EPTOn November 05 2016 01:17 Skynx wrote:
Letme post a random thought about Skynx' emo posts to appear like I'm doing something. Nothing usefull.
on Calix:
The game he's talking about Calix got townread by almost everyone D1 for very casual play with just posting random reads and took a nosedive later on. Me and TT nailed him by role usage later on. So TT is aware of Calix can do random stuff and look very town with it.
I have to agree with this. In the game so far no one has been objectively towny and giving out townreads is kina hard at this point. Now this might be regarded completely vice versa as Calix giving easy reads cuz he's wifoming scum but I think Calix has been towny so far even after doing some bad stuff early on. I think re-read on his reasonings for townreads will tell a lot about both Rels and Calix' alignments but this stuff above will suggest they are either town together or scum together.
I like this, TT's post was shit and he recognised it.
I dunno what to think about this whole mess. So he thinks darth has slipped? Imo its a very minor thing, even more when considered people said so so many bad stuff in first few hours of the game. Why there is so much emphasis on this one read and not others?
So this is like the most biased read ever. Suggesting me wifoming scum by raging is very biased as he knows I did it in my btdt game as doctor D1 which later on decided the game. He blatantly ignores that and uses my previous scum game to suggest meta.
Then there is the case on Exo, with only argument being Exo is overly defensive which has been used over and over and over again since the minute the game started.
All in all I'm not liking Rels but not sure what to do with him either. He is in no way town yet but none of above makes him objectively scummy compared to TT and NU.
Show nested quote +
On November 03 2016 22:22 Rels wrote:
Skynx is looking like Tumblewood when he was scum with me and tried to play as incoherently as possible to play the "too weird to be scum" card.
Skynx is looking like Tumblewood when he was scum with me and tried to play as incoherently as possible to play the "too weird to be scum" card.
Letme post a random thought about Skynx' emo posts to appear like I'm doing something. Nothing usefull.
on Calix:
Show nested quote +
On November 03 2016 22:52 Rels wrote:
TT while I'm gone please explain why Calix is your top town after seeing her scum game
TT while I'm gone please explain why Calix is your top town after seeing her scum game
The game he's talking about Calix got townread by almost everyone D1 for very casual play with just posting random reads and took a nosedive later on. Me and TT nailed him by role usage later on. So TT is aware of Calix can do random stuff and look very town with it.
Show nested quote +
On November 04 2016 06:23 Rels wrote:
This is a townie post. Especially from someone with a strong scumgame who have 0 problem finding lynchbaits to push.
On November 04 2016 02:39 Calix wrote:
I feel like I am being overly generous with my town-reads though. As it stands, I'm town-reading Skynx, mahrgell, darthfoley, ExO, Foreman to varying degrees.
Unless the scum team is something like Rels/ NU or TT/ Rels or some shit then I've definitely fucked up somewhere.
I feel like I am being overly generous with my town-reads though. As it stands, I'm town-reading Skynx, mahrgell, darthfoley, ExO, Foreman to varying degrees.
Unless the scum team is something like Rels/ NU or TT/ Rels or some shit then I've definitely fucked up somewhere.
This is a townie post. Especially from someone with a strong scumgame who have 0 problem finding lynchbaits to push.
I have to agree with this. In the game so far no one has been objectively towny and giving out townreads is kina hard at this point. Now this might be regarded completely vice versa as Calix giving easy reads cuz he's wifoming scum but I think Calix has been towny so far even after doing some bad stuff early on. I think re-read on his reasonings for townreads will tell a lot about both Rels and Calix' alignments but this stuff above will suggest they are either town together or scum together.
Show nested quote +
On November 03 2016 22:32 Rels wrote:
I really don't understand how these two can be your top town.
Marghell is so soft in his stances to me it screams scuuuuuum.
You played with me in a game where Calix played a very, very stgrong scumgame: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/513316-newbie-student-mafia-xxiii, so I don't understand how Calix can be top town in your mind when she has done nothing incredibly townie.
On November 03 2016 07:05 Tictock wrote:
Calix and Marghal (or w/e) are my top town atm. Mostly everything they have done has been to push the game forward and have been looking at multiple people from multiple angles.
Skynx is a little shitter for trying to imply that this early game is NAI. This is prob the least jokey start of a game I have every seen. Kinda null on him despite his early posts seeming unlikely to come from scum imo.
I kinda think NU is town but I'm not really sure why, just feels natural and relaxed I guess. In the same vein I kinda liked Dark's one post too so they are both townleaning nulls.
Calix and Marghal (or w/e) are my top town atm. Mostly everything they have done has been to push the game forward and have been looking at multiple people from multiple angles.
Skynx is a little shitter for trying to imply that this early game is NAI. This is prob the least jokey start of a game I have every seen. Kinda null on him despite his early posts seeming unlikely to come from scum imo.
I kinda think NU is town but I'm not really sure why, just feels natural and relaxed I guess. In the same vein I kinda liked Dark's one post too so they are both townleaning nulls.
I really don't understand how these two can be your top town.
Marghell is so soft in his stances to me it screams scuuuuuum.
You played with me in a game where Calix played a very, very stgrong scumgame: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/513316-newbie-student-mafia-xxiii, so I don't understand how Calix can be top town in your mind when she has done nothing incredibly townie.
I like this, TT's post was shit and he recognised it.
