|
On March 28 2016 23:18 LightningStrike wrote:
JAT to answer your question about Rels and VA:
VA is a meta borrowing from(gasp) Kush from Star Wars where I see some of his star wars posting atm and VA was scum there.
Rels: Okay he haven't done much stuff and usually tries to be the main voice at times and I not been feeling it this game and a good you had about the obs qt in Cell he forgot to give a read on me plus he would try harder to figure out my alignment.
Can you give me examples on how his posting here looks like star wars? Because I vehemently disagree with this. Don't really think I understand the Rels stuff but maybe that's on me. I have trouble concentrating right now.
|
My bad, thats supposed to be tumblewood not tictock. too many T names in this game.
|
On March 28 2016 23:20 VayneAuthority wrote:
alright I caught up on the thread im back. Really no reason to post a big post about 800+ posts so I will answer questions if there are any.
Specific things that triggered me -
1. voting yesterday. Was pretty dead tbh so trying to decide if that was possibly a town on town lynch or if it was just the holiday weekend.
2. I was thinking rels could be scum at some point then i started reading a bunch of posts of people i want nothing to do with thinking rels is scum which is weird. Potential separating maneuver? I do think Rels is a decent lynch still honestly his reads and paradigm of posting so far are meh.
3. Pretty sure Koshi is doing his play as bad as possible thing to stay alive. I would just assume whatever he says he means the opposite, would explain a lot of his posts/reads. No real point to respond to anything he says until its like day four.
4.This LS/rsoultin/etc circlejerk is still making me gag, please make it go away. Probably read like 20-25 posts reading through of them just sucking eachother off and saying that the other is town for zero reason and they dont want to lynch eachother. Exactly what the policy part of my vote was about.
my mafia atm - Rsoultin, Rels, Tictock, Alakaslam, ????
Any opinions regarding the claims?
|
On March 28 2016 23:19 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2016 23:14 Vivax wrote:As you see for a pile on my read progressed from suspecting him to choosing the lesser evil for myself in my book cause on D1 all reads are shit in big games. I voted and went to bed with 3 votes on tube thinking that im not going to stay up for this and cause I didnt expect the lynch to be in my hand anyways which proved to be true. On March 28 2016 23:02 Superbia wrote:I scumread (could be both present/past, still undecided) you mostly for your d1. Your vote on tubesock feels like a pile-on. Especially the first point of your explanation post is incredibly contrived: On March 26 2016 02:38 Vivax wrote:
Voting tubesock.
1 Maybe sandro is right on rso and since rso wants to lynch kurumi I lynch tubesock.
2 Would suck to be lynched D1 after not playing for so long and then posting so much for kur
3 Tubesock has to explain what ritoky had to do with anything in his read on kurumi and why he's more interested into his read on him instead of say, tumble or shape who he claimed where blending. "Maybe sandro is right on rso" => Maybe rso is indeed mafia. "since rso wants to lynch kurumi" => kurumi is my prime scumread, but now-possible-scum rsoultin is pushing on him. "I lynch tubesock" => I assume rso is now scum and because she's pushing my main scum-read, I'm pushing tubesock RATHER THAN RSO HERSELF.I cannot get over this post. I raised the question of you TRing rso and voting her because it raised some questionmarks, I did not scumread you for that. I scumread you for this post. My D1 reads were that Kurumi was scummy, rso was voting Kurumi, I decided sandro wasnt super apathetic and gave him a D1 freepass plus decided previously I could sheep him cause he's not complete shite when hes town, I had reasons to think tubesock could be mafia and didn't want to D1 lynch rsoultin, The only inconsistent thing was that I voted with Kurumi but since I had my own reasons and don't believe I am 100 % right on something on D1 in a game with so many players I decided it was fine. Trust me if I were mafia I would have found less complex reasons to pile on a wagon. But it's all consistent, you are free to call it bad reasoning but certainly not allowed to call me mafia for it. You went to sleep at 7PM?
