|
On March 28 2015 10:20 WaveofShadow wrote:
I mean, best plan is to give me control of stuff cuz I want it, but I won't have time to campaign like an idiot so I'm just give my vote to somebody I like.
Seems like a solid alternative to me.
TL;DR WoS doesn't like me even though I gave him all those chocolate chip cookies in Catastrophe 
|
Hmm, fair point. I do like you. Campaigning is annoying though.
|
On March 28 2015 10:24 WaveofShadow wrote:
Hmm, fair point. I do like you. Campaigning is annoying though.
Aw
Trolling the first few hours of a GreYMisT game is like the highlight of my year though!
|
On March 28 2015 10:01 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2015 09:58 ExO_ wrote:On March 28 2015 09:52 justanothertownie wrote:On March 28 2015 09:46 ExO_ wrote:On March 28 2015 09:44 Keirathi wrote:On March 28 2015 09:40 VisceraEyes wrote:On March 28 2015 09:37 Keirathi wrote:On March 28 2015 09:35 VisceraEyes wrote:I will not vote for anyone based on their self-aggrandizing campaign posters. You know who I will vote for though? On March 28 2015 09:21 yamato77 wrote:
I promise not to lynch anyone who votes me.
:D ##Vote: yamatoThis guy. Scum #22/X down. X-2 to go. Case in point: Keirathi. He spent a LOT of time on his campaign post, and has spent a LOT of time telling people to vote for him, and that's not how I want the person I vote for to be spending their time. EZPZ. I already found 2 scum. What more do you want from me!? Keirathi I feel like your interests align with those of the Justice Bloc. What do you say to an alliance, and unification of our campaigns? You can have warrior I'll get rogue! Why would you want to be rogue? I want to be warrior. However as a member of the Justice Bloc I feel that sometimes you lead by leading, and other times you lead by following. By setting the example of working with others I hope to show that we can work together as town. Hopefully more people will join me in this Justice Bloc! So what you are saying is that you agree with Keirathis scumreads?
Not really. They're not based on a whole lot. But nothing is at this point in the game. Getting elected is more important to me right now.
And be joining our Campaigns, I hope to get both myself and Keirathis elected!
|
On March 28 2015 10:09 Snarfs wrote:
At what point in time must the warrior declare who he is going to lynch and how long does the rogue have to respond? I'm assuming we have until deadline to vote an adventure party... then what's the timeline?
Perspective warriors must send their lynch target to me before the day ends, rogue needs to send a pardon command to me before the deadline as well.
|
rsoultin I finding your entrance quite lackluster compared to XXX and other games you rolled town.
|
btw I am going to vote for somebody who makes actual sense.
|
On March 28 2015 10:33 LightningStrike wrote:
rsoultin I finding your entrance quite lackluster compared to XXX and other games you rolled town.
I agree.
|
On March 28 2015 10:22 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2015 08:02 Snarfs wrote:
Snarfs' Recommended General Strategy
First, two general tips:
1. Lots of players = lots of confusion. Spam posts should be kept to a minimum as it will be VERY difficult to wade through all the distractions to determine alignment.
2. Role speculation on day 1 is spam. There is no point in trying to guess setup at this point, or talking about how wonderful the flavour text is. It is a distraction from finding mafia/3p.
Now, onto day 1 strategy:
Adventuring Party
I believe our Adventuring Party should follow strict guidelines as to how they act. Everyone should either express their agreement or disagreement with these guidelines as soon as possible so that we can keep track of people's stances before they get voted in. Please let me know if you disagree, and why.
Warrior - Our warrior should be someone who agrees to nominate a lynch based on a plurality vote. He/she should agree that it is important to get lots of opinions on the candidate before deciding on who to vote and SHOULD NOT be someone who will just pick their gut target. We need information from the day 1 lynch more than we need to hit mafia/3p. We need to know why people are for/against a certain lynch. A cowboy warrior will not give us that information.
Rogue - Our rogue should be someone who agrees NOT to no lynch. There is one circumstance I see a no lynch being acceptable on day 1, and that is only if the warrior goes rogue and chooses a target of their preference without listening to town. The rogue should agree to this as the ONLY circumstance for no lynch. Not based on their own 'gut' feelings.
I was trying to think of a way we can focus votes so that we guarantee we don't get a last minute swap of rogue/cleric. I think the only way this is possible is if we can find two candidates who agree to both of the above criteria and try to split our votes evenly to boost those two players.
Normally, this is where I'd nominate myself, but I can guarantee I will NOT be online for the first deadline.
Discuss! I like this plan, snarfs, and I like that you came up with it, too. lol all these candidates so eager to take control of the lynch  if there's a way to vote for the scum we want to lynch along with the warrior, that would be best, imo ^^ keeping everything neat and tidy and providing the information of a regular lynch at the end of the day
EBWOP:
To add on to why this is a good plan...even if for some reason we're obscenely wrong on the three top candidates, town still controls the lynch. Obviously the powers could be a concern, but town controlling the lynch is the most important thing.
Having everyone voting for who they'd have the warrior lynch as scum forces a regular lynch scenario.
