|
So I read most of your responses in terms of lynching me, that's fine. No need to defend myself against that because it would be a waste of my time. I'm here to try and figure out who's the mafia, not defend myself to the teeth as to why I'm not mafia, I already know I'm not mafia. I don't even get why most of you consider my posts scummy but on the other hand let people like Obi pass right under you.
On May 21 2015 15:09 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
It's not a conspiracy theory.
There's no conspiracy theory.
There's just nothing there.
It's not a theory, it's fact, you're scum. Also, I gotta ask, why are most of your posts worthless? and you have at least a few of these:
On May 22 2015 03:50 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Am not scum.
On May 20 2015 23:22 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
I'm not mafia, though.
D:
Your voting completely says another thing. You have yet to respond seriously to any of my posts, you completely ignore them and you sheep other peoples lynches to look good. Then there is Zealos, who I'm still building up my case on him.
|
On May 22 2015 10:51 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2015 09:23 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On May 22 2015 05:36 GlowingBear wrote:
Obi, help us then. Who do we lynch? Zealos/Stutters/Shockey. The Vivax case was okay, but the biggest issue with it was that Vivax never even bothered defending himself outside of his EoD reads post that got him lynched. It doesn't concern me at all that Damdred changed his read the way he did because I did the same thing. I would revisit Damdred if he's still around tomorrow or on lylo or something, but that's it. We need to purge inactives, and if they're town we can't keep them around until lylo because we can't rely on them to make sensible decisions if they're not playing the game. If they come back and make good posts then we can reassess, but until then this is what needs to be done. (Plus, shockey is super scummy and we should probably lynch him at some point anyhoezels.) Okay You have my sword Voting Shockey But why not lynching oats?
Idk. I'm kind of biased in the sense that Oats has been making a lot of sense to me in that I agree with a lot of what he's saying and he seems pretty reasonable.
|
Canada11355 Posts
On May 22 2015 04:06 KelsierSC wrote:Vote Count: ShoCkeyy(3) - Oatsmaster, Obiwanshinobi, glowingbear Qwerty(0) - Damdred(0) - Zealos(1) - Onegu until lynch!
ShoCkeyy is set to be lynched!
|
On May 22 2015 11:12 ShoCkeyy wrote:So I read most of your responses in terms of lynching me, that's fine. No need to defend myself against that because it would be a waste of my time. I'm here to try and figure out who's the mafia, not defend myself to the teeth as to why I'm not mafia, I already know I'm not mafia. I don't even get why most of you consider my posts scummy but on the other hand let people like Obi pass right under you. Show nested quote +On May 21 2015 15:09 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
It's not a conspiracy theory.
There's no conspiracy theory.
There's just nothing there. It's not a theory, it's fact, you're scum. Also, I gotta ask, why are most of your posts worthless? and you have at least a few of these: Your voting completely says another thing. You have yet to respond seriously to any of my posts, you completely ignore them and you sheep other peoples lynches to look good. Then there is Zealos, who I'm still building up my case on him.
No, you're not trying to solve the game. You never revisited your arguments regarding your first scum team. You just come to the thread and posts for survivability. You don't even care for what I've wrote on Damdred. You don't care for any other player in the game. You just came in thread saying this because you are now the leading wagon. You're just defending yourself and trying to discredit obi.
|
On May 22 2015 10:51 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2015 09:23 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On May 22 2015 05:36 GlowingBear wrote:
Obi, help us then. Who do we lynch? Zealos/Stutters/Shockey. The Vivax case was okay, but the biggest issue with it was that Vivax never even bothered defending himself outside of his EoD reads post that got him lynched. It doesn't concern me at all that Damdred changed his read the way he did because I did the same thing. I would revisit Damdred if he's still around tomorrow or on lylo or something, but that's it. We need to purge inactives, and if they're town we can't keep them around until lylo because we can't rely on them to make sensible decisions if they're not playing the game. If they come back and make good posts then we can reassess, but until then this is what needs to be done. (Plus, shockey is super scummy and we should probably lynch him at some point anyhoezels.) Okay You have my sword Voting Shockey But why not lynching oats?
Why do you wanna lynch me man, come on.
Same thing last game, you never actually say your reasons, I gotta drag it outta you .
Boring.
bleh qwerty doesnt actually have any scumreads.
Thats not good.
|
Did I say I want to lynch you?
