas are so gas heavy they probably don't have very many banelings. But if they do, you'll need the archons to block the banelings, since they don't have the [Light] tag.

Hmm it might be best to cut some zealots and channel extra minerals into cannons to help defend your pylon outposts and bases. I'm just thinking that while this build might be great at killing the units, the sheer speed and mobility of both mutas and lings are going to make you really vulnerable vs counterattacks. Perhaps open zealot/phoenix early pressure into zealot/archon/templar.

I wouldn't think that roach would be too big a deal vs this combo, because the archons have enough range they can fire from behind zealots, which negates much of the range disadvantage. Burrowed roaches might be a real problem though because they can recharge health much faster than you can recharge shields. In that case you'll obviously need to slam out a robobay just for observers. Maybe you could cover it with offensive cannons but I think they would be a big risk to take.
Welmu
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
Finland3295 Posts
October 13 2010 06:12 GMT
#33
Seems very interesting build. Must test when I get to home :D
Progamertwitter.com/welmu1 | twitch.com/Welmu1
DreamSailor
Profile Joined June 2010
Canada433 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-13 07:28:42
October 13 2010 06:49 GMT
#34
Zealot/Archon isn't actually -that- bad vs. Mass Roach if you aren't in a confined space.

Zealots actually fare very well against Roaches (I think a Zealot actually wins in a 1v1 no upgrades) Zealots tank and deal good damage, Archons sit back, and deal good damage + splash.

Doing this build I always favor a very fast +1 weapons, followed by a +2 weapons (You already have the council) getting armor upgrades when going very heavy into Archons simply cuts into your gas, because the Shield is unaffected by armor upgrades.

Charge actually really helps against Speed zerglings, as strange as it sounds.
It really prevents them from getting a surround, because charge intercepts them before they can do it. Against non-speed zealots, the lings get an instant concave around the zealots, shutting off retreats and dealing maximum damage, but with charge it creates an instant wall, preventing, or atleast slowing down, the surround. Speed zerglings are actually really good against zealots because of numbers and the surround, but if you cut off the surround they fare much better.

If you do this build, or a similar one, I would (Atleast against zerg) favor getting 2 HT's out right away, make them an Archon, then research storm and Khaydarin as soon as possible (While excess gas goes into weapons and more templar). Storms burst damage is just so high, and since you're making the High Templar anyways, you may as well do the good old, 1 storm -> Archon. (80 damage vs. Roaches + being whacked at by Zealots and Archons is more effective then you think)

Edit: My variation of the build. It's quite vulnerable to baneling busts (imo) and isn't near as polished as it could be, but I get enough stuff to defend, and to win. I get storm, because storm is just so powerful (Theres no reason -not- to get it against zerg or terran, I think vs. Protoss there are better options then HT tech) Yes, my storms lick in this game, and I can't find my cool PvZ where I do some better storms.

[image loading]


EditX2:

Found the replay, again, mistakes, but goes to show you how getting storm is a huge benefit over an extra archon or two. Also, Zealots and Archons do a crapload of damage at +3 weapons.

[image loading]
Where ever you go, there you are.
mrfatbush
Profile Joined October 2010
Australia26 Posts
October 14 2010 02:58 GMT
#35
This build pretty much thwarts any zerg attempt to turtle and harass with mutas. I feel going roach/infestor could work quite well since roach outrange archons. I would still add on a spire though. I've seen a pretty powerful play from Idra where he defends early/mid aggression using hydras and once he has enough hydras he gets mutas to compliment and gain map control.

So in this build matchup it seems like you'd swap out the hydras for roach/infestor into mutas. Dunno about late game though... because you would have range upgrades for roach which doesnt really help ultras..
Ryuu314
Profile Joined October 2009
United States12679 Posts
October 14 2010 05:56 GMT
#36
Archons are actually pretty decent against roaches too. They can tank quite a few shots and they also do very good dps against roaches (35+ per shot depending on upgrades). Earlier during release and also in beta I've used archons to fend off early roach pressure when I rushed HT tech but storm wasn't yet done. Archons and roaches have very similar range as of the current patch and aren't kited that easily.
As long as you can get out an archon by the time the roaches reach your ramp you should be able to hold it off with zealots and an archon fine. In other words, going through with the archon would still work on the bigger maps (ie not Blistering or SoW).
AlexXx
Profile Joined September 2010
United States58 Posts
October 17 2010 15:11 GMT
#37
Archons just totally demolish lings and muta.... its unbelievable!

