| Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games |
|
Meerel
Germany713 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/YvvtNgp.jpg) Hi, i made a retexture/redoodad version of Match Point for Hots i hope you like it. Overview: ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/2aATsTd.jpg) General: + Show Spoiler + Texture: Custom Playable: 152x168 Expands: 10 + 2 small Xel'Naga: 2 Pictures: + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/bHbZKLy.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/tslql1h.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/VPv4hK4.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/osk0cur.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/1b59seD.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/xhT4unB.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/1VTtHGq.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/FgSeWSK.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/bao91wm.jpg) | ||
|
isaachukfan
Canada785 Posts
| ||
|
Qwyn
United States2779 Posts
Yeah I think it would be good to remove towers and to make the natural ramp wider. Other than that looks really fun  . | ||
|
Qikz
United Kingdom12022 Posts
| ||
|
Qwyn
United States2779 Posts
On March 20 2013 07:31 Qikz wrote: I think the natural ramp personally being that small is fine since you should be able to attack from the highground (from above the third) and it adds defenders advantage against all ins who try and rush up the ramp. You really should remove the towers though. That's true, good point. I can't get over how good the texturing is for this map (I don't know why I like it so much! Nostalgia blast!). I love, love the cliff edges. Fewer/no towers is definitely something I would like to see that doesn't really happen. I don't know why map makers feel the need to put in towers just because they are there. | ||
FlaShFTW
United States10196 Posts
 i guess sc2 maps are smaller so thats where you compensated xD | ||
|
thezanursic
5489 Posts
| ||
|
TheAmazombie
United States3714 Posts
| ||
|
EatThePath
United States3943 Posts
Could you move the towers back a little from the ramp? It's hard for defender to position units at the top of the ramp. | ||
|
Mullet_Ben
United States54 Posts
| ||
|
PineapplePizza
United States749 Posts
| ||
|
a176
Canada6688 Posts
| ||
|
Meerel
Germany713 Posts
On March 20 2013 10:46 Mullet_Ben wrote: As cool as those cliffs are, how do reapers and colossi look moving up and down them? i have no idea^^ gonna change the tower some tomorrow | ||
|
ciox
58 Posts
| ||
|
gronnelg
Norway354 Posts
Loving the aesthetics though. Great BW look. Edit: Imba primarly because of FF. | ||
|
Qikz
United Kingdom12022 Posts
On March 20 2013 18:58 gronnelg wrote: Wouldn't this map be totally imba because of the narrow chokes, and generally lack of open spaces? Loving the aesthetics though. Great BW look. Edit: Imba primarly because of FF. That's not too much of an issue to be honest as it could just be a map for TvP, TvZ, PvP, PvT, TvT or ZvZ, not all maps have to be balanced for all the matchups and if they are it's usually quite a boring map. Echoing what someone said before it'd be good to either remove the gas from the third and make it mineral only as it's so easy to take, or atleast make it a one gas expo with less minerals or something. It's so easy to hold that base. EDIT: As I can't check right now, can you still nuke the fifth opposing players 5th bases from inside your main? I used to really like that about match point. | ||
|
Ragoo
Germany2773 Posts
The 1x ramp at the nat is debatable. It makes three bases easier to defend, on the other hand it also makes defending against a sieged position on the nat harder. Not sure how exactly this would play out for all matchups. | ||
|
KingCorwin
United States134 Posts
has very BW feel | ||
|
Meerel
Germany713 Posts
| ||
|
Quakecomm
United States344 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
|
EPT
