[M] (8) JRB Crucify

On March 22 2015 03:24 EatThePath wrote:
The towers should be on the low ground to induce movement/action there, and to slightly mitigate the turtliness they promote. I don't think close rush is a bad thing in FFA, it gives shape to the early game which is usually a dice roll on big "macro" maps. Here the clear imperative is to kill off your neighbor so you can take your fortress. This looks simple but fun!

You could make an interesting variant by adding Shakuras Plateau style connectors between the mains on the cardinal edges.

On March 21 2015 18:55 LComteVarauG wrote:
(Analyser doesn't want to work, so, sorry, I can't get one here)

On March 24 2015 03:27 And G wrote:
This is really, really awesome. I don't think close spawns will be a problem at all considering it's an FFA map. I like the island bases a lot.

The only thing I don't like is the watchtowers. IMO it would be better if there was only one watchtower in the middle of the central low ground. Since there are more players with more units it would make sense to remove the small deadzone there anyway.



Try removing the map preview image first.

On March 23 2015 13:24 Fatam wrote:
Looks fun. If you wanted to be even more cheeky you could add bases or half bases in the middle of those new paths you added (of course you'd probably need to widen them in the middle slightly to accomodate), at the risk of making terran even more OP with 2 bases to float a CC to.