i hope this game is longer

Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
i hope this game is longer ![]() | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On March 17 2009 14:06 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: Any mod / someone who saw that want to tell us what that was? EDIT: nevermind more_minerals isn't in this game lol he voted for bloodycobbler but then i guess he realized that he wasn't playing ![]() | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
![]() Anyway. I don't see why people are voting BC when he hasn't even made a statement in the thread yet. Why don't we wait for some actual campaigning instead of blind voting? | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
BC Qatol Jyvblamo Ver Fishball Pyrrhuloxia Fusionsdf Mikeymoo Teejing Semioldguy 0cz3c Mista Pika Chu Pyrrhuloxia i dont think i missed any. edit: this one sucks, second tally is accurate. i blame all you non format followers | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On March 18 2009 07:31 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: Show nested quote + On March 18 2009 07:21 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: Current vote tally: BC Qatol Jyvblamo Ver Fishball Pyrrhuloxia Fusionsdf Mikeymoo Teejing Semioldguy 0cz3c Mista Pika Chu Pyrrhuloxia i dont think i missed any. I thought I voted for BC not semioldguy yeah you did. my mistake. also what i did was run a ctrl+f for "vote for" but now that i am going back it looks like there are some votes that weren't posted in the correct format. Updated list comin in a minute. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
BC Qatol Jyvblamo Ver Fishball Chaoser Pyrrhuloxia Scaramanga Pyrrhuloxia Fusionsdf Mikeymoo Teejing LaxerCannon Semioldguy 0cz3c Mista Pika Chu Phrujbaz Caller (no longer running!) Malongo OK, now i really don't think i missed any! | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On March 18 2009 09:39 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: "The other reason we can't tell which side an incarcerated player is on simply by looking at kill power, is that kill power isn't going to change half of the time from a single Mafia being removed. So we would need to rely on a role-check anyway." So should we medic up on vigis hoping they will kill a mafia and survive the night? If the vigi called out someone the town has high suspicions of and the vigi is someone who has played in a way that looks legit maybe we should consider it because its the most likely way I see to have a publicly confirmed blue that can't be a GF. yes, this is true, however - someone the town is extremely suspicious of is not always red. And if the vigi hits a blue and survives the night with medic help or otherwise, a DT check would confirm they are either vigi or godfather. Maybe I am misunderstanding you, but Godfather won't show up on a DT check as Godfather, that's why he is the Godfather... If they hit a blue we won't send them roles and if there are extra vigi calls we'll have a short list to find mafia from. So... what if we just have one vigi a day call out a hit and then be protected that night. We are bound to eventually hit a red and have someone we can trust. Cons are obviously that it may not be worth the medics focusing and it may take too long and allow too many deaths to set up - plus if mafia get some kills on medics and vigis early we may never get a red and have wasted time setting this up. Still, the unique characteristic that mafia can't kill themselves seems like the only exploitable way to make sure someone is 100% blue so maybe we should consider it. The idea of medics protecting vets could work as long as all vigis call their hits so we know they didn't trigger a medic but the medic and vet could both be mafia or one or both could be millers or godfather and it would be awfully tough to weed that out. With one vigi a day claming and medics on him, there is no way to coordinate the meds. So we may end up with all meds on him or sometimes even none. I think it would allow mafia way too many free hits; they can probably count on the vig being protected and have less fear to spread the hits around to key players. Plus it only works if the vig hits a red. If the vig misses the negative consequences are rather harsh. If he lands a red then we've got a go to man for at least a little while. So i think it's extremely all-or-nothing, especially early on which unfortunately is when we need the most set up we can get. Good point that vig claiming a hit allows medic to avoid protection on that person. But if the vig is only targeting suspicious players, why would the medic be planning to protect that person anyway? One question: if we're really, really suspicious of someone, is it better to lynch them instead of using a one time vigi kill? I'm not really sure but i hope someone with more experience than i could answer this. