• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:28
CEST 10:28
KST 17:28
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection7Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview5[ASL21] Finals Preview: Two Legacies21
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 8-14): Clem and Solar double, PTR tested0RSL: S6 Finals played at BlizzCon 20269Douyu Cup 2026: $20,000 Legends Event (June 26-28)10[BSL22] Non-Korean Championship from 13 to 28 June4Weekly Cups (May 25-31): Clem doubles, 2v2 circuit heads toward finale0
StarCraft 2
General
RSL: S6 Finals played at BlizzCon 2026 TL Poll: How do you feel about the 5.0.16 PTR balance changes? Weekly Cups (June 8-14): Clem and Solar double, PTR tested Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners High level ptr replays? where can I find them?
Tourneys
Douyu Cup 2026: $20,000 Legends Event (June 26-28) Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) GSL Code S Season 2 (2026)
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
Mutation # 530 One For All The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 529 Opportunities Unleashed Mutation # 528 Infection Detected
Brood War
General
Where is EffOrt? BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ vespene.gg — BW replays in browser Quality of life changes in BW that you will like ?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Grand Finals [BSL22] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CEST Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2
Strategy
Relatively freeroll strategies Creating a full chart of Zerg builds Why doesn't anyone use restoration? Any training maps people recommend?
Other Games
General Games
ZeroSpace Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread PC Games Sales Thread
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
UK Politics Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Trading/Investing Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The HerO Fan Club! The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Facing Challenges in Mobile App Development
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Does Workplace Frustration D…
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
I'm an arrogant trash talke…
FlaShFTW
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 10132 users

[M] (2) Para Bellum

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Ferisii
Profile Joined February 2011
Denmark199 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-07-21 15:57:04
April 16 2015 15:04 GMT
#1

"If you want peace, prepare for war"
Released on: Global - UNLOCKED

Oh Agria, barely anyone likes your tileset, but dammit, I just had to give it a try!
Welcome to Para Bellum, a small farming outpost in the middle of nowhere, where the villagers have a little hidden secret. WMD in masses.

Anyhow, this is (was) my submission to the TLMC#6. I wanted to try a different map layout with small corridors added in. No 4 player map this time, as they are kinda... trickier to do.

Map Description:
'Para Bellum is a 2-player map with 12 normal expansions located on the outer reaches of the map.
The middle area consists of semi-big corridors, 4 of which can be controlled by destroying the standing Cooling Towers located at the entrances. Giving the ability for players to shape the area after their wishes.

Map size: 140x140
Distances:
* Main to main - 59 seconds.
* Nat to nat - 43 seconds.


Update Log:
~1.8
Replaced an old, unused texture with a new one. (Korhal Wastes Grass) Thanks to Algue for pointing it out!
Improved the texture details around trees somewhat.
Minor detail fixes.
~1.7
Major changes to the Natural base area. Reduced the width of the natural ramp, while also moved it slightly closer to the expansion base location. The area below the natural ramp got changed as well due to, well, the changes.
Moved the natural expansion one inch closer to the main ramp.
Expanded the terrain details underneath the cooling towers (Rock towers), to make them "pop" out more for the players/viewers.
Moved the rock decorations, the ones on the lowest level, to the sides of the playing field. (Too good widow-mine hiding spots)
More critters has entered the playing field. Can you find them all?
Completely removed the dark green texture from the map.
Minor terrain and detail fixes.
~1.6
Made some adjustments to the painted pathing at the corner bases.
Moved the dogs (critters) to outside the playing field.
Minor detail fixes.
~1.5
Fixed a painted pathing issue near the natural bases.
Vastly improved the performance around watery areas.
~1.4
Removed every single Floodlight doodad from the map. (PC performance cheers!)
Fixed some minor terrain issues
Updated the battle.net screenshot showcase again again.
+ Show Spoiler [Older versions] +
~1.3
Fixed a Gameheart logo issue.
Added 100 blue rock flowers to spice things up a bit.
Minor terrain fixes.
~1.2
Removed the Xel'naga Tower covering the middle area.
Widened up some more paths around the map.
Added in some more wildlife to the map. Birds now roams the land!
Updated the battle.net screenshot showcase once again.
~1.1
Widened up the corridors at the middle area.
Spiced the theme up some more with More random small rocks everywhere
Updated the battle.net screenshot showcase with the recent changes.
Hit the special 1500 doodad count!
~1.0
Non-beta release.



Overview, Analyser and Screenshots:
Overview:
[image loading] [image loading]
7 o'clock Bases
[image loading] [image loading]
[image loading] [image loading]
[image loading]
Details
[image loading] [image loading]
[image loading] [image loading]



Fun times ahead! ~
Author of Cactus Valley RE - My latest map: Para Bellum http://goo.gl/iV90wG
OtherWorld
Profile Blog Joined October 2013
France17333 Posts
April 16 2015 15:13 GMT
#2
Not really a fan of the middle tbh
Used Sigs - New Sigs - Cheap Sigs - Buy the Best Cheap Sig near You at www.cheapsigforsale.com
The_Templar
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
your Country52798 Posts
April 16 2015 15:27 GMT
#3
There seems to be way too much dead space in this map. The corner base is OK, but I'd open up the center (you can keep the same layout with the rocks if you'd like).
ModeratorI am still alive, somehow
TL+ Member
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
April 16 2015 19:52 GMT
#4
Loving the aesthetics. The tire tracks are a nice touch. Farm theme was definitely nailed.

