|
Message Blazinghand if you request a ban please ^_^
Also when the game you're sitting out is over! |
On July 18 2016 17:41 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2016 11:13 Onegu wrote:
Koshi someone ruined my game because I DIDNT modkill for failure to vote day 1. Thoughts??? So? That guy is an idiot. Your ban proposals are very justified and correct in my opinion. Don't know what it has to do with Koshi and his (also correct) stance on modkills for nonvotes.
Just found it ironic I got blasted for modkilling on first non vote in my first game hosting. And a gamed ruined because the guy thought I should have modkilled for first non vote.
Case of damned if you do damned if you don't....
|
Needs to be a semi permanent, it's happening to often if the person wants to come back and go through the hoops to get back fine. People need to know it's going to take you having to do more shit to comeback than sitout a few games. I thought VE should have gotten a perm.
|
On July 18 2016 20:01 Half the Sky wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2016 19:41 KelsierSC wrote:
Is this snickers first time offence? If it is perhaps be slightly more lenient and maybe a 5 game ban.
Probably give him a few days to cool off and see what he has to say for himself . Then pass judgement Comes down to how you want to apply precedent/consistency. 5 games is effectively a semiperm so we are probably talking semantics at this point. Examples: (1) SOTW 2: Bill Murray issues his role as after he's dead, this allows the scum team to solve via soup kill and win the game from an unwinnable situation. As he's a repeat offender, he had gotten at that time 3 games to semi. (2) January's invite game: Rayn posts his role PM. There was BM in that game, but separate from that, the game could have in theory continued. Rayn got 3 games, and he's been on the banlist umpteen times. (3) Bavaria: VE posts role PM whilst alive and mafia QT, game is forced to end. He's ruined the game and ruined the efforts of his scummates. (Bear the latter in mind for current game being ruled on.) (4) Current case: Snickers is already dead when he posts the mafia QT, and long dead at that. Rest is same as #3. You can argue #4 is worse than #3, he was unprovoked entirely and he was dead, but the effect is still all the same. I'd argue for 3 games to semiperm here.
#4 is definitely much worse than #3. Snickers did it with the intent to ruin the game while VE even tried to not include his teammates.
All the other cases you list are even less comparable.
|
My understanding of three to semiperm is that it's the same as a semiperm in that you are semipermmed and if you want to come back, you sit out three games formally before you even have a chance of doing so. Straight semiperm (i.e. Robik) basically means don't bother from what I've seen (and why it's called semi, when you are fully banned, I have no idea tbh).
Three-games is just that, three games and you are back in.
And yeah JAT, if you want to use the final argument (where he was unprovoked and posted whilst dead) you can argue for the tougher/(semi)perm end of the range here.
|
Not only was snickers' offense intentional, it was deliberate. I don't really see why you are comparing it to what VisceraEyes did.
|
On July 18 2016 20:01 Half the Sky wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2016 19:41 KelsierSC wrote:
Is this snickers first time offence? If it is perhaps be slightly more lenient and maybe a 5 game ban.
Probably give him a few days to cool off and see what he has to say for himself . Then pass judgement Comes down to how you want to apply precedent/consistency. 5 games is effectively a semiperm so we are probably talking semantics at this point. Examples: (1) SOTW 2: Bill Murray issues his role as after he's dead, this allows the scum team to solve via soup kill and win the game from an unwinnable situation. As he's a repeat offender, he had gotten at that time 3 games to semi. (2) January's invite game: Rayn posts his role PM. There was BM in that game, but separate from that, the game could have in theory continued. Rayn got 3 games, and he's been on the banlist umpteen times. (3) Bavaria: VE posts role PM whilst alive and mafia QT, game is forced to end. He's ruined the game and ruined the efforts of his scummates. (Bear the latter in mind for current game being ruled on.) (4) Current case: Snickers is already dead when he posts the mafia QT, and long dead at that. Rest is same as #3. You can argue #4 is worse than #3, he was unprovoked entirely and he was dead, but the effect is still all the same. I'd argue for 3 games to semiperm here.
