Generic Boring Mini Mafia

On May 18 2015 05:02 Damdred wrote:
Well then get started!

On May 18 2015 05:08 Damdred wrote:
Explain how its a mafia-ish opening instead of just putting some ill conceived notion in the thread at the very start.

On May 18 2015 05:20 Damdred wrote:
I'm not sure what exactly is mafia-ish about commenting on someone else opening, rather than coming into the thread and not say anything. Unless you are saying that i'm not actually commenting, or commenting and not giving him anything to work for?

Now if you agree with either of these shame shame on you.

On May 18 2015 05:31 Damdred wrote:
I'm not sure what I should be getting by his opening. Nor do I understand why you are queing on mine but its what it is I suppose

On May 10 2015 09:29 Damdred wrote:
Well I rolled town.

I think Rs is likely town

On May 10 2015 11:20 Damdred wrote:


This is almost as bad a read as me saying GB is town just saying.

However at this point I have a couple of preliminary town reads I believe just by tone and posting style and somewhat on content.

Rsoultin seems to be genuinely using the posts to press good ideas while pressing issues that are important in the thread.

HTS and Trfel both seem to have a good tone about them and it seems it is easy to follow what they mean while it somewhat mirrors what RS says I think it is a good sign of things to come and both are good leans.

KSC... is a bit harder for me to get a handle on at this point, I have a slight town lean on him. His tone and general demeanor remind me of Void Mafia at this point. However his style is also reminiscent of mini mafia to an extent, but the content is different. I'm pretty ok with him at this point.

LS is interesting, he always wastes posts but we'll see what his other posts do.

On May 10 2015 11:27 Damdred wrote:


The most impressive part is that you ignored the trutly contradicting things I put into the post but key'd in on something that I actually believe.

(3)

On May 10 2015 11:29 Damdred wrote:


To expand a good bit,

RS posts are decently good and even though the idea of HTS being mafia running in multiple posts, most of the posts however are well thought out and even the post where RS was being a pita towards the thread up above it still conveyed good ideas in a good manner.

However there is something really off in my reads.

(4)

On May 18 2015 07:40 sciberbia wrote:
##vote Zealos

Best read for mafia so far. He does a ton of filter-diving on Damdred to make it look like he's hardcore contributing, but he's super wishy-washy in his conclusions. Just look at the amount of hedging his bets here:






Like why even post all your research if you are this unsure in your conclusions? Looks like a good candidate for someone who is trying to look like they are contributing but isn't.

On May 18 2015 07:40 sciberbia wrote:
##vote Zealos

Best read for mafia so far. He does a ton of filter-diving on Damdred to make it look like he's hardcore contributing, but he's super wishy-washy in his conclusions. Just look at the amount of hedging his bets here:






Like why even post all your research if you are this unsure in your conclusions? Looks like a good candidate for someone who is trying to look like they are contributing but isn't.

On May 18 2015 15:52 sciberbia wrote:

I agree with your characterization of Palmar's play thus far. I think most of the thread would agree that Palmar's early play leaves a lot to be desired.

If you have time, could you give your opinion of ObiWanShinobi? Similar to Palmar, he has popped in and out of the thread, made some random posts, and not offered any reasoning or anything of use to the thread. Would you also consider voting him, or is there a difference between him and Palmar that makes Palmar more suspicious in your eyes?

On May 19 2015 00:13 GlowingBear wrote:


What do you think of the scum reads I've brought on that list post?

On May 18 2015 07:30 sciberbia wrote:

Damn this is a pretty reasonable and well thought-out response so I guess I can't vote you.

Of course it is entirely consistent with the theory that Palmar called you scum because you posted in his QT

But I'll wait for one of you to flip scum before returning to this.

On May 19 2015 00:41 Vivax wrote:


The word standpoint exists in english?

On May 19 2015 00:46 GlowingBear wrote:


There is something I dislike in your gameplay.

You come to the thread scumreading Damdred with actually good information. But says you're not convinced yet so you don't vote him.

