EPTNot voting and the enforcement - Page 4
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
boxerfred
Germany8360 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
| ||
|
nooniansoong
1538 Posts
Like if they will be replaced, then lynch them, if they will be modkilled, lynch someone else. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
There is a small to medium sized group of people who play mafia where I think it goes beyond a hobby and it is an obsession to a degree. I admittedly am one of those people and there are several others in this thread. We police the game pretty much in the thread all the time and we ride people who aren't decently hard in obs or the game itself. I can't remember how many times I've seen a non vote get mod killed because of forgetting to vote or voting in thread Instead of the voting thread. And even if it doesn't' ruin' the game to some degree it is one of the most demoralizing thing to select especially if that person was decently active beforehand. Ie slam in ippo or SL in several gamed. I think koshis idea of an escalating ban is the right way to go (sheeping). But I think I would be more lenient as there are irl things that happen, and if we were able to,change the typical rule set if we even have any activity requirements to something all hosts should adhere to in certain size games we would be better off I think. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On February 19 2016 05:16 ritoky wrote: if standard games were made to have no voting requirement i would abuse it. i know myself. same, the standard should be warning for 1st no vote and modkill + ban(s) for 2nd no vote but there should be more regulations against people that are notorious for breaking the rules. I would bend the rules in any way possible for mindgames and have done so in the past. So it would be justified for a mod to decide to modkill + ban me if I fail to vote for the 1st time rather than issuing a warning. Basically one standard to set, but gradually stricter regulations for people that constantly cause problems. | ||
|
boxerfred
Germany8360 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
|
boxerfred
Germany8360 Posts
| ||
|
justanothertownie
16308 Posts
On February 20 2016 08:27 boxerfred wrote: no Yes. It is not a terrible thought at first glance but in essence you are just introducing another unusual deadline which can be missed. Not to mention the extra work for the mods. If someone fails to vote he will still fail to vote and eods could get even messier than they are right now. | ||
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
| ||
| ||
