|
On September 11 2016 08:27 Damdred wrote:
Nu is just a joker now, makes me laugh.
In any case @Shape I think what hi was looking for on a reread was him actually bringing things up about the others in the pool.
Lets be honest sky is good at making cases and I don't see it here, he's good with reasoning and while I can see consolidation being the answer it just doesn't make a lot of sense with how his stance was when he entered the thread.
And he was pre try side lines during,the lynch and most of the day (slight hypocritical at parts of,me,to say).
Do you disagree?
Now includes a meta read oh god.
|
Damdred is 100% scum.
His meta read stating I normally put good cases and reasonings behind them is true. However EoD I discussed with TW, Calix and Vivax (I think?) how there was no obv scum and plynch was good here. Calix was trying to push Damdred for wrong reasons, I didn't agree to it. There was no case for me to make, I asked multiple times if anyone thinks someone was objectively scummy and make a case on it, no one came up. No one was scummy D1, TT was not the worst lynch overall.
Lynching any other plynch yesterday (with slight exception of Palms) would be worse.
|
On September 11 2016 08:51 Shapelog wrote:Just as I closed all the tabs, and was going to go back to catch up land. So I can go lie down, and not have to catch up tomorrow, since I know today I can tolerate playing. *sigh* FML Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 08:27 Damdred wrote:
Nu is just a joker now, makes me laugh.
In any case @Shape I think what hi was looking for on a reread was him actually bringing things up about the others in the pool.
Lets be honest sky is good at making cases and I don't see it here, he's good with reasoning and while I can see consolidation being the answer it just doesn't make a lot of sense with how his stance was when he entered the thread.
And he was pre try side lines during,the lynch and most of the day (slight hypocritical at parts of,me,to say).
Do you disagree? And tumble is better than what I have read bout of him so far. And he was town the last game, where he acted exactly like he is now. I reread a further back. and I see what you mean by the [u] part. From page 2 - 4 I found Several remarks of him stating Me/Palmar/Tumble or who ever was missing or not posting or what ever. But I have to agree that he really didn't do much about them, other then just throw out posts about it. Shade posts? but honestly why bother? In actives would get lynch anyways for PLs. And as I read further back. I noticed something weird. Show nested quote +On September 10 2016 00:38 Skynx wrote:On September 09 2016 09:51 Tictock wrote:On September 09 2016 07:00 NeverUnlucky wrote:On September 09 2016 06:46 Vivax wrote:On September 09 2016 06:37 Calix wrote:
It doesn't look like you guys do RVS and I don't relate to the few posts being made so far, so I'l just chip in with some thoughts on the setup. Not seeing anything particularly eye-popping aside from the following:
- Names aren't allowed in Last Wills but if you wanted to reference a player (e.g., say you're a Sheriff-Vig who wanted to say "I checked X/ this player is innocent/ guilty") then you could quote some post numbers by said player, quote something they said, etc. I don't think LWs will be that useful for the protectives unless nobody died on a certain night because telling the scum who was protected last night in the event of a kill just needlessly gives the scum information on what the healing roles are thinking. If anyone knows what the Doctor roles would even need to tell the town (aside from telling us who they scum-read or something) then I'm all ears.
- There's always the chance that the scum can interfere with the message being given. Although they can only rewrite LWs twice, we can't rely on the LWs much but I think it's good to establish a way for the dead townies to communicate with the rest of the thread because I'm not seeing a way that the scum manipulation of the LWs/ votes can be prevented.
- We might want to be careful with policy lynching apathetic/ inactive players or being sloppy with CFDs in general. I've been told that TL is more open to policy lynches compared to where I come from, but since lynched players become Sheriff-Vigs, I think it would be suboptimal play to give lazy players a KPN in the early stages. This point might be moot, however, as I don't know how anyone here plays or if anyone would qualify as policy-lynch material. (save for NU who I wouldn't consider a policy lynch)
Anyway, hi. It's pretty late for me so if I randomly drop off, don't be surprised. Bolded seems like fluff tbh cause you don't seem to have any own ideas to contribute for this part. "we have to find out what to do" . Who would've thought. Your last point is also pretty uninformative. It's like you're suggesting not to lynch. Doesn't look as bad as your second though. But still. You get a bit of benefit of the doubt for this being your first game here, but if somebody is meh for me right now it's you. Also, she infered that town had PRs before they were lynched which shows she didn't correctly read the setup. It's NAI, but To add to your point about her fluff: she used words like "we" -- Scum tend to use those words more than town to fit in the group. Scum!Calix uses "we" a lot. She ends her post with an excuse to why she wouldn't post in the upcoming hours. It's something scum tends to do more, but it still is NAI. Scum-reading Calix. @Vivax, don't give me or her the benefit of the doubt because we're "new", we aren't. We're both familiar to mafia. Giving either of us (especially her) a chance, it could be all we need to fly under your radar. I like this guy, this is a solid post.
