• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:07
CEST 20:07
KST 03:07
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation9$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced4Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ i aint gon lie to u bruh... ASL20 Preliminary Maps [G] Progamer Settings [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 719 users

[D] Asymmetric Melee Maps

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
lefix
Profile Joined February 2011
Germany1082 Posts
March 26 2011 16:07 GMT
#1
Asymmetric Melee Maps

I have been working on an asymmetric map layout for the last 2 weeks are so and have been giving it alot of thought during that time.
Obviously, the big issue with asymmetric maps is balance. i agree that it is almost impossible to reach the same level of balance you can achieve with mirror maps, but i think you can get close to it. it just requires alot of work/planning/testing.

Now if you look at sc2: there is 3 races, each has it's unique units/techtree/playstyle - because of this fact alone the game isn't 100% balanced, will probably never be and there will always be people whining and complaning about it. but i believe this is also what makes the game more interesting and successful than most other rts titles out there.
the different mechanics for each race, however, make even mirrored maps also unbalanced in tvz, zvp and pvt. for example, i think most will agree that a close position tvz on meta is far from being a balanced matchup. because of different race mechanics, all maps at least require players to adjust their game plan/playstyle to whatever spawnpositions you get. the only matchups where this isn't the case: tvt, zvz, pvp mirror matchups.
i was thinking about why it is widely accepted to have map/spawn position dependend imbalances in mixed matchups - it is even considered to make certain matchups more interesting to some degree. however in mirror matchups this has been pretty much nonexistent. a tabu? why not have a tvt matchup on an asymmetric map where spawn positions favor different builds for each player. like, have one terran with a more vulnerable natural but a closer third than his opponent. one might go for a more mobile army while the other might make more siege tanks, etc. those are just examples..
in my opinion, i think an asymmetric map can be balanced to an acceptable level. in fact, maybe more balanced than some of the mirror maps are (like the close pos meta tvz i mentioned above, or tvz on scrap station anyone? but the almost perfect balance of mirror matchups would be lost.

there are already alot of maps with rotational symmetry, which are also technically unbalanced unless you spawn cross position. recently, 3player rotational maps have gained alot of popularity - which are even a little more unbalanced than regular rotantional maps as you cannot have idendical terrain for each side - the game is designed for 45degree angles, 60degree angles just don't work that well :D especially ramps and chokes will cause alot of trouble. but testbug has proven that it can work and 3player maps have gained the acceptance of the community. granted, there is a huge step from 3player maps to completely asymmetric maps. but i believe once someone does it successfully there will be alot more coming. i would love to see more mappers and players give it a try. personally, i think that asymmetric maps can make matches even more interesting as they allow for more possible scenarios, more ways on how a map can be played.

i was wondering how others feel about about this topic. what is your opinion on asymmetric maps? do you think it could be played even on a competitive level? maybe only for lower skill levels?


Map of the Month | The Planetary Workshop | SC2Melee.net
WniO
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2706 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-26 16:21:24
March 26 2011 16:21 GMT
#2
they are my favorites and ive made quite a few of them.
most people tend to disregard asymmetric maps simply because they dont look balanced, oh well. of course they could be played on a competitive level, they just need to be made right so you dont have situations where 1 player can abuse the others position, which makes things very hard on the mapper trying to find those areas. heres a small one i made, yes its asymmetrical
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=180548
Archivian
Profile Joined November 2010
United Kingdom362 Posts
March 26 2011 18:14 GMT
#3
I've been working on an asymmetric map for a loooong time. Just trying to work out the layout .And there has been so many times I have basically wiped it clean and started again.

This has always been because of balance issues of course. Alot of the maps I upload here are often pushing an idea I am exploring for my asym map (the last one was different starting times on Protosopolis Gardens) , partly to see the reaction/advice/general rules of thumb from other great map makers and find out how bad an idea it was to apply it and mostly for my own learning curve in map making.


your example "like, have one terran with a more vulnerable natural but a closer third than his opponent" I think is a a good one. Because it raises the question of how player skill is percieved.

At the moment it seems that a match follows the idea of - All things should be equal, so the only thing left unequal are the players- . If its not all equal (or even percieved as not being equal) then it could throw up too much contention with regards to a fair fight.

Also players already adapt to the terrain, and in different instances (during micro battles, or routes etc) So i was left wondering what it was i was aiming for by making an asym map. What would be the point of it to counter or justify the contention.

What I am focusing on right now is 2 things

1) a map based around taking and holding positions to be able to safely advance. Basically taking territory eg. by taking this expo I can better control this area of the map and it leads to this other expo.

Its nothing new really, only in that it would be the key focus of the map. Which means starting distances and timing related to that kind of thing are treated as less relevent.

2) The other is trying to make it balanced but not balanced. eg. the distance to the third is the same, with the path being the same width, but player A has to travel in a straight line whilst player B has to turn a corner.

