|
On July 08 2015 04:29 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2015 04:22 Holyflare wrote:f5 "maybe hts will have replied to a single post directed to her suspicions on me and why they are wrong" f5 "maybe hts will have responded now" f5 "maybe hts just missed it, i'll repost it" f5 "maybe hts is writing a post" f5 "hts this is getting silly now" f5 "hts plz" On July 08 2015 04:06 Holyflare wrote:I'm disputing what you're saying because it looks like you are just adding things on that don't make sense for the sake of saying things (which I'm saying you've been doing all game) and you have totally ignored this post still: On July 08 2015 03:19 Holyflare wrote:On July 08 2015 03:15 Half the Sky wrote:On July 08 2015 03:10 Holyflare wrote:
he might be playing like mafia but then there's 4 other mafia in this game so i'd prefer we focus on those other people for a change and since HtS is blatently ignoring everything I write I don't mind lynching her at all. I don't mind milo lynch but I want people to talk about him with me. I'll be blunt here, I think you could be mafia and if you are, you have done a great job in the past derailing people with emotion and/or taking things out of context. I am still not at all impressed how/why you dropped the Trfel read or why you consider myself (or milo from your end) scummier than he. You REALLY can't understand why I think you're scummy??? After i've posted about 20 paragraphs about it and made a case? REALLY? Why do I care if you're impressed. If you town read Trfel and now I think his last post was honest and start town reading him why is your initial read of suspicion and how does that make sense for a mafia holyflare to even do. It doesn't, you're grasping at straws. You have no responses for any of the questions I raise. You misquote things, you take things out of context and then you try and spin it in a scummy way (milo post, ritoky actions) and then when I do it ONCE in this game (which isn't even true) you completely flip your read around. Your thoughts do not align with your actions. Your posts have no direction. Your scum read on milo did not progress in the slightest because you were "waiting for him to answer questions" despite him posting several times after that and I was asking him questions which you still didn't acknowledge. You keep posting how I am pushing milo but think you are also mafia which very likely makes me mafia but I am pushing milo and you think i'm mafia. That is the biggest double standard in this game. SO SO SO mafia double standardy in fact that i'm voting you. omfg hts how hard is this to do
My last read on Trfel was null....and waiting for him to return to thread. If you had an adequate reason to drop the read on Trfel that's one thing but you dropping the read on ritoky after you had the three of our names bolded also raised questions as to why.
I told you also why I wasnt' responding to you - I am also sick and tired of fighting with you, and I'd rather be more productive looking at others that we could be missing on. I haven't gotten a chance to look at the other people I'd had wanted to look and obviously at this point I do have a bad feeling scummers (maybe nto all of them, who knows) are just skating by.
I believe in the cases against both based on the gameplay of both but I've done it before and I've been wrong and if I am tunnelled on someone I shouldn't be, it's probably because of suboptimal play on my end, my target(s)' play or both. It's happened in Titanic 7, it's happened in Aperture, and it wouldn't surprise me at this point if it happened here.
|
The obvious benefit of not lynching into them is of course that scum can only rb one of them probably. So, if both of them claim rb tomorrow we can be sure that there is a mafia between them and if for some reason both of them are town they basically need to shoot one of them.
The problem is that we are not lynching into a pool of 2 people that likely contains mafia.
|
On July 08 2015 04:34 ritoky wrote:
Can we just go back to what I was saying before this milo thing happened?
A no-lynch is worse than lynching a 1-shot cop imo. So please consolidate on me or HtS. I do not want a no-lynch on day 1, it is awful.
Do you guys really think mafia makes this post?
|
On July 08 2015 04:43 Harkon wrote:
The obvious benefit of not lynching into them is of course that scum can only rb one of them probably. So, if both of them claim rb tomorrow we can be sure that there is a mafia between them and if for some reason both of them are town they basically need to shoot one of them.
The problem is that we are not lynching into a pool of 2 people that likely contains mafia.
Scum can just give us a meaningless green check though.
|
On July 08 2015 04:45 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2015 04:34 ritoky wrote:
Can we just go back to what I was saying before this milo thing happened?
A no-lynch is worse than lynching a 1-shot cop imo. So please consolidate on me or HtS. I do not want a no-lynch on day 1, it is awful. Do you guys really think mafia makes this post?