[image loading]


Apples is a 1500+ (maybe more) diamond and I have NEVER beat him untill i tried this archon play.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
October 17 2010 17:07 GMT
#38
Roach infestor is a huge problem since you will not have either immortals nor sentries.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
Wrongspeedy
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States1655 Posts
October 17 2010 17:19 GMT
#39
I will try this right away. I saw Hydro do something similar long ago, I dunno why I didn't think to use it.
It is better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.- John Stuart Mill
Markwerf
Profile Joined March 2010
Netherlands3728 Posts
October 17 2010 19:03 GMT
#40
About the build order:
I strongly encourage you to put a forge for +1 attack somewhere in the build. +1 attack is so damn important if you are using zealot/archon(/stalker).
Zealots 2 shots lings if they don't have 1 armor upgrade. HUGE difference.
Archons 1 shot lings if they DO have 1 armor upgrade (they 2 shot them if its 0-0 archons vs 0-1 lings). HUGE difference.
(regardless of the zerg upgrades a +1 attack upgrade will make your zealot/archon MUCH more effective against lings)
In case you wind up using stalkers against muta's it makes a fairly big difference as well as 0-0 stalkers take 13 shots to kill a muta (because of 1 instant regen from the muta's) whereas 1-0 stalkers take 11 shots exactly killing the muta (121 dmg total accounting for the 1 hp regen).

As the build puts up a fast twilight council anyway the forge can be put to good use non-stop as you can immediately follow up with armor or lvl 2 upgrades (I'd go lvl 2 attack if you are up against lings and see +1 armor, otherwise get armor).
AlexXx
Profile Joined September 2010
United States58 Posts
October 18 2010 00:57 GMT
#41
I agree +1 wep vs zerg is ALWAYS good.
StormWeapon
Profile Joined July 2010
United States159 Posts
October 18 2010 02:08 GMT
#42
I have been abusing Archons against Z every chance for weeks, but never came up with a build to get them early as I treated them just like going a storm build, which is different because all the research you need for storms you don't need for archons.

The only 2 units I have seen that can even deal with an archon-centric force are roaches and ultras, and even then archons can handle roaches decently.
Tyrant Potato
AlexXx
Profile Joined September 2010
United States58 Posts
October 18 2010 03:19 GMT
#43
I wouldnt suggest ultras vs archons, check out this replay :D

Archons just have SO much dmg. Brood Lords work pretty well if cliff microed well.

[image loading]
Vasili
Profile Joined August 2010
Australia125 Posts
October 18 2010 05:55 GMT
#44
If you scout a fast expo (hatch be4 pool) you can cut a gateway to early expand and you should be ok.. I like the effort you put into the build. Archons are my favourite unit but I never really have the solid plan to go straight for them. I would love to try this out sometime. I think you might be throwing down too many gateways before your expo though. Especially if the zerg goes heavy econ.
GaussWaffle
Profile Joined May 2010
United States211 Posts
October 18 2010 06:27 GMT
#45
nooooo, don't use the best unit vs. zerg, that's cheating!!!!!

I want to see more variants in toss builds : )

Do you toss in sentries in this build, simply for guardian shield vs. mutas, or is it really just zealot/archon with bare bones stalkers to slightly scare early muta counts
HeyJude
Profile Joined July 2010
United States157 Posts
October 18 2010 06:40 GMT
#46
I really like this build. I've been doing the DT variant of it(zealot opening->DT harass(sometimes wins to archons, works amazing in 2v2 RT.
vsportsguy
Profile Joined September 2010
United States118 Posts
October 18 2010 07:07 GMT
#47
Very nice build. I've yet to see an a single archon in any game I've ever played. I see templars from time to time, but nobody seems to want to warp them. It seems like this build absolutely crushes non ranged zerg units. I prefer to play ling/infestor against toss so this would counter that pretty well. Its refreshing to see some templar play, it mixes the game up.
Minimi][
Profile Joined September 2010
Germany43 Posts
October 18 2010 07:41 GMT
#48
try going this route of a forge first FE into a +2 weapon up timing push with chargelot and two archons, u still have to watch out for roach all ins

because ur current build is hard countered by any sort of acceptible scouting into roaches
tetramaster
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada253 Posts
October 18 2010 07:42 GMT
#49
The only issue I have with Templar play is that it's so....weak against roaches, and it's a pain to deal with mutalisks with templar due to how easily templar get picked off by a big ball o' mutalisks due to their speed (of the templar and the mutalisks)

Roaches, with their low cost and high HP amount, and pretty good damage (16+2 per up) just chew through zealots so damn quickly when they get into a large ball. With even more health than a marauder, and doing way more damage, it makes going zealot/templar dangerous, and you really aren't going to be having too much gas if you're doing templar play.