Contrast to Skynx here On September 09 2016 07:01 Skynx wrote:
Nothing good on tv/twitch and you guys are no fun, I'm offski to bed. First to post, been around, fucks off without saying anything and right about when things start happening. Of all NU's actions you picked this one to townread him? Whats special about it he's arguing about how using 'we' is NAI... I don't even know what to say about the point about me, sorry for not predicting when stuff is gona happen? When I left nothing was happening so I left. Not a fan of this post. Show nested quote +On September 10 2016 00:45 Skynx wrote:
HF is town for tunnel on TT easiest read so far. Into: Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 03:48 Skynx wrote:
Alright here is the deal people: TT is just soo hit and miss. He barely posted anything therefore no content to analyse properly. HF is tunnelled for whatever meta reason he has and blindly sheeping him is nuts.
TT is basically a plynch at this point but there are 2-3 others with similar no content no opinion just shitposting filters.
Can we please reconsider our lynch? Both of which, he contradicted. He previously analysed one of TT's posts, and said HF+ things. The problem is....is that i have no clue what the mafia motivation or agenda is for trying to get me/tumble/Palmar lynched over TT, other then the chance me/Tumble/Palmar steps up. And that is it. He is in a spot to push the TT lynch, yet doesn't, and goes back on the earlier points. Now if TT was scum, I would have a reasoning. Skynx was trying to protect scum!buddy TT. But TT was town. There is so little he would achieve by doing it. And it is a High risk, lowish reward to get one of me/Tt/Palmar/U? lynched, and then get lynched for not having anything else. All he would achieve is attention.... idk, the part i looked at made sense, but now that i found the quotes, I am confused on why the switch happen. TLDR: it is off now that I look at it, but I cannot figure-out if it is necessarily scummy, since the mindset doesn't make sense.
And you sir are bad for trying even harder for reasons to sr me. Nitpicking my easy tr on HF is sweet of you, however you skipped couple of remarks afterwards:
On September 10 2016 01:01 Skynx wrote:Show nested quote +On September 10 2016 00:46 NeverUnlucky wrote:On September 10 2016 00:45 Skynx wrote:
HF is town for tunnel on TT easiest read so far. Tunneling is NAI. Show nested quote +On September 10 2016 00:53 Holyflare wrote:On September 10 2016 00:45 Skynx wrote:
HF is town for tunnel on TT easiest read so far. What the fuck lol I mean first there is meta, from the games at least I've seen him play maf HF is very swingy and undecisive unless he's bussing. Second, when I was going thru the thread I didn't like TT either 1st because of the entry 2nd for the post i quoted some way back. When you see someone one the same page as you they are usually town cuz scum somehow has to scumread people on wrong grounds. Thats about it really, bare in mind I'm only in p12 so far.
On September 10 2016 01:06 Skynx wrote:
lol HF trolling the rest of the page ok maybe i can suspend my tr.
And again same jazz, I made remarks about other plynches but never actually did anything about it bla bla bla.
|
On September 11 2016 07:57 Damdred wrote:
Nu why is it again that sky can town hunt and you say he's scum hunting, but when I'm largely town hunting and trying to build what I think is the right group I am not?
And no I disagree with your conclusions over all on sky him voting tt especially when there was a movement away from tt (to a poont) is just scummy.
In fact he complains about people ignoring the other lurkers and never really brings much of anything worth talking about up just says the filter he checked wasn't that bad.
Then he bites someone who he really shouldn't given his filter. So no it's scum
Into
On September 11 2016 08:10 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 08:03 NeverUnlucky wrote:On September 11 2016 07:57 Damdred wrote:
Nu why is it again that sky can town hunt and you say he's scum hunting, but when I'm largely town hunting and trying to build what I think is the right group I am not?