I just don't get the bolded part. By that logic, Mattchew should be punished just as hard as Snickers. It's all about effect and what Mattchew did had the same effect as Snickers.
That just doesn't make any sense and is why you're generally required to prove mens rea. I get that this is forum mafia and not the real world, but it's still a good principle.
|
Snickers
07-15-2016
06:03 PM ET (US)
Like posting after deadlines is also something that can be a mistake. Not voting all day is a prty big mistake. Enough of one where its even justified to modkill even if its a mistake.
89
Snickers
07-15-2016
06:00 PM ET (US)
Also shape should have been modkilled. Thats kind of annoying when I cant do personal attacks because ls( a townie had to go off). Even though they are a legit scum strategy. I realize there is enough benefits so personal attacks shouldnt be allowed, but then enforce rules that dont help either alignment to a lesser degree.
Yea keep lying and changing your stance on things to benefit you and make me look worse. You wanted to uphold the op until you were proven wrong. Then you dismiss it. I already know your next bullshit post is going to be "you shoulda pmed it" but you answered early posts in the scum qt.
|
On July 19 2016 01:00 Snickers wrote:
Snickers
07-15-2016
06:03 PM ET (US)
Like posting after deadlines is also something that can be a mistake. Not voting all day is a prty big mistake. Enough of one where its even justified to modkill even if its a mistake.
89
Snickers
07-15-2016
06:00 PM ET (US)
Also shape should have been modkilled. Thats kind of annoying when I cant do personal attacks because ls( a townie had to go off). Even though they are a legit scum strategy. I realize there is enough benefits so personal attacks shouldnt be allowed, but then enforce rules that dont help either alignment to a lesser degree.
Yea keep lying and changing your stance on things to benefit you and make me look worse. You wanted to uphold the op until you were proven wrong. Then you dismiss it. I already know your next bullshit post is going to be "you shoulda pmed it" but you answered early posts in the scum qt.
I know it's hard to admit being wrong after having made a big mistake. But NOTHING that has happened this game warranted you ruining it.
You're going to be banned. It's always possible to be back here after sittouting games when/if you realize you were wrong and want to play again. Until that happens, it serves no purpose to post here. Everyone knows you are the one in the wrong so that will just be a waste of time and rage.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
The fact it was long after he died and therefore not in the heat of the moment of the game makes it pretty damn shitty
|
So you can use personal attacks but when i cross a line i should be modkilled? Cool story bro.
|
lol the amount of misunderstanding/word twisting is hilarious. I dont want to be back. I cant even play a game where a host knows the rules.
|
I find it quite funny how upset people get about this stuff. Its prty simple. I signed up for a game. The host doesnt know the rules and doesnt enforce them. The host wasted my time and so did shapelog for not voting so I "ruined" the game.
I dont feel bad about it all. After fucking the game up Onegu just wants to bitch/lie/pussy foot around to make himself look better.
|
But right lets not try to fix objective problems and just talk in circles. Thats why this community is growing. I love how someone suggests something would of happen if I brought this up post game.
|
On July 19 2016 03:03 Snickers wrote:
But right lets not try to fix objective problems and just talk in circles. Thats why this community is growing. I love how someone suggests something would of happen if I brought this up post game.
The only problem here right now is you. Feel free to leave at any time.
|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5955 Posts
Well just perm him, no need to discuss now tbh
|
You are a hypocrite by the very nature of how you talk. I can't imagine a situation where someone can think posting scum QT when you have nothing to do with the game anymore is a justifiable act.
The fact that you are still here trying to prove what you have done was ok in whatever point of view while saying you won't be back is hypocrysie at best.
I honestly dunno whats going through your mind, are you a bot?
|
|
|
I literally just explained that, you really have trouble reading. I love your response to what I wrote in the scum qt is completely ass backwards.
|
I can't open QT from turkey vpn. This is getting spammy so I'm just gona stop. Have a nice day sir.
|
lol. Still cant understand
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