Did you look at the vote count?
|
On May 22 2015 12:37 GlowingBear wrote:
Did I say I want to lynch you?
Did you look at the vote count?
"but why not lynching oats" implies that you want to lynch me.
Nobody else in the game even mentioned me being scum so you cant be asking why they think Im scum.
|
Also can everyone in the game just fucking vote please.
dont post, dont vote, how do we even know who you want to lynch much less if you are scum or not.
|
On May 22 2015 13:02 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2015 12:37 GlowingBear wrote:
Did I say I want to lynch you?
Did you look at the vote count? "but why not lynching oats" implies that you want to lynch me. Nobody else in the game even mentioned me being scum so you cant be asking why they think Im scum.
It's more of a question to know how does he reads you.
|
On May 22 2015 13:03 Oatsmaster wrote:
Also can everyone in the game just fucking vote please.
dont post, dont vote, how do we even know who you want to lynch much less if you are scum or not.
Don't post, don't play, don't sign in.
|
Vote Damdred. He's scum 90%+. I'm sorry, I really can't actually play right now, but he's scum.
|
On May 22 2015 13:55 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2015 13:02 Oatsmaster wrote:On May 22 2015 12:37 GlowingBear wrote:
Did I say I want to lynch you?
Did you look at the vote count? "but why not lynching oats" implies that you want to lynch me. Nobody else in the game even mentioned me being scum so you cant be asking why they think Im scum. It's more of a question to know how does he reads you.
ok so it was that type of question.
Stutters, please give at least one damn reason why damdred is scum.
come on.
|
Please Stutters. Even I stepped back.
|
Because he's not blue. Enough said.
|
I'm extremely lazy to build that case on Damdred, but I'll sum up the points I may be working upon:
1) Not wanting to give a read on me based on early games' lack of information, instantly giving palmar a town read without even revisiting it.
2) The most important: giving a town read on Vivax throghout the whole day1 but ending on voting him in the end. Gave scumreads on obi and Zealos. Never engages Zealos. Never votes for obi. When obi was with aot of votes, Damdred orefer to vote Vivax, a town lean, arguing that Palmar's case was very good, which couldn't be read as that in Damdred's perspectice because: Palmar's main point was Vivax raising suspicions on Damdred but never doing anything with it. This is not purely logical - part of this argument is associative. If Damdred is town he should realise this is not a strong argument. Second point of Palmar's case is about vivax making a lot of random suspicions and reads, something that Damdred TOWNREAD VIVAX FOR. So this point shouldn't be enough to convince Damdred. Last argument on Palmar's case was Vivax inactivity, which EVEN PALMAR SAID WAS A WEAK ARGUMENT. And Damdred uses this to JUSTIFY HIS VOTE ON VIVAX, but only after OBI STATES INACTIVITY IS ALIGNMENT INDICATIVE. He simply parroted obi. If inactivity is a problem for Damdred, WHY NOT LYNCHING ZEALOS, HIS ORIGINAL SCUMREAD, WHO ALSO WENT INACTIVE??? Damdred raises a lot of suspicions on Zealos but NEVER really does anything with it.
3) When I talk about a VIGI shot on Damdred, he instantly claims "blue" (without even saying what his role is). This makes no sense from a blue's perspectice because: (i) I was the first one to raise suspicions on him and it was still early night1. If he has an important role, it's way more important to try to establish your innocence while discussing with people, and not claiming being a power role instantly because he could be killed by Mafia, and (ii) it doesn't make sense to claim he is s blue without giving his role unless he is afraid of being counter claimed. So, saying he is blue is a safe way to stay away from a Vigi shot in a closed setup game.
His blue claim wasn't a townie wanting to establish his innocence to avoid having town wasting a bullet. His blue claim was a survival one, coming from a guy who doesn't want to get shot by vigi but isn't afraid of getting shot by Mafia.
And this 
|
On May 22 2015 14:28 Stutters695 wrote:
Because he's not blue. Enough said.
If you are blue you hard claim blue right now.
|
Even then I don't think your claim is going to do it. Damdred isn't getting lynched over Shockey in any world and I would still take his word over yours, especially at this rate.
|
Zzzz
This is silly, however zealos is the eight lynch today 100%
|
No, right lynch today is Shockey and you will vote him.
|
We can lynch this weak bus of yours later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