And no I disagree with your conclusions over all on sky him voting tt especially when there was a movement away from tt (to a poont) is just scummy.
In fact he complains about people ignoring the other lurkers and never really brings much of anything worth talking about up just says the filter he checked wasn't that bad.
Then he bites someone who he really shouldn't given his filter. So no it's scum The difference is that you are not confrontational at all in your posts. As if you didn't want to make enemies. That just fits with you town-hunting rather than scum-hunting. Why is it scummy then? You make a point. However, you never really brought anything worth talking about either. Does that make you scum as well? How is this making him scummy? Confrontational is a nai trait scum can be nice or mean and,the same as town. This is a non point I have talked about whatever I wanted to,when,I was in,thread, the fights. Reads, my read on tt most,of,these things were ignored by you however. Idk if voting is mandatory where you are, but jumping on at the end,has the least amount,of responsibilities and,if he brought,hf near tie and hf,flipped even more heat would be on him. His decision making,process does not portray town trying to push or figure out anything. Like what he said about ignoring super shape etc but never pushes then himself and votes the person he was upset we were pushing. That's not town.
Into
On September 11 2016 22:27 Damdred wrote:
Nothing that's posted makes me scum and honestly calix is creating a narrative that just fits what they want to see.
Sk might be scum I'm not sure the inconsitincies are more scum leaning but not,sure.
Anyway I'll probably be around some,then be here later on Monday.
Also I expected more from you hf.
Kill with fire guys.
|
On September 11 2016 22:31 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 22:24 Skynx wrote:
Damdred is 100% scum.
His meta read stating I normally put good cases and reasonings behind them is true. However EoD I discussed with TW, Calix and Vivax (I think?) how there was no obv scum and plynch was good here. Calix was trying to push Damdred for wrong reasons, I didn't agree to it. There was no case for me to make, I asked multiple times if anyone thinks someone was objectively scummy and make a case on it, no one came up. No one was scummy D1, TT was not the worst lynch overall.
Lynching any other plynch yesterday (with slight exception of Palms) would be worse. "Damdred is 100% scum" "He's right, I make good cases" Make a case on him if you're that good and he's 100% scum.
He's tryharding to scumread me for nothing other than me not switching to low hanging fruits I (and mind you me only no one else even brought them up) suggested would be better plynches when the actualy lynch did not post or defend for 36 hours.
This was the only reason then he thought 'fuck me thats weak' and brought up 'oh guys Skynx is very good town he makes decent cases with sick reasonings behind them' when I already pointed out there was no obv scum to make case on.
On September 11 2016 05:16 Skynx wrote:
Calix, if there is no obv scum plynches are ok D1. HF is trying to paint TT as scum but just ignore that its a plynch.
Now he's backing away cuz Shape kinda agreed but then backed away and you + Calix are not backing him up either.
|
On September 11 2016 22:37 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 22:31 Skynx wrote:On September 11 2016 07:57 Damdred wrote:
Nu why is it again that sky can town hunt and you say he's scum hunting, but when I'm largely town hunting and trying to build what I think is the right group I am not?
And no I disagree with your conclusions over all on sky him voting tt especially when there was a movement away from tt (to a poont) is just scummy.
In fact he complains about people ignoring the other lurkers and never really brings much of anything worth talking about up just says the filter he checked wasn't that bad.
Then he bites someone who he really shouldn't given his filter. So no it's scum Into On September 11 2016 08:10 Damdred wrote:On September 11 2016 08:03 NeverUnlucky wrote:On September 11 2016 07:57 Damdred wrote:
Nu why is it again that sky can town hunt and you say he's scum hunting, but when I'm largely town hunting and trying to build what I think is the right group I am not?
And no I disagree with your conclusions over all on sky him voting tt especially when there was a movement away from tt (to a poont) is just scummy.
In fact he complains about people ignoring the other lurkers and never really brings much of anything worth talking about up just says the filter he checked wasn't that bad.