Show nested quote +
On November 04 2016 07:32 Rels wrote:
On November 04 2016 06:12 Rels wrote:
Yeah that post was awful. And I don't understand why the fixation on Skynx on this post. He was mentioned three times:
"I agree that a lot of the stuff so far is NAI" (Skynx was the one saying that)
"I agree with Skynx that the votes so far have been really dumb and useless drama"
"I agreed that Skynx's posts were useless until he posted about the votes."
On November 04 2016 01:39 NeverUnlucky wrote:
for rels
Well, this quote isn't as good as I remembered it to be. There are certain points which I still like, others make me uncertain.
Why does he think it could be tvt if most of the stuff is NAI?
Also, saying that the Exo - Calix thingy was based off a gif is a mischaracterization of what happened I think.
Mind meld.
Foreman did not write off Calix ._.
He says that his reads could be wrong, but never stated his reads prior to this... zzz
Obviously no post will scream scum.
Bruh, that post he's referring to is Skynx saying "These posts are shit" and quotes Foreman and ExO's votes on Calix. How is that useful? How does he go from agreeing with Skynx in the previous paragraph to saying that his posts are useless?
I can see why you hated it.
for rels
Well, this quote isn't as good as I remembered it to be. There are certain points which I still like, others make me uncertain.
On November 03 2016 05:30 darthfoley wrote:
Had a read through, albeit quick because I won't be on later until like 7pm and don't want to read through 40 pages in one sitting.
I agree that a lot of the stuff so far is NAI. I think ExO vs. Calix could be TvT and was blown out of proportion based off a gif.
Had a read through, albeit quick because I won't be on later until like 7pm and don't want to read through 40 pages in one sitting.
I agree that a lot of the stuff so far is NAI. I think ExO vs. Calix could be TvT and was blown out of proportion based off a gif.
Why does he think it could be tvt if most of the stuff is NAI?
Also, saying that the Exo - Calix thingy was based off a gif is a mischaracterization of what happened I think.
However, I don't like this post. Who spends 4 lines discussing why the claimed VT? This is a super waste of a post.
I don't like this post. This comes off as scummy scummy buddy buddy
I also don't think the theoretical discussion of anti-town vs. pro-scum has much use if it's kept theoretical.
On November 03 2016 03:29 ExO_ wrote:
Also to clarify why I'm claiming my VT role right now:
I'm getting it out the open right now. I think in a game this size trying to fake claim to get scum to target me would be a waste of time. So I'm letting everyone know now I don't have any abilities I cannot do anything at night and can only vote. You can choose to either believe me or not, but I'm telling the truth
Also to clarify why I'm claiming my VT role right now:
I'm getting it out the open right now. I think in a game this size trying to fake claim to get scum to target me would be a waste of time. So I'm letting everyone know now I don't have any abilities I cannot do anything at night and can only vote. You can choose to either believe me or not, but I'm telling the truth
I don't like this post. This comes off as scummy scummy buddy buddy
On November 03 2016 04:32 mahrgell wrote:
gosh Calix, can we please stop post synced? Also after what I read from you last game I'm afraid of myself, if I share your thoughts... I don't want to be like you
Sorry.
gosh Calix, can we please stop post synced? Also after what I read from you last game I'm afraid of myself, if I share your thoughts... I don't want to be like you
Sorry.I also don't think the theoretical discussion of anti-town vs. pro-scum has much use if it's kept theoretical.
Mind meld.
Foreman completely writing off Calix basically because of one push is helping town at all. Seems like uber tunneling that never actually helps town. Don't see any post so far that screams scum SO hard that I wouldn't entertain the possibility that my read on someone was wrong. Seems a bit scummy to me, especially D1. I agree with Skynx that the votes so far have been really dumb and useless drama
Foreman did not write off Calix ._.
He says that his reads could be wrong, but never stated his reads prior to this... zzz
Obviously no post will scream scum.
Calix is a slight town read to me currently. I agreed that Skynx's posts were useless until he posted about the votes.
Bruh, that post he's referring to is Skynx saying "These posts are shit" and quotes Foreman and ExO's votes on Calix. How is that useful? How does he go from agreeing with Skynx in the previous paragraph to saying that his posts are useless?
I'll be back in about three hours, keep posting away
I can see why you hated it.
Yeah that post was awful. And I don't understand why the fixation on Skynx on this post. He was mentioned three times:
"I agree that a lot of the stuff so far is NAI" (Skynx was the one saying that)
"I agree with Skynx that the votes so far have been really dumb and useless drama"
"I agreed that Skynx's posts were useless until he posted about the votes."
On November 04 2016 06:15 Rels wrote:
LOL rereading the last two sentences it doesnt have match up
DF WHY THE FUCK would you go from "YEAH SKYNX IS RIGHT ALMOST EVERYTHING IS USELESS" to "SKYNX POSTS WERE USELESS" ? You apparently agreed with Skynx that there was not much to talk about ? Why did you consider Skynx posts useless when you agreed with them ?
LOL rereading the last two sentences it doesnt have match up
DF WHY THE FUCK would you go from "YEAH SKYNX IS RIGHT ALMOST EVERYTHING IS USELESS" to "SKYNX POSTS WERE USELESS" ? You apparently agreed with Skynx that there was not much to talk about ? Why did you consider Skynx posts useless when you agreed with them ?