I don't think the layout is particularly interesting, but it's solid.
@ opening up the middle - it's probably a good idea, I would leave some of the paths narrow and maybe just open up 2 of them or something. I don't think it's far off from being the right openness since even though it's chokey, you have multiple paths to the same point so a zerg with a large army can split it and flank from different directions and still have a decent engagement there.

IMO the map needs 1 more wrinkle to make it interesting enough, but that may just be me.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
Ferisii
Profile Joined February 2011
Denmark199 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-16 20:26:58
April 16 2015 20:20 GMT
#5
Version 1.1 has been pushed out. The corridors around the middle area have been widened up a bit. Also while I was at it, I upped the aesthetics a bit by adding some small rocks to it. Rocks is the new Pipe (fps players will get this)

Edit: A video preview will be done sometime tomorrow. Should be much more interesting to watch than simple pictures.
Author of Cactus Valley RE - My latest map: Para Bellum http://goo.gl/iV90wG
FlaShFTW
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States10477 Posts
April 16 2015 23:30 GMT
#6
if you made all those dead spaces and made them highgrounds, this map would have so much potential. maybe an inside 12/6 base with those dead spaces on high ground. then make the other places highgrounds too.
Writer#1 KT and FlaSh Fanboy || Woo Jung Ho Never Forget || Teamliquid Political Decision Desk
TL+ Member
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-17 05:50:36
April 17 2015 05:45 GMT
#7
Very pretty as always ferisii.

The deadspace is what makes this map, why all the hate? Is there an actual reason? imo the middle is fine, it creates a space that's actually worthwhile to hold. While it's not easy to kick out a camping army there, that's kind of the point of winning the position. All the routes out of the middle are narrow = bad for a huge army to move through. All the terminations of those narrow routes are wide open intersections, if not fields, where you have plenty of space to concave and engage from superior position.

While this map appears standard to the point of boring I actually think it has quite some nice things going on beyond first glance. Nice work!

[edit] Ok I take it back there could be a litlte more space in a few spots. It's hard to judge unless you look at the shots of individual bases. The one labelled "3rd" in analyzer should have more openness, take out those huts. And the crops poking into the middle should go to make it more open around the tower. Sorry haters I reinstate you now ^^ In principle though I still like the design.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
OtherWorld
Profile Blog Joined October 2013
France17333 Posts
April 17 2015 06:54 GMT
#8
On April 17 2015 14:45 EatThePath wrote:
Very pretty as always ferisii.

The deadspace is what makes this map, why all the hate? Is there an actual reason? imo the middle is fine, it creates a space that's actually worthwhile to hold. While it's not easy to kick out a camping army there, that's kind of the point of winning the position. All the routes out of the middle are narrow = bad for a huge army to move through. All the terminations of those narrow routes are wide open intersections, if not fields, where you have plenty of space to concave and engage from superior position.

While this map appears standard to the point of boring I actually think it has quite some nice things going on beyond first glance. Nice work!

[edit] Ok I take it back there could be a litlte more space in a few spots. It's hard to judge unless you look at the shots of individual bases. The one labelled "3rd" in analyzer should have more openness, take out those huts. And the crops poking into the middle should go to make it more open around the tower. Sorry haters I reinstate you now ^^ In principle though I still like the design.

Narrow routes are not necessarily bad for a huge army. They are bad for an army that requires to spread itself to trade decently. Basically I can't see a Zerg winning a game on this map past 10 minutes unless he goes full air, and then he probably loses anyway.
Used Sigs - New Sigs - Cheap Sigs - Buy the Best Cheap Sig near You at www.cheapsigforsale.com
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
April 17 2015 07:10 GMT
#9
On April 17 2015 15:54 OtherWorld wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 17 2015 14:45 EatThePath wrote:
Very pretty as always ferisii.

The deadspace is what makes this map, why all the hate? Is there an actual reason? imo the middle is fine, it creates a space that's actually worthwhile to hold. While it's not easy to kick out a camping army there, that's kind of the point of winning the position. All the routes out of the middle are narrow = bad for a huge army to move through. All the terminations of those narrow routes are wide open intersections, if not fields, where you have plenty of space to concave and engage from superior position.

While this map appears standard to the point of boring I actually think it has quite some nice things going on beyond first glance. Nice work!

[edit] Ok I take it back there could be a litlte more space in a few spots. It's hard to judge unless you look at the shots of individual bases. The one labelled "3rd" in analyzer should have more openness, take out those huts. And the crops poking into the middle should go to make it more open around the tower. Sorry haters I reinstate you now ^^ In principle though I still like the design.

