|
On March 30 2015 06:28 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 06:27 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On March 30 2015 06:27 Blazinghand wrote:
Hmm, I'm still not feeling too secure here, I guess I should claim? Answer my question? Are you even reading this thread at all? You're not the boss of me also, I'm afraid to read snarf's filter, cause what if i read his filter and be like "hey this dude is town" then people are gonna lynch me instead right
If you think he could be town then you should be looking through a bunch of other filters to look for other lynch targets.
What do you think of Koshi's list?
|
That being said. I have 0 problems with a snarf shot. But I need to know why the fuck we are lynching him because I haven't heard anybody say something really smart about a snarf lynch.
kita hapa hf JAT
What are your opinions on this snarf lynch?
I want them on paper. I want to read them.
|
On March 30 2015 06:28 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 06:27 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On March 30 2015 06:27 Blazinghand wrote:
Hmm, I'm still not feeling too secure here, I guess I should claim? Answer my question? Are you even reading this thread at all? You're not the boss of me also, I'm afraid to read snarf's filter, cause what if i read his filter and be like "hey this dude is town" then people are gonna lynch me instead right
I swear I have KP knowledge if I am willing to risk a few things, listen to me!
If this happens, the lyncher is going to die. BH can't get lynched look elsewhere.
Now, if you listen to me I'm good but if rsoultin decides to disbelieve me I will also need protection or I will also die a later cycle.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On March 29 2015 06:25 Trfel wrote:
[*]As mafia, sicklucker's claim is intended to try to get elected to the adventuring party, and to explain why he is not night killed in this game.
On March 29 2015 06:25 Trfel wrote:
Sicklucker didn't make any effort to push his campaign for the adventuring party.
On March 29 2015 06:25 Trfel wrote:
sicklucker himself stated that he never gets night killed.
On March 30 2015 04:31 Hapahauli wrote:
Furthermore, you're not really understanding what I"m trying to say about Trefl in general. Sicklucker post was good on its own. Paired with the 2nd, it is bad.
While I share your opinion about Trefl, I don't understand how you can say the sicklucker post was good on its own.
Based on the three quotes above, how does the justification for a mafia sicklucker look good, when he refutes it in his own set of posts?
As I was telling HF, your townyness usually becomes apparent if you actually put effort in the game and get shot shortly after. Do you intend to use PMs to their fullest extent tonight and be active on day two or do you anticipate being unavailable?
On March 30 2015 06:27 Blazinghand wrote:
Hmm, I'm still not feeling too secure here, I guess I should claim?
I'd like that.
|
Going to say it if you town read me. Then trust me my role goes really well with cleric. Sorry VE doesn't look like you are getting warrior or rogue and I'd much rather me get cleric than you.
|
On March 30 2015 06:33 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 06:28 Blazinghand wrote:On March 30 2015 06:27 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On March 30 2015 06:27 Blazinghand wrote:
Hmm, I'm still not feeling too secure here, I guess I should claim? Answer my question? Are you even reading this thread at all? You're not the boss of me also, I'm afraid to read snarf's filter, cause what if i read his filter and be like "hey this dude is town" then people are gonna lynch me instead right I swear I have KP knowledge if I am willing to risk a few things, listen to me! If this happens, the lyncher is going to die. BH can't get lynched look elsewhere. Now, if you listen to me I'm good but if rsoultin decides to disbelieve me I will also need protection or I will also die a later cycle.
what are you trying to say here?
|
On March 30 2015 06:32 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 06:31 Koshi wrote:On March 30 2015 06:30 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 06:27 Koshi wrote:On March 30 2015 06:26 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 06:25 Koshi wrote:On March 30 2015 06:24 rsoultin wrote:
okay i need people to tell me their top lynch target now or i'm defaulting to snarfs Explain to me why snarfs is mafia. have already the big lovely plan followed by a load of nothing, no attempts at finding scumreads, a half-assed top town read, need i go on? Yes. Show me games you played together and snarfs was a town leader. it's a little late for this koshi. just because he's not normally a town leader (which is what i presume you're saying here) doesn't mean his apparent lack of interest in his own plan isn't alignment indicative unless you have something that proves otherwise? i'm going with majority opinion which apparently is scattershot as all hell right now THAT IS NOT HOW IT WORKS RSOULTIN. People do shit all as town. If there is no reason why town!snarfs can't post something and not follow up on it then there is no reason for you to call him mafia. If he in previous big games was involved and pushed his ideas then I can understand your scumread on him. Otherwise. How is he not a shot in the dark? who is not a shot in the dark at this point?