Stalker/templar is not going to work out since speedlings surround SO fast, that unless you've got enough zealots with charge to stop them getting a good surround, you're toast.
Douillos
Profile Joined May 2010
France3195 Posts
October 18 2010 08:22 GMT
#50
YYYYAAAYYY the return of the zealot archon pushhhhhhhhhhh
(BW nostalgia inside :p)
Look a giraffe! Look a fist!!
DreamSailor
Profile Joined June 2010
Canada433 Posts
October 18 2010 08:37 GMT
#51
On October 18 2010 16:42 tetramaster wrote:
The only issue I have with Templar play is that it's so....weak against roaches, and it's a pain to deal with mutalisks with templar due to how easily templar get picked off by a big ball o' mutalisks due to their speed (of the templar and the mutalisks)

Roaches, with their low cost and high HP amount, and pretty good damage (16+2 per up) just chew through zealots so damn quickly when they get into a large ball. With even more health than a marauder, and doing way more damage, it makes going zealot/templar dangerous, and you really aren't going to be having too much gas if you're doing templar play.

Stalker/templar is not going to work out since speedlings surround SO fast, that unless you've got enough zealots with charge to stop them getting a good surround, you're toast.


I'm very seriously considering opening Robo in all my matchups now a days, Immortals are just so powerful against roaches. Getting a few immortals out then switching to Zealot/Templar is a decent play.
Where ever you go, there you are.
sleepingdog
Profile Joined August 2008
Austria6145 Posts
October 18 2010 11:22 GMT
#52
I just don't understand why so many ppl here are saying "roach, roach, roach" - lol OF COURSE you don't go zealots and tech to archons against roaches, even the OP suggested abandoning the build if zerg really commits to roaches

that's like saying "well, one gate robo could be bad vs mass-zealots"; duh....if zerg commits to a constant stream of roaches you obviously produce as many stalkers as your warpgates can handle and try to squeeze in a robo for immortals;
"You see....YOU SEE..." © 2010 Sen
Douillos
Profile Joined May 2010
France3195 Posts
October 19 2010 08:28 GMT
#53
On October 18 2010 20:22 sleepingdog wrote:
I just don't understand why so many ppl here are saying "roach, roach, roach" - lol OF COURSE you don't go zealots and tech to archons against roaches, even the OP suggested abandoning the build if zerg really commits to roaches

that's like saying "well, one gate robo could be bad vs mass-zealots"; duh....if zerg commits to a constant stream of roaches you obviously produce as many stalkers as your warpgates can handle and try to squeeze in a robo for immortals;



Yea this is the prefect anti muta ling IMO if pressure is properly kept on Z front. If you dont keep it properly though, mutas will rape your probes and lings will backstab you.
Look a giraffe! Look a fist!!
Slayer91
Profile Joined February 2006
Ireland23335 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-19 08:37:47
October 19 2010 08:33 GMT
#54
The problem with this build is its basically a blind counter to muta/ling. Sure you can react to fast roaches, but going roaches off a FE is VERY common to defend against protoss 1 base, and they're good units anyway. The last time someone went lotarchon (obviously he couldn't scout with no robo or hallucinate) i literally had like 16 speed roaches (and lots of drones off 2 base) and i met him in the middle and he just gg'd immediately.

Theres no way you can expect to scout roaches after a FE since he'll probably get them after some lings and 1-2 spine crawler and plenty of drones.

Someone mentioned stalker/templar, but roaches with speed beat both of those units very cost effectively.

As far as I can see, you basically need robo to beat roaches. I don't understand why all protoss just don't get robo these days. It's not really that bad against muta/ling 1 stalker beats 1 muta and guardian shield makes it worse, + you should have upgrade advantage. Having a couple colossus makes it much easier to deal with lings as well, especially with forcefields thrown in.
Monsoon
Profile Joined September 2010
United States14 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-29 20:42:12
October 29 2010 20:41 GMT
#55
Hi all, thanks for using my build!

