
[T][M] Resistance V - Section 31 - Page 7
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
![]() | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 19:19 sicklucker wrote: is there a point to this other then to brag? Basically yes, there is. Artanis knows what i am talking about and knows my thought process here, at least if he is town. Anyone who talks anything about scum sabotaging/aiding until this thing here is resolved is mafia!! | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 19:18 Half the Sky wrote: Rayn how are you so sure Artanis is town? sorry i misread the question. It basically has to do with me not seeing him playing towards anything.. ugh... idk it is hard to explain, i don't see him having scum agenda, or anything like that behind his posting. Same basically goes to sicklucker. and a part of it has to do with "reverse process of elimination". I am sorry it is really hard to explain, but i am quite sure i am right here. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 19:31 sicklucker wrote: I forget hts mission team but im not voting obv. day 2 only voting a me/rayn team for whoevers picking that HtS team was herself, me and kitaman. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 18:38 Rels wrote: You should ask him. p: From memory, Superbia, Xatalos, maybe HTS, maybe Arta. Remember, this is going to be an interesting post later on. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 20:09 Superbia wrote: I won't have anytime today bc of my gf's birthday. I will vote yes on this team for reasons I will explain tomorrow. you shouldn't vote yes though. especially if you don't have time to play today. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
But the problem with this is we would need at least one of the two remaining townies to see this and i am not sure if that's gonna happen so i go with the route of proving who is scum then instead. Sorry guys, this will take a bit more time, but i know what i am doing. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 21:38 Xatalos wrote: You're that confident in Artanis/SL? Over HTS? I can kind of see suspecting HTS after that odd team proposal, but if she was scum with Kita, why bother with adding Kita anyway? If HTS was scum and Kita town (lol), then.. Hm, maybe it could be to blame it on Kita? Well, I guess that makes sense. Still I doubt HTS/Kita are both Spies and Kita looks worse IMO. Neither Artanis nor SL has done much yet... I guess that could be taken as not pushing an agenda like you said. I'm not quite ready to call them "obvious town" yet though, because not doing anything could also mean that there hasn't been a reason to do anything (for example, if HTS was scum? - although I don't think it's too likely). Yeah that's what i am basically saying. I see no reason for HtS to not think you are town anymore, and add kita into the team if they are both mafia. That's why i think they are not both mafia. And kita is definitely easier to put the sabotage blame on than you are. But the switch from you -> kita gives me a pause, especially after HtS even puts Superbia as a townread over you (which i definitely do not agree with). The way i see scum approaching this from the point of view that you are town is basically that casting doubt on you is at this point of the game a good play, because it's highly unlike the HtS team gets passed, and you are the next leader on line. So whoever you pick (assuming you are picking two other townies), they have a valid excuse to disagree with the team based on "Xatalos is there". That's exactly what i did as scum in the last game i played, and it works out surprisingly well if you can't get your own team through and/or if you have the (rest of the) leaders from your scumteam in the bottom of the queue. That's also what i see all of kitaman/shockeyy/rels/hts possibly doing here. I don't understand any of those people's reasons for not heavily townreading you because you are very obviously town in this game. As for your last paragraph, i do think at least Artanis would push stuff more, and SL would bus (lol). ![]() | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
1) If there are three scum, and the plan goes through, we autowin the game. 2) That is not going to happen because kitaman will refuse to follow up with that if there is three scum 3) When kitaman refuses to the plan, he actually has to explain why one of Rels/ShoCkeyy is mafia 4) When kitaman says "no" to the plan, i am going to ask Rels about his read on kitaman, and where does he base that on -- in contrary to the read on you (the "Xatalos does not have scumreads" part -- i will explain that further then) 5) And then all of this doesn't matter, except for we get scum talking about each other and not give bullshit reads 6) And the plan will still be town-favored if there is even 2 scum in that group of three (which i am 95% sure of, unless i am playing horribly in this game). | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 22:12 Xatalos wrote: Yeah, I think it's a good way to put pressure on the scumteam. Not sure if you want to talk about the reasons openly like this though? I also thought of a couple other reasons unrelated to those, but I definitely wouldn't want to talk about them this openly.. Well if kitaman is scum he knows all this already because he is a smart guy. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