Then he bites someone who he really shouldn't given his filter. So no it's scum The difference is that you are not confrontational at all in your posts. As if you didn't want to make enemies. That just fits with you town-hunting rather than scum-hunting. Why is it scummy then? You make a point. However, you never really brought anything worth talking about either. Does that make you scum as well? How is this making him scummy? Confrontational is a nai trait scum can be nice or mean and,the same as town. This is a non point I have talked about whatever I wanted to,when,I was in,thread, the fights. Reads, my read on tt most,of,these things were ignored by you however. Idk if voting is mandatory where you are, but jumping on at the end,has the least amount,of responsibilities and,if he brought,hf near tie and hf,flipped even more heat would be on him. His decision making,process does not portray town trying to push or figure out anything. Like what he said about ignoring super shape etc but never pushes then himself and votes the person he was upset we were pushing. That's not town. Into On September 11 2016 22:27 Damdred wrote:
Nothing that's posted makes me scum and honestly calix is creating a narrative that just fits what they want to see.
Sk might be scum I'm not sure the inconsitincies are more scum leaning but not,sure.
Anyway I'll probably be around some,then be here later on Monday.
Also I expected more from you hf. Kill with fire guys. Why is being unsure at points scum indicative again? You can give some generalized reason about scum finding it hard to make scum reads. But the problems I pointed out are real. My town reads nu and shape think I am off base on my reasoning which I need to,check,into more.
Alright, why was I 100% scum some 12 hours ago and why you are not sure if I'm scum now?
|
Shape is a wierder case. I mean he agreed with Damdy for no reason, then nitpicked another reason I'm scum when i denied that very thing literally 2 posts later in my filter.
Then he backed away from everything cuz it didn't make sense. Not sure if this is scummy actually.
|
On September 11 2016 22:48 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 22:45 Skynx wrote:
Shape is a wierder case. I mean he agreed with Damdy for no reason, then nitpicked another reason I'm scum when i denied that very thing literally 2 posts later in my filter.
Then he backed away from everything cuz it didn't make sense. Not sure if this is scummy actually. are you trolling Shape doesn't agree with Damdred, Shape thinks you are town, mang.
Man check 71 again.
|
On September 11 2016 23:01 Palmar wrote:
The more skynx talks about me being a good lynch yesterday the more I want to kill him.
Oi sush you you were supposed to be afk til monday.
|
On September 11 2016 23:05 Palmar wrote:
Why did you say I only shitposted Skynx? I didn't post much, but I don't think much of what I posted was just shitty trolling. I actually think most of my posts are very reasonable and extremely intelligent.
Sure hun, maybe I will actually take you serious soon. + Show Spoiler +(Soon is the key word here)
|
On September 11 2016 23:08 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 22:58 Calix wrote:On September 11 2016 22:54 Damdred wrote:
Shape doesn't know what to make of your inconsistencies, sees no reason that you should do what you did as scum. You dropped your opinion while you were busy rehashing Shape's views, my dude. ' What does this even,mean. Sky misinterpreted what shape was saying I corrected him idk
Shit I missed this. if you can properly phrase my inconsistencies and they actually are logical I might drop some of the negative points about you.
|
|
|
Nice kill, prevented another embarrasment for hf.
|
On September 12 2016 06:12 NeverUnlucky wrote:
Superbia, HF, and Damdred were all pushing for a Calix lynch after TT's flip.
Calix scum-read Fuba, Skynx, Vivax, and Damdred.
Those are the ones I would look into first.
Calix never scum read me. Hell, he even defended me few pages back I dunno what you on about.
|
On September 12 2016 06:32 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2016 06:30 Skynx wrote:
Nice kill, prevented another embarrasment for hf. another person who hasn't read the thread
I dunno why you're under the impression that anyone reads the game at all.
|
On September 12 2016 06:35 NeverUnlucky wrote:
Only TW and Damdred have given their opinion on the kill. I WANT EVERYONE TO GIVE THEIR OPINION.
What an opinion they gave hahahaha
|
HF you're irish catholic right?
|
On September 12 2016 06:04 Half the Sky wrote:
Scott's last will is as follows:
"Hey all, it's the elite man that shadowed with somebody here one time, so I should be recognized. I have faith in you. The leadership of ViennaVivax forces Jews to wear PileumPalmar cornutum,a cone-shaped head dress, in addition to the yellow badges Jews are already forced to wear."
Flip incoming.
|
Just trying to figure who's the jew.
|
On September 12 2016 06:39 Holyflare wrote:why the fuck do I care? maybe tw thought she was towniest maybe mafia thought she was a medic dodgemaybe mafia thought she implicated someone maybe mafia just wanted to kill a towny no?
We don't have medic protection yet lynches=copcheck/vig, scumslip?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