People who have a filter?
The point of this game is to find mafia based on facts. Or find the best shot.
I don't see really good reasons for snarfs to be mafia.
Nobody even seem to have meta on this guy.
Why is he not a random 1 page filter townie?
|
On March 30 2015 06:32 Koshi wrote:
That being said. I have 0 problems with a snarf shot. But I need to know why the fuck we are lynching him because I haven't heard anybody say something really smart about a snarf lynch.
kita hapa hf JAT
What are your opinions on this snarf lynch?
I want them on paper. I want to read them.
It's just me but I'll answer you, earlier in his filter he chainsaw defends hapa a bit and then right after he wobbles about it. It's way to sure about hap alignment though when hap hadn't done anything at all to me.
That's why I think he's Scum overall
|
On March 30 2015 06:34 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 06:33 Alakaslam wrote:On March 30 2015 06:28 Blazinghand wrote:On March 30 2015 06:27 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On March 30 2015 06:27 Blazinghand wrote:
Hmm, I'm still not feeling too secure here, I guess I should claim? Answer my question? Are you even reading this thread at all? You're not the boss of me also, I'm afraid to read snarf's filter, cause what if i read his filter and be like "hey this dude is town" then people are gonna lynch me instead right I swear I have KP knowledge if I am willing to risk a few things, listen to me! If this happens, the lyncher is going to die. BH can't get lynched look elsewhere. Now, if you listen to me I'm good but if rsoultin decides to disbelieve me I will also need protection or I will also die a later cycle. what are you trying to say here?
I am trying to say don't lynch BH; at our peril
|
okay 5 minutes...majority is leaning snarfs with three preferring him and one saying he's an okay lynch
i really can't cut it much closer than that and y'all are too busy arguing with one another -_- can you please focus here?
|
On March 30 2015 06:32 Koshi wrote:
That being said. I have 0 problems with a snarf shot. But I need to know why the fuck we are lynching him because I haven't heard anybody say something really smart about a snarf lynch.
kita hapa hf JAT
What are your opinions on this snarf lynch?
I want them on paper. I want to read them.
Eh. I think he looks "objectively bad." First post is a "say nothing" intro post, followed by a great deal of weak town reads.
That being said, it makes sense that he'd do something like this, given that his priorities today seem to be voting for a "town" lynch party.
I think lynching him is a coinflip. Not a terrible coinflip, but I'd lynch Trfel or Sepul over him any day. WoS... I'd like to see him alive another day as I think there's some margin for error in my read there.
|
On March 30 2015 06:33 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 06:28 Blazinghand wrote:On March 30 2015 06:27 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On March 30 2015 06:27 Blazinghand wrote:
Hmm, I'm still not feeling too secure here, I guess I should claim? Answer my question? Are you even reading this thread at all? You're not the boss of me also, I'm afraid to read snarf's filter, cause what if i read his filter and be like "hey this dude is town" then people are gonna lynch me instead right I swear I have KP knowledge if I am willing to risk a few things, listen to me! If this happens, the lyncher is going to die. BH can't get lynched look elsewhere. Now, if you listen to me I'm good but if rsoultin decides to disbelieve me I will also need protection or I will also die a later cycle.
ALAKASLAM LISTEN CLOSELY TO ME. YOU ARE NOT GOING TO DO SHIT TO THE GUY WHO SHOOTS BH OR I WILL COME AFTER YOU AND WONT STOP TILL YOU DIE.
|
On March 30 2015 06:35 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 06:32 Koshi wrote:
That being said. I have 0 problems with a snarf shot. But I need to know why the fuck we are lynching him because I haven't heard anybody say something really smart about a snarf lynch.
kita hapa hf JAT
What are your opinions on this snarf lynch?
I want them on paper. I want to read them. It's just me but I'll answer you, earlier in his filter he chainsaw defends hapa a bit and then right after he wobbles about it. It's way to sure about hap alignment though when hap hadn't done anything at all to me. That's why I think he's Scum overall
Ok this is good.
|
I'm in the mid-80s page wise atm though I'm going to be re-reading some filters.
Right now, I'm good with rsoultin, JAT, Koshi, any of them in the adventuring party. All three are doing the detail-picking and alignment searching that I'd expect from each of their towngames, and their play is standing out to me right now.
For scumreads, I just finished Snarfs' filter, and I'm also fine with lynching him (assuming Rasputin wins the lynch control).