On November 04 2016 07:05 Rels wrote:
Nope. He didn't say "Skynx was useless until he posted about the votes and I agree with him that the votes are dumb and useless"
He said "Skynx said everything was NAI and I agree with him", then "I agree Skynx' psots were useless until that very last one about the votes".
Basically he both agrees that these posts are useless but also agree with them:
+ Show Spoiler +
The posta bout the votes is:
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 04 2016 07:00 Calix wrote:
This is more directed at your next post, but I don't understand your argument. I'm assuming that you're talking about this, right?
I don't see the incongruency. Isn't he basically saying "Skynx was useless until he posted about the votes and I agree with him that the votes are dumb and useless"?
Now that I've written it out like that, that's a pretty weird thing to say since it doesn't say much at all and the way it's worded makes it sound like he slight-town-read me because I agreed that Skynx was useless.
But I don't think it's inconsistent.
On November 04 2016 06:12 Rels wrote:
Yeah that post was awful. And I don't understand why the fixation on Skynx on this post. He was mentioned three times:
"I agree that a lot of the stuff so far is NAI" (Skynx was the one saying that)
"I agree with Skynx that the votes so far have been really dumb and useless drama"
"I agreed that Skynx's posts were useless until he posted about the votes."
On November 04 2016 01:39 NeverUnlucky wrote:
for rels
Well, this quote isn't as good as I remembered it to be. There are certain points which I still like, others make me uncertain.
Why does he think it could be tvt if most of the stuff is NAI?
Also, saying that the Exo - Calix thingy was based off a gif is a mischaracterization of what happened I think.
Mind meld.
Foreman did not write off Calix ._.
He says that his reads could be wrong, but never stated his reads prior to this... zzz
Obviously no post will scream scum.
Bruh, that post he's referring to is Skynx saying "These posts are shit" and quotes Foreman and ExO's votes on Calix. How is that useful? How does he go from agreeing with Skynx in the previous paragraph to saying that his posts are useless?
I can see why you hated it.
for rels
Well, this quote isn't as good as I remembered it to be. There are certain points which I still like, others make me uncertain.
On November 03 2016 05:30 darthfoley wrote:
Had a read through, albeit quick because I won't be on later until like 7pm and don't want to read through 40 pages in one sitting.
I agree that a lot of the stuff so far is NAI. I think ExO vs. Calix could be TvT and was blown out of proportion based off a gif.
Had a read through, albeit quick because I won't be on later until like 7pm and don't want to read through 40 pages in one sitting.
I agree that a lot of the stuff so far is NAI. I think ExO vs. Calix could be TvT and was blown out of proportion based off a gif.
Why does he think it could be tvt if most of the stuff is NAI?
Also, saying that the Exo - Calix thingy was based off a gif is a mischaracterization of what happened I think.
However, I don't like this post. Who spends 4 lines discussing why the claimed VT? This is a super waste of a post.
I don't like this post. This comes off as scummy scummy buddy buddy
I also don't think the theoretical discussion of anti-town vs. pro-scum has much use if it's kept theoretical.
On November 03 2016 03:29 ExO_ wrote:
Also to clarify why I'm claiming my VT role right now:
I'm getting it out the open right now. I think in a game this size trying to fake claim to get scum to target me would be a waste of time. So I'm letting everyone know now I don't have any abilities I cannot do anything at night and can only vote. You can choose to either believe me or not, but I'm telling the truth
Also to clarify why I'm claiming my VT role right now:
I'm getting it out the open right now. I think in a game this size trying to fake claim to get scum to target me would be a waste of time. So I'm letting everyone know now I don't have any abilities I cannot do anything at night and can only vote. You can choose to either believe me or not, but I'm telling the truth
I don't like this post. This comes off as scummy scummy buddy buddy
On November 03 2016 04:32 mahrgell wrote:
gosh Calix, can we please stop post synced? Also after what I read from you last game I'm afraid of myself, if I share your thoughts... I don't want to be like you Sorry.
gosh Calix, can we please stop post synced? Also after what I read from you last game I'm afraid of myself, if I share your thoughts... I don't want to be like you
Sorry.I also don't think the theoretical discussion of anti-town vs. pro-scum has much use if it's kept theoretical.
Mind meld.
Foreman completely writing off Calix basically because of one push is helping town at all. Seems like uber tunneling that never actually helps town. Don't see any post so far that screams scum SO hard that I wouldn't entertain the possibility that my read on someone was wrong. Seems a bit scummy to me, especially D1. I agree with Skynx that the votes so far have been really dumb and useless drama
Foreman did not write off Calix ._.
He says that his reads could be wrong, but never stated his reads prior to this... zzz
Obviously no post will scream scum.
Calix is a slight town read to me currently. I agreed that Skynx's posts were useless until he posted about the votes.
Bruh, that post he's referring to is Skynx saying "These posts are shit" and quotes Foreman and ExO's votes on Calix. How is that useful? How does he go from agreeing with Skynx in the previous paragraph to saying that his posts are useless?
I'll be back in about three hours, keep posting away
I can see why you hated it.
Yeah that post was awful. And I don't understand why the fixation on Skynx on this post. He was mentioned three times:
"I agree that a lot of the stuff so far is NAI" (Skynx was the one saying that)
"I agree with Skynx that the votes so far have been really dumb and useless drama"
"I agreed that Skynx's posts were useless until he posted about the votes."
This is more directed at your next post, but I don't understand your argument. I'm assuming that you're talking about this, right?