Since the roach patch, the meta game has switch to many roach heavy builds. That has resulted in me not doing this build blind so much any more (though it is still nice). But have no fear! I stand firmly by Archons versus mutaling!

I've been doing quite a bit of fast expand first, then once I see they are going mutaling, I will tech to Archons.

Here is a replay of me going 15 Nexus on Shakuras Plateau, pushing with standard gateway units, then teching to Archons to finish the game:

[image loading]
I'll never drop the anchor, if you never stop the rain.
Kiarip
Profile Joined August 2008
United States1835 Posts
October 29 2010 20:43 GMT
#56
I've been considering voidray/archon/zealot vs zerg, thoughts?
AER0K
Profile Joined July 2010
United States24 Posts
December 16 2010 02:38 GMT
#57
I think this work is brilliant... hand in hand w/ a FE though..
or some sort of 2Gate aggressive pressure moving into an FE.
Wakizashi
Profile Joined December 2010
Finland6 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-20 08:21:29
December 20 2010 08:20 GMT
#58
Yup this is a pretty nifty strat i have to say but getting charge early is just too expensive I just cant squeese out 200 gas ;F instead I go +1 atk right of the bat which helps shitloads and when I get my 3rd and 4th gas I get the charge.
The game
xDAYMANx
Profile Joined July 2010
United States29 Posts
December 21 2010 06:28 GMT
#59
nice post. I actually have been playing around with a build like this recently and find that if you do a 2gate open, the early pressure forces zerg back a bit with lings/spines. I then go for quick DTs, again putting pressure on them to build overseers/spores. Expo up while DTs harass, and retreat.

Then just pump out zlot +atk +charge, and take those dts you used for harass, defense and get the archons going. Couple sentry for FF, shield is good too.
Master of karate and friendship for everyone
ToastieNL
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Netherlands845 Posts
December 21 2010 06:56 GMT
#60
DT Archon = 250/250
HT Archon = 100/300

Right?

So a tad later in the game, using this with DTs is a bit better as you'll get harassment options and have more gas to use actual High Templar. Should watch out for cutting to many Zealots tho!
Zerg lategame is imbalanced as shit. Also: "Protoss is really strong recently. Perhaps, it's time for there to be some changes for Terran." -MMA. Even MMA asks for buffs. Srsly Blizzard. Srsly.
Wakizashi
Profile Joined December 2010
Finland6 Posts
December 27 2010 20:56 GMT
#61
On December 21 2010 15:56 ToastieNL wrote:
DT Archon = 250/250
HT Archon = 100/300

Right?

So a tad later in the game, using this with DTs is a bit better as you'll get harassment options and have more gas to use actual High Templar. Should watch out for cutting to many Zealots tho!


The thing is the dark shrine has 100 second build time opposed to templar archives 50 seconds and to me thats a lot besides in many scenarios especially since we've already opened this tech route we'd be later on getting storm and amulet anyways so its more beneficial for these purposes in my opinion. And nowdays I find myself getting stargates after my initial pressure and expanding but thats more of a matter of prefrence really. Could concider dts but using them for archons aint really my piece of cake.
The game
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 17h 36m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mcanning 323
BRAT_OK 99
UpATreeSC 66
StarCraft: Brood War
Jaedong 3730
Flash 2927
Barracks 2330
Mini 997
EffOrt 921
BeSt 776
Soma 708
Stork 483
Snow 450
firebathero 363
[ Show more ]
Larva 318
Zeus 203
Free 161
Hyun 117
Mind 108
Rush 101
Sharp 73
TY 59
soO 45
Shinee 30
zelot 28
sorry 27
scan(afreeca) 23
Movie 22
Terrorterran 19
Yoon 16
Shine 14
SilentControl 8
ivOry 6
Dota 2
canceldota48
League of Legends
Dendi1268
Counter-Strike
ScreaM1846
flusha209
allub174
Other Games
FrodaN1725
Beastyqt435
ceh9294
KnowMe130
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 52
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki39
• FirePhoenix2
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2631
• WagamamaTV608
League of Legends
• Nemesis5855
• TFBlade718
Other Games
• Shiphtur302
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
17h 36m
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
1d 17h
Esports World Cup
2 days
Esports World Cup
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.