EPT[LP] Cool stuff - Page 2
| Forum Index > News |
|
The_Piper42
United States426 Posts
| ||
|
waterglen
United States103 Posts
| ||
|
FILM
United States663 Posts
| ||
|
Sewi
Germany1697 Posts
Love to read old BW stuff. Brings back so many memories :p | ||
|
ThaZenith
Canada3116 Posts
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/Pholon/Liquipedia/derp2.png) Classic structure for curling tournaments lol. Loser of 1-2 game faces winner of 3-4, winner of that game faces winner of 1-2 in the final. I think the player progress chart is awesome. | ||
|
Vinck
England20 Posts
| ||
|
Navane
Netherlands2757 Posts
This looks like double elimination. X-1 is the winners bracket, X-2 the loosers bracket. | ||
|
darklordjac
Canada2231 Posts
| ||
|
Trap
United States395 Posts
| ||
|
lurked
Canada918 Posts
Really nice job from the wiki staff, keep going!  | ||
|
fidelity
Sweden410 Posts
| ||
|
Taawus
Estonia36 Posts
| ||
|
Snipinpanda
United States1227 Posts
But may I ask why the page is labeled as one fact tanks when it's clearly two? | ||
|
ReketSomething
United States6012 Posts
jk LP <3 thanks for the hard work guys! :_ way to go! | ||
|
Sayer
United States403 Posts
| ||
|
PointyBagels
United States90 Posts
| ||
|
c0ldfusion
United States8293 Posts
That's crazy, that means that the top of ladder (non-code S or A) is way stronger than the bottom of code A right now. If this continues into May, it could mean that Gom is giving code A players too much protection and not giving the up-and-comers enough of a shot - still a neat chart nonetheless. | ||
|
aisight
United States145 Posts
On February 03 2011 02:52 c0ldfusion wrote: So regarding the code A/code S charts, it looks like amongst all the code A players who dropped down to play in the pre-lims, only Ace made it back? That's crazy, that means that the top of ladder (non-code S or A) is way stronger than the bottom of code A right now. If this continues into May, it could mean that Gom is giving code A players too much protection and not giving the up-and-comers enough of a shot - still a neat chart nonetheless. How do you figure? With a potential turnover of half of the entire Code A roster each season, and with the typical ordering in seasons (top seeds are paired up against bottom seeds), you can end up with a completely new set of 32 players in two seasons. | ||
tofucake
Hyrule19237 Posts
On February 03 2011 11:00 aisight wrote: How do you figure? With a potential turnover of half of the entire Code A roster each season, and with the typical ordering in seasons (top seeds are paired up against bottom seeds), you can end up with a completely new set of 32 players in two seasons. I think you are the only person who actually understands the Code S/A and UpDown matches. | ||
|
imyzhang
Canada809 Posts
On February 05 2011 00:59 tofucake wrote: I think you are the only person who actually understands the Code S/A and UpDown matches. lol yeah, seems like there's a shit ton more players who don't get the gsl up/down matches, than those who do... (me being one who doesn't). man when i read 1999 it doesn't seem like that long ago. but when i think about it, that was 12 years ago... jesus, esports has come a long way. | ||
| ||