I agree with Skynx that the votes so far have been really dumb and useless drama
Calix is a slight town read to me currently. I agreed that Skynx's posts were useless until he posted about the votes.
Calix is a slight town read to me currently. I agreed that Skynx's posts were useless until he posted about the votes.
I don't see the incongruency. Isn't he basically saying "Skynx was useless until he posted about the votes and I agree with him that the votes are dumb and useless"?
Now that I've written it out like that, that's a pretty weird thing to say since it doesn't say much at all and the way it's worded makes it sound like he slight-town-read me because I agreed that Skynx was useless.
But I don't think it's inconsistent.
Nope. He didn't say "Skynx was useless until he posted about the votes and I agree with him that the votes are dumb and useless"
He said "Skynx said everything was NAI and I agree with him", then "I agree Skynx' psots were useless until that very last one about the votes".
Basically he both agrees that these posts are useless but also agree with them:
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 03 2016 04:12 Skynx wrote:
Man you guys are way too fun to read
Man you guys are way too fun to read
On November 03 2016 04:50 Skynx wrote:
None of what happened so far is AI guys please...
None of what happened so far is AI guys please...
On November 03 2016 04:54 Skynx wrote:
What is the point of spamming bunch of stuff that doesn't have anything to do with anything other than increasing postcount for people that are not here yet?
Show nested quote +
On November 03 2016 04:53 Calix wrote:
Then do something that will make AI posts happen.
What is the point of sitting around and complaining that people are making early reads exactly?
On November 03 2016 04:50 Skynx wrote:
None of what happened so far is AI guys please...
None of what happened so far is AI guys please...
Then do something that will make AI posts happen.
What is the point of sitting around and complaining that people are making early reads exactly?
What is the point of spamming bunch of stuff that doesn't have anything to do with anything other than increasing postcount for people that are not here yet?
On November 03 2016 04:58 Skynx wrote:
Add something constructive when i find opportunity to do so. Like I'm doing now, stopping you guys go overboard with surjective NAI stuff cuz it really means absolutely nothing what you guys accuse each other for in past few pages
Show nested quote +
On November 03 2016 04:56 Calix wrote:
To generate conversation so that the not-yet-here people have something constructive to add, of course.
What is your strategy to find scum if we're doing a poor job of it?
On November 03 2016 04:54 Skynx wrote:
What is the point of spamming bunch of stuff that doesn't have anything to do with anything other than increasing postcount for people that are not here yet?
On November 03 2016 04:53 Calix wrote:
Then do something that will make AI posts happen.
What is the point of sitting around and complaining that people are making early reads exactly?
On November 03 2016 04:50 Skynx wrote:
None of what happened so far is AI guys please...
None of what happened so far is AI guys please...
Then do something that will make AI posts happen.
What is the point of sitting around and complaining that people are making early reads exactly?
What is the point of spamming bunch of stuff that doesn't have anything to do with anything other than increasing postcount for people that are not here yet?
To generate conversation so that the not-yet-here people have something constructive to add, of course.
What is your strategy to find scum if we're doing a poor job of it?
Add something constructive when i find opportunity to do so. Like I'm doing now, stopping you guys go overboard with surjective NAI stuff cuz it really means absolutely nothing what you guys accuse each other for in past few pages
On November 03 2016 05:05 Skynx wrote:
Here is what happened;
Calix sr Exo (gif stuff)
Exo sr Calix (doesn't like his push)
Everyone sr Everyone (because all pushes are very surjective and doesn't mean anything and everyone is aware of that so might aswell sr the others)
What you are asking right now makes sense in that regard as me suggesting you guys pushing NAI stuff on eachother means I should also sr you guys but its just not right and this is all really nothing productive in the end.
Show nested quote +
On November 03 2016 05:00 Calix wrote:
Oh wonderful, that means that you can tell us how my case on NU doesn't show scum-indicative behaviour
Do you have any reads at all? I'm skeptical that you have no initial impressions at all.
On November 03 2016 04:58 Skynx wrote:
Add something constructive when i find opportunity to do so. Like I'm doing now, stopping you guys go overboard with surjective NAI stuff cuz it really means absolutely nothing what you guys accuse each other for in past few pages
On November 03 2016 04:56 Calix wrote:
To generate conversation so that the not-yet-here people have something constructive to add, of course.
What is your strategy to find scum if we're doing a poor job of it?
On November 03 2016 04:54 Skynx wrote:
What is the point of spamming bunch of stuff that doesn't have anything to do with anything other than increasing postcount for people that are not here yet?
On November 03 2016 04:53 Calix wrote:
Then do something that will make AI posts happen.
What is the point of sitting around and complaining that people are making early reads exactly?
On November 03 2016 04:50 Skynx wrote:
None of what happened so far is AI guys please...
None of what happened so far is AI guys please...
Then do something that will make AI posts happen.
What is the point of sitting around and complaining that people are making early reads exactly?
What is the point of spamming bunch of stuff that doesn't have anything to do with anything other than increasing postcount for people that are not here yet?
To generate conversation so that the not-yet-here people have something constructive to add, of course.
What is your strategy to find scum if we're doing a poor job of it?
Add something constructive when i find opportunity to do so. Like I'm doing now, stopping you guys go overboard with surjective NAI stuff cuz it really means absolutely nothing what you guys accuse each other for in past few pages
Oh wonderful, that means that you can tell us how my case on NU doesn't show scum-indicative behaviour
Do you have any reads at all? I'm skeptical that you have no initial impressions at all.
