EPTOn July 22 2016 03:41 Palmar wrote:
I thought his post about trying to force people to make mistakes by voting them was dumb in a fun way, so I voted him "to try to get him to make mistakes".
ie: I voted him to troll his reasoning.
Show nested quote +
On July 22 2016 03:39 emperorchampion wrote:
Either you are highlighting some serious flaws with everyone in this game right now, or you are lying. And I'm honestly not sure which. Probably it's true that RNG has the same reading capabilities as 13 humans.
OK, so then what was the motivation for your initial vote on lunatic?
On July 22 2016 03:32 Palmar wrote:
Kruppe is a crapshot, but as always with policy lynches, there exists a reason to play like he does as mafia, and none as town, so technically he should objectively be mafia.
On the other hand, trolls rarely care if they're playing anti town so whatever.
Also, bro.
I'm not joking, the list post was literally me randomizing the people in the game and adding some categories headers. I think my own name is in one of the null categories. It's 100% bullshit and should be treated as such.
On July 22 2016 02:55 Koshi wrote:
When there is disconnect between his scumhunting posts or he proven is plain wrong.
example.
He had Rels as town before and Kruppe mafia, but now he is lynching Rels and saying Kruppe is a 100% crapshoot. Why?
On July 22 2016 02:49 emperorchampion wrote:
Also at what point do we just lynch palmar for trolling and not making any sense =/
Also at what point do we just lynch palmar for trolling and not making any sense =/
When there is disconnect between his scumhunting posts or he proven is plain wrong.
example.
He had Rels as town before and Kruppe mafia, but now he is lynching Rels and saying Kruppe is a 100% crapshoot. Why?
Kruppe is a crapshot, but as always with policy lynches, there exists a reason to play like he does as mafia, and none as town, so technically he should objectively be mafia.
On the other hand, trolls rarely care if they're playing anti town so whatever.
Also, bro.
I'm not joking, the list post was literally me randomizing the people in the game and adding some categories headers. I think my own name is in one of the null categories. It's 100% bullshit and should be treated as such.
Either you are highlighting some serious flaws with everyone in this game right now, or you are lying. And I'm honestly not sure which. Probably it's true that RNG has the same reading capabilities as 13 humans.
OK, so then what was the motivation for your initial vote on lunatic?
Show nested quote +
On July 21 2016 04:01 Palmar wrote:
Go forth and make mistakes my friend
On July 21 2016 03:57 Lunaticman wrote:
Voting for people is a common tactic this generates pressure which generates misstakes, you can switch your vote anytime unless I am missing something.
On July 21 2016 03:53 emperorchampion wrote:
I dunno if this makes sense. Why would you vote for a town person?
Also I am far from fighting for my life. I am "defending" my self from tumble because his arguments are so weak, they are leading me to think that he might be scum.
On July 21 2016 03:45 Lunaticman wrote:
I think it was a good argument, and votes generate friction, which generates more content. I am totally fine voting for someone if I think the argument is good enough especially on day 1. What I find confusing is why you would demote your own arugment, that is very strange.
I actually think he is fighting for his life as a townie, but the day is far from over.
On July 21 2016 03:34 Skynx wrote:
What does emperors alignment has anything to do with mine? I haven't even read him yet.
Also you say what i just said is convincing enough for you to vote on ec. But i didn't say anything new or something related to his specific behaviour here.
So, thats kind of a shitty vote. Why is he mafia?
On July 21 2016 03:27 Lunaticman wrote:
Based on this I'm putting down my vote for now on EC.
Even if he turns green you will be the next auto lynch. Or rather a blue should check you during the night to save a lynch target.
I will change the vote if someone comes up with a better argument for a d1 lynch.
On July 21 2016 03:23 Skynx wrote:
Without ever rolling town he doesn't know how to be town its simple. Even he does exact opposite of what he did its forced and noticeable.
On July 21 2016 03:20 Tumblewood wrote:
and I don't get how ec can be scum three games in a row, then act the exact same way the next game and notbe scumread
and I don't get how ec can be scum three games in a row, then act the exact same way the next game and notbe scumread
Without ever rolling town he doesn't know how to be town its simple. Even he does exact opposite of what he did its forced and noticeable.
Based on this I'm putting down my vote for now on EC.
Even if he turns green you will be the next auto lynch. Or rather a blue should check you during the night to save a lynch target.
I will change the vote if someone comes up with a better argument for a d1 lynch.
What does emperors alignment has anything to do with mine? I haven't even read him yet.
Also you say what i just said is convincing enough for you to vote on ec. But i didn't say anything new or something related to his specific behaviour here.
So, thats kind of a shitty vote. Why is he mafia?
I think it was a good argument, and votes generate friction, which generates more content. I am totally fine voting for someone if I think the argument is good enough especially on day 1. What I find confusing is why you would demote your own arugment, that is very strange.
I actually think he is fighting for his life as a townie, but the day is far from over.
I dunno if this makes sense. Why would you vote for a town person?
Also I am far from fighting for my life. I am "defending" my self from tumble because his arguments are so weak, they are leading me to think that he might be scum.
Voting for people is a common tactic this generates pressure which generates misstakes, you can switch your vote anytime unless I am missing something.
Go forth and make mistakes my friend
I thought his post about trying to force people to make mistakes by voting them was dumb in a fun way, so I voted him "to try to get him to make mistakes".
ie: I voted him to troll his reasoning.
idontknowwhatiexpected.gif
![[image loading]](https://images.hellogiggles.com/uploads/2016/05/31034733/burn.jpg)
