|
On September 03 2016 04:42 scott31337 wrote:
Since everyone seemed to forget -
I'll be spending some good time in the thread this afternoon - I have an american football game to go to Thursday night, and driving out of town for work on Friday morning for network installs, so I won't be around much after today.
I'm still doing installs, I don't have time to play - but after I get home today things should be normal.
Post your reads please. Don't post the excel sheet, that is forbidden.
Post your reads.
|
and I don' tknow when this afternoon is but lynch is in 1 hour.
|
And move your vote from Vivax to TW.
|
Going afk now is a real bad idea. Oh boiiiiiii
|
I'm totally down for a TW lynch now.
His attention shift from Trfel to Rels which I noticed D1 makes perfect sense thinking of it now, just in reverse as I originally thought.
He wasn't more interested into talking about Rels cause Rels was mafia with him, but cause he wanted attention to shift away from Trfel.
He noticed his scumbuddy Trfel was doing scummy shit. Called it out first thanks to TMI, but as soon as Palmar was starting to crap on Rels for his entrance, he took the chance to not talk about Trfel whom he just called out for doing scummy shit.
Maybe I'm just tunneled but the theory sounds really sexy.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
For fuck sake tt is mafia IM HIS BIGGEST SUSPECT AND HE'S THE ONLY LNE VLITING WJTH ME LOLOLOL
WILL VOTE FW TOO
|
Yea, I don't want to lynch Palmar.
I like a lot of his posts, his opinions are original and they have evolved in ways that make sense to me. He also posted his list post almost right after I made all my WoT posts and had quite a few of the same views on the game that I do.
I could be wrong, but I'm not seeing mafia motivation in his play today.
|
Going to play Dota.
Vote TW. Don't vote Scott.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
AWHY ARE YOI VKTING EKTH ME
|
Don't have time but am sheeping.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
|
On September 03 2016 00:46 Palmar wrote:
Like if it isn't blatantly obvious to everyone in the game, my day 1 push on Rels was only like 10% real and 90% just to do shit to get the game started.
how is it 10% real
shouldn't it be 0% or a lot%?
how do you think something 10% of the way? this genuinely confuses me
On September 03 2016 04:35 Koshi wrote:
This is going nowhere. We need to vote the person who is most likely to flip mafia and that is TW. The guy barely survived the lynch D1 by mass posting and just pleading to anybody who would listen. We switched and lynched the vig.
D2 he did nothing but defend Palmar in 5 out of the 10 posts he made. And then called Palmar mafia in another and voted TT who is out of all low filters the most townie. I don't even know why he is voting TT tbh.
I expect no less of you koshi
|
Damn Palmar might even be right on geript.
On August 29 2016 14:45 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On August 29 2016 06:42 Vivax wrote:
Tumble's attention shift from Trfel along with my post that went undiscussed (maybe I'm just boring or post too much stuff to reply to in detail?) to Rels being accused by Palmar is kinda interesting. It's like the Rels issue is more important for him than the Trfel one without visible reasoning. I actually like this post. I don't agree with it, but there's thought behind it. Show nested quote +On August 29 2016 06:49 Trfel wrote:On August 29 2016 06:42 Vivax wrote:
Tumble's attention shift from Trfel along with my post that went undiscussed (maybe I'm just boring or post too much stuff to reply to in detail?) to Rels being accused by Palmar is kinda interesting. It's like the Rels issue is more important for him than the Trfel one without visible reasoning. Sorry Vivax, I'm still trying to figure this out. I'm not quite getting what you're saying. You're saying that if Tumblewood was actually interested in my alignment, and actually wanted to talk about me, then he would have discussed your post about me instead of just talking about Palmar's read on Rels? Or am I wrong? I like Trfel picking up on this post. Show nested quote +On August 29 2016 08:06 Tictock wrote:On August 29 2016 06:22 Vivax wrote:
I see good will from Trfel here but it's not going to catch a mafia disfo. So far both of them posted null stuff, with Trfel's scumclaim being posted to look like he wanted to draw attention, but since he's posting in sluggish tempo I'm not sure he wanted to actually draw attention but the opposite. But I don't want to crash his party if he thinks he's achieving something.
Also, salut Rels! This strikes me as the most interesting post thus far. Basically a long winded way of saying he has no idea what Trfel is doing. I agree with the first sentance but the rest is calling out Trfel for something, then saying he doesn't want to push Trfel for it. Mild scum lean for casting shade on Trfel but not wanting to look like a bad guy while doing it. I like picking up on the Vivax post and bringing it back up.
Why is he liking both posts from Trfel and TT even though their relation to my post is completely different? Trfel only asks questions about it, TT calls me scum for it. It's like geript has no own opinion on my post at all, he should at least know if he's agreeing or disagreeing with TT, and normally he should be disagreeing cause he liked my observation.
Why does he keep throwing suspicion at Trfel in these long posts but never seems to care about Trfel?
You will also notice how geript opens with having Trfel as scum (it appears that way) and while he heads down writing his post finding this one thing above as the only reason to possibly think Trfel is town, he more and more keeps putting him as bad town.
But why, actually? He starts his post mentioning stuff that looks mafia about Trfel, why does he have to conclude he's bad town and talk so much about it every time in his initial posts.
And by now Trfel for him is like forgotten, it should be one of the guys he's looking for in the + 1 after me and Daneler.
|
wow I explained that Palmar thing really poorly. but the concept of "10% real" motives doesn't make sense. think about it
|
So I'm kinda unscumreading scott on a whim and putting the team geript/Trfel/TW out there.
TWs flip will hopefully prove me right.
|
I think one of tt and Palmar has to be scum. only I don't think it's both, and I don't know which. there's just no way we're so right with such mediocre town play
|
and can we stop putting out 3-person teams with 0 scum flips
|
Tumble, this post:
On August 29 2016 06:21 Tumblewood wrote:
gonna jump on the "talk about trfel" ship
doesn't make a whole lot of sense that trfel would jokingly claim scum and then shift right into serious mode. well, maybe a little. I still don't like it.
vivax is also probably town for getting pissed at that.
On August 30 2016 09:39 Tumblewood wrote:
town
vivax
daneler
also probably town
hf
scummy
tt
scott?
null/don't care yet
most people
Then this post.
What happened to Trfel in between that you forgot about him after making a point that, looking back, was probably excellent?
|
Spent the past hour or so catching up. Earlier, I had thought that Palmar and Tumblewood weren't likely to both be Mafia, but recent posts by Tumblewood are making me rethink that. While I would rather lynch Scott or Palmar, I don't think those lynches will go anywhere today. As such, I am going to move my vote to Tumblewood, as well.
##vote Tumblewood
|
On September 03 2016 05:18 Vivax wrote:Tumble, this post: Show nested quote +On August 29 2016 06:21 Tumblewood wrote:
gonna jump on the "talk about trfel" ship
doesn't make a whole lot of sense that trfel would jokingly claim scum and then shift right into serious mode. well, maybe a little. I still don't like it.
vivax is also probably town for getting pissed at that. Show nested quote +On August 30 2016 09:39 Tumblewood wrote:
town
vivax
daneler
also probably town
hf
scummy
tt
scott?
null/don't care yet
most people Then this post. What happened to Trfel in between that you forgot about him after making a point that, looking back, was probably excellent?
"excellent"
I have learned my lesson on trying to read people based on their first ten posts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