Here is what happened;
Calix sr Exo (gif stuff)
Exo sr Calix (doesn't like his push)
Everyone sr Everyone (because all pushes are very surjective and doesn't mean anything and everyone is aware of that so might aswell sr the others)
What you are asking right now makes sense in that regard as me suggesting you guys pushing NAI stuff on eachother means I should also sr you guys but its just not right and this is all really nothing productive in the end.
On November 03 2016 05:10 Skynx wrote:
I mean I really dunno what to add here, its just NAI guys.
Can we talk about like flowers and butterflies?
I mean I really dunno what to add here, its just NAI guys.
Can we talk about like flowers and butterflies?
On November 03 2016 05:14 Skynx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 03 2016 05:10 Calix wrote:
Fact-check. I never stated a scum-read on ExO.
"all pushes are very subjective" - It's Day 1. Of course they are going to be 'subjective'. In fact, almost every single push in the history of mafia is 'subjective'. That doesn't mean you just do nothing since town has to be proactive to gain information, etc etc. This is all very obvious stuff so I won't drone on.
With that in mind, your approach is very hard to understand to me.
On November 03 2016 05:05 Skynx wrote:
Here is what happened;
Calix sr Exo (gif stuff)
Exo sr Calix (doesn't like his push)
Everyone sr Everyone (because all pushes are very surjective and doesn't mean anything and everyone is aware of that so might aswell sr the others)
What you are asking right now makes sense in that regard as me suggesting you guys pushing NAI stuff on eachother means I should also sr you guys but its just not right and this is all really nothing productive in the end.
On November 03 2016 05:00 Calix wrote:
Oh wonderful, that means that you can tell us how my case on NU doesn't show scum-indicative behaviour
Do you have any reads at all? I'm skeptical that you have no initial impressions at all.
On November 03 2016 04:58 Skynx wrote:
Add something constructive when i find opportunity to do so. Like I'm doing now, stopping you guys go overboard with surjective NAI stuff cuz it really means absolutely nothing what you guys accuse each other for in past few pages
On November 03 2016 04:56 Calix wrote:
To generate conversation so that the not-yet-here people have something constructive to add, of course.
What is your strategy to find scum if we're doing a poor job of it?
On November 03 2016 04:54 Skynx wrote:
What is the point of spamming bunch of stuff that doesn't have anything to do with anything other than increasing postcount for people that are not here yet?
On November 03 2016 04:53 Calix wrote:
Then do something that will make AI posts happen.
What is the point of sitting around and complaining that people are making early reads exactly?
On November 03 2016 04:50 Skynx wrote:
None of what happened so far is AI guys please...
None of what happened so far is AI guys please...
Then do something that will make AI posts happen.
What is the point of sitting around and complaining that people are making early reads exactly?
What is the point of spamming bunch of stuff that doesn't have anything to do with anything other than increasing postcount for people that are not here yet?
To generate conversation so that the not-yet-here people have something constructive to add, of course.
What is your strategy to find scum if we're doing a poor job of it?
Add something constructive when i find opportunity to do so. Like I'm doing now, stopping you guys go overboard with surjective NAI stuff cuz it really means absolutely nothing what you guys accuse each other for in past few pages
Oh wonderful, that means that you can tell us how my case on NU doesn't show scum-indicative behaviour
Do you have any reads at all? I'm skeptical that you have no initial impressions at all.
Here is what happened;
Calix sr Exo (gif stuff)
Exo sr Calix (doesn't like his push)
Everyone sr Everyone (because all pushes are very surjective and doesn't mean anything and everyone is aware of that so might aswell sr the others)
What you are asking right now makes sense in that regard as me suggesting you guys pushing NAI stuff on eachother means I should also sr you guys but its just not right and this is all really nothing productive in the end.
Fact-check. I never stated a scum-read on ExO.
"all pushes are very subjective" - It's Day 1. Of course they are going to be 'subjective'. In fact, almost every single push in the history of mafia is 'subjective'. That doesn't mean you just do nothing since town has to be proactive to gain information, etc etc. This is all very obvious stuff so I won't drone on.
With that in mind, your approach is very hard to understand to me.
Show nested quote +
On November 03 2016 03:08 Calix wrote:
So if you ARE mainly communicating in gifs then why claim a role first thing before doing that? Seems illogical for town to do.
On November 03 2016 03:06 ExO_ wrote:
![[image loading]](http://i458.photobucket.com/albums/qq303/neko_riddles/Fighting_Over_Marisa_From_Touhou_Pr.gif)
On November 03 2016 03:04 Calix wrote:
NU's boring. Nothing new to see there.
ExO, should I be asking why you're not 'largely communicating in gifs'? Don't get me wrong, I'm glad you're not, but I'm curious as to what made you change your mind.
NU's boring. Nothing new to see there.
ExO, should I be asking why you're not 'largely communicating in gifs'? Don't get me wrong, I'm glad you're not, but I'm curious as to what made you change your mind.
So if you ARE mainly communicating in gifs then why claim a role first thing before doing that? Seems illogical for town to do.
On November 03 2016 05:15 Skynx wrote:
Well, Calix is the one to make me explain how NAI stuff is NAI you can blame him for that if you really want to.
I'm just here to drink milk and fuck bitches.
