|
On January 25 2017 02:01 Onegu wrote:Show nested quote +On January 25 2017 01:23 justanothertownie wrote:On January 25 2017 00:39 Onegu wrote: First off the 99% and the 1% were hypothetical. I scum read HF and that scum read only got stronger throughout the day. You want to say the reasons are wrong whatever. Maybe next time I will be wrong but this time I was right.
Second If you dont want to make it about the belt you need to put that in the OP. Saying winning the game of mafia is the first and foremost objective, playing against your wincon to get the belt is strictly prohibited and will not get you the belt.
Playing against your wincon already IS strictly prohibited. Why do you assume that would be different in this game?! Thats not exactly what I meant. Lets not say 99 to 1 lets say 75 to 25 and you voting for you 25 to have a better shot at getting you qualified. No way to find that out unless you openly admit it. But technically yes, that would still be playing against your wincon and therefore is forbidden in my eyes. Anything you do to get the title which you would not do if you only cared about winning the game is. It is just not feasible to punish this unless it is blatantly obvious.
|
On January 25 2017 01:31 Calix wrote:There's more discussion over who the MVP should be than there was over who the mafia was in LYLO data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/248fb/248fb97879bae5e1175a9c92f38204f3e33336a3" alt="" Personally I think the setup needs to be changed. No majority vote and, if the MVP thing is going to be a problem, maybe change the rule about the winning team being the only ones eligible for MVP. Or just make it so that nobody gets MVP this game. That works if you want to set a baseline level of play for MVP to become a thing data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt=""
MVP wasnt a problem. My hypothetical problem was just that hypothetical. I scum read HF. I pushed HF. And I lynched HF. None of these facts change. Did HF play a better game than me, sure. IF slam isnt modkilled does HF win most likely. Maybe we lynch slam and then HF maybe not. Also go look in the obs, at the end most people said I was town. The only one who didnt said he rng'd me...
And you cannot change the rules post game. I mean he is the host and I guess he could but that makes a odd precedent to make.
@HF Look I am using big lawyer words like precedent!
|
On January 25 2017 02:07 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On January 25 2017 02:01 Onegu wrote:On January 25 2017 01:23 justanothertownie wrote:On January 25 2017 00:39 Onegu wrote: First off the 99% and the 1% were hypothetical. I scum read HF and that scum read only got stronger throughout the day. You want to say the reasons are wrong whatever. Maybe next time I will be wrong but this time I was right.
Second If you dont want to make it about the belt you need to put that in the OP. Saying winning the game of mafia is the first and foremost objective, playing against your wincon to get the belt is strictly prohibited and will not get you the belt.
Playing against your wincon already IS strictly prohibited. Why do you assume that would be different in this game?! Thats not exactly what I meant. Lets not say 99 to 1 lets say 75 to 25 and you voting for you 25 to have a better shot at getting you qualified. No way to find that out unless you openly admit it. But technically yes, that would still be playing against your wincon and therefore is forbidden in my eyes. Anything you do to get the title which you would not do if you only cared about winning the game is. It is just not feasible to punish this unless it is blatantly obvious.
This is what I am saying should be in the OP. That is all.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
You are town read because saying you want points and doing what you did is so blatantly retarded that you had to be town.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
|
Pretty good summary of the post game
|
Seemed relevant to me
![[image loading]](https://media4.giphy.com/media/13vRtNavW2EopO/giphy.gif)
And about myself, well,
![[image loading]](https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTaZsu2CMtcBY-9I0BZTF5zZ0Ti9QAEg9eRhUr9BghSCvW9Jupb8A)
Is clearly what I was doing because in full knowledge of the flooding of my ISP, (which was handled splendidly fwiw- they fixed it quick) I was so ready with the jeep and a sick board to go shredding the local waves streetside in the desert
Btw gif of a local guy who used a life sized rubber ducky to sail the streets in Palm Springs during the downpour imminent if I remember to find it
Sometimes I love this crazy town
|
On January 24 2017 21:25 justanothertownie wrote: Onegu being MVP is correct in my opinion. Ha! Didn't expect that, did you?
Yes, his reasoning in LYLO was absolutely disgusting but nevertheless he was the only townie in this game who lead a scumlynch. Normally I would agree that this LYLO performance alone is far from MVP worthy but there is simply noone else in this game who deserves it. Hapa played a really good early game but you are seriously crazy if you want to award MVP to someone who actively lynched himself as town.
Basically the only player who deserves MVP in this game is HF and sadly he wasn't on the winning team due to really unfortunate circumstances. this is bullshit
and you know it
onegu played like shit all game. he just voted HF first? so what
i actually had to hammer, and actually had a legit reason to vote him
|
On January 25 2017 00:32 Hapahauli wrote: Fact 1: A victory or loss does not determine how good your play was. Holyflare was the best player in this game, and a loss should change the equation here. Fact 2: It's kinda insane that my name is being floated out there for best player. I suppose I can pat myself on the back for being accurate, but knowing is not even half the battle. I self-voted. Period. Fact 3: It takes two townies to lynch at LYLO. If you have to give out an MVP to town, give it to Bill Murray. He clearly established himself as town, was correct about most of his reads, and was also a part of lynching HF.
I'll post more when I finish working. However, you should all know that this argument is inane. Since when do we care about e-penis points more than having a good game of mafia? That game was disgraceful by any standard, and I probably wouldn't give out any points for it. thank you
and you self voting saved the game so if they give it to you im ok with that
just dont give it to onegu he was a premadonna
|
hell give it to holyflare "onegu led a scumlynch" - LOL he literally wasnt even on the alakaslam wagon ... neither was vivax
i was the last to unvote that wagon and i didnt even vote hapa. i refused to. i didnt even want to unvote the wagon. how often have you seen someone be able to unvote a wagon instantly revote it and get a lynch on it? i moved onto 2 inactive players - damdred and DRUMROLL guess who Onegu
he was inactive all game he was inactive in lylo he had "spurts" of activity but even during those he wouldnt be around to talk im not saying i was active but he was even less active than i was and i didnt even read all 80 pages so im guessing he didnt either
|
giving mvp to a player that even i find to be bad town is shocking
speaking of being shocking id like to apologize to lightningstrike for that d1 fiasco where he had HF nailed as scum
game would have been 10x easier if we didnt have townplayers like myself and onegu
debating who to give the mvp to between him and i is like debating between the village idiots
we are the people holyflare left around
too bad i ended up with a really nice meta read of him and hammered him
|
|
On January 26 2017 08:00 Bill Murray wrote: debating who to give the mvp to between him and i is like debating between the village idiots
I don't disagree but noone else lynched mafia. Life isn't fair.
|
|
|
|
|