Here is what has happened regarding ShoCkeyy and his reads. He calls me scum. People point out how his reasoning is flawed. This makes him call ALSO Xatalos scum. Now okay, he thinks i am scum and Xatalos is scum, therefore he refuses a team of HtS/rayn/Xatalos. Logicwise this could make sense but the next thing he says is "at least switch rayn to Superbia so we know who is scum if the mission fails". This doesn't make any sense as town as: 1) If he reads Xatalos scum, he should want to swap BOTH of me and Xatalos from that team 2) therefore the only logical explanation for me is (if he actually wants to push a team of his liking and not just say something) that he needs scum there -> and that scum would be Superbia. Now i know this is unflipped association but you cannot basically deny that this is possible, and even likely. There is really nothing but unflipped associations in Resistance, and that is the only way i can see that (logically) making sense. Noone should ever push a team with scum in it unless they can logically explain it -- and "at least we know who is scum" is not a logical explanation for picking a team where there is scum over all town team. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 22:20 Half the Sky wrote: Pretty sure I did through the course of things, but sure will do again. Basically I had gone though his filter and I'm seeing points where he's driving the discussion pretty constructively. #455 is a good example of this to a response from Xatalos that would appear somewhat worded vaguely "like solving the game" where he's asking him to substantiate his read. He did the same thing to me in #458, the followups were there re: Superbia. The other posts that I liked were 569 and anything he mentioned after the nominations went through. The responses to Xatalos re: Superbia were spot on - the latter was not engaged constantly with the thread and from what I can tell those questions would appear to me as trying to figure Xata's alignment since he's obviously said he's not sold on him. As you seem to be relying heavily on meta -- at least here on Xatalos and Superbia (basically the whole read of yours on both of them is based on meta), why are you not relying on meta on kitaman. A couple of questions regarding this: - Do you think kitaman is incapable of making those kinda posts as scum? - Do you think kitaman's play does not make sense as scum (see my post towards him a couple of pages ago)? - Do you think kitaman has hard reads and is taking hard stances? If so, who would you say he thinks is scum and why? | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 22:26 ShoCkeyy wrote: rayn how much more are you going to post with out confronting me? Cause I was calling you out all day yesterday and not once did you interact with me... I want you to quote where I call you scum. Please... I don't argue with scum. And all of your posts are calling me scum. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 22:34 Half the Sky wrote: First question, admittedly no. Actually early on, I was pressuing him because I wasn't seeing town Kita (read: meta). Kita is a capable player as mafia. Quite. I am aware of that. I'll look at your post again a couple of pages ago but if I recall the right post - I would not take the position that Xatalos is exclusively mafia for not having any mafia reads but at the same time, he's not the first person in TL to scumread someone for not having any scumreads. When I was reading his filter - did he explicitly say "X is (alignment), Y is (this alignment)," no he didn't and if that's what you are looking for, I can understand why you are scumreading him. But in going through his posts on various people, it was pretty easy to tell for me from context who he was townreading or not as strongly. I know I even commented on that somewhere earlier in this game too. So if people want to reject this team for that reason, that's fine. If people want to fear read Kita, I get that. I am basically trying to say that he scumreads Xatalos for "not giving out scumreads" when Xatalos actually has a good portion of townreads based on quite logical reasons. In contrary to this, kitaman has only one real read, which is that i am town. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 22:37 raynpelikoneet wrote: I am basically trying to say that he scumreads Xatalos for "not giving out scumreads" when Xatalos actually has a good portion of townreads based on quite logical reasons. In contrary to this, kitaman has only one real read, which is that i am town. Like i couldn't give any less fucks about this "now this guy looks a bit better" or "now this guy looks a bit worse" and yes, it kinda implies you think something of their alignment. So does Xatalos' posting. So saying kitaman's posting does imply that and his "case" on Xatalos (=Xatalos' posting doesn't imply that) is just aa bunch of bullshit. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 22:40 ShoCkeyy wrote: Are you even reading the right thread?????... He obviously gives A LOT more reads... And where is there an actual read? | ||
| ||