Is this really the most important part of his post?
|
On March 28 2016 23:24 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2016 23:19 Superbia wrote:On March 28 2016 23:14 Vivax wrote:As you see for a pile on my read progressed from suspecting him to choosing the lesser evil for myself in my book cause on D1 all reads are shit in big games. I voted and went to bed with 3 votes on tube thinking that im not going to stay up for this and cause I didnt expect the lynch to be in my hand anyways which proved to be true. On March 28 2016 23:02 Superbia wrote:I scumread (could be both present/past, still undecided) you mostly for your d1. Your vote on tubesock feels like a pile-on. Especially the first point of your explanation post is incredibly contrived: On March 26 2016 02:38 Vivax wrote:
Voting tubesock.
1 Maybe sandro is right on rso and since rso wants to lynch kurumi I lynch tubesock.
2 Would suck to be lynched D1 after not playing for so long and then posting so much for kur
3 Tubesock has to explain what ritoky had to do with anything in his read on kurumi and why he's more interested into his read on him instead of say, tumble or shape who he claimed where blending. "Maybe sandro is right on rso" => Maybe rso is indeed mafia. "since rso wants to lynch kurumi" => kurumi is my prime scumread, but now-possible-scum rsoultin is pushing on him. "I lynch tubesock" => I assume rso is now scum and because she's pushing my main scum-read, I'm pushing tubesock RATHER THAN RSO HERSELF.I cannot get over this post. I raised the question of you TRing rso and voting her because it raised some questionmarks, I did not scumread you for that. I scumread you for this post. My D1 reads were that Kurumi was scummy, rso was voting Kurumi, I decided sandro wasnt super apathetic and gave him a D1 freepass plus decided previously I could sheep him cause he's not complete shite when hes town, I had reasons to think tubesock could be mafia and didn't want to D1 lynch rsoultin, The only inconsistent thing was that I voted with Kurumi but since I had my own reasons and don't believe I am 100 % right on something on D1 in a game with so many players I decided it was fine. Trust me if I were mafia I would have found less complex reasons to pile on a wagon. But it's all consistent, you are free to call it bad reasoning but certainly not allowed to call me mafia for it. You went to sleep at 7PM? Is this really the most important part of his post?
What is for you?
|
On March 28 2016 23:21 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2016 23:18 LightningStrike wrote:
JAT to answer your question about Rels and VA:
VA is a meta borrowing from(gasp) Kush from Star Wars where I see some of his star wars posting atm and VA was scum there.
Rels: Okay he haven't done much stuff and usually tries to be the main voice at times and I not been feeling it this game and a good you had about the obs qt in Cell he forgot to give a read on me plus he would try harder to figure out my alignment. Can you give me examples on how his posting here looks like star wars? Because I vehemently disagree with this. Don't really think I understand the Rels stuff but maybe that's on me. I have trouble concentrating right now.
Okay nvm on VA I just relooked there he just null atm and he is now posting.
|
This is not the first time you throwing soft suspicion my way, obi. Take a stance, what do you think of Vivax's reply? What is the important part of that post for you? And what does it make Vivax? What about myself? Where do you stand on my alignment?
|
On March 28 2016 23:23 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2016 23:20 VayneAuthority wrote:
alright I caught up on the thread im back. Really no reason to post a big post about 800+ posts so I will answer questions if there are any.
Specific things that triggered me -
1. voting yesterday. Was pretty dead tbh so trying to decide if that was possibly a town on town lynch or if it was just the holiday weekend.
2. I was thinking rels could be scum at some point then i started reading a bunch of posts of people i want nothing to do with thinking rels is scum which is weird. Potential separating maneuver? I do think Rels is a decent lynch still honestly his reads and paradigm of posting so far are meh.
3. Pretty sure Koshi is doing his play as bad as possible thing to stay alive. I would just assume whatever he says he means the opposite, would explain a lot of his posts/reads. No real point to respond to anything he says until its like day four.
4.This LS/rsoultin/etc circlejerk is still making me gag, please make it go away. Probably read like 20-25 posts reading through of them just sucking eachother off and saying that the other is town for zero reason and they dont want to lynch eachother. Exactly what the policy part of my vote was about.
my mafia atm - Rsoultin, Rels, Tictock, Alakaslam, ????
