| Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
|
RaiKageRyu
Canada4773 Posts
It's not just compacted into 4:3 ration either. The actual setup is 4:3, so you are losing out of watch you are seeing in overall space. SC2 was designed for widescreen, so this ain't something you can adjust to. It just feels wrong when watching. My only other complaint, because its not fair to compare multilingual casting support, is what OGN traditionally does but is a pet peeve of mine. When one person wins a match, they show the loser first and this has always irritated me ages ago. | ||
Dazer
239 Posts
Plus, OGN have great production, screamo music before the matches, dramatic headshot...etc. Gomtv is way behind imo. MLG, Dreamhack is way outclassed by what I saw on WCG. Shit never felt so real from watching SC2 until now. Shit's getting real son! PS: And big deal on the resolution, stop being so god damn picky. That problem can be easily fix compare to other things that OGN excels at. | ||
|
Kralic
Canada2628 Posts
Voted for OGN because I love the casters enthusiasm and of course when they say the English word even though they are translated in this game. ^^; 4:3 resolution is not the end of the world. | ||
|
figq
12519 Posts
| ||
|
gulati
United States2241 Posts
Don't get me wrong man, GOM has stepped their shit up since the Avertec Classics, which.. weren't bad, but were definitely not stellar either. I love how GOM provides English commentary, and we all love Tastosis, but the passion, professionalism, experience and legacy of OGN is something that is incomparable. OnGameNet's production value is the highest of any gaming tournament in the world; far superior to MLG or anything else I can even think of, in terms of commentators, animations, graphics, crowds (I can only speak for BW crowds since we don't know what OGN SC2 crowds are standardized as) and legacy. | ||
|
Kanil
United States1713 Posts
| ||
|
Draconicfire
Canada2562 Posts
| ||
|
peekn
United States1152 Posts
Now we just need Tasteosis to boogie on over there. | ||
|
jeremysaint
Canada80 Posts
until ogn starts casting in english it really doesnt matter what they do. i will buy the occassional season of gsl but with no english casting i would never buy ogn's series. however i suspect ogn will start casting in english as well, and at that point i really look forward to watching them. i rarely get to watch games with my favorite korean players, and a second league can only increase the chances that i will get to see more of julyzerg or mma. | ||
|
windsupernova
Mexico5280 Posts
Music wise... I actually like the Music GOM uses, more than what OGN uses, but oh well opinions. | ||
|
salito
1649 Posts
another silly poll | ||
Klogon
MURICA15980 Posts
I'm actually surprised by how much Gom is winning this poll. I thought OGN had aspects that were absolutely superb. | ||
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
the only flaw is that ratio but that is an issue easily resolved The obsing, the commentators, the lighting, the (deadpan) doom zooms its all fucking awesome. | ||
|
salito
1649 Posts
| ||
|
mtn
729 Posts
The quality of it is just fucking amazing. PS. Not to mention the Observer - KING. EDIT And for those who talk that stream quality is shit vs GOM are just stupid. Haven't u forgot how sc2 was when u could re-stream it on TL? If you want OGN in HD go to ongamenet.com - Register and watch it for FREE in HD. | ||
|
Zaxro
United States261 Posts
1.They have good English casters-No casters doesn't bug me as I watched BW for years with either my music playing or listening to the Korean commentators 2. They broadcast in a better resolution-This is the only real complaint I have about OGN broadcasting SC2 But in my mind all of that is overidden by the excellent zooms on players faces, something that I think has been missing from SC2, which just makes the whole thing fell much better. Also OGN's Studio>Gom's studio, as do OGN's shots of the crowd. Also OGN has better obsing, though that is something that doesn't bother me (after obsing is to a certain level of competant I don't really care, but OGN's obsing is notably very very good). I voted OGN, but I can see why people voted for GOM as I think many find them fairly significant, for a good reason | ||
|
gCgCrypto
Germany297 Posts
| ||
|
StutteR
United States1903 Posts
 | ||
|
Grayson Carlyle
Canada219 Posts
On September 25 2011 11:50 gulati wrote: OnGameNet's production value is the highest of any gaming tournament in the world; far superior to MLG or anything else I can even think of, in terms of commentators, animations, graphics, crowds (I can only speak for BW crowds since we don't know what OGN SC2 crowds are standardized as) and legacy. That's not what the poll is for though. Have you actually watched OGN's SC2? I waited until I had to vote. Inter-game crap is useless, who cares about it? OGN cuts out of action shots to get headshots of players, Obs isn't used to SC2 yet, it's broadcast in 4:3 with a non-adaptive codec (so things never "come into focus"; you can't read any numbers at all on the OGN broadcast), with shitty computers using low graphics settings and lastly they spend far too much time between games. For the actual games, GOM > OGN. Nothing else matters. Yah, it feels like it's still Brood War being played. And that's bad, because this is 2011. It looks like it's being broadcast on a TV from 1987. Someone said a cable TV broadcast was a good thing. I don't think they've actually watched any modern technology e-sports broadcast and have only been watching BW. Cable TV broadcasts in 320p are ruining e-sports. | ||
|
Gfire
United States1699 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
OSC
Replay Cast
OSC
Big Brain Bouts
Rex vs INexorable
GgMaChine vs HeRoMaRinE
Reynor vs herO
AI Arena Tournament
BSL: Ladder Tournament
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Patches Events
BSL Open Qualifier
BSL Open Qualifier
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