Show nested quote +
On November 03 2016 05:11 Foreman wrote:
Here is what happened:
Skynx entered thread
Skynx complained about unproductive content
Skynx provided unproductive content
What you are doing right now is worse than anything you've complained about, because you should be of the mindset that providing even more unproductive content would only make our situation worse, given your remarks.
On November 03 2016 05:05 Skynx wrote:
Here is what happened;
Calix sr Exo (gif stuff)
Exo sr Calix (doesn't like his push)
Everyone sr Everyone (because all pushes are very surjective and doesn't mean anything and everyone is aware of that so might aswell sr the others)
What you are asking right now makes sense in that regard as me suggesting you guys pushing NAI stuff on eachother means I should also sr you guys but its just not right and this is all really nothing productive in the end.
On November 03 2016 05:00 Calix wrote:
Oh wonderful, that means that you can tell us how my case on NU doesn't show scum-indicative behaviour
Do you have any reads at all? I'm skeptical that you have no initial impressions at all.
On November 03 2016 04:58 Skynx wrote:
Add something constructive when i find opportunity to do so. Like I'm doing now, stopping you guys go overboard with surjective NAI stuff cuz it really means absolutely nothing what you guys accuse each other for in past few pages
On November 03 2016 04:56 Calix wrote:
To generate conversation so that the not-yet-here people have something constructive to add, of course.
What is your strategy to find scum if we're doing a poor job of it?
On November 03 2016 04:54 Skynx wrote:
What is the point of spamming bunch of stuff that doesn't have anything to do with anything other than increasing postcount for people that are not here yet?
On November 03 2016 04:53 Calix wrote:
Then do something that will make AI posts happen.
What is the point of sitting around and complaining that people are making early reads exactly?
On November 03 2016 04:50 Skynx wrote:
None of what happened so far is AI guys please...
None of what happened so far is AI guys please...
Then do something that will make AI posts happen.
What is the point of sitting around and complaining that people are making early reads exactly?
What is the point of spamming bunch of stuff that doesn't have anything to do with anything other than increasing postcount for people that are not here yet?
To generate conversation so that the not-yet-here people have something constructive to add, of course.
What is your strategy to find scum if we're doing a poor job of it?
Add something constructive when i find opportunity to do so. Like I'm doing now, stopping you guys go overboard with surjective NAI stuff cuz it really means absolutely nothing what you guys accuse each other for in past few pages
Oh wonderful, that means that you can tell us how my case on NU doesn't show scum-indicative behaviour
Do you have any reads at all? I'm skeptical that you have no initial impressions at all.
Here is what happened;
Calix sr Exo (gif stuff)
Exo sr Calix (doesn't like his push)
Everyone sr Everyone (because all pushes are very surjective and doesn't mean anything and everyone is aware of that so might aswell sr the others)
What you are asking right now makes sense in that regard as me suggesting you guys pushing NAI stuff on eachother means I should also sr you guys but its just not right and this is all really nothing productive in the end.
Here is what happened:
Skynx entered thread
Skynx complained about unproductive content
Skynx provided unproductive content
What you are doing right now is worse than anything you've complained about, because you should be of the mindset that providing even more unproductive content would only make our situation worse, given your remarks.
Well, Calix is the one to make me explain how NAI stuff is NAI you can blame him for that if you really want to.
I'm just here to drink milk and fuck bitches.
The posta bout the votes is:
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 03 2016 05:18 Skynx wrote:
Bah fine;
These are absolutely terrible votes.
Bah fine;
Show nested quote +
On November 03 2016 03:19 Foreman wrote:
Way to overanalyze. So tryhard that it makes me think I should
##Vote Calix
On November 03 2016 03:08 Calix wrote:
So if you ARE mainly communicating in gifs then why claim a role first thing before doing that? Seems illogical for town to do.
On November 03 2016 03:06 ExO_ wrote:
On November 03 2016 03:04 Calix wrote:
NU's boring. Nothing new to see there.
ExO, should I be asking why you're not 'largely communicating in gifs'? Don't get me wrong, I'm glad you're not, but I'm curious as to what made you change your mind.
NU's boring. Nothing new to see there.
ExO, should I be asking why you're not 'largely communicating in gifs'? Don't get me wrong, I'm glad you're not, but I'm curious as to what made you change your mind.
So if you ARE mainly communicating in gifs then why claim a role first thing before doing that? Seems illogical for town to do.
Way to overanalyze. So tryhard that it makes me think I should
##Vote Calix
Show nested quote +
On November 03 2016 03:15 ExO_ wrote:
If you were actually happy I wasn't posting gifs, why would you bring up the fact that I said I would post primarily gifs? I think any reasonable person realizes that's much more likely to get me to post gifs, than to offer an explanation that will ultimately be irrelevant to the game.
You brought it up in the hopes that I would stick to my word and posts only gifs, instead of helping town. You are scum
##vote Calix
On November 03 2016 03:12 Calix wrote:
Please point me to where I 'attempted to get you to revert to gif posting only' if you'd be so kind. You'll note that I specifically said 'I'm glad you are not posting in gifs' (which you then responded to...with a gif...instead of a response)
And yes, it's illogical for town to claim a role and then post a gif in lieu of a coherent response.
On November 03 2016 03:11 ExO_ wrote:
You think it's illogical for me to immediate claim VT before posting a gif?