Any opinions regarding the claims?
Ah right, if it wasn't apparent by my mafia I do think there are too many roles. Especially since we killed two confirmed blues already. Slam's play is 100% mafia so far and Rsoultin im like 50/50 on but her lynch would give a wealth of information regardless of flip.
Because honestly I dont trust people like ritoky 100% yet he keeps repeating the same thing and going off on RL tangents which is concerning.
|
On March 28 2016 23:26 Superbia wrote:
This is not the first time you throwing soft suspicion my way, obi. Take a stance, what do you think of Vivax's reply? What is the important part of that post for you? And what does it make Vivax? What about myself? Where do you stand on my alignment?
There's nothing soft about it - it seemed like you picked the most minuscule part of the post to comment on.
|
On March 28 2016 23:31 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2016 23:26 Superbia wrote:
This is not the first time you throwing soft suspicion my way, obi. Take a stance, what do you think of Vivax's reply? What is the important part of that post for you? And what does it make Vivax? What about myself? Where do you stand on my alignment? There's nothing soft about it - it seemed like you picked the most minuscule part of the post to comment on.
It's the most important for me.
|
What do you think about it?
|
Actually, give me a second - that conversation was a bit deeper than I thought it was when I glanced over it.
|
On March 28 2016 23:32 Superbia wrote:
What do you think about it?
I think Vivax's bedtime is a relatively weird thing to fixate on but that's it.
|
On March 28 2016 23:32 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2016 23:31 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On March 28 2016 23:26 Superbia wrote:
This is not the first time you throwing soft suspicion my way, obi. Take a stance, what do you think of Vivax's reply? What is the important part of that post for you? And what does it make Vivax? What about myself? Where do you stand on my alignment? There's nothing soft about it - it seemed like you picked the most minuscule part of the post to comment on. It's the most important for me.
Like, how is this possible exactly?
|
On March 28 2016 23:36 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2016 23:32 Superbia wrote:On March 28 2016 23:31 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On March 28 2016 23:26 Superbia wrote:
This is not the first time you throwing soft suspicion my way, obi. Take a stance, what do you think of Vivax's reply? What is the important part of that post for you? And what does it make Vivax? What about myself? Where do you stand on my alignment? There's nothing soft about it - it seemed like you picked the most minuscule part of the post to comment on. It's the most important for me. Like, how is this possible exactly?
Because either he admits to lurking or has to explain his early (what could be considered tactical) departure from the thread. I don't want to explain how his answer would affect my read.
|
|
|
Wait from your filter you agree with Koshi's list. Is this still the case?
|
On March 28 2016 23:46 Superbia wrote:
Wait from your filter you agree with Koshi's list. Is this still the case?
I started agreeing with it and then kind of axed that idea when I started moving people around.
Tumble is probably my top scum along with Tt and I've got a few outliers that aren't concrete yet.
|
On March 28 2016 23:40 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2016 23:36 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On March 28 2016 23:32 Superbia wrote:On March 28 2016 23:31 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On March 28 2016 23:26 Superbia wrote:
This is not the first time you throwing soft suspicion my way, obi. Take a stance, what do you think of Vivax's reply? What is the important part of that post for you? And what does it make Vivax? What about myself? Where do you stand on my alignment? There's nothing soft about it - it seemed like you picked the most minuscule part of the post to comment on. It's the most important for me. Like, how is this possible exactly? Because either he admits to lurking or has to explain his early (what could be considered tactical) departure from the thread. I don't want to explain how his answer would affect my read.
Fine, but I'm going to keep this in mind when he responds.
|
On March 28 2016 23:47 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2016 23:46 Superbia wrote:
Wait from your filter you agree with Koshi's list. Is this still the case? I started agreeing with it and then kind of axed that idea when I started moving people around. Tumble is probably my top scum along with Tt and I've got a few outliers that aren't concrete yet.
Then now is the time to push them. So far you don't seem very interested in getting that done.
You could start by explaining why Koshi/rsoul aren't good lynches and continue explaining why tumble and TT are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