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On March 18 2009 10:23 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: The biggest risk I see is the mafia faking as a vigi and stringing us along by posing as a vigi attempting to kill blue after blue and having the mafia end up killing the same person. We would probably have to choose as a town who the vigi should kill because that way a fake vigi wouldn't be able to just choose someone who is not mafia everytime and claim every morning that the mafia had killed the same person in order to foil them. Vigis are always having to deal with the risk of killing a blue or green so as long as its a person the town is okay with attacking I don't think the negative consequences are that bad, however early on we are probably unlikely to have an extra kill to want to give to a vigi that might be fake when we could double lynch - we are also unlikely to even have someone to double lynch. Thing is: say a legit vig claims a hit, and overnight turns out that person was green/blue. Mafia can now kill the vig for free, because it reveals no new information to us. Or they let him live and allow suspicion to develop. Even some mafia/players could push a case to say that the vig must have been faking and start a bandwagon to lynch, then we lost a lynch and a vig and a vig hit and a bystander. You cannot count on such a bandwagoning attempt to be immediately transparent - i think the power of bandwagoning has been proven in previous games. I understand we have precious few options for confirming blues, but the adequacy of the plans so far leads me to question whether it is even worth it to bother with them in this round. I suspect it will be better to hold our elected officials to an agenda that solely benefits town - under pressure of lynch if they screw up. This could help minimize any damage done by a possible elected mafia, because an elected townie will act for the towns benefit anyway unless he is an idiot. But then we just screwed up by electing an idiot etc. edit fixed tags | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On March 18 2009 11:02 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: Show nested quote + On March 18 2009 10:50 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: Thing is: say a legit vig claims a hit, and overnight turns out that person was green/blue. Mafia can now kill the vig for free, because it reveals no new information to us. Or they let him live and allow suspicion to develop. Even some mafia/players could push a case to say that the vig must have been faking and start a bandwagon to lynch, then we lost a lynch and a vig and a vig hit and a bystander. You cannot count on such a bandwagoning attempt to be immediately transparent - i think the power of bandwagoning has been proven in previous games. If the Vig is going to kill a blue/green the mafia will probably let him do it. If the vig is going to kill red they will probably try to kill the vig to prevent organization. If the vig gets killed after killing a blue/green its not the end of the world since they had no power left anyway. If the mafia bandwagon to kill the vig who killed a blue/green I think they will look suspicious - we aren't giving the roles to a vig unless they hit red. On the fourth day if a vigi comes forward saying they are a vigi when we've already had 3 claim then we have a short list from which we can find at least one mafia and if we accidentally kill a blue/green while using clues to sift through it at least they are ones that killed how the town wanted them to (have to make sure we hold them to this so the mafia won't want to fake a vigi and then be asked to kill a red that they can't kill) and are now powerless. Yeah, if the vig is smart he will send his hit to Chuiu before he claims in the thread, to ensure the hit goes through no matter if he is targeted by mafia. I guess I just think the consequences of missing are worse than you think they are. But still this takes a lot of time, 4 days is a lot of kp for the mafia. I am not as against the plan as Ace is, but I still don't like it. You might be right though, that it is the best chance we have. Show nested quote + On March 18 2009 10:50 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: I understand we have precious few options for confirming blues, but the adequacy of the plans so far leads me to question whether it is even worth it to bother with them in this round. I suspect it will be better to hold our elected officials to an agenda that solely benefits town - under pressure of lynch if they screw up. This could help minimize any damage done by a possible elected mafia, because an elected townie will act for the towns benefit anyway unless he is an idiot. But then we just screwed up by electing an idiot etc. I do agree that the vigi plan is a long shot however I don't think it is mutually exclusive with holding elected officials to the demands of the town under pain of lynch - that should happen regardless. That's true, i don't know why i said it like that. They are not mutually exclusive, but consider cost v benefit of vigi plan vs. not doing anything at all and perhaps it comes out about even. The thread is exploding now and I'm like 20 posts behind so this reply is probably late. