|
shining can you answer my question please
why did you say this
On June 11 2015 15:53 The Shining wrote:
No, I'm mad that you said you'd kill me for it, when Onegu and Shockeyy are also players under the radar and not playing how I've seen them play before. Inconsistency. And when have I ever been OK with being scummed or lynched as town? Like bugs brings me up as this "missing link" and now out of all the players, you're okay saying you would kill me. And you said that either after you read my filter and thought my EoD was towny so you want to kill someone with towny points, or before you read my filter, which is a very bold statement and horrible town play if you were willing to kill me before even reading.
So which was it?
when have you played with/seen shockeyy play
|
On June 12 2015 05:58 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2015 05:55 wherebugsgo wrote:shining can you answer my question please why did you say this On June 11 2015 15:53 The Shining wrote:
No, I'm mad that you said you'd kill me for it, when Onegu and Shockeyy are also players under the radar and not playing how I've seen them play before. Inconsistency. And when have I ever been OK with being scummed or lynched as town? Like bugs brings me up as this "missing link" and now out of all the players, you're okay saying you would kill me. And you said that either after you read my filter and thought my EoD was towny so you want to kill someone with towny points, or before you read my filter, which is a very bold statement and horrible town play if you were willing to kill me before even reading.
So which was it? when have you played with/seen shockeyy play shockey played in generic boring mini
ah yes, that explains a lot
see this is why I ask people for their past games
|
I originally voted
batsnacks
Kickstart
Breske
switched Kickstart to yamato
I didn't realize order mattered till BH's FAQ post
|
if yamato is wrong we just lynch him ezpz. Like no mafia would ever do what yamato just did, the claim makes no sense from scum perspective. It's a 1 for 1 trade that heavily favours town.
so we can safely assume BM is scum and he's not even bothering to defend himself at this point. The only purpose that would serve would be to shit up the thread and there is literally no defense that will keep him alive so whatever. Waste of time/effort on his part so it's no surprise.
The last scum can be one of only 4 players IMO, in order of decreasing likelihood:
Shockeyy
Tubesock
Shining
Onegu
We lynch straight down that list and we probably win the game
|
also we only get 2 witchcraft votes today
|
On June 12 2015 06:21 Breshke wrote:
Even easier WBG we split that list in half.
Two of those players plus another two players vote for player A in their one slot witchcraft vote. Then put player C as their second vote these guys vote first so player A reaches 4 votes first
Then the remaining two scumspects plus the remaining three players vote player B in their one slot plus player C in their two slot.
So player A has 4 and B has 5 if scum is on A then b gets elected if scum is on B then A gets elected cos they got 4 first.
Both PRs can then blaspheme into this group and even if one does we probably win the game tomorrow.
Does this make sense it's 7 am for me so it might not
yeah I'm trying to figure out a voting plan that would do as you describe.
The problem is that if you end up with 1 scum in each of the two then you end up with even votes...but that's probably okay because we can just alternate lynch.
|
oh yeah also blaspheme is now the best role lol
|
ah yeah derp I'm retarded
|
dunno why I was including BM in the list of players. # of players discounting BM is 9.
|
9 players, 2 are scum ->
Let's say we do a vote split like this. Take Yamato out because he's basically confirmed town and that gives us an even number.
List A: WBG, Shining, Tube, Breske vote YAMATO, BATS - > should result in 4 votes on yamato/bats
List B: Onegu, Shockeyy, bats, FF vote WBG, BRESKE - > should result in 4 votes on wbg/breske
If Yamato, Bats get elected scum is in list B
If WBG, Breske get elected scum is in list A
Yamato should vote for FF/Onegu or something and waste the vote so we have 8 people
|
On June 12 2015 06:29 Breshke wrote:
WBG how did you not die? Are you not a PR or was there normal kp on you?
I am not a power role. There are 2 ways I could've lived
1. They used the Witch Hunter KP on me, and it missed
2. I ate the normal KP and someone protted me.
We can't tell the difference cause there is no RB.
|
|
|
I meant 9 players, 1 is scum
god I can't count
|
On June 12 2015 06:35 wherebugsgo wrote:
9 players, 2 are scum ->
Let's say we do a vote split like this. Take Yamato out because he's basically confirmed town and that gives us an even number.
List A: WBG, Shining, Tube, Breske vote YAMATO, BATS - > should result in 4 votes on yamato/bats
List B: Onegu, Shockeyy, bats, FF vote WBG, BRESKE - > should result in 4 votes on wbg/breske
If Yamato, Bats get elected scum is in list B
If WBG, Breske get elected scum is in list A
Yamato should vote for FF/Onegu or something and waste the vote so we have 8 people
thoughts on this please. Let's coordinate the votes today
The players who get voted will basically confirm the voters as townies. So for example if me/Breske get elected then
Onegu/Shockeyy/bats/FF are all confirmed
if yamato/bats get elected then it confirms myself, Shining, Tube, and Breske
It would also confirm the people getting voted for, which would leave only 2 candidates on each side to be scum
|
On June 12 2015 06:43 batsnacks wrote:
I appear to be in both lists. Would you guys like me to make the plan? lol
you're not in both lists. read again. your vote goes on WBG/Breske
|
On June 12 2015 06:43 Onegu wrote:
Dont understand
each side is supposed to get 4 votes. If one of the sides gets 3 votes, then we know in the list of voters that one of them had to be scum.
We split the 4 scum candidates into groups of 2 and put them on opposite sides. The result is that this plan will autoconfirm four townies at once. Since yamato is already basically confirmed that means by beginning of d3 we will have 5 confirmed townies (although one of them might be dead)
|
btw the following day we could repeat the plan and just move the players around. e.g. say we figured the scum had to be in List B. We know one of Shockeyy/Onegu is almost certainly mafia, we just lynch one and dump the other one onto a voting list with 2-3 confirmed townies (depending on how many players are alive). Then that would confirm them as scum if the opposite list ended up winning (and we can move some of the other players around a bit too)
|
On June 12 2015 06:51 Onegu wrote:
What if lets say you and breshke are scum and we get wrecked by this???
how the fuck can me and breshke both be scum if BM is scum
|
like either way we'll know.
we'll know because mafia cannot kill 3 people, which is the number they need to kill for us to not know who got elected.
If I am scum and I kill Breske, then Yamato/Bats will know they weren't elected and will be alive tomorrow. If Bats is scum and kills yamato, myself and Breske will know we were not elected.
Pretty simple to understand. Yes, if me/breske get elected, any one of us 4 (WBG, Breske, Shining Tube) could be scum but the far more likely answer is that 1 out of 2 of Shining and Tube is scum.
That occurs while FOUR townies get autoconfirmed. Scum can't win that shit because every day we can confirm more townies through the proper voting pattern.
|
On June 12 2015 06:54 Onegu wrote:
BM hasnt flipped yet.
so what? are you saying that yamato is lying?
BM hasn't flipped but one of him or yamato has to be scum
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