Going to dive a few more filters for more scumreads. I'm going to take a closer look at WoS and a few others.
I fully realise why people don't like my play (looking at you HF) when I flip town, I think you'll see how RL can wreck my play. Next cycle I should have more than 2h of playtime, but for now, just going to carry on.
|
I'd probably prefer a Trfel lynch out of the options. I remember seeing his post on sicklucker at the time and commenting it was overexplained. That's as good as anything else.
VA good lynch.
Snarfs is really underwhelming, but I don't know if that makes him mafia.
|
@slam and BH I really need you to vote me
|
On March 30 2015 06:34 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 06:32 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 06:31 Koshi wrote:On March 30 2015 06:30 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 06:27 Koshi wrote:On March 30 2015 06:26 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 06:25 Koshi wrote:On March 30 2015 06:24 rsoultin wrote:
okay i need people to tell me their top lynch target now or i'm defaulting to snarfs Explain to me why snarfs is mafia. have already the big lovely plan followed by a load of nothing, no attempts at finding scumreads, a half-assed top town read, need i go on? Yes. Show me games you played together and snarfs was a town leader. it's a little late for this koshi. just because he's not normally a town leader (which is what i presume you're saying here) doesn't mean his apparent lack of interest in his own plan isn't alignment indicative unless you have something that proves otherwise? i'm going with majority opinion which apparently is scattershot as all hell right now THAT IS NOT HOW IT WORKS RSOULTIN. People do shit all as town. If there is no reason why town!snarfs can't post something and not follow up on it then there is no reason for you to call him mafia. If he in previous big games was involved and pushed his ideas then I can understand your scumread on him. Otherwise. How is he not a shot in the dark? who is not a shot in the dark at this point? People who have a filter? The point of this game is to find mafia based on facts. Or find the best shot. I don't see really good reasons for snarfs to be mafia. Nobody even seem to have meta on this guy. Why is he not a random 1 page filter townie?
meh i don't agree with kita and bh hasn't done enough for me to want to lynch him even before the claim, wave of shadow has looked good and bad by equal measure to me...i'm not seeing much but policy lynches being brought forward and the hapa waffling damdy mentioned was something i noticed too...we were talking about it earlier
|
On March 30 2015 06:34 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2015 06:25 Trfel wrote:
[*]As mafia, sicklucker's claim is intended to try to get elected to the adventuring party, and to explain why he is not night killed in this game. Show nested quote +On March 29 2015 06:25 Trfel wrote:
Sicklucker didn't make any effort to push his campaign for the adventuring party. Show nested quote +On March 29 2015 06:25 Trfel wrote:
sicklucker himself stated that he never gets night killed. Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 04:31 Hapahauli wrote:
Furthermore, you're not really understanding what I"m trying to say about Trefl in general. Sicklucker post was good on its own. Paired with the 2nd, it is bad. While I share your opinion about Trefl, I don't understand how you can say the sicklucker post was good on its own. Based on the three quotes above, how does the justification for a mafia sicklucker look good, when he refutes it in his own set of posts? As I was telling HF, your townyness usually becomes apparent if you actually put effort in the game and get shot shortly after. Do you intend to use PMs to their fullest extent tonight and be active on day two or do you anticipate being unavailable?
I largely used the word "good" in the sense that it looked good on its face, and the reason I was suspicious of Trfel was for reasons other than his case. I agree his justification for reading sicklucker as mafia is the best, but there's no inherent mafia motive in bad reasoning.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On March 30 2015 06:36 Hapahauli wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 06:32 Koshi wrote:
That being said. I have 0 problems with a snarf shot. But I need to know why the fuck we are lynching him because I haven't heard anybody say something really smart about a snarf lynch.
kita hapa hf JAT
What are your opinions on this snarf lynch?
I want them on paper. I want to read them. Eh. I think he looks "objectively bad." First post is a "say nothing" intro post, followed by a great deal of weak town reads. That being said, it makes sense that he'd do something like this, given that his priorities today seem to be voting for a "town" lynch party. I think lynching him is a coinflip. Not a terrible coinflip, but I'd lynch Trfel or Sepul over him any day. WoS... I'd like to see him alive another day as I think there's some margin for error in my read there.
While the idea is bad in theory, do you think a mafia Sepul opens by saying "Finding mafia would be a plus, but seems secondary"?
|
From reading Snarf his filter. There is a 0% chance Hapa is mafia with Snarfs.
0 fucking %
ZERO
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