Then you instantly scumread Palmar (who, by the way, is voting Damdred) and you place your vote in him, saying he is your strongest scumread, but without any strong substance.

When I ask you to check my scum reads on my list post, instead of going to Damdred (your first suspicion), you go for sciberbia. Of course you link him to Damdred, but the fact that you focus SCIBERBIA instead of Damdred bugs me a lot.

On May 19 2015 01:00 Stutters695 wrote:
He's not concerned with finding scum, just how he looks.

On May 19 2015 01:03 Damdred wrote:
....what? That's a horrible read on shining

On May 19 2015 03:14 Damdred wrote:


idk how to tell the difference from your normal postings should work on that

On May 19 2015 04:01 Onegu wrote:
I really dont like zelous at this point.

First he says only one of palmar or damdred is mafia.

He votes Damdred for not looking like his assassination game. Which doesnt make much sense as my play isnt going to look like that game either.

Then he says we should switch to palmar for???? Not really sure I guess because palmar hasnt done anything...

Then he goes back to Damdred for the same assassination reason.

What changed Palmar still hasnt done anything. So why switch again?

##Vote Zealous

On May 19 2015 04:19 sciberbia wrote:
@Zealos
Oh one other thing I wanted to ask you. Why did you say that one of Palmar and Damdred is scum? Were you saying that there is some sort of connection between their alignments, like one is town and the other is scum?

Sorry to throw so many things at you at once. Please try to answer this question and both the questions in my previous post though. Break your answers into separate posts if you want.

On May 18 2015 05:48 Damdred wrote:
Sorry no reads or leans on the first 15 posts of the game. Company policy

Lololol this is a hilarious thread.

IDK what to even say, my read on vivax is decent. Read on palmar is ok, read on scib is great.

Just a bunch of baddies

....what? That's a horrible read on shining

Not ego at all I'm just content calling badies bad currently, I'm not needed in any front in this thread when everyone piles up on me

I've literally listed two mafia already who knows about a third one of the people misrepresenting probably or just parroting to parrot

...ive explained why what obi did was scummy and why.

If you want to be basic I suppose so. I'm glad you can take a complex reasoning and dumb it down to the most bare bones to make it look stupid gj

idk how to tell the difference from your normal postings should work on that

On May 19 2015 21:41 ShoCkeyy wrote:
I still can't believe you guys don't see the alignment. I called three of them out and then I'm now the next target. If I would have never called them out, I wouldn't be set up to be lynched. Going to lose a very active town.

On May 20 2015 01:30 ShoCkeyy wrote:
Because they're interested in joining a new game, one where they can try to do something, but eventually see it's a long and drawn out process to the point where they just barely visit the thread anymore.

On May 20 2015 02:15 Damdred wrote:


I figured that's what it was

On May 20 2015 01:40 ObiWanShinobi wrote:


What's wrong with it?



I don't understand what you're trying to say.

On May 20 2015 02:24 Damdred wrote:
Hehe zealos trying to bait me, not working

On May 20 2015 04:34 sciberbia wrote:


It's really irritating if he is town because you are supposed to play to win the game. Like it's stated in the rules that you are not supposed to intentionally play like shit.

But if you think that he is going to intentionally play like shit as either alignment then I think that is basis for a policy lynch if nothing else. Plus Palmar's points were pretty OK and I was leaning scum on him originally in any case.

Dunno if it matters, but I'm just gonna throw my vote on Vivax. I'm not completely confident on Obi, and Vivax should not be allowed to live. He said he would be back between 8pm and 9pm in Austria and it's now 9:30.

##unvote
##vote Vivax

On May 20 2015 04:39 Vivax wrote:


I play to win the game, I just post less and with less effort on D1s until people stop lynching me for inactivity, that's not against the rules, it just furthers my wincon across all my games.

On May 20 2015 04:42 sciberbia wrote:


Intentionally playing scummy is not playing to win the game Vivax. Getting yourself lynched does not help your team regardless of your alignment. If you're town I'm honestly going to be pretty annoyed.