|
On May 22 2015 05:08 Damdred wrote:
You know GB, this is just a piece of friendly advice stop making wagers about your playing time in games. Strong arming people like that is not the right way to play especially when you are wrong.
You have a narrative that you think makes me scum when it doesn't, oh well. When I flip town look at zealos and stutters both promising content and vanishing again.
They will probably delurk soon after this post
Help me understand what's wrong on my points, then.
|
Town lean on vivax in first few hours, prior to palmars case I explicity have vivax falling down the town charts and eventually have him in policy lynch land which I was ok with several times.
I've explained obi several times and reversed my read on him.
I can read palmar most of the time, my reasons were good and pure.
All of zealos content was about me nothing to engage on I could be objective with at that point as I've stated before.
|
Why are we trying to kill people who post?
|
On May 19 2015 03:58 Damdred wrote:
Game is decently easy though,
I know my alignment
GB is most likely town here
Scib is really towny
Stutters won't be lynched
Oats/Oneg shouldn't probably be lynched today probably.
Vivax is falling but I like him when he is atm
palmar is palmar I think he's still townish
Shining is a plynch hope he gets more active
qwerty hasn't posted at all if we plynch it should be him
Which leaves
Shockers who's posts are just weird at the high end of the mafia spectrum
Obi who I think did scummy things but not sure if I would 100% lynch him probably would vig him if he's still being lazy soon
and ze
This is page four of your filter
You say he is falling but you still like him. Your other post on him is just saying Palmar's case was good.
Tell me EXACTLY why Palmar's case was good, like I'm a five years old innocent child
|
Oh and don't say it's because Palmar is a good player and you sheeped him because he was scumreading you throghout the entire day 1 and if you're town you can't trust his reads that muchz
|
Obi, help us then. Who do we lynch?
|
Because Palmar put a good case out and he figures game out.
|
On May 22 2015 06:27 Damdred wrote:
Because Palmar put a good case out and he figures game out.
I was one step closer to not wanting to lynch you anymore, and you post this shit
Fuck this game
|
You are upset over the truth d1 Palmar ends up catching scum, the case was and is good 100%. Perfectly sheepable and you are getting upset over the truth
|
That's exactly it Damdy.
I'm upset that palmar did a good case that even made me vote Vivax
I'm upset that I also sheeped palmar because I felt Vivax was scum for the point 2 in his case
I'm upset that you voted a town lean of yours day1
I'm upset that you say Palmar made a good case and I'm talking nonsense even if point 2 in my case has the same thought process palmar displayed in the point 1 of his case.
I'm upset that I asked you to help me to understand what was wrong in every point of my case and you just say about palmar but never say a word about point 1 and 3 and say I'm dumb
I'm upset because I'm playing a game that moved only 4 pages on day 2 and the only reads I can have is from one of the biggest filters
I'm upset because Onegu shot a townie
I'm upset because people call me bad without even trying to solve the game
It's boring
|
There's a massive difference you see,
#1) I had the biggest filter in the game up until today.
#2) Palmars case is different considering vivax only content wasn't tunneling on Palmar
#3) I have tried to solve the game give reads every day in fact and nobody even responds
#4) I keep pointing out people who keep promising content and not delivering and are just actively lurking at points
#5) you ignore those people just to focus on me currently
So, IDK why you are directing all your angst at me.
|
I kinda want to lynch Zealos now... Like he hasnt done anything today... I didnt like him day one and nothing has changed.
Lets go with that
##Unvote
##Vote: Zealos
|
I'm not ignoring those people?
I've put stutters and Zealos in a possible scum team?
Ok damdy, here is the deal. If you're Mafia you deserve to win the game simply because you are active in a flood of inactive townies. So you're town.
|
|
|
|
|
On May 22 2015 05:36 GlowingBear wrote:
Obi, help us then. Who do we lynch?
Zealos/Stutters/Shockey.
The Vivax case was okay, but the biggest issue with it was that Vivax never even bothered defending himself outside of his EoD reads post that got him lynched. It doesn't concern me at all that Damdred changed his read the way he did because I did the same thing.
I would revisit Damdred if he's still around tomorrow or on lylo or something, but that's it. We need to purge inactives, and if they're town we can't keep them around until lylo because we can't rely on them to make sensible decisions if they're not playing the game.
If they come back and make good posts then we can reassess, but until then this is what needs to be done.
(Plus, shockey is super scummy and we should probably lynch him at some point anyhoezels.)
|
On May 22 2015 06:38 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2015 06:27 Damdred wrote:
Because Palmar put a good case out and he figures game out. I was one step closer to not wanting to lynch you anymore, and you post this shit Fuck this game
I don't understand the issue you have with this post tbh.
|
Qwerty Shockey Zealos were my top 3 in that order from poe, haven't looked at associations between them because undisputed associations are bad. Onegu basically said what I wanted to. I would prefer a QwerTrfel lynch but I'm not particularly opposed to a Zealos or Shockey lynch.
Actually...is it just me or did Stutters show up again with another apology/excuse for activity? But nothing afterwards? I said his d2 would be telling and it kind of is...except for the copious amounts of inactivity from others.
Stutters, when you come back, who would you lynch?
|
LMAO EBWOP unflipped, NOT undisputed association. That doesn't even sound correct.
|
On May 22 2015 09:23 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Zealos/Stutters/Shockey. The Vivax case was okay, but the biggest issue with it was that Vivax never even bothered defending himself outside of his EoD reads post that got him lynched. It doesn't concern me at all that Damdred changed his read the way he did because I did the same thing. I would revisit Damdred if he's still around tomorrow or on lylo or something, but that's it. We need to purge inactives, and if they're town we can't keep them around until lylo because we can't rely on them to make sensible decisions if they're not playing the game. If they come back and make good posts then we can reassess, but until then this is what needs to be done. (Plus, shockey is super scummy and we should probably lynch him at some point anyhoezels.)
Okay
You have my sword
Voting Shockey
But why not lynching oats?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
