|
On January 16 2017 05:45 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On January 16 2017 05:41 Hapahauli wrote:On January 16 2017 05:36 Vivax wrote:On January 16 2017 05:32 Hapahauli wrote:
"Agree here" = I didn't like HolyFlare's entrance. Do you find it scummy? Yes. #1 On January 16 2017 04:07 Holyflare wrote:
I like that vivax drew his conclusion, I like that hapa called it weird because I felt the same.
That is all. #2 On January 16 2017 04:34 Holyflare wrote:On January 16 2017 04:11 Hapahauli wrote:
Your attempt at diplomacy bores me.
Why do you like that Vivax drew his conclusion if you thought it was weird? I liked the process of reading what you were doing and making a remark on how it affected his thought on you. It was remarkably high level compared to what I'm used to seeing recently. #2 is not a satisfying explanation of #1. It does not make much sense how HF can consider something "weird", yet "remarkably high level". I don't find it scummy, actually. It might even show that he's in a cozy mood cause in my experience mafia feels like they need to put something substantial on the table. And I don't believe that mafia HF would believe that to be enough. Maybe I'm overestimating his scum game but I believe, simply put, that he would try harder. For me it's just disappointing so far as he didn't have an own opinion about any of our points. Actually he earns some town points in my book for a post that looks bad on the surface.
We can't just have HF be that cozy though I mean he does have the best scum game out of everyone here :o
|
When did you get this calm Vivax? You were much more... angry when I saw you play a year back or so.
On Holyflare, I think your analysis is way too speculative. For example, even marv has demotivated scum-games. The goal right now isn't to have objective analysis. It is to make people talk so you have enough information to objectively analyze.
|
On January 16 2017 04:45 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On January 16 2017 04:36 Hapahauli wrote:On January 16 2017 04:34 Holyflare wrote:On January 16 2017 04:11 Hapahauli wrote:
Your attempt at diplomacy bores me.
Why do you like that Vivax drew his conclusion if you thought it was weird? I liked the process of reading what you were doing and making a remark on how it affected his thought on you. It was remarkably high level compared to what I'm used to seeing recently. So do you find Vivax's post weird for the reason I posted out? Ot because it is higher-level than what you're used to seeing? Or something else? Correct.
Is this a troll post btw? I don't see how you can answer correct to multiple questions formulated as mutually exclusive.
|
I honestly need HF to post more before I try to even read him since he got so few posts but I don't want him to be slacking honestly because if he's town he will win us the game and if he's scum we will figure it out.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
##vote damdred
You're playing a different game to us.
|
On January 16 2017 05:59 Holyflare wrote:
##vote damdred
You're playing a different game to us.
Explain what you mean by playing a different game to us?
|
No I'm not I have reached conclusions based on whack think.
I think hapa v vivax is t v t.
I think ls is town.
Have talked about everything I find interesting. So what other game an I playing?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
You talked about ls but hapa wasn't interested till later and it feels like you were interjecting into the vivax/hapa thing with nonsense drivel about ls just to have something to talk about instead of figuring out what hapa was talking about or alluding to what you meant by their fight feeling off.
You also said that hapa/vivax felt off but then concluded it's tvt? I thought you might have been on my wavelength with the vivax thing (copied from me? Can't remember the time of it) but when hapa did his really strange unvote based on no real response from vivax I kind of got the opposite feeling that hapa just didn't care enough about his original reasoning.
The ls interjecting is the main thing really because you don't even have any real conviction behind it.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
You also never really talked to me on a personal level which is what you've done in the past few games which is odd.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Can't be bothered to troll anymore I'm just going to try hard. I don't honestly believe anyone took my first post seriously to be honest it's clearly a troll that people have been playing shit recently.
Here's what I think:
Vivax made a good post but ended with the wrong conclusion. Not that strange since it's vivax.
Hapa picked up on the wrong conclusion, liked that he pushed it but then he pushed it a bit too far for my liking and it looked a little bit forced when he unvoted imo.
I liked ls's sun and moon video link but that's a shit reason to town read someone.
Damdred above.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I also skipped over 70% of hapa/vivax sooooo pinch of salt.
|
I'm honestly tired of trying to interact and get on a good working relationship in games hf to just be ignored half of the time by you.
Yes I thought the right was a bit strange but vivax responses since then haven't been bad (most have been good).
I responded to hapa about my read on ls that's the long and short of it shrug.
|
HF isn't exactly ignoring you...
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On January 16 2017 06:52 Damdred wrote:
I'm honestly tired of trying to interact and get on a good working relationship in games hf to just be ignored half of the time by you.
Yes I thought the right was a bit strange but vivax responses since then haven't been bad (most have been good).
I responded to hapa about my read on ls that's the long and short of it shrug.
On January 16 2017 04:22 Damdred wrote:
It is interesting as a side note that hapa was interested enough to ask me a question about ls reading but just disnt care enough to respond to me answering (feelings hurt).
Really I did like that vivax had a sort of point he wanted to drive home. I disagree with him though.
I liked hapa offensive capabilities but I sort of feel like it was misplaced it felt like.
Fight seems off to me.
What you're saying doesn't make the least bit of sense though. In the post above you CLEARLY liked vivax over hapa and saying the fight feels off (read mvt) and the posts after this one seem to be you disliking hapa more and more but now recently you're saying you liked vivax's posts more and it feels like tvt?
The thought process doesn't make sense with what you're saying.
|
I'm not saying he is the past three games or so he ignored me for the early parts (mostly in my mind). So I really didn't see a reason to go about the same thing the same way again.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
God that's a shit post:
Vivax has good posts.
Hapa aggressive feels off/misplaced.
Series of posts annoyed/questioning/responding to hapa.
Say fight is tvt.
Explain it's because VIVAX (the person you liked) posted better.
That series of thoughts does not make sense.
|
Like I know it would be amazing if I always have thought processes that make sense. But I don't have them all of the time.
I do like vivax more as time goes along, just because I make a comment. I really have liked most of vivax posts doesnt mean I haven't liked hapas.
So meh
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
So you've liked hapas all along? Why did it feel "off" then??
|
I didn't say I liked all of hapas posts in fact I clearly said that how he was going against vivax felt off. And it did and his follow up questions and answers posts were decent with some nice thoughts in it.
So please sont out words in my mouth
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
It's hard not to when you have to be forced to elaborate though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