Its harder to work out though and even then I'm not sure if it will work.
"you were only supposed to blow the bloody doors off!" Micheal Caine
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
March 26 2011 18:34 GMT
#4
I've actually been considering the opposite the last day or two. I actually cannot find a reason to have more than two spawn positions on a map at all, so I've been sticking to 2p maps. If someone could convince me otherwise that would welcome, but I'm just not sure.

I'm something of a perfectionist when it comes to mirror, over time I've eliminated various types of maps because of imbalance. Starting with 3p maps, because they cannot be mirrored properly, followed my the rotational-spawn 4p maps, which also have extreme asymmetric in close positions (new rotational GSL maps have done a good job of making all rush distances the same, but it's still not exactly fair,) and now I've removed all 4p maps.

It's a little weird, because non-rotational 4p maps are actually mirrored, in different ways like LT/Meta vs Shakuras/Kulas. However, I don't see any pros to a 4p map at all, only cons. There will be four quadrants of the map that are the same, meaning less original, creative terrain work and more mirroring. This makes it easy on the mapmaker, but limits their ability to design the map. It makes games more boring, I'd much rather watch a XNC game than a Meta, or even a Crevasse or Terminus (although TDA seems to make for the best games). The spawn positions are more predictable in a 2p but the expansions can be less predictable, and the paths units take, and a lot more stuff that is more complex than that.

So in a way I actually agree. 2p maps are no less symmetrical than 4p maps, but 4p maps have more of the same terrain coppied more times, so even though you can spawn in different locations (which has it's own set of problems,) once you're into the game it can get less interesting, as you say that the symmetrical maps are less interesting.

But there's no way to get around the fact that having 4 spawn positions adds luck to the game. Even if all the positions seem balanced for every matchup (which is a tough task), there's still decisions that must be made before you know where they are, as well as things like one player getting lucky and scouting the right way, while the other has to go all the way around. It's not too major, but at this point I don't see any pros for 4p maps to counteract it.

I think the 2p maps are a good middleground, they are perfectly mirrored but have way more terrain to be designed by the mapper. So if the mapper is good, the very custom terrain but lend itself to better and more balanced gameplay than a 4p map, while being less boring as well. It's all more in the control of the mapper, and I think allows the games more high-level, because there are more things to think about, not just the same terrain features over and over as much. It allows higher-level mapping to by glorified as well, as more skill I think would be required, or at least more effort could be put into a single 2p map the same size and with the same or close-to the same number of bases as a 4p map.

Getting more to the subject at hand, I think mirror matchups in particular need a very symmetrical map, some players might have a better time with certain portions of a asymmetrical map, even if it's considered balanced, which it probably could never be close to.

But while reading this, I did think about non-mirrors. And actually, I'm not sure if it's a great idea, but it's not based on chance so it should be better than 4p maps. Basically, what if the map was altered based on the race? That is, a base where the Zerg spawns would be altered to look different than a base where a Toss spawns. Could be done via triggers. You could actually balance the matchup somewhat in these ways. You cannot alter the cliff levels with triggers but you could add/remove destructible rocks and neutral buildings, and things like that. IDK, it might work to do something like that. Maybe on a map like Crevasse, you could remove the rocks blocking the ramp for all Zerg players, maybe. Or random stuff like unpowered cannons for Protoss. Might be better just to keep it simple, though.

all's fair in love and melodies
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV European League
16:00
Swiss Groups Day 3
Scarlett vs ShamelessLIVE!
WardiTV809
TKL 279
Liquipedia
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
16:00
Warmup Cup 2
uThermal297
IndyStarCraft 230
SteadfastSC115
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 380
uThermal 297
TKL 279
IndyStarCraft 230
SteadfastSC 115
BRAT_OK 84
UpATreeSC 77
ProTech36
MindelVK 17
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 1565
Shuttle 955
EffOrt 931
firebathero 303
Mini 272
TY 91
Dewaltoss 90
soO 56
sas.Sziky 18
yabsab 11
[ Show more ]
IntoTheRainbow 9
GoRush 7
Dota 2
Gorgc11730
qojqva1918
League of Legends
Dendi1038
Grubby1
Counter-Strike
fl0m1144
byalli546
flusha354
zeus216
Foxcn181
sgares47
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu414
Khaldor139
Other Games
FrodaN2224
Beastyqt601
oskar147
KnowMe143
QueenE53
Trikslyr47
ArmadaUGS16
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick45299
StarCraft 2
angryscii 15
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Reevou 7
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix3
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2575
• masondota2817
League of Legends
• Nemesis6327
• Jankos1196
• TFBlade1059
Other Games
• imaqtpie980
• Shiphtur604
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
5h 53m
RSL Revival
15h 53m
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
18h 53m
Replay Cast
1d 5h
RSL Revival
1d 15h
Classic vs Cure
FEL
1d 21h
OSC
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
2 days
FEL
2 days
[ Show More ]
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.