Give me a break. If anything your attempt to get me to revert to gif posting only and now trying to throw shade on me is indicative of your scum alignment
On November 03 2016 03:08 Calix wrote:
So if you ARE mainly communicating in gifs then why claim a role first thing before doing that? Seems illogical for town to do.
On November 03 2016 03:06 ExO_ wrote:
On November 03 2016 03:04 Calix wrote:
NU's boring. Nothing new to see there.
ExO, should I be asking why you're not 'largely communicating in gifs'? Don't get me wrong, I'm glad you're not, but I'm curious as to what made you change your mind.
NU's boring. Nothing new to see there.
ExO, should I be asking why you're not 'largely communicating in gifs'? Don't get me wrong, I'm glad you're not, but I'm curious as to what made you change your mind.
So if you ARE mainly communicating in gifs then why claim a role first thing before doing that? Seems illogical for town to do.
You think it's illogical for me to immediate claim VT before posting a gif?
Give me a break. If anything your attempt to get me to revert to gif posting only and now trying to throw shade on me is indicative of your scum alignment
Please point me to where I 'attempted to get you to revert to gif posting only' if you'd be so kind. You'll note that I specifically said 'I'm glad you are not posting in gifs' (which you then responded to...with a gif...instead of a response)
And yes, it's illogical for town to claim a role and then post a gif in lieu of a coherent response.
If you were actually happy I wasn't posting gifs, why would you bring up the fact that I said I would post primarily gifs? I think any reasonable person realizes that's much more likely to get me to post gifs, than to offer an explanation that will ultimately be irrelevant to the game.
You brought it up in the hopes that I would stick to my word and posts only gifs, instead of helping town. You are scum
##vote Calix
These are absolutely terrible votes.
I dunno what to think about this whole mess. So he thinks darth has slipped? Imo its a very minor thing, even more when considered people said so so many bad stuff in first few hours of the game. Why there is so much emphasis on this one read and not others?
Show nested quote +
On November 04 2016 20:54 Rels wrote:
Skynx has a real shot at being scum too. A lot of his posts just look like fake to me, faking a "not-caring" tone. To compare with Foreman, it looks like Skynx is trying to appear not caring, while Foreman just doesn't care and wite stuff that he thinks.
And I know weaker scums tend to do that after losing scumgames 'cause it's easier to play. And I know Skynx is not a very good scum player.
These posts make me think that:
+ Show Spoiler +
Actually, his only real content were in his 2 huge wall posts. I disagree with pretty much everything he's said in it. A lot of it is just logical mistakes that are not scum tells.
Skynx has a real shot at being scum too. A lot of his posts just look like fake to me, faking a "not-caring" tone. To compare with Foreman, it looks like Skynx is trying to appear not caring, while Foreman just doesn't care and wite stuff that he thinks.
And I know weaker scums tend to do that after losing scumgames 'cause it's easier to play. And I know Skynx is not a very good scum player.
These posts make me think that:
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 03 2016 04:12 Skynx wrote:
Man you guys are way too fun to read
Man you guys are way too fun to read
On November 03 2016 04:50 Skynx wrote:
None of what happened so far is AI guys please...
None of what happened so far is AI guys please...
On November 03 2016 04:54 Skynx wrote:
What is the point of spamming bunch of stuff that doesn't have anything to do with anything other than increasing postcount for people that are not here yet?
Show nested quote +
On November 03 2016 04:53 Calix wrote:
Then do something that will make AI posts happen.
What is the point of sitting around and complaining that people are making early reads exactly?
On November 03 2016 04:50 Skynx wrote:
None of what happened so far is AI guys please...
None of what happened so far is AI guys please...
Then do something that will make AI posts happen.
What is the point of sitting around and complaining that people are making early reads exactly?
What is the point of spamming bunch of stuff that doesn't have anything to do with anything other than increasing postcount for people that are not here yet?
On November 03 2016 04:58 Skynx wrote:
Add something constructive when i find opportunity to do so. Like I'm doing now, stopping you guys go overboard with surjective NAI stuff cuz it really means absolutely nothing what you guys accuse each other for in past few pages
Show nested quote +
On November 03 2016 04:56 Calix wrote:
To generate conversation so that the not-yet-here people have something constructive to add, of course.
What is your strategy to find scum if we're doing a poor job of it?
On November 03 2016 04:54 Skynx wrote:
What is the point of spamming bunch of stuff that doesn't have anything to do with anything other than increasing postcount for people that are not here yet?
On November 03 2016 04:53 Calix wrote:
Then do something that will make AI posts happen.
What is the point of sitting around and complaining that people are making early reads exactly?
On November 03 2016 04:50 Skynx wrote:
None of what happened so far is AI guys please...
None of what happened so far is AI guys please...
Then do something that will make AI posts happen.
What is the point of sitting around and complaining that people are making early reads exactly?
What is the point of spamming bunch of stuff that doesn't have anything to do with anything other than increasing postcount for people that are not here yet?
To generate conversation so that the not-yet-here people have something constructive to add, of course.
What is your strategy to find scum if we're doing a poor job of it?
Add something constructive when i find opportunity to do so. Like I'm doing now, stopping you guys go overboard with surjective NAI stuff cuz it really means absolutely nothing what you guys accuse each other for in past few pages
On November 03 2016 05:10 Skynx wrote:
I mean I really dunno what to add here, its just NAI guys.
Can we talk about like flowers and butterflies?
I mean I really dunno what to add here, its just NAI guys.