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On March 18 2009 11:58 Ace wrote: @Inf: You know if I'm against some plan in a Mafia game and if you assume I'm innocent - there has to be a really good reason right? Look at the plan and tell me after going through all the "if this happens, and then if this and this and this" happens and it all comes out what is the point? It's like no one realizes this game is designed so that there is no way to have early central organization as easy as before, but you guys are going to kill yourselves and all the rest of us in trying. right now it's better to see how the this election and the first day plays out while letting the DTs do whatever it is they want to do. Yeah... if I assume that you're innocent ![]() You're too smart a player for me to comfrotably assume anything about you ^^ If dt's are going to do whatever they want, I bet they will go rolecheck for the high profile guys and maybe the smurfs. Maybe 1 or 2 will save their rolecheck for day 2. Then we could have some more fun day 1 dt roleclaims! | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On March 19 2009 09:16 fusionsdf wrote: If we have to lynch someone on the first day, then it makes sense to lynch the person with the most clues against them, even if the clues aren't 100%. It makes just as much sense to lynch an inactive. edit: It* | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On March 20 2009 10:13 JL13 wrote: Well so far it seems like the problem with vigi's as they send in their hits is: 1) Do vigi's publicly claim their hits after sending PMs to Chuiu, thus medics don't protect vigi hits ensuring the hit goes through regardless if the target is town/mafia? 2) Do vigi's stay silent and pray medics don't protect the target? Am I getting this right? I will post my opinions once I get this cleared up. 1) Yes that's the idea, if a vigi were to claim he would only claim after PMing Chuiu his hit. 2) As long as the vigi is targeting a known suspect of the town, he shouldn't have to worry about that player being protected - this is of course assuming we have no medics purposely messing up the game. The only reason a vigi would speak up beforehand is to prove his identity as blue - but that only works if he hits a mafia successfully. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
I suggested a possible clue link from the 4th mafia that stayed behind, waiting for Incognito, to the name "Lurker." It sort of fits, but I want to bring it up again so others can see it. Also: what kind of person could run with their hands behind their head and also grab a gun and throw it to the side? Perhaps someone who is very "Versatile." It's possible but i don't think Chuiu usually writes clues like that. I'd imagine that mafioso to be hinting towards some kind of animal, like a monkey, or someone with multiple appendages. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On March 20 2009 12:43 Ace wrote: Show nested quote + On March 20 2009 12:32 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: dreamflower, i like the idea of betrayal regarding the man that helped Chuiu up and then stabbed him. Why would Chuiu, the sheriff and hardened crime fighter, accept the help up from a criminal? It could be someone he recognized or knew that betrayed him by siding with the mafia. So we should keep an eye in the day posts for someone that kills in a deceitful way, by tricking his victims into thinking he is going to help them. I suggested a possible clue link from the 4th mafia that stayed behind, waiting for Incognito, to the name "Lurker." It sort of fits, but I want to bring it up again so others can see it. Also: what kind of person could run with their hands behind their head and also grab a gun and throw it to the side? Perhaps someone who is very "Versatile." It's possible but i don't think Chuiu usually writes clues like that. I'd imagine that mafioso to be hinting towards some kind of animal, like a monkey, or someone with multiple appendages. If it helps Versatile is also synonymous with being ambidextrous. However for both their hands to be behind their head, and then grab something suggests another pair of hands doesn't it? Yeah I agree that the clue definitely suggests some extra body part or force being used. Versatile's name just jumped out to me on the list when I was thinking about that particular mafioso. On March 20 2009 12:44 redtooth wrote: Show nested quote + On March 20 2009 12:39 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: Yeah I see pikachus and lions put their hands behind their heads all the time don't you edited to show how dumb day 1 clue analysis is. its good work you guys are doing but i don't know if it will produce any results. i'm going to sleep now. hahah excellent point. Don't worry, eventually someone will say the gladiator link in my profile is a clue because a mafioso killed someone with a knife (oh if only MidnightGladius was playing ![]() | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On March 20 2009 13:02 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: Show nested quote + On March 20 2009 12:48 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: On March 20 2009 12:43 Ace wrote: On March 20 2009 12:32 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: dreamflower, i like the idea of betrayal regarding the man that helped Chuiu up and then stabbed him. Why would Chuiu, the sheriff and hardened crime fighter, accept the help up from a criminal? It could be someone he recognized or knew that betrayed him by siding with the mafia. So we should keep an eye in the day posts for someone that kills in a deceitful way, by tricking his victims into thinking he is going to help them. I suggested a possible clue link from