EPT[T][M] Resistance V - Section 31 - Page 59
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
like xatatos not nominating himself to have 4 confirmed town. like me not voting for ANY TEAM that does not include me the list goes on and on scum | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On November 04 2015 20:35 sicklucker wrote: Its also not me being biased the chart says were the top 3 towns more or less as no one scum reads us. I know you town read artanis so from your pov if your town submitting that team makes sense. No one understands the logic of putting yourself in the team better then me but you also need that team to pass and its only attempt 2 of 5 so people are still very picky like me. Also if the said mission passes it would make a likely town circle of 4 people rather then 3 im not totally sure the mechanics but that seems like a good spot to be in. Hmmm somewhat dangerous sentiment if we might be collectively wrong on one player. Eh....could be reading too much into this. But in post 917, he says he's going to veto any Xatalos (I assume he infers on the team Xatalos being on the team). So how does he know or realise - from his own POV - he wouldn't submit a scumbuddy and then goes to say that it's a "likely" town circle of 4 instead of 3 when it's possible (again I bring this point up from before) that someone who passes a first mission who is spy can always fail a subsequent mission later. If he doesn't trust Xatalos on a team and then suggests Artanis wouldn't have the balls to fail it then he jumps to a likely town circle of 4 people.... ....it's quite illogical. Mafia motivated? Thoughts? | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
| ||
|
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
| ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On November 05 2015 09:10 ShoCkeyy wrote: Trying to play ketchup, still at the office, will be driving soon, ughhh.... an hour commute gg. Other than that, can I get a quick list of the next team that will be up for voting? Xata/rayn/sicklucker The gist is that sicklucker is somewhat contentious on having been inactive but I am personally trying to pick through what he does have in his filter and see if there are any legit red flags. Some people didn't like Xata either but I'll let those who more object to him bring that side of it up. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On November 05 2015 08:09 sicklucker wrote: super likely mafia. Im positive he has no reason to scum read me he just needs an excuse not to vote the all town team On November 05 2015 09:08 sicklucker wrote: oh i liked the xatalos filter thing. i think we should pass this its very likely 3 towns from my pov Since this post infers that you didn't see the xatalos analysis until now....why does super need an excuse to reject the SL/xat/rayn team if you thought xat was scum? Wouldn't a scum super be happy to pass the team you thought had a spy in it? | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On November 05 2015 08:12 sicklucker wrote: BUT I AM. LIKE I CAME UP WITH SOME PRETTY CRAZY SHIT I agreed with Superbia on this tbh, and I discussed some of the play from both town and mafia games I remember of you. I cannot easily say you are one alignment over another based on your current play this game but you are a lot more difficult to read as a result, so I don't see how Superbia's comment here is an issue that you made it out to be (per your filter). | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
| ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On November 05 2015 09:17 Half the Sky wrote: I agreed with Superbia on this tbh, and I discussed some of the play from both town and mafia games I remember of you. I cannot easily say you are one alignment over another based on your current play this game but you are a lot more difficult to read as a result, so I don't see how Superbia's comment here is an issue that you made it out to be (per your filter). EBWOP - for clarification, I am leaning town, but what I meant to say is that I cannot more confidently read you as town (a hard town read). | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
sicklucker, post #1163 please...or whatever people are taking you to task for, probably going to affect honestly whether people vote the team with you up or down tbh. Good night lovelies. | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
On November 05 2015 09:13 kitaman27 wrote: Since this post infers that you didn't see the xatalos analysis until now....why does super need an excuse to reject the SL/xat/rayn team if you thought xat was scum? Wouldn't a scum super be happy to pass the team you thought had a spy in it? WHY would scum want a all town team to pass? | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
On November 05 2015 09:10 Half the Sky wrote: Hmmm somewhat dangerous sentiment if we might be collectively wrong on one player. Eh....could be reading too much into this. But in post 917, he says he's going to veto any Xatalos (I assume he infers on the team Xatalos being on the team). So how does he know or realise - from his own POV - he wouldn't submit a scumbuddy and then goes to say that it's a "likely" town circle of 4 instead of 3 when it's possible (again I bring this point up from before) that someone who passes a first mission who is spy can always fail a subsequent mission later. If he doesn't trust Xatalos on a team and then suggests Artanis wouldn't have the balls to fail it then he jumps to a likely town circle of 4 people.... ....it's quite illogical. Mafia motivated? Thoughts? how is it mafia motivated to win the game for town on day 1? | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
On November 05 2015 09:10 Half the Sky wrote: Hmmm somewhat dangerous sentiment if we might be collectively wrong on one player. Eh....could be reading too much into this. But in post 917, he says he's going to veto any Xatalos (I assume he infers on the team Xatalos being on the team). So how does he know or realise - from his own POV - he wouldn't submit a scumbuddy and then goes to say that it's a "likely" town circle of 4 instead of 3 when it's possible (again I bring this point up from before) that someone who passes a first mission who is spy can always fail a subsequent mission later. If he doesn't trust Xatalos on a team and then suggests Artanis wouldn't have the balls to fail it then he jumps to a likely town circle of 4 people.... ....it's quite illogical. Mafia motivated? Thoughts? IF XATA puts up 3 towns and the mission passes without putting up himself. this like 100% proves hes town and thats why I suggested he do it. kinda annoyed he didnt do it but other things suggest hes town so ill go with it. Xata town read all 3 of us so I was very curious if he would do it. its kind of suspect he didnt tbh but im town reading him on other things | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On November 05 2015 09:40 sicklucker wrote: WHY would scum want a all town team to pass? You called xata scum though at that point. So it wasn't an all town team from your perspective. Yet you scum read him for wanting to reject it anyways. | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
| ||