Can we talk about like flowers and butterflies?
On November 03 2016 05:15 Skynx wrote:
Well, Calix is the one to make me explain how NAI stuff is NAI you can blame him for that if you really want to.
I'm just here to drink milk and fuck bitches.
Show nested quote +
On November 03 2016 05:11 Foreman wrote:
Here is what happened:
Skynx entered thread
Skynx complained about unproductive content
Skynx provided unproductive content
What you are doing right now is worse than anything you've complained about, because you should be of the mindset that providing even more unproductive content would only make our situation worse, given your remarks.
On November 03 2016 05:05 Skynx wrote:
Here is what happened;
Calix sr Exo (gif stuff)
Exo sr Calix (doesn't like his push)
Everyone sr Everyone (because all pushes are very surjective and doesn't mean anything and everyone is aware of that so might aswell sr the others)
What you are asking right now makes sense in that regard as me suggesting you guys pushing NAI stuff on eachother means I should also sr you guys but its just not right and this is all really nothing productive in the end.
On November 03 2016 05:00 Calix wrote:
Oh wonderful, that means that you can tell us how my case on NU doesn't show scum-indicative behaviour
Do you have any reads at all? I'm skeptical that you have no initial impressions at all.
On November 03 2016 04:58 Skynx wrote:
Add something constructive when i find opportunity to do so. Like I'm doing now, stopping you guys go overboard with surjective NAI stuff cuz it really means absolutely nothing what you guys accuse each other for in past few pages
On November 03 2016 04:56 Calix wrote:
To generate conversation so that the not-yet-here people have something constructive to add, of course.
What is your strategy to find scum if we're doing a poor job of it?
On November 03 2016 04:54 Skynx wrote:
What is the point of spamming bunch of stuff that doesn't have anything to do with anything other than increasing postcount for people that are not here yet?
On November 03 2016 04:53 Calix wrote:
Then do something that will make AI posts happen.
What is the point of sitting around and complaining that people are making early reads exactly?
On November 03 2016 04:50 Skynx wrote:
None of what happened so far is AI guys please...
None of what happened so far is AI guys please...
Then do something that will make AI posts happen.
What is the point of sitting around and complaining that people are making early reads exactly?
What is the point of spamming bunch of stuff that doesn't have anything to do with anything other than increasing postcount for people that are not here yet?
To generate conversation so that the not-yet-here people have something constructive to add, of course.
What is your strategy to find scum if we're doing a poor job of it?
Add something constructive when i find opportunity to do so. Like I'm doing now, stopping you guys go overboard with surjective NAI stuff cuz it really means absolutely nothing what you guys accuse each other for in past few pages
Oh wonderful, that means that you can tell us how my case on NU doesn't show scum-indicative behaviour
Do you have any reads at all? I'm skeptical that you have no initial impressions at all.
Here is what happened;
Calix sr Exo (gif stuff)
Exo sr Calix (doesn't like his push)
Everyone sr Everyone (because all pushes are very surjective and doesn't mean anything and everyone is aware of that so might aswell sr the others)
What you are asking right now makes sense in that regard as me suggesting you guys pushing NAI stuff on eachother means I should also sr you guys but its just not right and this is all really nothing productive in the end.
Here is what happened:
Skynx entered thread
Skynx complained about unproductive content
Skynx provided unproductive content
What you are doing right now is worse than anything you've complained about, because you should be of the mindset that providing even more unproductive content would only make our situation worse, given your remarks.
Well, Calix is the one to make me explain how NAI stuff is NAI you can blame him for that if you really want to.
I'm just here to drink milk and fuck bitches.
On November 03 2016 22:17 Skynx wrote:
I only like darth so far for making sense with his posts while keeping it short and meaningfull.
I hate TT's reads in p15 or something they are literally the worst. He deserves a vote but I'll touch on this a bit later on.
Exo's reads are quite bad aswell but less bad than TT.
Haven't read Rels yet.
Rest is bad and should feel bad for being able to spam this much and actually say nothing of worth.
I'm gona vote for a stfu lynch on the biggest filter for now before i actually get a time to read in detail cuz this shit is unacceptable.
I only like darth so far for making sense with his posts while keeping it short and meaningfull.
I hate TT's reads in p15 or something they are literally the worst. He deserves a vote but I'll touch on this a bit later on.
Exo's reads are quite bad aswell but less bad than TT.
Haven't read Rels yet.
Rest is bad and should feel bad for being able to spam this much and actually say nothing of worth.
I'm gona vote for a stfu lynch on the biggest filter for now before i actually get a time to read in detail cuz this shit is unacceptable.
Actually, his only real content were in his 2 huge wall posts. I disagree with pretty much everything he's said in it. A lot of it is just logical mistakes that are not scum tells.
So this is like the most biased read ever. Suggesting me wifoming scum by raging is very biased as he knows I did it in my btdt game as doctor D1 which later on decided the game. He blatantly ignores that and uses my previous scum game to suggest meta.
Then there is the case on Exo, with only argument being Exo is overly defensive which has been used over and over and over again since the minute the game started.
All in all I'm not liking Rels but not sure what to do with him either. He is in no way town yet but none of above makes him objectively scummy compared to TT and NU.
I'm not saying you're raging, you're not raging, I'm saying your tone at the beginning of the game seems forced.
Weird that you liked so many posts but you ended up with a "not liking" read ?