the 4th mafia that stayed behind, waiting for Incognito, to the name "Lurker." It sort of fits, but I want to bring it up again so others can see it. Also: what kind of person could run with their hands behind their head and also grab a gun and throw it to the side? Perhaps someone who is very "Versatile." It's possible but i don't think Chuiu usually writes clues like that. I'd imagine that mafioso to be hinting towards some kind of animal, like a monkey, or someone with multiple appendages. If it helps Versatile is also synonymous with being ambidextrous. However for both their hands to be behind their head, and then grab something suggests another pair of hands doesn't it? Yeah I agree that the clue definitely suggests some extra body part or force being used. Versatile's name just jumped out to me on the list when I was thinking about that particular mafioso. On March 20 2009 12:44 redtooth wrote: On March 20 2009 12:39 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: Yeah I see pikachus and lions put their hands behind their heads all the time don't you edited to show how dumb day 1 clue analysis is. its good work you guys are doing but i don't know if it will produce any results. i'm going to sleep now. hahah excellent point. Don't worry, eventually someone will say the gladiator link in my profile is a clue because a mafioso killed someone with a knife (oh if only MidnightGladius was playing ![]() Didn't someone say that there was a scene from the movie Gladiator where someone helps another guy up and then stabs them? Yeah that was brought up but I forget by who. I'm not worried about it though. On March 20 2009 12:57 redtooth wrote: Show nested quote + On March 20 2009 12:48 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: hahah excellent point. Don't worry, eventually someone will say the gladiator link in my profile is a clue because a mafioso killed someone with a knife (oh if only MidnightGladius was playing ![]() well i clicked that link and would just like to say that i want my 2 coins back. For that, my friend, you must defeat me in the arena! ![]() (i dont even know what that smilie means) | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On March 21 2009 14:59 redtooth wrote: Now that my semi-rage post is over with, let's get down to business. Ace was probably jailed to protect him from hits. The question now is: did a medic actually do his job and block a hit or was the fifth hit on Ace. Medics, just because someone is on Ace's list of the "vets" doesn't mean you shouldn't save them. Ver's death is going to be a big blow to us. I'm surprised that they killed Scaramanga (assuming Ver didn't pick him off). He would have probably have wasted one of our lynches. Obviously a mistake on the mafia's part so we can assume that they weren't too active in the last hours of the night when Ver started pressing Scara. Clue analysis will probably be the name of the game. If you aren't willing to post (as many people are claiming to be) then go through people's profiles and google/wikipedia odd sounding names. We can redeem this debacle. To Chuiu: There's no way of us knowing if the medics/dt were afk or inactive right? If we lose because our medics are "at work" then I propose we ban them. This night was ridiculous. The mafia hit on Scara is really weird, becaus eif he was given a bg role (even if it was mistaken!) it means that he was green, because blues cannot be given a bg role. So we can conclude that either the mafia messed up or they hit him for two plasusible reasons: 1)Scara was somehow still bodyguard maybe 2)Scara had been in contact with players via PM and be good to eliminate. It just doesn't fit though. I hope I'm not misinterpreting the rules, because I don't think it's possible that a vigi could have knocked off Scara. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
haven't decided who to lynch yet. BTW the Humbug clue you guys are talking about - the theme of deception - fits well with the killer on Day 1 who helped Chuiu up and then stabbed him. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
I've been as active as I can, Caller. Not really sure what you're comparing my previous levels of activity to. The only game I can remember being at least somewhat active was BC's, where i did clue analysis. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
March 22 2009 17:12 GMT
#1018
On March 22 2009 15:03 Caller wrote: Show nested quote + On March 22 2009 14:53 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: I vote for Mandalor I've been as active as I can, Caller. Not really sure what you're comparing my previous levels of activity to. The only game I can remember being at least somewhat active was BC's, where i did clue analysis. Your posts so far are a mismatch of anti-vigi plan posts and uninformativeposts about last night-a lot of aomething that says nothing, and you haven't really done the clue analysis that you did last games. Like I said: i've been as active as i can so far. School + job and other commitments take up a lot of time. I have 2 very difficult exams coming up and have to spend the next few days preparing. Perhaps after that i'll have more time to debate in here, and i apologize that i have not been able to contribute as much as i used to. And btw, only a couple of my posts this