I see no reason why not.
|
On July 08 2015 04:36 Harkon wrote:
Would you please answer HF before he has an aneurysm?
I just did. It may or may not satisfy him, but it is what it is.
|
i REALLY think milo is also a cop now, for reasons i can't say
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 08 2015 04:45 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2015 04:34 ritoky wrote:
Can we just go back to what I was saying before this milo thing happened?
A no-lynch is worse than lynching a 1-shot cop imo. So please consolidate on me or HtS. I do not want a no-lynch on day 1, it is awful. Do you guys really think mafia makes this post?
yes, for the reason you're asking this question.
mafia say this all the time in fact.
|
In what world does mafia go "the best play here is to lynch me/this other person with majority votes" and then questions people on why they're not doing so?
|
On July 08 2015 04:45 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2015 04:45 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On July 08 2015 04:34 ritoky wrote:
Can we just go back to what I was saying before this milo thing happened?
A no-lynch is worse than lynching a 1-shot cop imo. So please consolidate on me or HtS. I do not want a no-lynch on day 1, it is awful. Do you guys really think mafia makes this post? yes, for the reason you're asking this question. mafia say this all the time in fact.
Do they though?
I've never seen it. Ever.
|
On July 08 2015 04:45 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2015 04:43 Harkon wrote:
The obvious benefit of not lynching into them is of course that scum can only rb one of them probably. So, if both of them claim rb tomorrow we can be sure that there is a mafia between them and if for some reason both of them are town they basically need to shoot one of them.
The problem is that we are not lynching into a pool of 2 people that likely contains mafia. Scum can just give us a meaningless green check though.
Yes, but then he has to justify not being shot or rbed because why would mafia let a claimed cop get a check?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 08 2015 04:45 ritoky wrote:
i REALLY think milo is also a cop now, for reasons i can't say
laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaame
|
Obi I don't believe you really believe that mafia isn't able to say that.
|
On July 08 2015 04:45 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2015 04:34 ritoky wrote:
Can we just go back to what I was saying before this milo thing happened?
A no-lynch is worse than lynching a 1-shot cop imo. So please consolidate on me or HtS. I do not want a no-lynch on day 1, it is awful. Do you guys really think mafia makes this post?
Yes. It seems super desperate. Town should be going "FUCKING LYNCH HTS OBV SCUM WTF ARE YOU GUYS DOING", not martyring the shit out of themselves.
|
On July 08 2015 04:45 ritoky wrote:
i REALLY think milo is also a cop now, for reasons i can't say
Uh?
|
On July 08 2015 04:46 Vivax wrote:
Obi I don't believe you really believe that mafia isn't able to say that.
It doesn't make sense though.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 08 2015 04:47 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2015 04:46 Vivax wrote:
Obi I don't believe you really believe that mafia isn't able to say that. It doesn't make sense though.
yes, it does.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
|
On July 08 2015 04:46 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2015 04:45 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On July 08 2015 04:34 ritoky wrote:
Can we just go back to what I was saying before this milo thing happened?
A no-lynch is worse than lynching a 1-shot cop imo. So please consolidate on me or HtS. I do not want a no-lynch on day 1, it is awful. Do you guys really think mafia makes this post? Yes. It seems super desperate. Town should be going "FUCKING LYNCH HTS OBV SCUM WTF ARE YOU GUYS DOING", not martyring the shit out of themselves.
It is literally the exact opposite of desperate.
What you think town should be doing and what town actually does are two completely different things.
|
On July 08 2015 04:48 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2015 04:46 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 08 2015 04:45 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On July 08 2015 04:34 ritoky wrote:
Can we just go back to what I was saying before this milo thing happened?
A no-lynch is worse than lynching a 1-shot cop imo. So please consolidate on me or HtS. I do not want a no-lynch on day 1, it is awful. Do you guys really think mafia makes this post? Yes. It seems super desperate. Town should be going "FUCKING LYNCH HTS OBV SCUM WTF ARE YOU GUYS DOING", not martyring the shit out of themselves. It is literally the exact opposite of desperate. What you think town should be doing and what town actually does are two completely different things.
I'm just saying mafia can make this post, the post in itself does not make mafia.
But I do think ti looks desperate. I agree town doesn't always does what it should but this whole "I'm town, lynching confirmed town is better than no-lynching" is very likely to come from scum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