If anyone has a good idea as to how to lock in the third slot please share.
Snarfs gets a light townread from me for starting the conversation, especially while not attempting to get the votes for himself.
|
On March 28 2015 10:33 LightningStrike wrote:
rsoultin I finding your entrance quite lackluster compared to XXX and other games you rolled town.
##vote LightningStrike
cuz↓
On March 28 2015 10:33 Koshi wrote:
btw I am going to vote for somebody who makes actual sense.
|
On March 28 2015 10:33 LightningStrike wrote:
rsoultin I finding your entrance quite lackluster compared to XXX and other games you rolled town.
i'm not being jokey, you mean xP it's hardly lackluster
now what do you think of the plan, which is by far more important to me right now than the toneread you think you have on me lol
|
On March 28 2015 10:35 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2015 10:33 LightningStrike wrote:
rsoultin I finding your entrance quite lackluster compared to XXX and other games you rolled town. i'm not being jokey, you mean xP it's hardly lackluster now what do you think of the plan, which is by far more important to me right now than the toneread you think you have on me lol
The plan is decent but it just seems to simple of a plan that might backfire.
|
On March 28 2015 10:38 LightningStrike wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2015 10:35 rsoultin wrote:On March 28 2015 10:33 LightningStrike wrote:
rsoultin I finding your entrance quite lackluster compared to XXX and other games you rolled town. i'm not being jokey, you mean xP it's hardly lackluster now what do you think of the plan, which is by far more important to me right now than the toneread you think you have on me lol The plan is decent but it just seems to simple of a plan that might backfire.
howso? and what parts do you think we should fix so it's less likely to backfire
|
I feel like people are making this too difficult?
Find 3 people that are very likely town (which should be very easy) and have them lynch someone who is scum.
|
On March 28 2015 10:39 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2015 10:38 LightningStrike wrote:On March 28 2015 10:35 rsoultin wrote:On March 28 2015 10:33 LightningStrike wrote:
rsoultin I finding your entrance quite lackluster compared to XXX and other games you rolled town. i'm not being jokey, you mean xP it's hardly lackluster now what do you think of the plan, which is by far more important to me right now than the toneread you think you have on me lol The plan is decent but it just seems to simple of a plan that might backfire. howso? and what parts do you think we should fix so it's less likely to backfire
Mainly about the Rogue because the problem with Rouge is that anyone can No Lynch I mean unless we get Confirmed Town in the 2nd Slot scum will go for a no lynch easily. We need confirmed town on the 2nd highest votes.
|
Based on my experience in TL mafia so far:
1. Everyone will to the plan.
2. Rogue and Warrior will do the exact opposite of the plan, thus fucking things up
3. Everyone will be very angry and say Rogue and Warrior should be lynched.
4. By the time lynch time comes around entirely new people will have been targeted and the people who fucked up everything in the beginning get a free pass.
|
*ebwop
everyone will agree to the plan
|
On March 28 2015 10:41 Keirathi wrote:
I feel like people are making this too difficult?
Find 3 people that are very likely town (which should be very easy) and have them lynch someone who is scum.
lol ^ the true example of overly simplistic
i'd like people to commit to who they would lynch. obviously i can't force that, but if we can agree on that as a town, it will give us more information than simply voting for townies xP the mod already said that whoever wins the vote has to already have the lynch submitted
|
On March 28 2015 10:41 LightningStrike wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2015 10:39 rsoultin wrote:On March 28 2015 10:38 LightningStrike wrote:On March 28 2015 10:35 rsoultin wrote:On March 28 2015 10:33 LightningStrike wrote:
rsoultin I finding your entrance quite lackluster compared to XXX and other games you rolled town. i'm not being jokey, you mean xP it's hardly lackluster now what do you think of the plan, which is by far more important to me right now than the toneread you think you have on me lol The plan is decent but it just seems to simple of a plan that might backfire. howso? and what parts do you think we should fix so it's less likely to backfire Mainly about the Rogue because the problem with Rouge is that anyone can No Lynch I mean unless we get Confirmed Town in the 2nd Slot scum will go for a no lynch easily. We need confirmed town on the 2nd highest votes.
nah, scum wouldn't. If the rogue picks no lynch we lynch him day2 or deal with him in the night.
|
On March 28 2015 10:41 LightningStrike wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2015 10:39 rsoultin wrote:On March 28 2015 10:38 LightningStrike wrote:On March 28 2015 10:35 rsoultin wrote:On March 28 2015 10:33 LightningStrike wrote:
rsoultin I finding your entrance quite lackluster compared to XXX and other games you rolled town. i'm not being jokey, you mean xP it's hardly lackluster now what do you think of the plan, which is by far more important to me right now than the toneread you think you have on me lol The plan is decent but it just seems to simple of a plan that might backfire. howso? and what parts do you think we should fix so it's less likely to backfire Mainly about the Rogue because the problem with Rouge is that anyone can No Lynch I mean unless we get Confirmed Town in the 2nd Slot scum will go for a no lynch easily. We need confirmed town on the 2nd highest votes.
or we just commit to policy lynching the rogue if he no-lynches? xP kinda simple
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