game have been uninformative. Please do not generalize. In any case i have a couple hours free time now so let's make a post. I suppose i should probably make a comment about the artery thing Pyrr posted. I do not think this is a clue that links to me. Let's see why: Ver's major arteries were stabbed into and they left him there to bleed out and die. First off we see that we are talking in plurals here; there is more than one artery. Where are the major arteries in the body? Thigh/leg (femoral) , neck (jugular), wrist/arm (carpal?), and heart (aorta).Ver got stabbed in these places. So pyrr is referring to the infundibulum in the heart. Problem is this guy was stabbed in many places, not to mention the heart is behind the rib cage and so rather more difficult to stab. Additionally: there is more than one infundibulum in the body, and only one is located near an artery. If Chuiu was to wikipedia my name to make a clue, it is safe to assume he would have noticed this. And who is the first person to say "nice find?" Ashwtini, someone who has already been singled out for behaving strangely. Caller, who is already suspicious of me for other reasons - suspicions which may be somewhat justified, although misplaced. --- If we are assuming the sentence is a clue, the thing to note about it is that the killer is very knowledgeable and skilled to be able to target the major arteries with lethal precision. What's more important about Ver's killers though is that one is covered in tattoos and symbols, and the other appeared pathetic at fighting and was actually skilled. Both of those characteristics are unique descriptors that we can expect to see again (though in a different form) in the coming day posts. I admit i'm having a difficult time getting a solid link from these clues to anyone. A connection to the tattoos could be mikeymoo's profile, which is just a list of random stuff, similar to the tattoos. But i don't think his behavior matches. Someone who appears pathetic at fighting could be a semi-old-guy, or a LeperKahn (would you expect a leprechaun to appear skilled at fighting)? Those are both weak though. Here i think is the ideal course of action: 1. Mandalor is hung (he always dies early. cursed? probably.) 2. He is mafia or miller. We learn a bit about SoG. 3. Nightfall. Rice may be vigi'd - i wouldn't be surprised to see it. Lowering KP to 5. 4. People die. Hopefully not very many. Clues are had. After Rice who is good as dead, my current favorite suspicion based on clues is Humbug. Also, people please keep in mind Versatile's mafia character list when clue analyzing: On March 22 2009 06:26 Versatile wrote: 3. As for the mafia personalities, I've come up with: a. Powerful, dressed in all black, armed man this may be Rice. b. Weak, pathetic fight man c. Tattooed biker man d. Person-in-charge w/ bum characteristics The collector. Humbug possibly?. e. Person possible multiple arms from Day 1 (or is a Pikachu lol) f. Explosions man who sets traps and taunts. My additions in bold. edit: grammar | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
March 24 2009 01:58 GMT
#1120
On March 24 2009 08:42 semioldguy wrote: I definitely want to hear from others how we should handle this as a town. Mandalor's lynch doesn't conclusively prove you as innocent, but it is a strong argument. It is possible that you would be mafia, seeing Mandalor's lynch inevitable, and pose as dt to seal the deal on his lynch and gain you trust for the town, even though doing so loses KP. If you were mafia you also would not pretend to claim his innocence because that would have been easily counter checked by a real DT. So basically your innocence comes into question if a large quantity of blues start mysteriously dying. My gut feeling is that you are telling the truth. The innocence of the other two detective can be ascertained when: 1.we see who is killed at night 2. what their clue/rolechecks come back as. if they lie, something will eventually turn up that exposes them, either from deaths or further rolecheck. It is then your job to expose this... i think. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
March 24 2009 05:11 GMT
#1155
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
April 03 2009 21:06 GMT
#1673
| ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games Grubby6435 tarik_tv5358 summit1g4262 Beastyqt1518 Lowko1051 FrodaN805 shahzam426 elazer223 Pyrionflax159 Trikslyr71 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Adnapsc2 StarCraft: Brood War![]() • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • sooper7s • Migwel ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • AfreecaTV YouTube • IndyKCrew ![]() Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
PiGosaur Monday
Online Event
herO vs Lemon
Solar vs GuMiho
Code For Giants Cup
The PondCast
WardiTV Spring Champion…
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
Online Event
Clem vs Nice
SHIN vs Classic
Replay Cast
Clem vs Dark
ByuN vs herO
OSC
Online Event
Creator vs GuMiho
Percival vs Dark
Zoun vs ByuN
Lemon vs Ryung
[ Show More ] WardiTV Spring Champion…
SC Evo League
Replay Cast
Online Event
WardiTV Spring Champion…
Online Event
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Spring Champion…
Online Event
Afreeca Starleague
Soulkey vs Scan
Barracks vs Light
Wardi Open
|
|