Narrow routes are not necessarily bad for a huge army. They are bad for an army that requires to spread itself to trade decently. Basically I can't see a Zerg winning a game on this map past 10 minutes unless he goes full air, and then he probably loses anyway.

For ZvT specifically, there are lots of situations where zerg is happy to fight in a corridor, especially if they can have a flank from behind as well. That seems plausible here. But zerg doesn't have to force that because they have good open areas outside the nat and vertical 3rd and either side of the 4th. I'm not sure why you make such a strong statement about imbalance..?
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
OtherWorld
Profile Blog Joined October 2013
France17333 Posts
April 17 2015 07:38 GMT
#10
On April 17 2015 16:10 EatThePath wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 17 2015 15:54 OtherWorld wrote:
On April 17 2015 14:45 EatThePath wrote:
Very pretty as always ferisii.

The deadspace is what makes this map, why all the hate? Is there an actual reason? imo the middle is fine, it creates a space that's actually worthwhile to hold. While it's not easy to kick out a camping army there, that's kind of the point of winning the position. All the routes out of the middle are narrow = bad for a huge army to move through. All the terminations of those narrow routes are wide open intersections, if not fields, where you have plenty of space to concave and engage from superior position.

While this map appears standard to the point of boring I actually think it has quite some nice things going on beyond first glance. Nice work!

[edit] Ok I take it back there could be a litlte more space in a few spots. It's hard to judge unless you look at the shots of individual bases. The one labelled "3rd" in analyzer should have more openness, take out those huts. And the crops poking into the middle should go to make it more open around the tower. Sorry haters I reinstate you now ^^ In principle though I still like the design.

Narrow routes are not necessarily bad for a huge army. They are bad for an army that requires to spread itself to trade decently. Basically I can't see a Zerg winning a game on this map past 10 minutes unless he goes full air, and then he probably loses anyway.

For ZvT specifically, there are lots of situations where zerg is happy to fight in a corridor, especially if they can have a flank from behind as well. That seems plausible here. But zerg doesn't have to force that because they have good open areas outside the nat and vertical 3rd and either side of the 4th. I'm not sure why you make such a strong statement about imbalance..?

Yes, because in those situations it's the Terran who needs to spread out to trade well, and then the Zerg will be very favored. But in ZvP and Zvsome styles of Mech, I think that this middle design is too narrow to be balanced. Now that's just theorycrafting, obviously.
Used Sigs - New Sigs - Cheap Sigs - Buy the Best Cheap Sig near You at www.cheapsigforsale.com
Ferisii
Profile Joined February 2011
Denmark199 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-07-07 15:32:34
April 17 2015 21:15 GMT
#11
so many distractions I had to endure today! But I finally got the newest version finished up and made a small preview video for it! Hope you'll like it. Check the OP for it.

I decided to remove the middle Xel'naga Tower to open up some space, and I also made a bunch of areas more wide, thus, army movement should be much more fluid around the map.
Author of Cactus Valley RE - My latest map: Para Bellum http://goo.gl/iV90wG
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 15h 32m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 28518
Sea 3457
Tasteless 401
actioN 249
Zeus 157
Soma 67
Mind 65
Larva 58
sorry 29
ZergMaN 26
[ Show more ]
yabsab 25
soO 24
Bale 15
League of Legends
JimRising 509
Counter-Strike
summit1g9757
shoxiejesuss721
olofmeister559
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King98
Heroes of the Storm
Trikslyr54
Other Games
WinterStarcraft875
Liquid`RaSZi499
Happy253
Sick249
Dewaltoss31
RuFF_SC223
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream2641
Other Games
gamesdonequick618
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH287
• LUISG 18
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 3
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1593
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
15h 32m
Replay Cast
1d
The PondCast
2 days
OSC
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
GSL
4 days
Maru vs ShoWTimE
Classic vs Reynor
herO vs Lambo
Solar vs Clem
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
4 days
XuanXuan vs Jaystar
Mihu vs Messiah
eOnzErG vs Dewalt
Bonyth vs Jaystar
TerrOr vs Messiah
XuanXuan vs Mihu
eOnzErG vs Jaystar
Replay Cast
4 days
GSL
5 days
Patches Events
5 days
[ Show More ]
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
5 days
Dewalt vs Messiah
Bonyth vs Mihu
TerrOr vs XuanXuan
eOnzErG vs Messiah
Jaystar vs Mihu
Dewalt vs XuanXuan
Bonyth vs TerrOr
Replay Cast
5 days
WardiTV Weekly
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-06-15
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Heroes Pulsing #1

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
YSL S3
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
SCTL 2026 Spring
Maestros of the Game 2
WardiTV Spring 2026
Murky Cup 2026
Heroes Pulsing #2
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1

Upcoming

CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
Douyu Cup 2026
BCC 2026
Heroes Pulsing #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.